Biomedical subjects

Alexander Shvetsov

Publications and source records attributed to Alexander Shvetsov.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Hydrophobic loop dynamics and actin filament stability.

It has been postulated that the hydrophobic loop of actin (residues 262-274) swings out and inserts into the opposite strand in the filament, stabilizing the filament structure. Here, we analyzed the hydrophobic loop dynamics utilizing four mutants that have cysteine residues introduced at a single location along the yeast actin loop. Lateral, copper-catalyzed disulfide cross-linking of the mutant cysteine residues to the native C374 in the neighboring strand within the filament was fastest for S265C, followed by V266C, L267C, and then L269C. Site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) studies revealed that C265 lies closest to C374 within the filament, followed by C266, C267, and then C269. These results are not predicted by the Holmes extended loop model of F-actin. Furthermore, we find that disulfide cross-linking destroys L267C and L269C filaments; only small filaments are observed via electron microscopy. Conversely, phalloidin protects the L267C and L269C filaments and inhibits their disulfide cross-linking. Combined, our data indicate that, in solution, the loop resides predominantly in a "parked" position within the filament but is able to dynamically populate other conformational states which stabilize or destabilize the filament. Such states may be exploited within a cell by filament-stabilizing and -destabilizing factors.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2006

Conformational dynamics of loop 262-274 in G- and F-actin.

According to the original Holmes model of F-actin structure, the hydrophobic loop 262-274 stabilizes the actin filament by inserting into a pocket formed at the interface between two protomers on the opposing strand. Using a yeast actin triple mutant, L180C/L269C/C374A [(LC)(2)CA], we showed previously that locking the hydrophobic loop to the G-actin surface by a disulfide bridge prevents filament formation. We report here that the hydrophobic loop is mobile in F- as well as in G-actin, fluctuating between the extended and parked conformations. Copper-catalyzed, brief air oxidation of (LC)(2)CA F-actin on electron microscopy grids resulted in the severing of thin filaments and their conversion to amorphous aggregates. Disulfide, bis(methanethiosulfonate) (MTS), and dibromobimane (DBB) cross-linking reactions proceeded in solution at a faster rate with G- than with F-actin. Cross-linking of C180 to C269 by DBB (4.4 A) in either G- or F-actin resulted in shorter and less stable filaments. The cross-linking with a longer MTS-6 reagent (9.6 A) did not impair actin polymerization or filament structure. Myosin subfragment 1 (S1) and tropomyosin inhibited the disulfide cross-linking of phalloidin-stabilized F-actin. Electron paramagnetic resonance measurements with nitroxide spin-labeled actin revealed strong spin-spin coupling and a similar mean interspin distance ( approximately 10 A) in G- and in F-actin, with a broader distance distribution in G-actin. These results show loop 262-274 fluctuations in G- and F-actin and correlate loop dynamics with actin filament formation and stability.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2005

Synthesis and biological evaluation of 6/7-exo-methyl-3beta-(4-iodo)phenyltropane-2beta-carboxylic acid methyl esters.

6beta/7beta-Methyl-2-methoxycarbonyltropinones (3a, 3b) were synthesized and used as starting materials in the synthesis of 6beta/7beta-methyl-2beta-methoxycarbonyl-3beta-phenyltropanes (6a, 6b), 6beta/7beta-methyl-2beta-methoxycarbonyl-3beta-(4-iodo)phenyltropanes (7a, 7b) and 6beta-methyl-2beta-methoxycarbonyl-3beta-(4-iodo)phenylnortropane (8). The effect of 6/7-groups was evaluated by in vitro receptor binding to dopamine (DAT), serotonin (SERT) and norepinephrine (NET) transporters. Introduction of a methyl group at the 6- or 7-position diminished the overall affinity for the transporters, though mostly to NET. In vivo locomotor tests were performed in mice for compounds 7a and 8. Compound 8 had no apparent effect on locomotor activity. Compound 7a increased locomotion in a wide dose range, but was much less potent than a reference compound, 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-(4-iodo)phenyl-tropane (beta-CIT).

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Actin-destabilizing factors disrupt filaments by means of a time reversal of polymerization.

Actin, one of the most highly conserved and abundant eukaryotic proteins, is constantly being polymerized and depolymerized within cells as part of cellular motility, tissue formation and repair, and embryonic development. Many proteins exist that bind to monomeric or filamentous (F) forms of actin to regulate the polymerization state. It has become increasingly apparent that the ability of different proteins to bind to and regulate actin filament dynamics depends on the ability of the filament to exist in altered conformations. Yet, little is known about how these conformational changes occur at the molecular level. We have destabilized F-actin filaments by forming a disulfide that locks the "hydrophobic plug" to the body of the actin subunit or by altering the C terminus of actin with a tetramethylrhodamine label. We also examined F-actin filaments at short times after the initiation of polymerization. In all three cases, a substantial fraction of protomers can be found in a "tilted" state that also is induced by actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin proteins. These observations suggest that F-actin filaments are annealed over time into a stable filament and that actin-depolymerizing proteins can effect a time reversal of polymerization.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2004

Cofilin (ADF) affects lateral contacts in F-actin.

The effect of yeast cofilin on lateral contacts between protomers of yeast and skeletal muscle actin filaments was examined in solution. These contacts are presumably stabilized by the interactions of loop 262-274 of one protomer with two other protomers on the opposite strand in F-actin. Cofilin inhibited several-fold the rate of interstrand disulfide cross-linking between Cys265 and Cys374 in yeast S265C mutant F-actin, but enhanced excimer formation between pyrene probes attached to these cysteine residues. The possibility that these effects are due to a translocation of the C terminus of actin by cofilin was ruled out by measurements of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from tryptophan residues and ATP to acceptor probes at Cys374. Such measurements did not reveal cofilin-induced changes in FRET efficiency, suggesting that changes in Cys265-Cys374 cross-linking and excimer formation stem from the perturbation of loop 262-274 by cofilin. Changes in lateral interactions in F-actin were indicated also by the cofilin-induced partial release of rhodamine phalloidin. Disulfide cross-linking of S265C yeast F-actin inhibited strongly and reversibly the release of rhodamine phalloidin by cofilin. Overall, this study provides solution evidence for the weakening of lateral interactions in F-actin by cofilin.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

PubMed2003

ADF/cofilin use an intrinsic mode of F-actin instability to disrupt actin filaments.

Proteins in the ADF/cofilin (AC) family are essential for rapid rearrangements of cellular actin structures. They have been shown to be active in both the severing and depolymerization of actin filaments in vitro, but the detailed mechanism of action is not known. Under in vitro conditions, subunits in the actin filament can treadmill; with the hydrolysis of ATP driving the addition of subunits at one end of the filament and loss of subunits from the opposite end. We have used electron microscopy and image analysis to show that AC molecules effectively disrupt one of the longitudinal contacts between protomers within one helical strand of F-actin. We show that in the absence of any AC proteins, this same longitudinal contact between actin protomers is disrupted at the depolymerizing (pointed) end of actin filaments but is prominent at the polymerizing (barbed) end. We suggest that AC proteins use an intrinsic mechanism of F-actin's internal instability to depolymerize/sever actin filaments in the cell.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

PubMed2002

Locking the hydrophobic loop 262-274 to G-actin surface by a disulfide bridge prevents filament formation.

Models of F-actin structure predict the importance of hydrophobic loop 262-274 at the interface of subdomains 3 and 4 to interstrand interactions in filaments. If this premise is correct, prevention of the loop conformational change--its swinging motion--should abort filament formation. To test this hypothesis, we used site-directed mutagenesis to create yeast actin triple mutant (LC)2CA (L180C/L269C/C374A). This mutation places two cysteine residues in positions potentially enabling the locking of loop 262-274 to the monomer surface via disulfide formation. Exposure of the purified mutant to oxidation catalysts resulted in an increased electrophoretic mobility of actin on SDS PAGE and a loss of two cysteines by DTNB titrations, consistent with disulfide formation. The polymerization of un-cross-linked mutant actin by MgCl2 was inhibited strongly but could be restored to wild type actin levels by phalloidin and improved greatly through copolymerization with the wild-type actin. Light scattering measurements revealed nonspecific aggregation of the cross-linked actin under the same conditions. Electron microscopy confirmed the absence of filaments and the presence of amorphous aggregates in the cross-linked actin samples. Reduction of the disulfide bond by DTT restored normal actin polymerization in the presence of MgCl2 and phalloidin. These observations provide strong experimental support for a critical role of the hydrophobic loop 262-274 in the polymerization of actin into filaments.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗