Biomedical subjects

Alexander Souvorov

Publications and source records attributed to Alexander Souvorov.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Genomic BLAST: custom-defined virtual databases for complete and unfinished genomes.

BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) searches against DNA and protein sequence databases have become an indispensable tool for biomedical research. The proliferation of the genome sequencing projects is steadily increasing the fraction of genome-derived sequences in the public databases and their importance as a public resource. We report here the availability of Genomic BLAST, a novel graphical tool for simplifying BLAST searches against complete and unfinished genome sequences. This tool allows the user to compare the query sequence against a virtual database of DNA and/or protein sequences from a selected group of organisms with finished or unfinished genomes. The organisms for such a database can be selected using either a graphic taxonomy-based tree or an alphabetical list of organism-specific sequences. The first option is designed to help explore the evolutionary relationships among organisms within a certain taxonomy group when performing BLAST searches. The use of an alphabetical list allows the user to perform a more elaborate set of selections, assembling any given number of organism-specific databases from unfinished or complete genomes. This tool, available at the NCBI web site http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/Entrez/genom_table_cgi, currently provides access to over 170 bacterial and archaeal genomes and over 40 eukaryotic genomes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length.

BACKGROUND: In general, the length of a protein sequence is determined by its function and the wide variance in the lengths of an organism's proteins reflects the diversity of specific functional roles for these proteins. However, additional evolutionary forces that affect the length of a protein may be revealed by studying the length distributions of proteins evolving under weaker functional constraints. RESULTS: We performed sequence comparisons to distinguish highly conserved and poorly conserved proteins from the bacterium Escherichia coli, the archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus, and the eukaryotes Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and Homo sapiens. For all organisms studied, the conserved and nonconserved proteins have strikingly different length distributions. The conserved proteins are, on average, longer than the poorly conserved ones, and the length distributions for the poorly conserved proteins have a relatively narrow peak, in contrast to the conserved proteins whose lengths spread over a wider range of values. For the two prokaryotes studied, the poorly conserved proteins approximate the minimal length distribution expected for a diverse range of structural folds. CONCLUSIONS: There is a relationship between protein conservation and sequence length. For all the organisms studied, there seems to be a significant evolutionary trend favoring shorter proteins in the absence of other, more specific functional constraints.

Animals↗