PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Alan D Tice

Publications and source records attributed to Alan D Tice.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Experience of infectious diseases consultants with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: results of an emerging infections network survey.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), little is known about the role of infectious diseases consultants in the process or their perceptions of OPAT. METHODS: In May 2004, the Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network (EIN) surveyed its members to characterize their involvement and experiences with OPAT. RESULTS: Of the 454 respondents (54%) who completed the questionnaire, 426 (94%) indicated that patients in their primary inpatient facility were "frequently" discharged while receiving OPAT, estimating that, on average, 19 patients are discharged from their hospitals while receiving OPAT each month. Although 86% of EIN members stated that they personally order OPAT for some patients, 18% indicated that they have no involvement, and 37% stated they only rarely or occasionally oversee OPAT. EIN members involved in OPAT estimated that approximately 90% of their patients who take OPAT received therapy at home, and the members described variable monitoring and oversight methods. Of the respondents, 68% of providers collectively estimated that they encountered 1951 infectious and serious noninfectious complications of OPAT in the past year. The most frequently used antibiotics included vancomycin, ceftriaxone, and cefazolin, most commonly used for bone and joint infections. CONCLUSIONS: These results testify to the pervasive use of OPAT in today's health care system, the variable role of infectious diseases consultants, and the heterogeneity in oversight and management practices. The widespread use of OPAT and its frequent complications indicate the need for additional studies to establish optimal methods of delivery and management to insure the quality and safety of the process.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2005

Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for diabetic foot infections (SIDESTEP): prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blinded, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot infections are a common and serious problem, yet few randomised trials of adequate quality have compared the efficacy of the various antibiotic regimens available for their treatment. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for foot infections. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blinded, multicentre trial in adults (n=586) with diabetes and a foot infection classified as moderate-to-severe and requiring intravenous antibiotics. We assigned patients intravenous ertapenem (1 g daily; n=295) or piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g every 6 h; n=291) given for a minimum of 5 days, after which oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (875/125 mg every 12 h) could be given for up to 23 days. Investigators retained the option to administer vancomycin to patients in either group to ensure adequate coverage for potentially antibiotic resistant Enterococcus spp and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a favourable clinical response (cure or improvement) on the day that intravenous antibiotic was discontinued. Analyses were by an evaluable-patient only approach. This study is registered with , number NCT00229112. FINDINGS: Of the 576 patients treated, 445 were available for assessment at the end of intravenous therapy. Both baseline characteristics and favourable clinical response rates were similar for the 226 who received ertapenem and the 219 who received piperacillin/tazobactam (94%vs 92%, respectively; between treatment difference 1.9%, 95% CI -2.9 to 6.9). Rates of favourable microbiological responses (eradication rates and clinical outcomes, by pathogen) and adverse events did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Clinical and microbiological outcomes for patients treated with ertapenem were equivalent to those for patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam, suggesting that this once-daily antibiotic should be considered for parenteral therapy of diabetic foot infections, when deemed appropriate.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for infections with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVES: As increasing numbers of patients are being treated with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), it becomes ever more important to ascertain the risks and benefits of such treatment for patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,515 patients with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections who were treated with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial monotherapy. All patients were included in the adverse drug reaction analysis; 1,252 were evaluable for purposes of evaluating treatment efficacy. RESULTS: The six antibiotics most frequently used in this study (ceftriaxone, cefazolin, vancomycin, oxacillin, nafcillin, and clindamycin) appeared to be equivalent in achieving the desired efficacy outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin was associated with a significantly greater number of side effects than was ceftriaxone, cefazolin, or oxacillin, and nafcillin was associated with a significantly greater number of adverse events than ceftriaxone.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Ertapenem: a new opportunity for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Ertapenem is a parenteral carbapenem antimicrobial with pharmacological properties that allow it to be given once daily. This makes it a consideration for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). In comparison with information from the OPAT Outcomes Registry, ertapenem seems well suited for the types of infections and bacteria that are commonly treated with OPAT, plus it has additional activity against anaerobic bacteria. This added spectrum makes it possible to treat complicated skin/skin-structure, complicated intra-abdominal and pelvic infections with a single antibiotic instead of the multiple agents that have usually been required. Ertapenem is also comparable to other OPAT antimicrobials in terms of adverse effects and clinical outcomes. This antimicrobial can be given with any delivery model, although its stability when mixed is such that daily preparation or self-mixing systems need to be considered. Ertapenem should be added to the growing list of once-daily parenteral antibiotics that can be given to outpatients.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2003

Outcomes of osteomyelitis among patients treated with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of diabetes, vascular disease, age, and antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcomes, including amputation rates, in patients with osteomyelitis treated in the outpatient setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated with intravenous antimicrobial therapy for osteomyelitis at an outpatient infectious diseases practice. All patients were followed for at least 6 months. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-four patients qualified for inclusion, with follow-up information available for up to 10 years. One hundred and thirty-nine patients (31%) had recurrences and 27 (6%) had amputations. Of the recurrences, 108 (78%) occurred within 6 months and 132 (95%) within 1 year. In univariate analyses, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and the combination were all associated with the risk of recurrence; age (>70 years) was not. For osteomyelitis due to Staphylococcus aureus, the relative risk of recurrence, using a Cox regression model, was 0.8 for ceftriaxone (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4 to 1.5; P = 0.53), 1.1 for cefazolin (95% CI: 0.5 to 2.2; P = 0.80), and 2.5 for vancomycin (95% CI: 1.1 to 5.6; P = 0.04), as compared with the use of a penicillinase-resistant penicillin. CONCLUSION: Diabetes and peripheral vascular disease are important factors in determining the prognosis of patients with osteomyelitis, but age is not. Almost all recurrences of osteomyelitis occur within 1 year. Recurrence rates with osteomyelitis associated with S. aureus appear to be higher with the use of vancomycin, whereas ceftriaxone and cefazolin appear to be similar to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Risk factors and treatment outcomes in osteomyelitis.

Outcome indicators of recurrence and amputation were used to evaluate risk factors and treatment choices in 454 patients with osteomyelitis who completed outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Three hundred and fifteen (69.4%) were apparently cured at the time outcomes were measured and 139 (30.6%) had a recurrence. Of the recurrences, 56% occurred within 3 months, 78% within 6 months and 95% within 1 year. Both the initial pathogen and the choice of antibiotic had an effect on the risk of treatment failure. Osteomyelitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa was associated with more than a two-fold increase in recurrence (P = 0.005) compared with infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. There was a positive correlation between P. aeruginosa and amputation. With S. aureus infections, the risk of recurrence was more than twice as great with vancomycin therapy as opposed to treatment with beta-lactams (P = 0.03). Treatment with ceftriaxone was as effective as the penicillinase-resistant penicillins and cefazolin.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Intestinal parasites of the Pacific.

Information about intestinal parasites in Hawaii and the Pacific is not current. We reviewed reports on fecal samples obtained from two laboratories and found recovery rates of 9.3% in Hawaii, 14.2% in Saipan, 18% in Rota and 9.5% in Guam. The most frequently identified parasites were Blastocystis hominis (7.6%), Giardia lamblia (1.2%), and Entamoeba coli (0.7%). Although the incidence and types of organisms have changed with time, physicians in Hawaii should continue looking for intestinal parasites.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Cost perspectives for outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy.

Intravenous antimicrobial therapy often continues after a patient is discharged from the hospital or it begins in the outpatient setting. Reimbursement for this therapy varies by payer. The United States Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) Outcomes Registry is a valuable resource for quantifying cost by payer, as well as for describing practice patterns and adverse events related to intravenous antimicrobial therapy. To describe the reimbursement structure and cost of intravenous vancomycin home care therapy for four different types of payers, a survey of home infusion companies was done. Also surveyed were infusion programs participating in the OPAT Outcomes Registry, representing four different types of payers, to determine the cost of outpatient intravenous therapy. A retrospective cohort study of these infusion programs was conducted to describe practice patterns and to identify adverse events that resulted from intravenous vancomycin. We found that the cost of outpatient therapy was substantial, although nonuniform, across payer types. Alternative outpatient therapies associated with lower risks for adverse events and lower costs should be considered.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Bloodborne pathogen exposure and recommendations for management.

Bloodborne pathogens pose a continuing threat to healthcare workers. The frequency of needlesticks and wounds from other sharps has been reduced by the use of safety devices in many healthcare workplaces but it has not been eliminated. The need for appropriate management of a needlestick or other exposure that could carry a bloodborne pathogen has become increasingly clear as more is learned about the factors affecting transmission of these infectious agents. With better diagnostic tools and more therapeutic agents the success rate of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) will continue to improve. This article will focus on those agents as they pose the greatest known threats and offer the potential for intervention.

Blood-Borne Pathogens↗