PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Alexander G G Turpie

Publications and source records attributed to Alexander G G Turpie.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Thromboprophylaxis in medical patients: the role of low-molecular-weight heparin.

Many hospitalised medical patients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Consensus statements recommend that such patients be assessed for risk of VTE on admission to hospital and receive thromboprophylaxis where appropriate. However, VTE prophylaxis is not widely used in medical patients. One explanation is that assessing medical patients' risk of VTE is complicated. The risk depends not only on the current illness but also on multiple intrinsic factors, and a variety of strategies for identifying patients who should receive thromboprophylaxis have been suggested. Thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin (UFH) has proved to be effective in reducing the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis and overall mortality in medical patients. Clinical trial evidence, including a meta-analysis, suggests that thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is at least as effective as with UFH, and also has the advantage of fewer bleeding complications. In particular, two large, randomised clinical trials--Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin (MEDENOX) and Prospective Evaluation of Dalteparin Efficacy for Prevention of VTE in Immobilized Patients Trial (PREVENT)--showed that thromboprophylaxis with the LMWHs enoxaparin (40 mg s.c. once daily) or dalteparin (5,000 IU once daily) is more effective than placebo and well tolerated in medical patients. In addition, the Thromboembolism-Prevention in Cardiopulmonary Diseases with Enoxaparin (THE-PRINCE) trial showed that enoxaparin treatment was as effective as UFH. These studies provide solid evidence for the widespread use of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Superiority of fondaparinux over enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery using different efficacy end points.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the relevance of various efficacy end points established for thromboprophylaxis trials, we compared the results of the fondaparinux phase III program in major orthopedic surgery using the original primary efficacy end point with those obtained when the efficacy end points recently suggested by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy and the European Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) were used. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Fondaparinux was compared with enoxaparin in four multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials of major orthopedic surgery. The original primary efficacy end point consisted of a composite of deep-vein thrombosis detected by mandatory bilateral venography, documented symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism up to day 11. The efficacy end point established by the ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy comprises any proximal deep-vein thrombosis, symptomatic proven deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or fatal pulmonary embolism, and that established by the European CPMP comprises any proximal deep-vein thrombosis, symptomatic proven pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either subcutaneous fondaparinux (2.5 mg once daily) starting postoperatively or approved enoxaparin regimens. RESULTS: Using the original end point of the fondaparinux studies, the incidence of venous thromboembolism was 13.7% (371 of 2,703 patients) in the enoxaparin group compared with 6.8% (182 of 2,682 patients) in the fondaparinux group, with a common odds reduction of 55.2% (p = 10(-17); 95% confidence interval, 45.8% to 63.1%) in favor of fondaparinux. The respective incidences of efficacy end points with enoxaparin and fondaparinux were 3.3% and 1.7%, respectively, according to the ACCP definition, and 3.9% and 2.1%, respectively, according to the CPMP definition. The common odds reduction in favor of fondaparinux was 49.6% (p < 0.001) and 48.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fondaparinux was consistently more effective than enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, irrespective of the established composite outcomes used.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Fondaparinux: a Factor Xa inhibitor for antithrombotic therapy.

Fondaparinux (Arixtra) is the first of a new class of antithrombotic compounds - Factor Xa inhibitors. This synthetic pentasaccharide acts by inhibiting Factor Xa selectively. Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in animal models of venous and arterial thromboses and bleeding risk. In humans, its pharmacokinetic profile after subcutaneous injection shows a rapid onset of antithrombotic activity and an elimination half-life that reliably allows once-daily dosing. As the inter-subject variability is limited, no laboratory monitoring of coagulation parameters is needed. The efficacy and safety of fondaparinux have been examined in several Phase II and III clinical trials. So far, the largest programme has involved approximately 9000 patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery of the lower limbs. In the setting of short-term prophylaxis, the efficacy of fondaparinux for preventing venous thromboembolism was significantly superior to that of the low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin (common reduction in risk: 50.6%; p < 0.001). The benefit of extended thromboprophylaxis with fondaparinux in hip fracture surgery patients was also demonstrated. Fondaparinux also showed benefit in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in other surgical and medical settings and in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. Overall, fondaparinux therapy was as well-tolerated as currently available treatments. In conclusion, selective inhibition of Factor Xa is an effective antithrombotic strategy. Fondaparinux may substantially improve the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. Fondaparinux 2.5 mg once-daily s.c. has been approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery. Fondaparinux use in extended prophylaxis (4 weeks) after hip fracture surgery has also been recently approved.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2004

The safety of antithrombotic therapy during pregnancy.

A number of clinical conditions can require the use of antithrombotic drugs during pregnancy. These mainly include prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and fetal complications in high-risk patients, treatment of VTE and prevention of arterial emboli in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. However, there are several problems when using antithrombotic drugs during pregnancy. Warfarin, as well as the other coumarin compounds, crosses the placenta and has the potential to cause both bleeding in the fetus and teratogenicity, therefore its use is not recommended during the first trimester and during the perinatal period. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) do not cross the placenta and are safe for the fetus, but long-term treatment with UFH is problematic because of its inconvenient administration, the need to monitor anticoagulant activity and because of its potential side effects, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis. LMWH is the drug of choice in the prevention and treatment of VTE during pregnancy because of its practical advantages over UFH and because of a lower risk of side effects. Patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses represent a major clinical challenge. Warfarin, the drug of choice in non-pregnant women, can be administered between the 12th and 36th week. Full-dose UFH is recommended in the first trimester and after week 36. The use of LMWH as an alternative to UFH is still a matter of debate, because inadequate data are available.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2004

Correlation of plasma coagulation parameters with thromboprophylaxis, patient characteristics, and outcome in the MEDENOX study.

CONTEXT: Plasma anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities correlate with the dose of low-molecular-weight heparin, and D-dimer and thrombin-antithrombin complexes are markers of procoagulant activity. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between plasma coagulation parameters and patient characteristics, including renal function, thromboprophylaxis, and incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the MEDENOX study population. DESIGN: Controlled, multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-four acutely ill medical patients. INTERVENTIONS: Either 20 or 40 mg of enoxaparin administered subcutaneously or a placebo once daily for 10 (+/-4) days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: VTE and plasma anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities, D-dimer, and thrombin-antithrombin levels in blood collected before prophylaxis was given (day 0) and after the last injection of the study drug. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Anti-Xa activity correlated with the dose of enoxaparin. In patients with mild or moderate renal impairment, there was no significant relationship between anti-Xa activity and the creatinine clearance rate. D-dimer concentrations were lower at day 10 (+/-4) in the 40-mg group, which had a 63% lower VTE incidence, than at day 0. No venographically confirmed thromboses were found in patients with a normal D-dimer concentration (<0.5 microg/mL [0.5 mg/L]). D-dimer levels were higher in patients with VTE than in those without VTE, but no predictive value could be demonstrated for individual patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Future therapeutic directions for factor Xa inhibition in the prophylaxis and treatment of thrombotic disorders.

The targeted mechanism of factor Xa inhibition has been studied extensively, initially as prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the orthopedic surgical setting. Future therapeutic directions for selective factor Xa inhibition in the management of other thrombotic diseases are discussed. Thromboembolic diseases can occur in the venous or arterial sides of the circulatory system. Factor Xa inhibition is a targeted approach to anticoagulation that resulted from significant advances in our understanding of the coagulation cascade. The factor Xa inhibitor fondaparinux has been studied extensively in the orthopedic surgical setting for the prophylaxis of VTE. Current investigations that are under way or completed evaluate the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the management of various thrombotic diseases. The future development of fondaparinux resides primarily in three therapeutic areas: prevention of VTE, treatment of VTE, and treatment of acute coronary syndromes. For the prevention of VTE, fondaparinux has been studied as extended prophylaxis following hip fracture surgery (PENTHIFRA Plus), for use in high-risk abdominal surgical patients (PEGASUS and APOLLO), and for use in medical patients (ARTEMIS). Studies evaluating fondaparinux for the treatment of VTE are part of the large MATISSE clinical program (MATISSE DVT and MATISSE PE). Fondaparinux was investigated in phase 2 studies for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, including acute ST-segment myocardial infarction (PENTALYSE) and unstable angina (PENTUA). Encouraging data from these trials are the basis for phase 3 programs in this area (MICHELANGELO). The orthopedic prophylactic and nonorthopedic clinical programs for fondaparinux in the management of thrombosis support the concept that targeted inhibition of coagulation is an effective advance in antithrombotic therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Perioperative management of patients receiving oral anticoagulants: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of various management strategies for patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs) who need to undergo surgery or invasive procedures are unknown. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and synthesis of the English-language literature examining the perioperative management and outcomes of patients receiving long-term OAC therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-one reports were identified. The quality of the identified reports was generally poor; no randomized controlled trials have been performed and duration of follow-up was typically not stated. Overall, 29 thromboembolic events occurred amont 1868 patients (1.6%; 95% confidence interval, 1.0%-2.1%), including 7 strokes (0.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0%-0.7%). Thromboembolic event rates by management strategy were 0.4% (1 of 237) for continuation of OAC, 0.6% (6 of 996) for discontinuation of OAC therapy without administration of intravenous heparin, 0% (0 of 166) for discontinuation of OAC therapy with administration of intravenous heparin, 0.6% (1 of 180) for discontinuation of OAC therapy with administration of low-molecular-weight heparin, and 8.0% (21 of 263) for unspecified or unclear strategies. Major bleeding while receiving therapeutic OAC was rare for dental procedures (0.2% [4 of 2014]), arthrocentesis (0% [0 of 32]), cataract surgery (0% [0 of 203]), and upper endoscopy or colonoscopy with or without biopsy (0% [0 of 111]). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients can undergo dental procedures, arthrocentesis, cataract surgery, and diagnostic endoscopy without alteration of their regimen. For other invasive and surgical procedures, oral anticoagulation needs to be withheld, and the decision whether to pursue an aggressive strategy of perioperative administration of intravenous heparin or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin should be individualized. The current literature is substantially limited in its ability to help choose an optimal strategy. Further and more rigorous studies are needed to better inform this decision.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients with enoxaparin: a subgroup analysis of the MEDENOX study.

The Medical Patients with Enoxaparin (MEDENOX) trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled study that defined the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely ill, immobilized, general medical patients and the efficacy of the low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin, in preventing thrombosis. We performed a post-hoc analysis to evaluate the effect of 40 mg enoxaparin once daily on MEDENOX patient outcome in different types of acute medical illness (heart failure, respiratory failure, infection, rheumatic disorder and inflammatory bowel disease) and pre-defined risk factors (chronic heart and chronic respiratory failure, age, immobility, previous VTE and cancer). The primary outcome was the occurrence of documented VTE between days 1 and 14. The relative risk reduction [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for VTE comparing 40 mg enoxaparin with placebo in the subgroups were: acute heart failure, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.10-0.84); acute respiratory failure, 0.25 (95% CI, 0.10-0.65); acute infectious disease, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.09-0.81); and acute rheumatic disorder, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.11-2.16). The relative risk reduction for VTE in the pre-defined risk factor subgroups were: chronic heart failure, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08-0.92); chronic respiratory failure, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.10-0.68); age, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.09-0.51); immobility, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.14-1.72); previous VTE, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.15-1.68); and cancer, 0.50 (95%o CI, 0.14-1.72). The beneficial effects of enoxaparin extend to a wide range of acutely ill medical patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Fondaparinux, the first selective factor Xa inhibitor.

Fondaparinux (Arixtra, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Paris, France) is a pentasaccharide that selectively inhibits factor Xa; it is the first of a new class of synthetic antithrombotic agents. Fondaparinux has a linear pharmacokinetic profile allowing once-daily subcutaneous administration. Absence of metabolism, complete bioavailability, and lack of nonspecific binding in plasma contribute to the predictability of its effect. Fondaparinux has been approved for use in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism following orthopedic surgery. In this setting, it was found to reduce VTE risk by more than 50% in comparison with the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin, with an incidence of clinically important bleeding not significantly different from that of standard low molecular weight heparin regimens. Furthermore, 4 weeks of prophylaxis with fondaparinux after hip fracture surgery was shown to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism by 96% compared with 1-week prophylaxis. Finally, the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux in the treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndromes appears promising.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

New pentasaccharides for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism: clinical studies.

Fondaparinux, a selective inhibitor of factor Xa, is the first of a new class of antithrombotic compounds, the synthetic pentasaccharides. Its benefit-to-risk ratio in preventing venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery was investigated in four randomized, double-blind international phase III trials in patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture, elective hip replacement, and major knee surgery. Compared to enoxaparin, fondaparinux administered at a subcutaneous dose of 2.5 mg qd, starting postoperatively, reduced the overall incidence of venous thromboembolism up to day 11 by 55.2% (p < 0.001). The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was low and did not differ between the two groups. Overall, fondaparinux achieved optimal efficacy and safety when treatment was initiated > or =6 h after the surgical procedure. In a further randomized double-blind trial, 4 weeks of prophylaxis with fondaparinux after hip fracture surgery reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism by 96% as compared to 1 week of prophylaxis, and was well tolerated. Fondaparinux has been recently approved for use in thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery. The clinical development of fondaparinux in other thromboprophylactic indications is ongoing.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2002

Fondaparinux vs enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis of 4 randomized double-blind studies.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgery remains a condition at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Fondaparinux, the first of a new class of synthetic selective factor Xa inhibitors, may further reduce this risk compared with currently available thromboprophylactic treatments. METHODS: A meta-analysis of 4 multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials in patients undergoing elective hip replacement, elective major knee surgery, and surgery for hip fracture (N = 7344) was performed to determine whether a subcutaneous 2.5-mg, once-daily regimen of fondaparinux sodium starting 6 hours after surgery was more effective and as safe as approved enoxaparin regimens in preventing VTE. The primary efficacy outcome was VTE up to day 11, defined as deep vein thrombosis detected by mandatory bilateral venography or documented symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: Fondaparinux significantly reduced the incidence of VTE by day 11 (182 [6.8%] of 2682 patients) compared with enoxaparin (371 [13.7%] of 2703 patients), with a common odds reduction of 55.2% (95% confidence interval, 45.8% to 63.1%; P<.001); this beneficial effect was consistent across all types of surgery and all subgroups. Although major bleeding occurred more frequently in the fondaparinux-treated group (P =.008), the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (leading to death or reoperation or occurring in a critical organ) did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, 2.5 mg of fondaparinux sodium once daily, starting 6 hours postoperatively, showed a major benefit over enoxaparin, achieving an overall risk reduction of VTE greater than 50% without increasing the risk of clinically relevant bleeding.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Postoperative fondaparinux versus postoperative enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip-replacement surgery: a randomised double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Elective hip-replacement surgery carries significant risk of venous thromboembolism, despite use of thromboprophylaxis. We aimed to see whether the pentasaccharide fondaparinux, the first drug of a new class of synthetic antithrombotic agents, could reduce this risk to a greater extent than other available treatments. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 2275 consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who were undergoing elective hip-replacement surgery to receive postoperative subcutaneous injections of either 2.5 mg fondaparinux once daily or 30 mg enoxaparin twice daily. The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism to day 11. The main safety outcomes were bleeding and death. Patients were followed up for 6 weeks. FINDINGS: We assessed venous thromboembolism to day 11 in 1584 (70%) of 2275 patients. By day 11, venous thromboembolisms were recorded in 48 (6%) of 787 patients on fondaparinux and in 66 (8%) of 797 patients on enoxaparin. The relative reduction in risk was 26.3% (95% CI -10.8 to 52.8, p=0.099). The two groups did not differ in the number of patients who died or in the number who had clinically relevant bleeding. INTERPRETATION: In patients undergoing elective hip-replacement surgery, 2.5 mg fondaparinux once daily was not significantly more effective than 30 mg enoxaparin twice daily in reducing risk of venous thromboembolism. However, the lower risk recorded with fondaparinux than enoxaparin was clinically important, with no increase in clinically relevant bleeding.

Adult↗