Multimodal analgesia for chest tube removal after cardiac surgery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Alexandre Yazigi.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Combined coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are performed in an attempt to reduce the risk of postoperative stroke after CABG surgery in patients with significant or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The choice between regional and general anesthesia for CEA is still under debate. Regional anesthesia offers an excellent monitoring technique of the neurologic status of the awake patient during carotid clamping. In an attempt to improve monitoring of the neurologic status and avoid the use of temporary shunting in patients undergoing the combined procedure, a different approach is described combining regional anesthesia for CEA followed immediately by general anesthesia for CABG surgery. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized case series. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients scheduled for combined CEA and CABG surgery underwent a "staged" anesthetic approach from January to December 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Pulmonary, femoral artery, and urinary catheters were inserted under local anesthesia. A deep cervical plexus block was then performed and supplemented by a superficial cervical plexus block. The patient was draped for standard combined CEA and CABG surgery. CEA was then performed using standard techniques. Without altering the surgical field, general anesthesia was given and endotracheal intubation performed following the successful CEA. Coronary revascularization was then completed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CEA and CABG surgery were completed successfully in all patients. There was no need for conversion from local to general anesthesia. Endotracheal intubation was easily performed in all patients. There was no hospital mortality in this series. No neurologic events were observed during the CEA. A reversible ischemic stroke, ipsilateral to the CEA, occurred postoperatively on awakening from CABG surgery in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: This staged anesthetic approach for combined CABG and CEA surgery is an alternative in this complex subset of patients.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the characteristics and learning impact of role models as perceived by interns and residents in an Arabic Middle Eastern country, Lebanon. METHODS: A structured and self-administered questionnaire was sent to the cohort of interns (n = 34) and residents (n = 66) training in a Lebanese university hospital. The questionnaire contained pre-specified items related to professional and personal characteristics of positive and negative role models, as well as to the impact of these models on professional learning and career choices. Responders were asked to recognise and to rank-order the items associated to their identified models. RESULTS: A total of 88 responders (97%) had positive role models and 87 responders (96%) had negative role models in their current training programme. Characteristics identified most frequently and ranked most highly by the trainees were related to clinical skills in positive role models and to inadequate humanistic and collaborative attitudes in negative models. Role modelling had a positive impact on the achievement of clinical skills for 55% of the responders, and on the acquisition of humanistic and collaborative attitudes for 30% of them. Thirty-eight per cent of the trainees were influenced by their role models in the choice of their specialities. Responses were generally comparable between levels of training and between medical and surgical specialities. CONCLUSION: Clinical teachers, practising in a non-occidental cultural and medical learning environment, are considered very frequently as role models by their interns and residents and have a positive impact on their professional learning and career choices. Strategies to reinforce role modelling are needed in Lebanon, in order to pass a broad spectrum of professional values to our students.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation and process of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in an intensive care unit. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in the medical intensive care unit of a university hospital in Lebanon. PATIENTS: Forty-five consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU for a 1-year period and for whom a decision to withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment was made. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients were followed up until their death. Data regarding all aspects of the implementation and the process of withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment were recorded by a senior staff nurse. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment was applied to 9.6% of all admitted patients to ICU. Therapies were withheld in 38% and were withdrawn in 7% of patients who died. Futility of care and poor quality of life were the two most important factors supporting these decisions. The nursing staff was not involved in 26% of the decisions to limit care. Families were not implicated in 21% of the cases. Decisions were not notified in the patients' medical record in 23% of the cases. Sixty-three percent of patients did not have a sedative or an analgesic to treat discomfort during end-of-life care. CONCLUSIONS: Life-sustaining treatment were frequently withheld or withdrawn from adult patients in the Lebanese ICU. Cultural differences and the lack of guidelines and official statements could explain the ethical limitations of the decision-making process recorded in this study.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of intraoperative myocardial ischemia in lower extremity vascular surgery with general anesthesia vs regional anesthesia via combined sciatic and femoral nerve blocks. DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized study. SETTING: This study was set at an academic medical center. PATIENTS: The study included 50 patients scheduled for elective lower extremity vascular surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in group 1 received balanced general anesthesia, whereas patients in group 2 received combined sciatic and femoral nerve blocks with 40 mL of 0.375% bupivacaine. Monitoring included a radial artery catheter and multilead, dual-channel electrocardiogram with computerized ST-segment analysis. Blood pressure and heart rate variations were maintained within 10% of preoperative values by adjusting anesthetic depth, fluid replacement, and vasoactive drug dosages. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: An ST-segment depression of at least 1 mm or elevation of at least 2 mm lasting for more than 1 minute was considered a significant episode of myocardial ischemia. Intraoperative hemodynamic data and the frequency of significant ST-segment change episodes were recorded. The number of patients with ischemic episodes and the total number of these episodes were lower in group 2 than in group 1 (1 patient vs 7 patients, P = 0.02; and 2 vs 14 episodes, P = 0.04). No significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 regarding systolic or diastolic arterial pressures, or heart rate. CONCLUSION: Compared with general anesthesia, combined sciatic and femoral nerve blocks reduce the frequency of intraoperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing lower extremity vascular surgery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of ondansetron for prevention of pruritus, nausea and vomiting after cesarean delivery with intrathecal sufentanil-morphine. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Referral center, institutional practice. PATIENTS: 100 nonbreastfeeding women undergoing elective cesarean delivery with sufentanil-morphine-bupivacaine anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: After the umbilical cord was clamped, patients in Group 1 received ondansetron 8 mg intravenously (IV) and patients in Group 2 received placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency and severity of postoperative (24-hour) pruritus, nausea and vomiting, surgical pain, and side effects related to ondansetron were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: In the ondansetron group, 38 patients had pruritus (16 mild and 22 severe) and 9 patients had nausea and vomiting (5 mild and 4 severe). In the placebo group, 41 patients had pruritus (21 mild and 20 severe) and 29 patients had nausea and vomiting (9 mild and 15 severe). The frequency and severity of the nausea and vomiting episodes were significantly reduced in the ondansetron group. Pain scores were comparable between groups. No side effects related to ondansetron were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic IV ondansetron 8 mg is safe and effective in reducing the frequency and the severity of nausea and vomiting, but not pruritus, following cesarean delivery with intrathecal sufentanil-morphine.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prophylactic effect of postoperative oral amiodarone on the incidence and severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who had coronary artery surgery (n = 200). INTERVENTIONS: Patients in group 1 (n = 100) received oral amiodarone, 15 mg/kg, 4 hours after arrival in the intensive care unit, followed by 7 mg/kg/d until hospital discharge. Patients in group 2 (n = 100) received placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Incidence, duration, and recurrence of new episodes of AF and maximal ventricular rate response were recorded from day 0 until hospital discharge. Side effects related to amiodarone and complications induced by new-onset AF were noted. The incidence of new-onset AF (12% v 25%) and maximal ventricular rate response (120 +/- 21 beats/min v 135 +/- 24 beats/min) were significantly lower in the amiodarone group. There were no side effects related to the administration of amiodarone. The incidence of complications induced by AF was comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative prophylactic oral amiodarone after coronary artery surgery is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of new-onset AF and maximal ventricular rate response.
PURPOSE: To compare in a prospective randomized trial the effects of thoracic epidural infusions of fentanyl (F) and bupivacaine (B) to intrathecal morphine (M) and sufentanil (S) on analgesia and respiratory function following thoracotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 55 patients undergoing an elective postero-lateral thoracotomy were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I (n = 27): received intrathecal S (5 microg) and M (0.5 mg) one hour before surgery. Group II (n = 28) received, after induction of anesthesia, an initial dose of 10 to 20 mL of a solution of B 0.25% and F 2 microg.mL(-1) via an epidural thoracic catheter previously inserted between T5 and T8. The same solution was infused during surgery. After surgery, patients received a continuous infusion of B 0.1% and F 2 microg.mL(-1) with a bolus every 15 min if needed. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), SpO(2), PaCO(2), respiratory rate (RR), forced expiratory volume in one second, peak expiratory flow rate and forced vital capacity were recorded at different times from the day before surgery till T48 = 48 hr after surgery. Subjective pain was assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring at rest and during cough. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted between both groups concerning VAS, HR, MAP, SpO(2), PaCO(2) and RR. Variations of the respiratory function tests were identical in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that intrathecal M and S offer analgesia comparable to thoracic epidural infusion of B and F.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.