Biomedical subjects

Alexander Grunewald

Publications and source records attributed to Alexander Grunewald.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

The integration of multiple stimulus features by V1 neurons.

We investigated how V1 neurons integrate two stimulus features by presenting stimuli from a stimulus set made up of all combinations of eight different directions of motion and nine binocular disparities. We investigated the occurrence and shape of the resulting joint tuning function. Among V1 neurons, approximately 80% were jointly tuned for disparity with orientation or direction. The joint tuning function of all jointly tuned neurons was separable into distinct tuning for disparity on the one hand, and orientation or direction tuning on the other. The degree of separability and the mutual information between the stimulus and the firing rates were strongly correlated. The mutual information of jointly tuned neurons when both features were decoded together was highly correlated with the mutual information when the two features were decoded separately, and the information was then summed. Jointly tuned neurons were just as good at representing information about single features as neurons tuned for only a single feature. The tuning properties of most jointly tuned neurons did not dynamically evolve over time, nor did jointly tuned neurons respond earlier than neurons tuned for only a single feature. The response selectivity of V1 neurons is low and decreases the information that a neuron represents about a stimulus. Together these results suggest that distinct stimulus features are integrated very early in visual processing. Furthermore, V1 generates a distributed representation through low response selectivity that avoids the curse of dimensionality by using separable joint tuning functions.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Motion repulsion is monocular.

Motion repulsion is the illusory enlargement of the angle between objects moving in two different directions of motion. Previous work suggests that motion repulsion occurs under dichoptic conditions, and therefore is binocular. In reference repulsion the direction of motion is misperceived even if only a single direction of motion is presented. In an experiment I show that repulsion under dichoptic conditions is correlated with reference repulsion, but not with binocular motion repulsion. This suggests that motion repulsion proper, which occurs over and beyond reference repulsion, does not occur under dichoptic conditions, implying that motion repulsion is monocular.

Humans↗

PubMed2002

Neural correlates of structure-from-motion perception in macaque V1 and MT.

Structure-from-motion (SFM) is the perception of three-dimensional shape from motion cues. We used a bistable SFM stimulus, which can be perceived in one of two different ways, to study how neural activity in cortical areas V1 and MT is related to SFM perception. Monkeys performed a depth-order task, where they indicated in which direction the front surface of a rotating SFM cylinder display was moving. To prevent contamination of the neural data because of eye position effects, all experiments with significant effects of radius, vergence, and velocity were excluded. As expected, the activity of approximately 50% of neurons in V1 and approximately 80% of neurons in MT is affected by the stimulus. Furthermore, the activity of 20% of neurons in area V1 is modulated with the percept. This proportion is higher in MT, where the activity of >60% of neurons is modulated with the percept. In both areas, this perceptual modulation occurs only in neurons with activity that is also affected by the stimulus. The perceptual modulation is not correlated with neural tuning properties in area V1, but it is in area MT. Together, these results suggest that V1 is not directly involved in the generation of the SFM percept, whereas MT is. The perceptual modulation in V1 may be attributable to top-down feedback from MT.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2002

Temporal dynamics of binocular disparity processing with corticogeniculate interactions.

A neural model is developed to probe how corticogeniculate feedback may contribute to the dynamics of binocular vision. Feedforward and feedback interactions among retinal, lateral geniculate, and cortical simple and complex cells are used to simulate psychophysical and neurobiological data concerning the dynamics of binocular disparity processing, including correct registration of disparity in response to dynamically changing stimuli, binocular summation of weak stimuli, and fusion of anticorrelated stimuli when they are delayed, but not when they are simultaneous. The model exploits dynamic rebounds between opponent ON and OFF cells that are due to imbalances in habituative transmitter gates. It shows how corticogeniculate feedback can carry out a top-down matching process that inhibits incorrect disparity responses and reduces persistence of previously correct responses to dynamically changing displays.

Computer Simulation↗