Biomedical subjects

Alessandro Marco De Nunzio

Publications and source records attributed to Alessandro Marco De Nunzio.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Stance- and locomotion-dependent processing of vibration-induced proprioceptive inflow from multiple muscles in humans.

We performed a whole-body mapping study of the effect of unilateral muscle vibration, eliciting spindle Ia firing, on the control of standing and walking in humans. During quiet stance, vibration applied to various muscles of the trunk-neck system and of the lower limb elicited a significant tilt in whole body postural orientation. The direction of vibration-induced postural tilt was consistent with a response compensatory for the illusory lengthening of the stimulated muscles. During walking, trunk-neck muscle vibration induced ample deviations of the locomotor trajectory toward the side opposite to the stimulation site. In contrast, no significant modifications of the locomotor trajectory could be detected when vibrating various muscles of the lower as well as upper limb. The absence of correlation between the effects of muscle vibration during walking and standing dismisses the possibility that vibration-induced postural changes can account for the observed deviations of the locomotor trajectory during walking. We conclude that the dissimilar effects of trunk-neck and lower limb muscle vibration during walking and standing reflect a general sensory-motor plan, whereby muscle Ia input is processed according to both the performed task and the body segment from which the sensory inflow arises.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2006

Time to reconfigure balancing behaviour in man: changing visual condition while riding a continuously moving platform.

While balancing on a continuously antero-posterior (A-P) translating platform (10 cm, 0.5 Hz), the head normally oscillates with the platform without vision but is stabilized in space with vision. We estimated the time to shift from one to the other balancing behaviour when visual condition changed at some stage during the balancing trials. Ten subjects performed randomly 50 balancing trials (each lasting 18 s): 10 trials with eyes open (EO), 10 with eyes closed (EC), 15 in which participants started with EO and closed their eyes (condition EO-->EC) in response to an acoustic signal delivered during the trial, and 15 starting with EC and closing their eyes (EC-->EO) in response to the same signal. No other specific instruction was given. Displacements of malleolus, hip and head, and EMG from leg and axial muscles were recorded. Indexes of amplitude of A-P head and hip oscillation and of amplitude of EMG activity were computed. All variables were larger with EC than EO. On changing visual condition during the trial, the pattern of head and hip movement and of muscle activity turned into that appropriate for the new visual condition in a time-interval ranging from about 1 to 2.5 s. For each subject, the mean latency of the change in the balancing behaviour was assessed by statistical methods. On average, the latencies of kinematics and EMG changes proved to be longer for the EO-->EC condition than vice versa. Further, the latencies of the changes were also measured across all EO-->EC and EC-->EO individual trials. These values were clustered around particular epochs of the first few oscillation cycles following the shift in visual condition. The results show that subjects can rapidly adapt their balancing behaviour to the new visual condition. However, they appear to refrain from releasing the new behaviour were this unfit, and unfastened it at appropriate time in the next platform translation cycle. These findings reveal the temporal and spatial features of the automatic release of the new balancing strategy in response to a shift in the ongoing sensory set, and emphasize the swiftness in the change in balancing behaviour when subjects pass from a non-visual to a visual reference frame.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Trunk muscle proprioceptive input assists steering of locomotion.

During locomotion, human subjects navigate in their environment and choose the direction by means of the internal representation of space that is continuously updated by sensory input. Aim of this study was to assess whether trunk proprioceptive information plays a role in the definition of the reference frame for orientation. Unilateral trunk muscle vibration was applied during locomotion along a straight path in seven subjects. Vibration was administered either from the onset or in the middle of a seven-step task, under eyes-open (EO) or blindfolded condition. The deviation of the walking trajectory was quantified by the distance of the seventh from the first foot print along the medio-lateral axis. Foot angles and stride lengths were computed for all foot-falls. Vibration produced a clear-cut deviation from the straight-ahead direction when delivered in the middle of blindfolded locomotion. With EO the deviation was much smaller. A mild deviation was obtained in blindfolded condition when vibration started at the onset of locomotion. All deviations from the straight-ahead were accompanied by coherent changes in foot orientation on the ground. Trunk proprioception plays a major role in the definition of locomotor trajectory. Trunk input seems to be weighted against vision and whole-body kinematic information.

Analysis of Variance↗