Change from oral poliovirus vaccine to inactivated poliovirus vaccine.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Child↗
Biomedical subjects
Alfonso Mele
Publications and source records attributed to Alfonso Mele.
Clinicobiological features and outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia occurring as a second tumor: the GIMEMA experience.
We analyzed the clinicobiological features and treatment outcome of a series of acute promyelocytic leukemias (APLs) occurring as a second tumor (APL-st's, n = 51) and compared these with a large group of de novo APL cases (n = 641), both observed by the Italian cooperative group GIMEMA. In the APL-st group, 37 patients had received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for their primary malignancy (PM), while 14 had been treated by surgery alone. Compared with de novo APL patients, APL-st patients were characterized by a predominance of females (P <.003), higher median age (P <.05), and worse performance status (P <.005). The median time elapsed between PM and APL-st was 36 months, with a longer latency for patients treated with surgery alone. No significant differences were found with regard to karyotypic lesions or type of promyelocytic leukemia/retinoic acid receptor alpha (PML/RARalpha) fusion in the 2 cohorts. A high prevalence of PMs of the reproductive system was observed among the female APL-st population (24 [71%] of 34 patients in this group had suffered from breast, uterine, or ovarian cancer). Thirty-one APL-st and 641 de novo APL patients received homogeneous APL therapy according to the all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and idarubicin regimen (the AIDA regimen). The complete remission (CR), 4-year event-free survival (EFS), and 4-year overall survival (OS) rates were 97% and 93%, 65% and 68%, and 85% and 78% in the APL-st and de novo APL groups, respectively. In spite of important clinical differences (older age and poorer performance status), the APL-st group responded as well as the de novo APL group to upfront ATRA plus chemotherapy, probably reflecting genetic similarity.
Adolescent↗
Progress in prevention and control of hepatitis B: a congress reviewing the first ten years since the introduction of mass vaccination in Italy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adolescent↗
Hepatitis B in Italy: where we are ten years after the introduction of mass vaccination.
In Italy, a program of vaccination against hepatitis B targeted at the immunisation of persons at high risk began in 1983. In 1991, vaccination became mandatory for all newborns and adolescents. Since then, the vaccine has been given to more than 10 million children, with an outstanding record of safety and efficacy. The coverage rate is globally around 94%, with differences between the Northern and Southern regions, with the latter having the lower acceptance rate. According to the National Surveillance System (SEIEVA), the incidence of acute hepatitis B per 10(5) inhabitants declined from 5.4 in 1990 to 2 in 2000. The reduction was even greater among 15-24-year-old individuals, where the incidence rate per 10(5) decreased from 17.3 to 2 in the same period. In parallel with the decline of hepatitis B, hepatitis delta has also declined significantly. Catch-up immunisation of unvaccinated adolescents, as well as an effort to improve the vaccination coverage rate in high-risk groups, are required to ameliorate the efficacy of the vaccination campaign. Routine administration of booster doses of vaccine is not considered necessary to sustain immunity in immunocompetent persons.
Adolescent↗
Long-term immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccination and policy for booster: an Italian multicentre study.
BACKGROUND: Universal anti-hepatitis-B vaccination of infants and adolescents was implemented in Italy in 1991. We undertook a multicentre study in previously vaccinated individuals to assess the duration of immunity and need for booster, over 10 years after vaccination. METHODS: In 1212 children and 446 Italian Air Force recruits vaccinated as infants and adolescents, respectively, we measured the concentrations of antibodies to hepatitis-B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and the presence of antibodies to hepatitis-B core antigen (anti-HBc) at enrollment; postimmunisation values were not available. Individuals positive for anti-HBc were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B viral DNA. Individuals with anti-HBs concentrations at 10 IU/L or more were regarded as protected; those with antibody less than 10 IU/L were given a booster dose and retested 2 weeks later. Individuals showing postbooster anti-HBs concentrations of less than 10 IU/L were offered two additional vaccine doses and retested 1 month after the third dose. FINDINGS: Protective anti-HBs concentrations were retained in 779 (64%, 95% CI 61.6-67) children and 398 (89%, 86.4-92.1) recruits. We recorded antibody amounts of less than 10 IU/L in 433 children (36%, 33-38.4) and 48 (11%, 7.9-13.6) recruits. One child and four recruits were positive for anti-HBc, but negative for HBsAg and hepatitis B viral DNA. Antibody concentrations were higher in recruits than in children (geometric mean titre 234.8 IU/L vs 32.1 IU/L, p=0.0001). 332 (97%) of 342 children and 46 (96%) of 48 recruits who received a booster showed an anamnestic response, whereas ten (3%) children and two (4%) recruits remained negative for anti-HBs or had antibody concentrations of less than 10 IU/L. Prebooster and postbooster antibody titres were strongly correlated with each other in both groups. All individuals given two additional vaccine doses (eight children and two recruits) showed anti-HBs amounts of more than 10 IU/L at 1 month after vaccination. INTERPRETATION: Strong immunological memory persists more than 10 years after immunisation of infants and adolescents with a primary course of vaccination. Booster doses of vaccine do not seem necessary to ensure long-term protection.
Adult↗
Quality of life assessment in chronic liver disease.
The evaluation of quality of life in chronic liver disease is a crucial outcome measure of all interventions on patients. This paper presents a variety of clinical situations in which it is essential to assess quality of life: in fact, chronic liver disease ranges from asymptomatic B or C hepatitis to liver failure and transplantation. It also points out some methodological pitfalls: in particular, the choice of validated questionnaires, the use of generic instruments versus specific ones, timing of administration, choice of cross-sectional versus longitudinal studies, control of bias (selection and attrition) and other relevant methodological issues.
Chronic Disease↗