PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Aldo Pietro Maggioni

Publications and source records attributed to Aldo Pietro Maggioni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Body mass index, prognosis and mode of death in chronic heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial.

AIMS: To assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI), mortality and mode of death in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients; to define the shape of the relationship between BMI and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of 5010 patients from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial. The end-points of the study were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Mortality rate was 27.2% in underweight patients (BMI<22 kg/m2), 21.7% in normal weight patients (BMI 22-24.9 kg/m2), 17.9% in overweight patients (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) and 16.5% in obese patients (BMI>30 kg/m2) (p<0.0001). The rates of non-cardiovascular death did not differ among groups. The risk of death due to progressive heart failure was 3.4-fold higher in the underweight than in the obese patients (p<0.0001). Normal weight, overweight and obese patients had lower risk of death as compared with underweight patients (p=0.019, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96; p=0.0005, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84; p=0.003, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.88, respectively) independently of symptoms, ventricular function, beta-blocker use, C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide levels. CONCLUSIONS: In CHF patients a higher BMI is associated with a better prognosis independently of other clinical variables. The relationship between mortality and BMI is monotonically decreasing.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Left bundle branch block as a risk factor for progression to heart failure.

The prevalence of conduction disturbances, particularly left bundle branch block (LBBB), is strongly correlated with age and with the presence of cardiovascular disease. LBBB has been reported to affect approximately 25% of the heart failure (HF) population and it is likely that the deleterious role of such conduction disorders in the progression to HF has been underestimated. The purpose of this article is to review the data from the literature indicating that LBBB may have a causative role, mediated through the resulting intra-ventricular asynchrony, in the deterioration of cardiac function and the development of cardiac remodelling and HF. It also aims to address the potential for future clinical therapies for this conduction disorder.

Bundle-Branch Block↗
PubMed2006

A clinically practicable diagnostic score for metabolic syndrome improves its predictivity of diabetes mellitus: the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto miocardico (GISSI)-Prevenzione scoring.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MS) is associated with late-onset diabetes. However, diagnostic criteria for individual components of MS are based on categorical/arbitrary cut points and, therefore, do not exploit the information yield of each factor. We aimed to generate a diagnostic score for MS (MS-Score), aimed at predicting diabetes by giving appropriate weight to the individual components of MS. METHODS: Of 11,323 patients with prior myocardial infarction and followed up for 3.5 years in the GISSI-Prevenzione study, 3855 subjects with diabetes at baseline or missing information for relevant variables were excluded. A Cox proportional hazards model including age, sex, glycemia, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension, and body mass index was fitted to create a diagnostic score. A cutoff point of 28 of the score was the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity for MS diagnosis (MS-Score). The prognostic performance of the MS-Score was compared with that of the diagnostic criteria of MS, as defined by National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (MS-ATP). RESULTS: Of 7468 patients, 940 developed diabetes. The risk of getting diabetes significantly and progressively increased in the quintiles of the score reaching > 6-fold higher risk in the last one. The predictive capability of MS-Score was significantly higher than that of the MS-ATP (AUC = 0.650 vs 0.587, sensitivity 67% vs 52%, specificity 63% vs 66%, P = .0002). The MS-Score, but not the MS-ATP, was significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: MS-Score improves the prediction of diabetes development by using the full informative content of individual components for diagnosis of MS.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Rationale and design of the GISSI-Atrial Fibrillation Trial: a randomized, prospective, multicentre study on the use of valsartan, an angiotensin II AT1-receptor blocker, in the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence.

BACKGROUND: The possibility of preventing atrial fibrillation recurrence with anti-arrhythmic agents is very limited, given the discouraging results obtained with current drugs in many patients. Data from experimental studies suggest that angiotensin II AT1-receptor blockers can influence atrial remodelling, a key factor in atrial fibrillation initiation and maintenance. Moreover, some preliminary clinical data show that angiotensin II AT1 -receptor blockers can prevent atrial fibrillation episodes. The GISSI-Atrial Fibrillation (AF) trial is a randomized, prospective, parallel group, placebo-controlled, multicentre study designed to test whether angiotensin II AT1-receptor blockers can reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that, in patients with a history of recent atrial fibrillation who are treated with the best recommended therapies, the addition of the angiotensin II AT1-receptor blocker valsartan (titrated up to 320 mg) is superior to placebo in reducing atrial fibrillation recurrence. A substudy will analyse the effect of valsartan on left atrial dimensions and on neurohormones. The study population consists of patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (at least two electrocardiogram documented atrial fibrillation episodes in the previous 6 months or successful cardioversion in the last 2 weeks) with underlying cardiovascular diseases or comorbidities. With approximately 100 centres participating in Italy, a total of 1402 patients are randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive valsartan or placebo. The enrolment period will last 12 months and the patients will be followed for 12 months from study entry. CONCLUSIONS: The GISSI-AF is the largest trial aimed at assessing the role of angiotensin receptor blockade in reducing the recurrence of atrial fibrillation and its possible mechanisms of action in terms of its effects on atrium remodelling and neurohormones.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗
PubMed2005

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction, total mortality, and sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction treated with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.

BACKGROUND: Sudden death (SD) has a major impact on mortality (M) in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (SyD). In GISSI-Prevenzione, treatment with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) reduced M and SD in post-MI patients, but their effect in patients with SyD is unknown. METHODS: 11,323 patients with prior MI and NYHA class < or = II were recruited. After excluding patients with no ejection fraction (EF) measurement (1684), and those with missing data (n=9), 9630 patients were available for analysis. Multivariate Cox regression adjusted models were fitted. RESULTS: Compared to patients with EF > 50%, SyD patients had higher M (12.3% vs. 6.0%) and SD (3.4% vs. 1.4%) rates. PUFA reduced M similarly in patients with (RR 0.76 (0.60-0.96) P=0.02) and without SyD (RR 0.81 (0.59-1.10) P=0.17) (heterogeneity tests P=0.55). In contrast, the effect on SD was markedly asymmetrical: PUFA produced a marked reduction (RR 0.42 (0.26-0.67) P=0.0003) of risk in SyD patients whereas the effect was less evident (RR 0.89 (0.41-1.69) P=0.71) in patients with EF > 50% (heterogeneity tests P=0.07). There was a significant increase in SD with worsening EF (P test for trend=0.02), the benefit on SD in patients with EF < or = 40% being 4-fold higher than in those with EF > 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing SyD is associated with elevated risk of SD and with increasing benefit from PUFA. The effect of PUFA on SD reduction was greater in patients with SyD. Prospective trials testing the effect of PUFA in populations with SyD are required.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

GlObal Secondary Prevention strategiEs to Limit event recurrence after myocardial infarction: the GOSPEL study. A trial from the Italian Cardiac Rehabilitation Network: rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation programmes are a proven treatment for individuals with recent myocardial infarction, resulting in reduced morbidity and mortality compared to usual care. Unfortunately, following completion of a cardiac rehabilitation programme, risk factors and lifestyle behaviours may deteriorate. The GlObal Secondary Prevention strategiEs to Limit event recurrence after myocardial infarction (GOSPEL) study investigates the benefits of a programme of continued educational and behavioural interventions to achieve optimal long-term secondary prevention goals. DESIGN: This will be a multicentre, randomized, controlled study carried out in 78 Italian cardiac rehabilitation centres. METHODS: After completion of an initial cardiac rehabilitation programme, patients with recent (<3 months) myocardial infarction were randomized to either a long-lasting (over 3 years) multifactorial continued educational and behavioural programme (intensive approach) or usual care (control) group. Intensive approach patients participated in extensive cardiac rehabilitation sessions, monthly from months 1 to 6, then every 6 months for 3 years. Each session consisted of aerobic exercise, comprehensive lifestyle and risk factor counselling, and clinical assessment. Usual care patients returned to their family physicians' care, and attended the reference centre only for the 6-month and then annual scheduled assessment. The efficacy of the two different strategies will be evaluated in terms of morbidity and mortality as primary endpoint. RESULTS: From January 2001 through December 2002, 3241 patients were enrolled. Results will be available in mid 2006. CONCLUSIONS: The GOSPEL trial, the rationale and design of which we present here, was designed to test a new strategy of secondary prevention delivery and to raise standards of long-term secondary prevention in Italy. With a cohort of over 3200 patients, GOSPEL is the largest randomized, multifactorial lifestyle and risk factor intervention trial after myocardial infarction conducted so far.

Counseling↗
PubMed2005

VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion) trial.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) are an evidence-based treatment for patients who after myocardial infarction (MI) present with either heart failure (HF) or left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or both. An alternative could be a more complete inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system through the blockade of the angiotensin type 1 receptors. The effect of valsartan or captopril, or the combination of the two in post-MI HF or systolic dysfunction or both, has been evaluated in the VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion) trial. Total mortality and the combined secondary end point of cardiovascular death, MI or HF were not significantly different in the three groups after 24.7 months of follow-up. Valsartan was not inferior to captopril in terms of total mortality and cardiovascular death, MI and HF. Valsartan can be considered an alternative treatment to ACE-I in these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Clinical characteristics and outcome of diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. Data from the BLITZ-1 study.

BACKGROUND: The determinants of a worse outcome in diabetic patients after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are controversial. They include delayed hospital admission, worse clinical presentation and lesser efficacy of accepted therapeutic interventions. Therefore, to improve our knowledge, we aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment options and short-term outcomes of diabetic patients in a survey of consecutive AMI subjects admitted to the Italian coronary care unit (CCU) network in the current era of reperfusion. METHODS: The BLITZ study prospectively enrolled patients with AMI, within 48 hours of symptom onset, admitted to 296 out of the 341 existing Italian CCUs from October 15 to 29, 2001. Diabetic status was recorded by collecting clinical history. In-hospital and post-discharge management and outcomes were collected up to 30 days from admission. RESULTS: Overall, 434 of 1959 enrolled patients (22%) had a clinical diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetic patients were older, more frequently women, had a worse coronary risk profile, and an unfavorable clinical presentation compared to non-diabetics. Among 1275 patients with ST-elevation AMI, diabetics (20%) received a similar proportion of any reperfusion therapy (61 vs 66%, p = 0.10), but significantly less primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (9 vs 16%, p = 0.003). Diabetic patients were treated less often with oral beta-blockers than non-diabetics both during hospitalization (56 vs 64%, p = 0.003) and at discharge (54 vs 61%, p = 0.01). In contrast, in-hospital use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (76 vs 67%, p = 0.0003), digitalis (10 vs 5%, p = 0.0005), and diuretics (54 vs 36%, p < 0.0001) was more frequent among diabetics. During their index admission, subjects with diabetes had higher in-hospital mortality (11 vs 6%, p = 0.0004), as well as higher rates of reinfarction (6 vs 2%, p = 0.0003), new congestive heart failure (28 vs 14%, p < 0.0001), cardiogenic shock (10 vs 5%, p = 0.0005) or recurrent angina (22 vs 16%, p = 0.0034). A similar pattern was observed at 30-day follow-up. At multivariate analysis, diabetic status was not confirmed to be an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although diabetic patients with AMI admitted to the Italian CCU network have a higher in-hospital and 30-day morbidity and mortality rates compared to non-diabetics, a clinical diagnosis of diabetes has no independent predictive value on short-term outcome.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

[The AREA IN-CHF trial (antiremodeling effect of aldosterone receptors blockade with canrenone in mild chronic heart failure): rationale and design].

The RALES study has shown that spironolactone reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality both from progressive heart failure and sudden death in patients with NYHA class III or IV heart failure. This favorable effect was clearly independent of a diuretic effect. EPHESUS extended these results to eplerenone in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and signs of heart failure. Antialdosterone drugs may be effective because they oppose the effects of aldosterone to sodium retention, loss of magnesium and potassium, sympathetic activation, baroreceptor function and vascular compliance. Antialdosterone treatment may also antagonize the effect of aldosterone in promoting cardiac fibrosis. In a RALES substudy baseline serum PIIINP, a marker of extracellular matrix turnover, showed an independent negative correlation with survival and chronic heart failure hospitalizations in the placebo group. Therefore it seems interesting to evaluate the effect of canrenone, an aldosterone receptor blocker, on the progression of left ventricular dysfunction in patients with mild heart failure assuming standard therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Rationale and design of the GISSI heart failure trial: a large trial to assess the effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and rosuvastatin in symptomatic congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The GISSI Heart Failure project is a large-scale, randomized, double-blind study designed to investigate the effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and rosuvastatin on mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with New York Heart Association classes II to IV heart failure, already receiving optimized recommended therapy, will be recruited in a nation-wide network of more than 300 cardiology and internal medicine services to be randomly allocated to treatment with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (1 g daily) or the corresponding placebo. Patients with no clear indication or contraindication to cholesterol-lowering therapy will be further randomized to receive low-dose rosuvastatin (10 mg daily) or placebo. According to data available in heart failure registries, it is expected that 70% of the patients will be suitable to enter both components of the trial, which assume the same co-primary endpoints: (a) 15% reduction of all-cause mortality and (b) 20% reduction of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalizations. The trial is event-driven and will continue either until at least 1252 deaths have been recorded or a reduction of all-cause mortality will satisfy the significance boundaries, which have been established to stop the study. The recruitment of the planned sample size of approximately 7000 patients randomized in the n-3 PUFA trial is expected to be completed within 18 months from the trial start. As of February 29, 2004, 4624 heart failure patients have been included in the trial. CONCLUSION: The GISSI-HF project, with its protocol articulated into two independent randomization schemes, has the aim and the power to verify the hypothesis that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and rosuvastatin can favorably modify the prognosis of patients with symptomatic heart failure.

Fatty Acids, Omega-3↗
PubMed2004

In-hospital and one-year outcomes of patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis or primary coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to observe the outcomes of high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolysis in a community setting. METHODS: A prospective study of the in-hospital and 12-month outcomes was conducted in 17 cardiology centers where primary angioplasty was available, and in 30 where it was not. Three thousand seventy-four patients in the first 12 hours of an evolving infarction were recruited; among these, 2227 patients who met one or more pre-defined criteria of increased risk were included in the study. RESULTS: Thrombolysis and primary angioplasty were respectively performed in 1090 and in 721 patients; 416 patients (18.7%) received no reperfusion treatment. The incidence of the primary combined in-hospital endpoint (death, non-fatal reinfarction and stroke) was similar in patients treated with thrombolysis (9.2%) and with primary angioplasty (10.7%) (odds ratio--OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval--CI 0.86-1.63, p = NS), and was higher (22.6%) in patients receiving no reperfusion treatment as compared to thrombolysis (OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.36-4.63, p < 0.0001). The occurrence of the 12-month endpoint (death, reinfarction, congestive heart failure and recurrent angina) was lower after primary angioplasty than after thrombolysis (26.8 vs 35.0%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84, p = 0.0003), due to a lower incidence of angina. At multivariate analysis, older age, anterior infarction, Killip class > 1, high heart rate, and low systolic blood pressure on admission were all significantly associated with a higher incidence of both endpoints. The adjusted analysis confirmed that, despite similar in-hospital results after both reperfusion treatments, primary angioplasty was independently associated with better 1-year outcomes (relative risk 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.79, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this observation in the community setting, a strategy of primary angioplasty in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction was not better than thrombolysis in terms of mortality or recurrent infarction, but was associated with less angina at 1 year.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

[Diabetes mellitus, left ventricular dysfunction and congestive heart failure].

Diabetes is a well known risk factor for the development of congestive heart failure. Epidemiological evidence in the community underscores the prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in diabetic patients as 2-fold with respect to non-diabetic ones, with half of them completely asymptomatic. Diastolic dysfunction in diabetic hearts, in comparison with non-diabetic, is even more frequent. The high prevalence has been explained by the frequent coexistence of an underlying diabetic cardiomyopathy, hypertension and ischemic heart disease. In these patients, the diabetic metabolic derangement, together with the early activation of sympathetic nervous system, induce a decrease of myocardial function. The activation of renin-angiotensin system results in an unfavorable cardiac remodeling. The progression from myocardial damage to overt dysfunction and heart failure is often asymptomatic for a long time and frequently undiagnosed and untreated. Currently, the widespread availability of echocardiography and possibly the use of cardiac natriuretic peptides, may allow for an earlier recognition of most of such patients. In heart failure, diabetic patients have a worse prognosis than non-diabetics. The available pharmacological treatments, such as ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers and possibly angiotensin receptor blockers, togheter with a tight glycemic control, may be effective to reverse the remodeling process and prevent cardiovascular events. In order to identify most of the diabetic patients at risk of development of left ventricular dysfunction and to prevent its progression to overt heart failure, it seems important to elaborate a screening strategy in order to diagnose and treat most of diabetic patients with myocardial damage.

Diabetes Complications↗
PubMed2003

Current presentation and management of heart failure in cardiology and internal medicine hospital units: a tale of two worlds--the TEMISTOCLE study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose pf the current article is to describe the clinical profile, use of resources, management and outcome in a population of real-world inpatients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: With a prospective, cross-sectional survey on acute hospital admissions, we evaluated the overall and provider-related differences in patient characteristics, diagnostic work-up, treatment and inhospital outcome of 2127 patients with heart failure admitted to 167 cardiology departments and 250 internal medicine departments between February 14 and 25, 2000. Patients admitted to cardiology units were younger (56.3% >70 years vs 76.2%, P <.0001), had more severe symptoms (NYHA IV 35% vs 29%, P =.00014), and more often underwent evaluation of ventricular function (89.3% vs 54.8%, P <.0001) and coronary angiography (7.5% vs 0.9%, P <.0001) than those admitted to medical units. Moreover, they were more often prescribed beta-blockers (17.8% vs 8.7%, P <.0001). However, prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (78.7% vs 81.5%, P = not significant [NS]) and inhospital mortality (5.2% vs 5.9%, P = NS) were similar. A 6-month follow-up visit was performed in 56.4% of cases (68.2% of cardiology vs 49.4% of medicine patients, P <.0001); 6-month readmission (43.7% vs 45.4%, P = NS) and mortality (13.9% vs 16.7%, P = NS) rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with heart failure admitted to cardiology and internal medicine units represent 2 clearly different populations. In both groups, diagnostic procedures and evidence-based treatments, such as beta-blockers, appeared to be underused, and there was a lack of structured follow-up, as well as a poor 6-month prognosis.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2003

Survival and hospitalization in heart failure patients with or without diabetes treated with beta-blockers.

BACKGROUND: Physicians are still concerned about prescribing beta-blockers in diabetic patients with heart failure. METHODS: In the outcome research study (the Beta-Blockers in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: Guided Use in Clinical Practice [BRING-UP] study), the responsible clinicians could decide whether to start beta-blocker treatment and which agent to use. A total of 3091 patients were enrolled by 202 cardiologic centers: 25% of the recruited patients were already on beta-blockers, 28% started treatment at the enrollment visit, and 47% were not started on beta-blockers. RESULTS: The 1-year mortality, hospitalization rate, and the combined end point of mortality or hospitalization were higher in diabetic patients (15.8% versus 10.9%; relative risk [RR] = 1.44; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.16-1.78, P =.001) (31.0% versus 24.0%; RR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.11-1.49; P =.0009) (40.5% versus 30.1%; RR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.19-1.51; P =.0001). The event-free analysis of the 4 groups (diabetic patients not treated with beta-blockers, diabetic patients treated with beta-blockers, nondiabetic patients not treated with beta-blockers, nondiabetic patients treated with beta-blockers) showed that patients treated with beta-blockers had a higher event-free probability than patients not treated with beta-blockers regardless the presence of diabetes (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of post hoc analysis, diabetic patients with chronic heart failure benefit from beta-blockers even if at a lower degree. Thus, there are no justifications to avoid beta-blockers in heart failure patients in the presence of diabetes.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2003

Ergometric score systems after myocardial infarction: prognostic performance of the Duke Treadmill Score, Veterans Administration Medical Center Score, and of a novel score system, GISSI-2 Index, in a cohort of survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were to evaluate the performance of the Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) and the Veteran Affairs Medical Center Score (VAMCS) in predicting 6-month death in GISSI-2 study survivors of acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents, and to develop a simple predictive scoring system from the same database. METHODS: Patients of the GISSI-2 study (n = 6251) performed a maximal symptom-limited exercise test 1 month after myocardial infarction. We calculated for each patient the DTS and the VAMCS. Based on the coefficients of a multivariate analysis of our database, we developed a simple predictive scoring system and performed an internal validation. The prognostic value of each scoring system was assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Six-month mortality rates in the subgroups of each scoring system were as follows: DTS: low risk 0.6%, moderate risk 1.8%, high risk 3.4% (P < or =.0001); VAMCS: low risk 0.6%, moderate risk 1.9%, high risk 4.7% (P < or =.0001); GISSI-2 Index: low risk 0.5%, moderate risk 1.9%, high risk 6.1% (P < or =.0001). The results of multivariate analysis (relative risk [RR] and 95% CI) were as follows: DTS: moderate risk 2.50 (1.47-12.59), high risk 5.13 (3.61-15.55); VAMCS: moderate risk 2.65 (1.53-4.59), high risk 5.97 (3.10-11.49); GISSI-2 Index: moderate risk 3.16 (1.81-5.52), high risk 8.65 (4.36-17.18). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ergometric-derived prognostic score systems in a population of survivors of acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic drugs distinguishes subgroups at different risks of death and allows an appropriate recourse to more costly procedures.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

[Ongoing trials and future prospects].

Rosuvastatin is a new statin with a great number of pharmacological benefits related to the capacity of modifying favorably the lipid profile but also for the selective binding with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, relative hydrophilic properties and selectivity for hepatic cells. Rosuvastatin demonstrated to be more efficacious in reducing LDL cholesterol levels than other statins and to be capable of increasing HDL cholesterol levels. It is well tolerated in a wide range of dosages maintaining its effectiveness. Many trials are ongoing with the aim to evaluate not only the efficacy of rosuvastatin in terms of surrogate endpoints but also in terms of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The usefulness of rosuvastatin will be evaluated also in selective patient populations affected by advanced renal disease or chronic heart failure. Two relevant research projects have been started recently, the GALAXY Programme, designed for evaluating the efficacy of rosuvastatin in atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease and the GISSI-HF trial planned with the aim of testing the efficacy of this statin on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure and investigating the pharmacological effects on the pathophysiological mechanisms of heart failure.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗