Biomedical subjects

Akifumi Kanai

Publications and source records attributed to Akifumi Kanai.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Sumatriptan alleviates pain in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

OBJECTIVES: Arterial compression of the trigeminal root may lead to trigeminal neuralgia. 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists may inhibit vasodilation and inflammation near the irritated trigeminal root. A recent study showed attenuation of mechanical allodynia by a 5-HT1A receptor agonist in a rat model of trigeminal neuralgia. The present study examined the effectiveness of a 5-HT1A/1B/1D receptor agonist, sumatriptan, on pain relief in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. METHODS: The study was conducted in 15 patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. The patients had been suffering from painful paroxysms for at least 1 month. Each patient was injected with 1 mL of saline subcutaneously (placebo), followed 15 minutes later with subcutaneous sumatriptan (3 mg in 1 mL saline). This was followed the next day by oral sumatriptan (50 mg twice daily) for 1 week. RESULTS: The visual analog scale did not change after saline, but significantly decreased after subcutaneous sumatriptan. Both 1 week after oral sumatriptan and 1 week after discontinuation of the drug, visual analog scale scores resulted in a significant decrease from the baseline. Adverse events after subcutaneous sumatriptan occurred in 4 patients: fatigue in 4 and nausea in 2. Side effects from the oral medication appeared in 4 patients: fatigue in 2, nausea in 1 and chest discomfort in 1. These side effects subsided soon after discontinuation of sumatriptan. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that subcutaneous injection followed by oral administration of sumatriptan produces prompt and continuous analgesia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Subcutaneous sumatriptan for refractory trigeminal neuralgia.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical compression of the trigeminal root by an artery is thought to cause trigeminal neuralgia. The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist may inhibit neurogenic inflammation and vasodilation near the irritated trigeminal root. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist, sumatriptan, on a paroxysmal pain in trigeminal neuralgia. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with trigeminal neuralgia refractory to previous treatment were randomized to receive subcutaneously either 3 mg (1 mL) of sumatriptan or 1 mL of saline placebo. Following a 7-day period, patients crossed over to receive the alternative treatment. Paroxysmal pain triggered by touching or moving the face was assessed with VAS before and 15 minutes after the treatment. Patients used a descriptive scale to pain-grade outcome, and asked to note whether the pain returned and how long after therapy it recurred. RESULTS: Subcutaneous sumatriptan, but not placebo, significantly decreased VAS from 8.3 +/- 2.1 to 2.4 +/- 3.0 cm (mean +/- SD). The number of patients who described their pain as moderately or slightly better was 20 in the sumatriptan group and 1 in the placebo group. The effect of subcutaneous sumatriptan persisted for a median period of 7.9 hours (range: 1-20 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous sumatriptan produced prompt analgesia without serious adverse reactions in patients with trigeminal neuralgia refractory to previous treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

A comparison of epidural blockade produced by plain 1% lidocaine and 1% lidocaine prepared by dilution of 2% lidocaine with the same volume of saline.

Local anesthetics are commonly diluted with saline, but the influence of the dilution on the epidural anesthesia remains unclear. We randomized 40 patients scheduled for gynecological abdominal surgery under epidural anesthesia to one of two groups; those in group P received plain commercially prepared 1% lidocaine and those in group D received 1% lidocaine derived from 2% lidocaine and the same volume of saline was infused epidurally with an epidural catheter at L1-2. The pH and sodium and chloride ion concentrations of the solutions were measured. Sensory and motor blockade, foot skin temperature, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate were assessed at 5, 10, and 15 min after the epidural infusion. The spread of sensory blockade was significantly wider in group P at all assessment times than in group D. The increase of foot temperature and decrease of mean arterial blood pressure were significantly faster in group P than in group D. Although the mean pH values of the two solutions were similar, sodium and chloride ion concentrations of the diluted solution were significantly larger than those of the plain solution. We conclude that 2% lidocaine diluted with the same volume of saline produces less potent epidural blockade than commercially prepared plain 1% lidocaine.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗

PubMed2005

Rapid injection of epidural mepivacaine speeds the onset of nerve blockade.

PURPOSE: When used intraoperatively, mepivacaine can produce a satisfactory sensory block. However, insufficient information is available concerning the factors that affect the speed of nerve blockade with epidural analgesia. The optimal rate of injection of mepivacaine has not been determined. We examined whether the speed of epidural infusion of mepivacaine affects the speed of nerve blockade. METHODS: Forty patients, physical status ASA I-II, scheduled for gynecological abdominal surgery, were enrolled in this double blind randomized trial. A catheter was inserted 4 cm in the epidural space in the midline at L1-L2. Three minutes after a test dose of 2 mL plain 1% mepivacaine over four seconds, 8 mL were injected epidurally at a rate of 1 mL.sec(-1) (fast group) or 0.05 mL.sec(-1) (slow group). Sensory and motor blockade, blood pressure, and heart rate were assessed at five, ten, and 15 min after the epidural injection. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the spread of sensory blockade at five minutes after the epidural injection between the two groups, but not at ten and 15 min. Blood pressure decreased at five and ten minutes, recovered at 15 min in the fast group, and remained stable in the slow group. CONCLUSION: Rapid injection of mepivacaine in the epidural space produced a more rapid onset of epidural block than slow injection, but there was no difference in the final extent of the block.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

[Effectiveness of ropivacaine and fentanyl for postoperative epidural analgesia following thoracic surgery].

BACKGROUND: Epidural ropivacaine is now a common drug used for postoperative analgesia. However, little information is available concerning regression of sensory blockade and analgesia following prolonged epidural infusion of ropivacaine. We investigated the efficacy of ropivacaine and fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after thoracic surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing thoracic surgery were enrolled. After surgery with general and thoracic epidural anesthesia, continuous epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine+fentanyl (1.67 microg x ml(-1)) was started at a rate of 6 ml x h(-1) for patients whose height was more than 155 cm and 4 ml x h(-1) for those below 155 cm with possibility of an additional bolus injection of 3 ml at least every 60 min. RESULTS: An additional epidural injection of 3 ml produced a decrease in VAS without significant changes of vital signs. The greatest VAS was 10+/-25 mm in the incision site and 36+/-38 mm in the ipsilateral shoulder. Sensory blockade was sustained until the morning after the day of surgery. Also blood pressure and heart rate were stable throughout the observation period. There were no adverse effects except for slight nausea in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: A bolus of 3 ml with continuous 4-6 ml x h(-1) epidural injection of ropivacaine plus a small dose of fentanyl would decrease postoperative pain with stable vital signs in patients after thoracic surgery.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

[Advantage of ropivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia following leg orthopedic surgery].

BACKGROUND: Epidural administration of local anesthetics may lead to effective pain relief. However, tachyphylaxis or other problems following prolonged epidural anesthesia may develop and in many cases difficulties exist in the maintenance of the similar degree of sensory blockade. The present study was therefore performed to investigate the analgesic effect of continuous postoperative epidural infusion of ropivacaine with fentanyl in comparison with that of bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone. METHODS: After leg orthopedic surgery with lumbar combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, thirty-six patients were randomized to one of the three postoperative epidural infusion groups: bupivacaine 0.125%, ropivacaine 0.2%, or ropivacaine 0.2% with 2.2 microg x ml(-1) (400 microg x 180 ml(-1)) of fentanyl. Continuous epidural infusion was started at a rate of 6 ml x h(-1) with possibility of an additional bolus injection of 3 ml at least every 60 min. Pain was assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) just before and 15 min after epidural bolus injections, and 15-20 h after the start of continuous epidural infusion as the severe at pain through the observation. The spread of analgesia (loss of sharpness in pinprick perception) and motor block (Bromage scale) were evaluated bilaterally. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were also measured. RESULTS: The epidural bolus infusion was associated with a significant decrease of VAS (P < 0.001) and stable blood pressure and heart rate in all groups. The maximal VAS in patients receiving 0.2% ropivacaine+fentanyl was significantly less compared to that in the other two groups. The regression of sensory blockade was significantly prolonged in patients treated with ropivacaine+fentanyl. There was no significant difference in the spread of sensory analgesia between 20 min and 15-20 h after the continuous epidural anesthesia in this group. None of the patients developed adverse effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, and pruritus. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural injection of ropivacaine with fentanyl decreased postoperative pain with stable vital signs in patients undergoing leg orthopedic surgery, as compared to bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone, possibly because of the maintenance of sensory blockade by ropivacaine and enhancement of this sensory blockade by fentanyl.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

[Cranial subdural hematoma after inadvertent dural puncture at epidural anesthesia].

Intracranial subdural haematoma has been reported to be an exceptionally rare complication of accidental dural puncture. An accidental lumbar dural puncture occurred in a 36-yr-old male undergoing orthopedic knee surgery. On the morning after the operation, the patient complained of severe occipital headache, although this was relieved with loxoprofen and rest. This was assumed to be a postdural puncture headache (PDPH) because it had a postural component (it was worse on sitting up). On the third day after the operation, the patient developed a severe diffuse headache together with nausea, which did not subside with analgesia and bed rest. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head showed a small acute subdural hematoma in the bilateral temporooccipital region with no mass effect. The patient was conscious and oriented. There was no focal neurological deficit. The patient was managed conservatively with bed rest and intravenous fluids. His condition improved without surgical decompression and was discharged on the 40 th day after the operation. Severe and prolonged PDPH shoud be considered as a warning sign of an intracranial complication.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

[Comparison of propofol LCT and propofol MCT/LCT regarding the injection pain at different sites and the memory].

BACKGROUND: Incidence and intensity of pain on intravenous injection of propofol LCT were compared with those of propofol MCT/LCT. METHODS: Eighty adult patients scheduled to receive general anesthesia were divided into two groups, propofol LCT (Group L, AstraZeneca) and propofol MCT/LCT (Group M, Maruishi Pharmaceutical). The peripheral vein was inserted with an 18 gauge intravenous catheter at the dorsal hand, the wrist, or the anterior brachial region. Propofol 2.0 mg x kg(-1) was injected at the speed of 5 mg x sec(-1). Noninvasive arterial blood pressure, heart rate, a BIS value and a degree of pain were measured. We used chi2 analysis and Wilcoxon t-test for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: There was a significantly larger incidence of injection pain in the Group L than the Group M (70% vs. 30%). The pain at the brachial region was significantly less as compared with the wrist or the dorsal hand in both groups. The ratio of patients having the memory of pain on the next day to those complaing the injection pain was 50% in the Group L and 36% in the Group M. There were no significant differences between the two groups in changes in BIS values and doses of propofol necessary for the loss of consciousness. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that propofol MCT/LCT elicits less pain on injection than propofol LCT. The injection pain is less at the brachial region than the wrist or the hand. Amnesia of pain may be obtained both with propofol MCT/ LCT and propofol LCT.

Anesthesia, General↗

PubMed2004

[Masseter muscle rigidity after suxamethonium during induction and postoperative abortive malignant hyperthermia in a patient with esophageal achalasia].

A 38-year-old man diagnosed as esophageal achalasia developed masseter muscle rigidity after intravenous suxamethonium during anesthetic induction. Anesthesia was maintained with intravenous agents and epidural blockade, while the masseter muscle rigidity continued. After the surgery, his body temperature increased to 38.8 degrees C concomitantly with the appearance of myoglobinuria suggesting the occurrence of abortive malignant hyperthermia. These symptoms were dissolved by dantrolene administration. He was later proved to be negative with CICR test.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[Postoperative analgesia using continuous lumbar epidural infusion of ropivacaine in comparison with bupivacaine].

BACKGROUND: Epidural bupivacaine infusion is a commonly used technique for postoperative analgesia because of its motor-sparing properties. Recently a new long acting local anesthetic, ropivacaine, has become available. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine with regard to postoperative analgesia when administered continuously into the lumbar epidural space. METHODS: All patients were ASA I II and undergoing ipsi-lateral leg orthopedic surgery with epidural or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to following three groups: 0.1% ropivacaine (0.1 R); 0.2% ropivacaine (0.2 R); 0.125% bupivacaine (0.125 B). At the end of surgery, continuous infusion was begun at a rate of 6 ml.hr 1 after a bolus epidural administration of 5 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine in R groups and 0.25% bupivacaine in B group. Sensory and motor block, blood pressure, pulse rate, verbal pain score (VPS), analgesic consumption were assessed at 20 min, 1, 3, 10-20 hrs following the beginning of continuous infusion. RESULTS: Vital signs were stable at every measuring point in all groups. In 0.1 R group (n = 20), the spread of sensory block at 3 hrs after infusion was lower than 0.2 R group (n = 19), and VPS during the study was higher than 0.125 B group (n = 17). Bromage scale after 3 hrs was higher in 0.2 R group compared with 0.125 B group. The degree of sensory and motor block gradually decreased, resulting in little difference between the groups. When epidural anesthesia was spread over the surgical area throughout the study, 0.2 R or 0.125 B was sufficiently relieved from postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: After leg orthopedic surgery, 6 ml.hr-1 of 0.2 R or 0.125 B provided enough postoperative analgesia when the spread of anesthesia covered the operated area. 0.2 R would be better compared to 0.125 B in continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia due to less systemic toxicity, even though it accompanies a little more intense motor block.

Adult↗