Biomedical subjects

Alan Johnston

Publications and source records attributed to Alan Johnston.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Motion-induced spatial conflict.

Borders defined by small changes in brightness (luminance contrast) or by differences in colour (chromatic contrast) appear to move more slowly than those defined by strong luminance contrast. As spatial coding is influenced by motion, if placed in close proximity, the different types of moving border might appear to drift apart. Using this configuration, we show here that observers instead report a clear illusory spatial jitter of the low-luminance-contrast boundary. This visible interaction between motion and spatial-position coding occurred at a characteristic rate (approximately 22.3 Hz), although the stimulus motion was continuous and invariant. The jitter rate did not vary with the speed of movement. The jitter was not due to small involuntary movements of the eyes, because it only occurred at a specific point within the stimulus, the low-luminance-contrast boundary. These findings show that the human visual system contains a neural mechanism that periodically resolves the spatial conflict created by adjacent moving borders that have the same physical but different perceptual speeds.

Color↗

PubMed2003

Latency differences and the flash-lag effect.

The tendency for briefly flashed stimuli to appear to lag behind the spatial position of physically aligned moving stimuli is known as the flash-lag effect. Possibly the simplest explanation for this phenomenon is that transient stimuli are processed more slowly than moving stimuli. We tested this proposal using a task based upon the simultaneous tilt illusion. When an oriented stimulus is surrounded by another oriented stimulus, the inner stimulus can appear to be rotated away from the orientation of the surround. By flashing central static sinewave gratings at specific phases of an annular gratings rotation cycle, we were able to determine the temporal dependence of the tilt illusion. Our results suggest a small, approximately 20 ms, processing advantage for the rotating stimulus relative to the flashed stimulus. Such a small advantage, if due to differential latencies, is insufficient to account for the flash-lag effect.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

Comparing solid-body with point-light animations.

The movement of faces provides useful information for a variety of tasks and is now an active area of research. We compare here two ways of presenting face motion in experiments: as solid-body animations and as point-light displays. In the first experiment solid-body and point-light animations, based on the same motion-captured marker data, produced similar levels of performance on a sex-judgment task. The trend was for an advantage for the point-light displays, probably in part because of residual spatial cues available in such stimuli. In the second experiment we compared spatially normalised point-light displays of marker data with solid-body animations and pseudorandom point-light animations. Performance with solid-body animations and normalised point-light displays was similar and above chance, while performance with the pseudorandom point-light stimuli was not above chance. We conclude that both relatively few well-placed points and solid-body animations provide useful information about facial motion, but that a greater number of randomly placed points does not support above-chance performance. Solid-body animations have the methodological advantages of reducing the importance of marker placement and are more effective in isolating motion information, even if they are subsequently rendered as point-light displays.

Cues↗

PubMed2002

Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes.

BACKGROUND: When simultaneous visual events appear to occur at different times, the discrepancy has generally been ascribed to time differences in neural transmission or cortical processing that lead to asynchronous awareness of the events. RESULTS: We found, however, that an apparent delay of changes in motion direction relative to synchronous color changes occurs only for rapid alternations, and this delay is not accompanied by a difference in reaction time. We also found that perceptual asynchrony depends on the temporal structure of the stimuli (transitions [first-order temporal change] versus turning points [second-order temporal change]) rather than the attribute type (color versus motion). CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the perception of the relative time of events is based on the relationship of representations of temporal pattern that we term time markers. We conclude that the perceptual asynchrony effects studied here do not reflect differential neural delays for different attributes; rather, they arise from a faulty correspondence match between color transitions and position transitions (motion), which in turn results from a difficulty in detecting turning points (direction reversals) and a preference for matching markers of the same type.

Color Perception↗