PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Aleece Caron

Publications and source records attributed to Aleece Caron.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The outcomes card. Development of a systems-based practice educational tool.

INTRODUCTION: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires competence in systems-based practice (SBP) demonstrating understanding of complex interactions between systems of care and its impact upon care delivery. Patient safety is a useful vehicle to facilitate learning about these interactions. AIM: Develop an educational tool, Outcomes Card (OC), to reinforce core concepts of SBP. SETTING: Urgent Care Center at Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Pilot study of an educational intervention for residents that included patient safety didactic sessions and analysis of 2 self-identified clinical cases using the OC. Residents entered the following information on the OC: case description, type of event (error, near miss, and/or adverse event), error type(s), systems, and system failures. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Two reviewers independently analyzed 98 cards completed during 60 two-week trainee rotations (81.7% return rate). Interrater reliability for error types between residents and physician supervisor and between reviewers was excellent (kappa=0.88 and 0.95, respectively), and for system identification was good (kappa=0.66 and 0.68, respectively). The self-assessment survey (56.6% return rate) suggests that residents improved their knowledge of patient safety and had positive attitudes about the curriculum. DISCUSSION: This pilot study suggests that OCs are feasible and reliable educational tools for enhancing competence in SBP.

Adult↗

Measuring performance improvement: total organizational commitment or clinical specialization.

BACKGROUND: Resources for hospitals are limited when they are faced with multiple publicly reported performance measures as tools to assess quality. The leadership in these organizations may choose to focus on 1 or 2 of these outcomes. An alternative approach is that the leadership may commit resources or create conditions that result in improved quality over a broad range of measures. METHODS: We used aggregated data on mortality, length of stay, and obstetrical outcomes from Greater Cleveland Health Quality Choice data to test these theories. We used Pearson correlation analysis to determine of outcomes were correlated with one another. We used repeated-measures ANOVA to determine if an association existed between outcome and time and outcome and hospital. RESULTS: All of the outcomes across all hospitals demonstrate a trend of overall improvement. Both the Pearson and ANOVA result support the hypothesis for the organization-wide approach to quality improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital that make improvements in one clinical area trend to make improvements in others. Hospitals that produce improvements in limited clinical or administrative areas may not have completely adopted CQI into their culture or may not have yet realized the benefits of their organizational commitments, but use some of the concepts to improve quality outcomes.

Humans↗