PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Aleksandra Mikolajka

Publications and source records attributed to Aleksandra Mikolajka.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Protein solubility: sequence based prediction and experimental verification.

MOTIVATION: Obtaining soluble proteins in sufficient concentrations is a recurring limiting factor in various experimental studies. Solubility is an individual trait of proteins which, under a given set of experimental conditions, is determined by their amino acid sequence. Accurate theoretical prediction of solubility from sequence is instrumental for setting priorities on targets in large-scale proteomics projects. RESULTS: We present a machine-learning approach called PROSO to assess the chance of a protein to be soluble upon heterologous expression in Escherichia coli based on its amino acid composition. The classification algorithm is organized as a two-layered structure in which the output of primary support vector machine (SVM) classifiers serves as input for a secondary Naive Bayes classifier. Experimental progress information from the TargetDB database as well as previously published datasets were used as the source of training data. In comparison with previously published methods our classification algorithm possesses improved discriminatory capacity characterized by the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.434 between predicted and known solubility states and the overall prediction accuracy of 72% (75 and 68% for positive and negative class, respectively). We also provide experimental verification of our predictions using solubility measurements for 31 mutational variants of two different proteins.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Structure of the N-terminal domain of the FOP (FGFR1OP) protein and implications for its dimerization and centrosomal localization.

The fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) oncogene partner, FOP, is a centrosomal protein that is involved in the anchoring of microtubules (MTS) to subcellular structures. The protein was originally discovered as a fusion partner with FGFR1 in oncoproteins that give rise to stem cell myeloproliferative disorders. A subsequent proteomics screen identified FOP as a component of the centrosome. FOP contains a Lis-homology (LisH) motif found in more than 100 eukaryotic proteins. LisH motifs are believed to be involved in microtubule dynamics and organization, cell migration, and chromosome segregation; several of them are associated with genetic diseases. We report here a 1.6A resolution crystal structure of the N-terminal dimerization domain of FOP. The structure comprises an alpha-helical bundle composed of two antiparallel chains, each of them having five alpha-helices. The central part of the dimer contains the LisH domain. We further determined that the FOP LisH domain is part of a longer N-terminal segment that is required, albeit not sufficient, for dimerization and centrosomal localization of FOP.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Molecular determinants for the complex formation between the retinoblastoma protein and LXCXE sequences.

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRb) is a key negative regulator of cell proliferation that is frequently disregulated in human cancer. Many viral oncoproteins (for example, HPV E7 and E1A) are known to bind to the pRb pocket domain via a LXCXE binding motif. There are also some 20 cellular proteins that contain a LXCXE motif and have been reported to associate with the pocket domain of pRb. Using NMR spectroscopy and isothermal calorimetry titration, we show that LXCXE peptides of viral oncoproteins bind strongly to the pocket domain of pRb. Additionally, we show that LXCXE-like peptides of HDAC1 bind to the same site on pRb with a weak (micromolar) and transient association. Systematic substitution of residues other than conserved Leu, Cys, and Glu show that the residues flanking the LXCXE are important for the binding, whereas positively charged amino acids in the XLXCXEXXX sequence significantly weaken the interaction.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

NMR and mass spectrometry studies of putative interactions of cell cycle proteins pRb and CDK6 with cell differentiation proteins MyoD and ID-2.

Cell growth and differentiation require precise coordination of cell cycle and differentiation proteins. This can be achieved by direct interactions between proteins, by indirect interaction in multiprotein complexes, or by modulation of gene expression levels of partner proteins. Contradictory data abound in the literature regarding the binding between some central cell cycle proteins, pRb, and CDK6, with myogenic differentiation promoting, MyoD, and inhibiting, Id-2, factors. We have tested these interactions using pure proteins and in vitro biophysical and biochemical methods, which included mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), the affinity chromatography pull-down assays, and gel filtration chromatography. Using this multimethod approach, we were able to document interactions between pRb and HPV-E7, pRb and SV40 large T antigen, CDK6 and p19, and MyoD and DNA. Using the same methods, we could unambiguously show that there is no direct protein-protein interaction in vitro between the small pocket domain of pRb and the bHLH domain of MyoD, the small pocket domain of pRb and Id-2, and CDK6 and a 15-amino-acid peptide from the C-terminal domain of MyoD. Indirect interactions, through additional binding partners in multiprotein complexes or modulation of gene expression levels of these proteins, are therefore their probable mode of action.

Animals↗