PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Akihito Tsuji

Publications and source records attributed to Akihito Tsuji.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A phase II study of LFP therapy (5-FU (5-fluorourasil) continuous infusion (CVI) and Low-dose consecutive (Cisplatin) CDDP) in advanced biliary tract carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Unresectable biliary tract carcinoma is known to demonstrate a poor prognosis. We conducted a single arm phase II study of LFP therapy (5-FU (5-fluorourasil) continuous infusion (CVI) and Low-dose consecutive (Cisplatin) CDDP) for advanced biliary tract malignancies basically on an outpatient basis. METHODS: Between February 1996 and September 2003, 42 patients were enrolled in this trial. LFP THERAPY: By using a total implanted CV-catheter system, 5-FU (160 mg/m2/day) was continuously infused over 24 hours for 7 consecutive days and CDDP (6 mg/m2/day) was infused for 30 minutes twice a week as one cycle. The administration schedule consisted of 4 cycles as one course. RESIST criteria (Response evaluation criteria for solid tumors) and NCI-CTC (National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria) (ver.3.0) were used for evaluation of this therapy. The median survival time (MST) and median time to treatment failure (TTF) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Patients characteristics were: mean age 66.5(47-79): male 24 (54%): BDca (bile duct carcinoma) 27 GBca (Gallbladder carcinoma) 15: locally advanced 26, postoperative recurrence 16. The most common toxicity was anemia (26.2%). Neither any treatment related death nor grade 4 toxicity occurred. The median number of courses of LFP Therapy which patients could receive was two (1-14). All the patients are evaluable for effects with an over all response rates of 42.9% (95% confidence interval C.I.: 27.7-59.0) (0 CR, 18 PR, 13 NC, 11 PD). There was no significant difference regarding the anti tumor effects against both malignant neoplasms. Figure 2 Shows the BDca a longer MST and TTF than did GBca (234 vs 150, 117 vs 85, respectively), but neither difference was statistically significant.The estimated MST and median TTF were 225 and 107 days, respectively. The BDca had a longer MST and TTF than GBca (234 vs 150, 117 vs 85, respectively), but neither difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: LFP therapy appears to be useful modality for the clinical management of advanced biliary tract malignancy.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

[S-1+Low-Dose CDDP].

A review of the published literature was undertaken to ascertain the trends in treatment schedules of combination of an oral fluorouracil derivative S-1 with low-dose CDDP (25 mg/m2 or less) for un-resectable and recurrent gastric cancer. The case reports demonstrated as follows: S-1 was given as standard doses of 80-120 mg/body. With regard to CDDP administration, 4 mg/m2 or less was given for 4-consecutive weeks following 2-weeks rest and 6-10 mg/m2 was given for 3-consecutive weeks following 2-weeks rest in the case of 5-day/week CDDP administration. There have been reports of 6-8 mg/m2 CDDP given once or twice a week and weekly CDDP of 10-25 mg/m2 without grade 3 or more adverse events. A phase I study demonstrated the recommend dose of CDDP in the case of 5-day/week was 4 mg/m2 in the regimen of 4-consecutive weeks and 2-weeks rest with a standard dose of S-1. Three phase I studies on weekly low-dose CDDP with S-1 showed the recommend doses were 20-25 mg/m2. S-1+low-dose and a high-dose (30-90 mg/m2) CDDP have come into wide use in Japan. There have been no differences between the case reports and the clinical studies in quantity and quality for both regimens. The unified regimen of S-1+low-dose CDDP as an outpatient based chemotherapy should be developed.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2005

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and surgical resection for a mucinous gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination.

We herein report the case of a patient with mucinous gastric carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination that disappeared after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 alone. The patient has survived for over 23 months after surgery, without recurrence. A 60-year old man was referred to our hospital because of an advanced gastric cancer, detected by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at another hospital. Staging laparoscopy was performed on October 25, 2002, and revealed massive peritoneal dissemination. Two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 were administered, at 120 mg/day for 28 days, as one course. Total gastrectomy, with D2 lymph node dissection, was performed on January 24, 2003. The peritoneal dissemination had macroscopically disappeared and the cytology of the peritoneal lavage fluid was class III. His final diagnosis was gastric carcinoma, MLU, type 3, T2(SS), P0, H0, M0, N3, CY0, stage IV.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗
PubMed2004

Combination phase I trial of a novel oral fluorouracil derivative S-1 with low-dose cisplatin for unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer (JFMC27-9902).

PURPOSE: The Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer conducted a Phase I study of a novel oral fluorouracil derivative, S-1, combined with a low dose of cisplatin in unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: S-1 was administered orally at 80-120 mg/body/day, depending on body surface area. One course consisted of consecutive administration for 28 days followed by a rest of 14 days. Low-dose cisplatin was given i.v. on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26 of each course. The dose escalation of cisplatin began with an initial dose of 1 mg/m(2)/day as level 1 and was stepped up to 2, 3, 4, and 6 mg/m(2)/day as level 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The regimen was repeated for at least two courses. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients was entered in the study. There was no treatment-related death. At level 5, consisting of 5 evaluable patients, dose-limiting toxicity was experienced as grade 3 appetite loss in 2 patients and grade 4 neutropenia in 1 patient. The maximum-tolerated dose of cisplatin was estimated to be 6 mg/m(2)/day. We decided on a recommended dose of cisplatin of 4 mg/m(2)/day because the dosage was one level under the maximum-tolerated dose. All 3 patients at level 4 showed partial response, suggesting promising clinical efficacy with this dosage. The serum concentration of cisplatin at level 4 was 918 +/- 92 ng/ml on day 26 of the first course. CONCLUSIONS: S-1 with low-dose cisplatin may become an effective regimen with acceptable toxicity for gastric cancer.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

[Two resected cases of advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination after successful treatment with TS-1 plus low-dose CDDP].

We report two resected cases of advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination after successful treatment with TS-1 plus low-dose CDDP. Patient 1 presented with right hypochondralgia and underwent laparotomy with diagnosis of type 4 gastric cancer by gastrointestinal fiberscopy. However, the tumor was judged to be unresectable due to peritoneal dissemination, and chemotherapy was performed. At the completion of course 1, he underwent laparotomy again. Although the tumor involved the body of the pancreas and transverse colon, there was no peritoneal dissemination. Therefore, a total gastrectomy was performed with distal pancreatectomy, partial colectomy, cholecystectomy, and D2 lymph node dissection. Patient 2 presented with anorexia and was diagnosed with type 3 gastric cancer by gastrointestinal fiberscopy. CT revealed the tumor was unresectable due to peritoneal dissemination, and so chemotherapy was performed. He underwent laparotomy at the completion of course 3. There was no peritoneal dissemination, so a total gastrectomy was performed with cholecystectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Both patients remain alive and in good condition without any signs of recurrence after surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Preliminary clinical evaluation of continuous infusion of 5-FU and low-dose Cisplatin (LFP) therapy alone and combined with radiation therapy for treatment of advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer].

We evaluated the clinical effect of 5-FU and low-dose Cisplatin (LFP) therapy alone and LFP therapy combined with radiation therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer. From March 1995 to September 2000, 11 patients with inoperable esophageal cancer, 8 patients with adjuvant chemotherapy post operation, and 14 patients with recurrent esophageal cancer were treated with LFP therapy. 5-FU (160 mg/m2/day) was continuously infused over 24 hours, and CDDP (3-7 mg/m2/day) was infused for 30 minutes. The administration schedule consisted of 5-FU for 7 consecutive days and CDDP for 5 days followed by a 2-day rest, each for four weeks. We combined radiation therapy for the patients with all lesions that could be included in the radiation field. Of 30 patients with measurable lesions the response rates of LFP therapy alone and LFP therapy combined with radiation therapy were 33% and 60%, respectively. Toxicity over grade 3 appeared in 3 of 15 patients with LFP therapy combined with radiation therapy. There was no significant difference between LFP therapy alone and LFP therapy combined with radiation therapy with regard to survival rate of inoperable and recurrent esophageal cancer. In conclusion, LFP therapy alone may be effective for esophageal cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Preliminary clinical evaluation of low-dose cisplatin and continuous infusion of 5-FU (LFP) chemotherapy after weekly high-dose 5-FU therapy for the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer].

In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of low-dose cisplatin and continuous 5-FU infusion systemic chemotherapy (LFP therapy) for the treatment of unresectable and recurrent liver metastases from colorectal cancer after weekly high-dose 5-FU therapy via the hepatic artery (WHF therapy). At the start of chemotherapy, 12 patients with multiple extrahepatic lesions were treated with the LFP therapy (LFP group), and 18 patients with none or a few extrahepatic lesions were treated with the WHF therapy followed by the LFP therapy (LFP after WHF group). In the LFP group, the response rate was 50.0% (PR 6) and the one-year survival rate was 50.0%. On the contrary, in the LFP after WHF group, the response rate was 38.9% (CR 1, PR 6) and the one-year survival rate after LFP started was 46.0%. We conclude that the LFP therapy may be effective for the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer even after the WHF therapy.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Combination chemotherapy with continuous 5-fluorouracil and low-dose cisplatin infusion for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In this study we evaluated the efficacy and toxicities of combination chemotherapy consisting of continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and low-dose cisplatin infusion (low-dose FP therapy) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with advanced HCC in whom local treatment was not indicated were enrolled. The low-dose FP therapy consisted of 5-FU (170 mg/m2/day on days 1 to 7/week, continuous infusion) and cisplatin (3 mg/m2/day in 100 ml normal saline, infusion more than 30 minutes, on days 1 to 5/weeks). The patients were treated for 4 consecutive weeks with a subsequent one-week rest period. RESULTS: Thirty-seven of the 38 patients (97%) completed this therapy. A partial response was obtained in 18 (47%), no change in 10 and progressive disease in 9. The time to progression was 211 days. The most common toxicity was nausea/vomiting (13.2%). CONCLUSION: Low-dose FP therapy has a substantial effect on low-grade toxicity in long-term treatment. Low-dose FP therapy is useful for the treatment of advanced HCC.

Adult↗