PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Alain Bucheton

Publications and source records attributed to Alain Bucheton.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

A novel repeat-associated small interfering RNA-mediated silencing pathway downregulates complementary sense gypsy transcripts in somatic cells of the Drosophila ovary.

Replication of the gypsy endogenous retrovirus involves contamination of the female germ line by adjacent somatic tissues. This is prevented by flam, an as-yet-uncloned heterochromatic pericentromeric locus, at the level of transcript accumulation in these somatic ovarian tissues. We tested the effect of a presumptive RNA silencing mechanism on the accumulation of RNAs produced by constructs containing various gypsy sequences and report that the efficiency of silencing is indeed correlated with the amount of complementary RNAs, 25 to 30 nucleotides in length, in the ovary. For instance, while these RNAs were found to display a three- to fivefold excess of the antisense strands, only the transcripts that contain the complementary sense gypsy sequences could be repressed, indicating that they are targeted at the RNA, not DNA, level. Their size and asymmetry in strand polarity are typical of the novel repeat-associated small interfering RNA (rasiRNA)-mediated pathway, recently suspected to prevent the deleterious expression of selfish DNA specifically in the germ line. Unlike microRNAs (but like rasiRNAs and, surprisingly, siRNAs as well), gypsy rasiRNAs are modified at the 3' end. The rasiRNA-associated protein Piwi (but not Aub) is required for gypsy silencing, whereas Dicer-2 (which makes siRNAs) is not. In contrast, piwi, aub, and flam do not appear to affect somatic siRNA-mediated silencing. The amount of gypsy rasiRNAs is genetically determined by the flam locus in a provirus copy number-independent manner and is triggered in the somatic tissues by some pericentromeric provirus(es), which are thereby able to protect the germ line from retroviral invasion.

3' Flanking Region↗

Restrictive flamenco alleles are maintained in Drosophila melanogaster population cages, despite the absence of their endogenous gypsy retroviral targets.

The flamenco (flam) locus, located at 20A1-3 in the centromeric heterochromatin of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome, is a major regulator of the gypsy/mdg4 endogenous retrovirus. In restrictive strains, functional flam alleles maintain gypsy proviruses in a repressed state. By contrast, in permissive strains, proviral amplification results from infection of the female germ line and subsequent insertions into the chromosomes of the progeny. A restrictive/permissive polymorphism prevails in natural and laboratory populations. This polymorphism was assumed to be maintained by the interplay of opposite selective forces; on one hand, the increase of genetic load caused by proviral insertions would favor restrictive flam alleles because they make flies resistant to these gypsy replicative transpositions and, on the other, a hypothetical resistance cost would select against such alleles in the absence of the retrovirus. However, the population cage data presented in this paper do not fit with this simple resistance cost hypothesis because restrictive alleles were not eliminated in the absence of functional gypsy proviruses; on the contrary, using 2 independent flam allelic pairs, the restrictive frequency rose to about 90% in every experimental population, whatever the pair of alleles and the allelic proportions in the initial inoculum. These data suggest that the flam polymorphism is maintained by some strong balancing selection, which would act either on flam itself, independently of the deleterious effect of gypsy, or on a hypothetical flanking gene, in linkage disequilibrium with flam. Alternatively, restrictive flam alleles might also be resistant to some other retroelements that would be still present in the cage populations, causing a positive selection for these alleles. Whatever selective forces that maintain high levels of restrictive alleles independently of gypsy, this unknown mechanism can set up an interesting kind of antiviral innate immunity, at the population level.

Alleles↗

Characterization of a nucleocapsid-like region and of two distinct primer tRNALys,2 binding sites in the endogenous retrovirus Gypsy.

Mobile LTR-retroelements comprising retroviruses and LTR-retrotransposons form a large part of eukaryotic genomes. Their mode of replication and abundance favour the notion that they are major actors in eukaryote evolution. The Gypsy retroelement can spread in the germ line of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster via both env-independent and env-dependent processes. Thus, Gypsy is both an active retrotransposon and an infectious retrovirus resembling the gammaretrovirus MuLV. However, unlike gammaretroviruses, the Gypsy Gag structural precursor is not processed into Matrix, Capsid and Nucleocapsid (NC) proteins. In contrast, it has features in common with Gag of the ancient yeast TY1 retroelement. These characteristics of Gypsy make it a very interesting model to study replication of a retroelement at the frontier between ancient retrotransposons and retroviruses. We investigated Gypsy replication using an in vitro model system and transfection of insect cells. Results show that an unstructured domain of Gypsy Gag has all the properties of a retroviral NC. This NC-like peptide forms ribonucleoparticle-like complexes upon binding Gypsy RNA and directs the annealing of primer tRNA(Lys,2) to two distinct primer binding sites (PBS) at the genome 5' and 3' ends. Only the 5' PBS is indispensable for cDNA synthesis in vitro and in Drosophila cells.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

In vivo RNA localization of I factor, a non-LTR retrotransposon, requires a cis-acting signal in ORF2 and ORF1 protein.

According to the current model of non-LTR retrotransposon (NLR) mobilization, co-expression of the RNA transposition intermediate, and the proteins it encodes (ORF1p and ORF2p), is a requisite for the formation of cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complexes which contain necessary elements to complete a retrotransposition cycle later in the nucleus. To understand these early processes of NLR mobilization, here we analyzed in vivo the protein and RNA expression patterns of the I factor, a model NLR in Drosophila. We show that ORF1p and I factor RNA, specifically produced during transposition, are co-expressed and tightly co-localize with a specific pattern (Loc+) exclusively in the cytoplasm of germ cells permissive for retrotransposition. Using an ORF2 mutated I factor, we show that ORF2p plays no role in the Loc+ patterning. With deletion derivatives of an I factor we define an RNA localization signal required to display the Loc+ pattern. Finally, by complementation experiments we show that ORF1p is necessary for the efficient localization of I factor RNA. Our data suggest that ORF1p is involved in proper folding and stabilization of I factor RNA for efficient targeting, through Loc+ patterning, to the nuclear neighborhood where downstream steps of the retrotransposition process occur.

Animals↗

Analysis of the Drosophila gypsy endogenous retrovirus envelope glycoprotein.

gypsy is the only endogenous retrovirus of Drosophila whose infectious properties have been reported. Previous studies have shown an unexpected relationship between the gene encoding the putative envelope glycoprotein (Env) of gypsy and genes encoding the fusion protein of several baculoviruses. The fact that fusion proteins mediate membrane fusion suggests that Env of insect retroviruses might also have fusogenic properties. The results reported here indicate that gypsy Env mediates cell-to-cell fusion. Cleavage of the Env precursor was also studied; it is shown that this polypeptide is cleaved at a furin-like cleavage site. This is the first report that the env-like gene of insect retroviruses encodes a fusion protein.

Animals↗

Evidence for a piwi-dependent RNA silencing of the gypsy endogenous retrovirus by the Drosophila melanogaster flamenco gene.

In Drosophila melanogaster, the endogenous retrovirus gypsy is repressed by the functional alleles (restrictive) of an as-yet-uncloned heterochromatic gene called flamenco. Using gypsy-lacZ transcriptional fusions, we show here that this repression takes place not only in the follicle cells of restrictive ovaries, as was previously observed, but also in restrictive larval female gonads. Analyses of the role of gypsy cis-regulatory sequences in the control of gypsy expression are also presented. They rule out the hypothesis that gypsy would contain a single binding region for a putative Flamenco repressor. Indeed, the ovarian expression of a chimeric yp3-lacZ construct was shown to become sensitive to the Flamenco regulation when any of three different 5'-UTR gypsy sequences (ranging from 59 to 647 nucleotides) was incorporated into the heterologous yp3-lacZ transcript. The piwi mutation, which is known to affect RNA-mediated homology-dependent transgene silencing, was also shown to impede the repression of gypsy in restrictive female gonads. Finally, a RNA-silencing model is also supported by the finding in ovaries of short RNAs (25-27 nucleotides long) homologous to sequences from within the gypsy 5'-UTR.

5' Untranslated Regions↗

[Genomic instability associated with human LINE-1 rétrotransposition].

LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon accounts for approximately 17 % of the human genome. Because of the great number of identical copies, L1 can be implicated in genomic rearrangements associated with events of homologous recombination between heterologous sites. Moreover, even if the vast majority of the L1 elements are inactive, some are still able to mobilize themselves by retrotransposition. Thus, L1 is regarded as an insertional mutagenic agent. Moreover, recent works have shown that active retrotransposons were able to mobilize other sequences to generate retro-pseudogenes or to amplify other repeated sequences. Finally, L1 has been associated recently with new genomic rearrangements generated upon insertions such as large genomic deletions. L1 then can be considered as a major factor that has affected and shaped the human genome through several mechanisms.

Genomic Instability↗

A novel double-stranded RNA-binding protein, disco interacting protein 1 (DIP1), contributes to cell fate decisions during Drosophila development.

We report the identification of the Disco Interacting Protein 1 (DIP1) gene isolated in a yeast interaction trap screen using the zinc finger protein disconnected (disco) as a bait. DIP1 encodes a protein containing two double-stranded RNA binding domains (dsRBD). Consistent with the presence of dsRBD, DIP1 binds dsRNA or structured RNAs in Northwestern assays. DIP1 is found in nuclear subdomains resembling speckles known to accumulate transcription and splicing factors. In early embryos, nuclear localization of DIP1 protein coincides with the onset of zygotic gene expression. Later in development DIP1 expression is decreased in dividing cells in different tissues. Overexpression of DIP1 in the eye-antennal imaginal disc, early in embryonic and larval development, causes the formation of supernumerary structures in the head capsule. A role for DIP1 in epigenetic mechanisms that lead to the establishment and/or maintenance of cell fate specification is discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Comparative sequence analysis and predictions for the envelope glycoproteins of insect endogenous retroviruses.

Insect endogenous retroviruses (IERVs) are present in the genome of several species. Previous studies have shown a relationship between the envelope glycoproteins (Envs) and fusion proteins (FPs) of several baculoviruses. We used this sequence similarity to predict fusion domains in the Envs of IERVs. We suggest that FPs and Envs share several specific sequence and structural motifs with other RNA viruses in the viral transmembrane protein superfamily.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Gene silencing triggered by non-LTR retrotransposons in the female germline of Drosophila melanogaster.

Several studies have recently shown that the activity of some eukaryotic transposable elements is sensitive to the presence of homologous transgenes, suggesting the involvement of homology-dependent gene-silencing mechanisms in their regulation. Here we provide data indicating that two non-LTR retrotransposons of Drosophila melanogaster are themselves natural triggers of homology-dependent gene silencing. We show that, in the female germline of D. melanogaster, fragments from the R1 or from the I retrotransposons can mediate silencing of chimeric transcription units into which they are inserted. This silencing is probably mediated by sequence identity with endogenous copies of the retrotransposons because it does not occur with a fragment from the divergent R1 elements of Bombyx mori, and, when a fragment of I is used, it occurs only in females containing functional copies of the I element. This silencing is not accompanied by cosuppression of the endogenous gene homologous to the chimeric transcription unit, which contrasts to some other silencing mechanisms in Drosophila. These observations suggest that in the female germline of D. melanogaster the R1 and I retrotransposons may self-regulate their own activity and their copy number by triggering homology-dependent gene silencing.

Animals↗

Chimeric RNA transposition intermediates of the I factor produce precise retrotransposed copies.

I elements in Drosophila melanogaster are non-long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons of particular interest because high levels of transposition can be induced by appropriate crosses. They use a full-length RNA transposition intermediate as a template for reverse transcription. Detailed molecular characterization of this intermediate is rendered difficult because of the many transcripts produced by defective elements. The use of an active I element marked with a sequence encoding the HA epitope solves this problem. We used an RNA circularization procedure followed by RT-PCR to analyze the transcripts produced by actively transposing tagged I elements. Most start at the 5' end at the second nucleotide of the I element and all are polyadenylated at a site located in genomic sequences downstream of the 3' end. One of the tagged I elements, inserted in locus 88A, produces chimeric transcripts that carry sequences from both 5'- and 3'-flanking genomic DNA. We show that synthesis of these chimeric transcripts is controlled by the I element itself. Analysis of full-length transposed copies of this element shows that the extra sequences at the 5' and 3' ends are not integrated during retrotransposition. This suggests that initiation and arrest of reverse transcription during retrotransposition are precise processes.

3' Flanking Region↗

Tandem UAA repeats at the 3'-end of the transcript are essential for the precise initiation of reverse transcription of the I factor in Drosophila melanogaster.

Non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons, widespread among eukaryotic genomes, transpose by reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate. Some of them, like L1 in the human, terminate at the 3'-end with a poly(dA) stretch whereas others, like the I factor in Drosophila melanogaster, have instead a short sequence repeated in tandem. This suggests different requirements for the initiation of reverse transcription. Here, we have used an RNA circularization/reverse transcription-PCR technique to analyze the 5'- and 3'-ends of the full-length transcripts produced by the I factor at the time of active retrotransposition. These transcripts are capped and polyadenylated similar to conventional messenger RNAs. We have analyzed the 3'-ends of transcripts and transposed copies produced by I elements mutated at the 3'-ends. Transcripts devoid of tandem UAA repeats, although capable of building the components of the retrotransposition machinery, are inefficiently used as retrotransposition intermediates. Such transcripts produce rare new integrated copies issued from the inaccurate initiation of reverse transcription near the 3'-end of the element. The tandem UAA repeats at the 3'-end of the transcripts of I are required for the efficient and precise initiation of reverse transcription. This strong specificity of the I factor reverse transcriptase for its own transcript has implications for the impact of I factor retrotransposition on the host genome.

Animals↗

Utilization of the IR hybrid dysgenesis system in Drosophila to test in vivo mobilization of synthetic SINEs sharing 3' homology with the I factor.

The current model of short interspersed nuclear element (SINE) mobility suggests that these non-coding retroposons are able to recruit for their own benefits the enzymatic machinery encoded by autonomous long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs). The recent characterization of potential SINE-LINE partner pairs that share common 3' end sequences concurs with this model and has led to a potent picture of tRNA-derived SINEs consisting of a tripartite functional structure (Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 (1996) 3756; Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 (1999) 1238; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 2869). This structure consist of a 5' polIII tRNA-related promoter region, a central conserved domain and a variable 3' region with homology to the 3' end of LINEs, believed to be essential to direct recognition by the LINE proteins. To test this model in vivo, we have designed synthetic SINEs possessing this 'canonical' structure, including 3' homology to the 3' UTR of the LINE I factor from Drosophila. These synthetic elements were introduced in a Drosophila reactive strain, and SINE retroposition was assessed following dysgenic crosses that are known to induce high levels of I factor germinal transposition. In the progeny from the dysgenic crosses 3400-4000 flies were analyzed but no retroposed copy of the chimeric SINEs was detected, indicating that what is assumed to be a typical SINE structure is not sufficient per se to allow efficient trans-mobilization of our synthetic SINEs by an actively amplifying partner LINE. Alternatively, the apparent absence of natural fly SINEs may underline intrinsic properties of fly biology that are incompatible with the genesis and/or propagation of SINE-like elements.

Animals↗

Comparative and functional studies of Drosophila species invasion by the gypsy endogenous retrovirus.

Gypsy is an endogenous retrovirus of Drosophila melanogaster. Phylogenetic studies suggest that occasional horizontal transfer events of gypsy occur between Drosophila species. gypsy possesses infective properties associated with the products of the envelope gene that might be at the origin of these interspecies transfers. We report here the existence of DNA sequences putatively encoding full-length Env proteins in the genomes of Drosophila species other than D. melanogaster, suggesting that potentially infective gypsy copies able to spread between sexually isolated species can occur. The ability of gypsy to invade the genome of a new species is conditioned by its capacity to be expressed in the naive genome. The genetic basis for the regulation of gypsy activity in D. melanogaster is now well known, and it has been assigned to an X-linked gene called flamenco. We established an experimental simulation of the invasion of the D. melanogaster genome by gypsy elements derived from other Drosophila species, which demonstrates that these non- D. melanogaster gypsy elements escape the repression exerted by the D. melanogaster flamenco gene.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Mapping and identification of essential gene functions on the X chromosome of Drosophila.

The Drosophila melanogaster genome consists of four chromosomes that contain 165 Mb of DNA, 120 Mb of which are euchromatic. The two Drosophila Genome Projects, in collaboration with Celera Genomics Systems, have sequenced the genome, complementing the previously established physical and genetic maps. In addition, the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project has undertaken large-scale functional analysis based on mutagenesis by transposable P element insertions into autosomes. Here, we present a large-scale P element insertion screen for vital gene functions and a BAC tiling map for the X chromosome. A collection of 501 X-chromosomal P element insertion lines was used to map essential genes cytogenetically and to establish short sequence tags (STSs) linking the insertion sites to the genome. The distribution of the P element integration sites, the identified genes and transcription units as well as the expression patterns of the P-element-tagged enhancers is described and discussed.

Animals↗

[Regulation of the expression of repeated sequences and RNA interference].

Living organisms have to fight against the invasion of many parasites. Among them are viruses and transposable elements that are able to integrate in the genome of their host. After integration, they can replicate and propagate. The defence mechanisms against these invaders are still largely unknown but are widely studied in plants as well as in fungi and animals, particularly Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. The compilation of recent data allows us to draw a general scheme for these mechanisms. In particular, it seems that the propagation of viruses, transposable elements and repeated sequences is controlled by mechanisms repressing the expression of these sequences at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Post-transcriptional regulation of repeated sequences and transposable elements is related to RNA interference (RNAi), an evolutionary conserved silencing process induced by the presence of double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs). Many genes and molecular intermediates have now been identified, revealing the different steps of the mechanism underlying this process. Finally, different results suggest that these post-transcriptional silencing processes are involved in the development of organisms. DICER is a nuclease responsible for the processing of dsRNA into short RNA molecules (siRNAs) considered as the interfering agent. siRNAs interact with the transcript of the targeted gene and this interaction induces degradation of the transcript. DICER is also involved in the processing of small temporal RNAs (stRNA) involved in the timing of development. stRNAs have the same structure as siRNAs. They regulate their target genes by interacting with elements present in their 3'UTR and blocking translation. RNAi appears to be an universal regulatory mechanism that was still unknown a few years ago. It is now largely used in large scale inactivation of genes to determine their function, and some recent studies indicate that it might be used in human therapy.

Animals↗