Biomedical subjects

Alan Barge

Publications and source records attributed to Alan Barge.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.

This paper examines the design of phase II trials in oncology and recommends departing from the traditional uncontrolled trial design. Entrance into phase II clinical evaluation represents a key milestone in the development of any new cancer therapy. As novel molecular-targeted therapies are introduced, whose primary action is to slow the growth of tumors, it will be important to ensure that the clinical trial design will effectively capture any clinical benefit of these agents. The objective of a phase II trial should, in addition to identifying active therapies, be extended to identifying those that are likely to be successful in pivotal trials. It is therefore necessary to quantify the likelihood of either incorrectly halting the development of an active agent or continuing development of an ineffective agent. We believe only randomized studies with comparative intent and including a concurrent active control, can reliably assess these risks corresponding to significance and power. Given that the objective of phase II studies is to identify promising treatments, it is important not be constrained by conventional levels of significance. This paper will review the various approaches to phase II trial design in oncology and provide a framework for fully powered randomized trials of a moderate size. For example, a randomized trial of just 100 patients could lead to the termination of development of 90% of inactive agents whereas at least 80% of agents with a meaningful and realistic increase in progression-free survival would be identified for confirmatory study. We believe randomized studies with progression-free survival endpoints are the most powerful and economical method of determining the clinical activity of new cytostatic agents.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.

The traditional development paradigm for phase II trials in oncology has been challenged in recent years by the introduction of cytostatic therapies. These agents slow the growth of tumors rather than cause high rates of shrinkage, this argues for the use of endpoints that measure growth inhibition such as progression free survival. We have previously argued the need for randomized trials in this setting. Here we discuss methodological solutions to enhance the development decision at the end of phase II in the context of progression endpoints employed in randomized trials. There are well recognized issues associated with progression endpoints relating to bias in the timing and interpretation of assessments. In this paper we present design and analysis solutions that will minimize bias by using methods that are either partially or completely time independent. We also discuss other design features to maximize the information yielded in a phase II setting. We advocate the creation of progression endpoints that utilize all available progression data rather than early fixed time-point analyses and show that little is to be gained by assessing progression status any more frequently than would be required in routine clinical practice. Such design and analysis measures will optimize the development decision made at the end of phase II clinical evaluation.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

A multicenter phase II trial of ZD6474, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of ZD6474, an orally available inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) tyrosine kinase with additional activity against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer and had received prior treatment with an anthracycline and taxane; measurable disease was required. Patients were enrolled sequentially into one of two dose cohorts, 100 or 300 mg orally once daily; 28 days defined one cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate; pharmacokinetics and serial pharmacodynamic studies were obtained. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were enrolled between May 2002 and April 2003, and 44 were evaluable for response. Diarrhea was the most commonly reported toxicity and seemed dose related (grade >/=2: 4.5% and 37.5% in the 100 and 300 mg cohorts, respectively). Rash was reported by 26% of patients but was never worse than grade 2. Seven patients in the 300 mg cohort had asymptomatic grade 1 prolongation of the QTc interval. Hypertension requiring treatment was not reported. There were no objective responses; one patient in the 300 mg cohort had stable disease >/=24 weeks. All patients in the 300 mg cohort and 90% of patients in the 100 mg cohort achieved steady-state concentrations exceeding the IC(50) for VEGF inhibition in preclinical models. CONCLUSION: ZD6474 monotherapy was generally well tolerated but had limited monotherapy activity in patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Vascular targeting in pancreatic cancer: the novel tubulin-binding agent ZD6126 reveals antitumor activity in primary and metastatic tumor models.

ZD6126 is a novel vascular-targeting agent that acts by disrupting the tubulin cytoskeleton of an immature tumor endothelium, leading to an occlusion of tumor blood vessels and a subsequent tumor necrosis. We wanted to evaluate ZD6126 in primary and metastatic tumor models of human pancreatic cancer. Nude mice were injected orthotopically with L3.6pl pancreatic cancer cells. In single and multiple dosing experiments, mice received ZD6126, gemcitabine, a combination of both agents, or no treatment. For the induction of metastatic diseases, additional groups of mice were injected with L3.6pl cells into the spleen. Twenty-four hours after a single-dose treatment, ZD6126 therapy led to an extensive central tumor necrosis, which was not seen after gemcitabine treatment. Multiple dosing of ZD6126 resulted in a significant growth inhibition of primary tumors and a marked reduction of spontaneous liver and lymph node metastases. Experimental metastatic diseases could be significantly controlled by a combination of ZD6126 and gemcitabine, as shown by a reduction of the number and size of established liver metastases. As shown by additional in vitro and in vivo experiments, possible mechanisms involve antivascular activities and subsequent antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of ZD6126 on tumor cells, whereas direct activities against tumor cells seem unlikely. These data highlight the antitumor and antimetastatic effects of ZD6126 in human pancreatic cancer and reveal benefits of adding ZD6126 to standard gemcitabine therapy.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Inhibition of SRC tyrosine kinase as treatment for human pancreatic cancer growing orthotopically in nude mice.

PURPOSE: The Src family comprises a family of nonreceptor intracellular tyrosine kinases that mediate a variety of cellular pathways. Src kinases are overexpressed in a variety of human tumors, including cancer of the colon, breast, and pancreas, and they are an integral part of tumor cell signaling pathways associated with migration, proliferation, adhesion, and angiogenesis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We investigated whether the blockade of Src kinase by daily oral administration of the novel Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor AZM475271 [kindly provided by AstraZeneca (Macclesfield, United Kingdom)], alone or in combination with intraperitoneal gemcitabine, can inhibit growth and metastasis of orthotopically implanted human pancreatic carcinoma cells in nude mice. RESULTS: Treatment with AZM475271 alone reduced the primary pancreatic tumor volume by approximately 40%, whereas AZM475271 plus gemcitabine reduced tumor volume by 90%. Furthermore, treatment with AZM475271 and gemcitabine significantly reduced metastasis: none of eight animals who received the combination treatment had lymph node or liver metastases, compared with five of five and three of five animals, respectively, in the control group (P = 0.001). Src inhibition by AZM475271 (alone or with gemcitabine) was associated with significantly reduced tumor cell proliferation, decreased tumor microvessel density, and increased apoptosis in vivo. Moreover, these effects were all significantly increased when gemcitabine was combined with AZM475271 compared with gemcitabine alone. CONCLUSIONS: Src inhibition by AZM475271, either alone or in combination with gemcitabine, demonstrated significant antitumor and antimetastatic activity in an orthotopic nude mouse model for human pancreatic cancer. The combination of AZM475271 with gemcitabine sensitized tumor cells to the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine.

Administration, Oral↗