Biomedical subjects

Alan P Sawchuk

Publications and source records attributed to Alan P Sawchuk.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Discretionary carotid patch angioplasty leads to good results.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the type and need for angioplasty in 253 consecutive carotid endarterectomies. METHODS: Polyester knitted gelatin sealed patch (DP) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patches were used in, respectively, 159 and 29 patients, with 65 vessels closed primarily (no patch [NP]). RESULTS: Surgical results, estimated blood loss, and surgical time were similar in each group. Postoperative hematomas occurred in 6 DP and 3 NP patients. There were 3 strokes in the DP group. Long-term duplex evaluation was possible in 201 patients. The number of patients who had less than 15%, 15% to 50%, 50% to 79%, 80% to 99%, 100%, or an ungraded degree of narrowing were as follows for each group: DP, 117, 2, 5, 0, 1, and 2; PTFE, 18, 1, 1, 0, 0; and NP, 53, 0, 0, 0, 1. Statistical analysis failed to show any difference between groups postoperatively or in long-term follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that selective patching is safe and effective in male patients who undergo carotid endarterectomy. The type of patch material also is inconsequential. Patch type and its use should be at the surgeon's discretion.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Open surgical repair of children less than 13 years old with lower extremity vascular injury.

PURPOSE: We sought to review the diagnosis and treatment of children with lower extremity vascular injury. METHODS: We performed a query of our vascular surgery database from 1996 through 2002 to determine those with lower extremity vascular injuries requiring surgery who were also less than 13 years of age. Patient demographics, presentation, cause, surgical specifics, and outcome were sought. RESULTS: Six children (2 girls and 4 boys) with an average age of 6.8 years (range, 2-9 years) were found. The causes were 3 blunt injuries, 2 iatrogenic injuries, and 1 penetrating injury. Associated injuries were common. There were 3 femoral and 3 popliteal artery injuries. Two were pseudoaneurysms (common femoral and popliteal artery), and 4 were acute occlusions, of which 3 experienced a delay in diagnosis. There was one primary below-knee amputation. Four reverse vein bypasses were performed, and one vein patch repair of a pseudoaneurysm was performed. Generally, 7 to 9 O interrupted Prolene (Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) repairs were performed. A delay in diagnosis (2 blunt injuries) resulted in 2 major amputations and 1 insensate foot. Four reconstructions are functioning with viable limbs (follow-up, 5-49 months). An associated brain injury resulted in the only death. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular blunt injury is especially insidious in children. However, an aggressive approach of vascular repair, even extensive bypasses with reverse vein, will allow limb salvage in the absence of a diagnostic delay.

Child↗

PubMed2004

Short-stay carotid endarterectomy in a tertiary-care Veterans Administration hospital.

BACKGROUND: This study focused on 200 carotid endarterectomies (CEA) performed at our Veterans Administration Hospital (VAH) to determine whether 1-day hospitalization after CEA is safe and the degree to which it can be achieved. METHODS: Over 36 months, 200 CEAs were performed for asymptomatic stenosis (n = 104), transient ischemic attacks (n = 68), and stroke (n = 28). General anesthesia was used in 189 procedures. RESULTS: The hospital stay was 1 day for 132 procedures and more than 1 day in 68 CEAs. The average stay was 1.69 +/- 1.5 days. After surgery there were 3 strokes, 5 hematomas that required evacuation, and 5 myocardial infarctions. There were no deaths. Four patients were readmitted in the 1-day and the greater than 1-day stay groups. History of myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency, longer operative time, and complications correlated with a greater than 1-day stay (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: A 1-day hospital stay is safe and practical in a VAH setting, resulting in good clinical outcomes.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Endovascular vs open AAA repair: does size matter?

Since the natural tendency of the aorta is to increase in diameter and tortuosity with age and since abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) increase in diameter and length over time, encroaching on the renal and hypogastric orifices, early repair of AAAs (when > or =4.0 cm) may allow greater applicability of the endovascular option because of more favorable aortoiliac morphology. Patients who present at an older age with larger AAAs should be more likely to be anatomically excluded from endovascular AAA repair. Over a 42-month period, 317 consecutive patients referred with aortoiliac aneurysms (infrarenal AAA > or =4.0 cm) were evaluated by one of the authors (SGL) for endovascular vs open repair based on computed tomography (CT) and angiographic imaging. The 10 anatomic exclusion criteria were those applicable to the Zenith endograft (Cook, Inc), which currently is the most anatomically inclusive of the aortic endografts in commercial use in the United States. Based on their aortoiliac morphology, 212 patients were excluded from endovascular repair and 105 were included as acceptable anatomic candidates. Age, AAA size, and the reason(s) for exclusion were recorded for each patient. By use of Student's t test and logistic and linear regression analyses, the groups were compared by age, AAA size, and age + size. There was no significant difference in patient age or AAA size distribution between the group of patients excluded from endovascular repair based on aortoiliac morphology compared to those who met the inclusion criteria. Patients with small AAAs (4.0-5.4 cm) had similar age distribution as those with large (> or =5.5 cm) AAAs. The majority of patients (87%) were excluded based on proximal aortic neck morphology. The presence of aortoiliac morphology that precludes endovascular repair is independent of patient age or AAA size at presentation. A patient presenting with a small (4.0-5.4 cm) AAA is not more likely to be a candidate for endovascular repair than a patient with a large AAA.

Aged↗