PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Allan D Kirk

Publications and source records attributed to Allan D Kirk.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Induction immunosuppression.

Induction immunosuppression is intense, prophylactic therapy used at the time of transplantation based on the empiric observation that more powerful immunosuppression is required to prevent acute rejection early. In the past decade, there has been a growing trend towards the use of specialized agents such as antibody therapies for induction. In general, these agents have been shown to reduce the rate of acute rejection. However, their use has not been clearly shown to improve long-term transplant outcomes. This overview will review the biological basis for induction immunosuppression and the mechanisms of action of those specialized induction agents currently in clinical use. Clinical trials investigating induction regimens will be evaluated, and an individualized approach to the use of induction immunosuppressants will be presented.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Platelet-derived or soluble CD154 induces vascularized allograft rejection independent of cell-bound CD154.

CD154 is a cell surface molecule expressed on activated T cells that binds to CD40, an activating molecule on APCs. Its blockade has been shown to prevent allograft rejection, presumably by interrupting interactions between T cells and APCs. It is known that activated human platelets express and shed CD154 and can induce APC activation and other immune processes in vitro. Here we show that platelet-derived CD154 is sufficient to initiate cardiac allograft rejection independent of any cellular source of this molecule. CD154-KO mice reject cardiac allografts after receiving CD154-expressing human platelets or recombinant CD154 (rCD154) trimers. Treatment with the human CD154-specific mAb 5c8 specifically prevents this induced rejection. Soluble trimers, but not platelets, induce rejection when infused temporally remote from the surgical procedure, suggesting that surgically induced platelet activation is required for CD154 release. Allograft rejection can thus be instigated by activated platelets through CD154. These data implicate platelets as a proximal component of acquired alloimmunity, providing insight into the mechanisms of allograft rejection and the physiological response to trauma in general.

Animals↗

Composite tissue allotransplantation: classification of clinical acute skin rejection.

BACKGROUND: Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is a recently introduced option for limb replacement and reconstruction of other nonreconstructible tissue defects. As with recipients of other allotransplants, CTA recipients can experience rejection episodes that are presumed to be mediated by immune mechanisms similar to those affecting solid organ grafts. However, a systematic examination of this process has not been performed, and there are no standardized criteria for the description of severity or type of rejection. METHODS: We collected biopsies from human limb allografts and abdominal walls in various stages of rejection for histological and immunohistochemical analysis to formulate a CTA rejection scheme. Biopsies were ranked by severity and reproducibility of the system was tested using a second set of biopsies. Tissue slides were examined blindly by three pathologists and the nonparametric Kendall coefficient of concordance (W) was used to assess the amount of agreement among the pathologists in their classification grades. RESULTS: Rejection initially appeared as a perivascular infiltrate progressing to involve the dermis. Arteritis was observed only in the medium to large size arteries of the subcutis. Myositis was seen occasionally. Perineural involvement without frank neuritis was present in advanced rejection. The infiltrate was predominantly CD4+ in milder cases and CD8+ in advanced cases. HLA-DR was minimally expressed in keratinocytes even in severe rejection. Kendall's W was 0.9375 (p< or =0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this survey, we proposed an initial classification system for acute rejection in the skin of a CTA and demonstrated that this system is easily reproduced by independent pathologists.

Antigens, Surface↗

Transplant tolerance: converging on a moving target.

Enthusiasm for tolerance induction has been tempered by the realization that it is more difficult to achieve clinically than was predicted by experimental models. Unlike the view that the immune response to an allograft is ordered and thus predictable, we view alloimmunity as highly plastic and molded by previous and ongoing experiences with allogeneic and environmental antigens. This implies that an individual's response to an allograft changes over time and that responses of seemingly similar individuals may vary greatly. This variability highlights the need to develop assays for monitoring the recipient immune response as well as individualized methods for therapeutic immune modulation.

Animals↗

Human monocytes as intermediaries between allogeneic endothelial cells and allospecific T cells: a role for direct scavenger receptor-mediated endothelial membrane uptake in the initiation of alloimmunity.

Recipient monocytes, T cells, and donor endothelial cells (ECs) are recognized as critical components of allograft rejection. We have recently shown that human monocytes infiltrate vascularized allografts before clinical rejection and have thus hypothesized that monocytes, rather than costimulation-poor ECs, initiate an alloimmune response. However, the nature of the interactions between ECs, monocytes, and T cells has been incompletely defined. Specifically, it is not clear whether these cells interact in a hierarchical manner, nor is it apparent what constitutes an interaction. We therefore studied human ECs, monocytes, and T cells in various isolated in vitro combinations to define the salient features of their contact and to determine whether their interactions were sequential in nature. We find that T cells proliferate poorly to allogeneic ECs and autologous monocytes but well to autologous monocytes following allogeneic EC contact. We show that monocytes gain their stimulatory capacity by phagocytizing allogeneic but not autologous EC membranes in a process governed by scavenger receptors. This process facilitates the subsequent presentation of intact donor HLA molecules to T cells (semidirect presentation). Moreover, monocytes are receptive to T cell help only after exposure to ECs and require CD4+ T cells to optimally express costimulatory molecules and foster Ag presentation. Our results indicate that monocytes engage allogeneic ECs through scavenger receptors and are then primed to facilitate T cell activation in a codependent manner. This reciprocal codependence allows for monocytes to serve as a regulated bridge between the allograft and T cells.

Cell Communication↗

Composite tissue allotransplantation: classification of clinical acute skin rejection.

BACKGROUND: Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is a recently introduced option for limb replacement and reconstruction of other nonreconstructible tissue defects. As with recipients of other allotransplants, CTA recipients can experience rejection episodes that are presumed to be mediated by immune mechanisms similar to those affecting solid organ grafts. However, a systematic examination of this process has not been performed, and there are no standardized criteria for the description of severity or type of rejection METHODS: We collected biopsies from human limb allografts and abdominal walls in various stages of rejection for histological and immunohistochemical analysis to formulate a CTA rejection scheme. Biopsies were ranked by severity and reproducibility of the system was tested using a second set of biopsies. Tissue slides were examined blindly by three pathologists and the nonparametric Kendall coefficient of concordance (W) was used to assess the amount of agreement among the pathologists in their classification grades. RESULTS: Rejection initially appeared as a perivascular infiltrate progressing to involve the dermis. Arteritis was observed only in the medium to large size arteries of the subcutis. Myositis was seen occasionally. Perineural involvement without frank neuritis was present in advanced rejection. The infiltrate was predominantly CD4+ in milder cases and CD8+ in advanced cases. HLA-DR was minimally expressed in keratinocytes even in severe rejection. Kendall's W was 0.9375 (p<or=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this survey, we proposed an initial classification system for acute rejection in the skin of a CTA and demonstrated that this system is easily reproduced by independent pathologists.

Acute Disease↗

Composite tissue allotransplantation: development of a preclinical model in nonhuman primates.

BACKGROUND: Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) has been recently introduced as a potential treatment for tissue loss secondary to burns, injuries, or resections. However, the optimal strategies to prevent CTA rejection remain undefined. Presently, no CTA model exists to evaluate human-specific immunosuppressants or the relative immunogenicity of all CTA tissues. METHODS: We established a NHP CTA model utilizing a sensate osteomyocutaneous radial forearm flap that avoids functional impairment even in the case of graft loss. The model was evaluated in19 monkeys that underwent auto- or allotransplantation, with or without subtherapeutic immunosuppression to temporarily characterize rejection. RESULTS: Autografts showed no evidence of rejection. Nonimmunosuppressed allografts were rapidly rejected showing a perivenular T-cell infiltrate. This was associated with subsequent alloantibody formation and led to graft thrombosis without prominent dermal infiltration. Subtherapeutically immunosuppressed animals also developed alloantibody and rejected in a delayed fashion exhibiting a marked dermal lymphocytic infiltrate similar in magnitude and distribution to previously reported human cases. CONCLUSION: Our NHP model for CTA is well tolerated by NHPs, results in allosensitization, is responsive to immunosuppression, allows for the evaluation of CTA histology and can be used for the systematic preclinical evaluation of therapeutic maneuvers to improve allograft survival.

Animals↗

Results from a human renal allograft tolerance trial evaluating T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab combined with deoxyspergualin.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative lymphocyte depletion induces allograft tolerance in some animal models, but in humans has only been shown to reduce immunosuppressive requirements. Without maintenance immunosuppression, depleted human renal allograft recipients experience rejection characterized by infiltration of the allograft with monocytes and macrophages. T-cell depletion combined with a brief course of deoxyspergualin (DSG), a drug with inhibitory effects on monocytes and macrophages, induces tolerance in nonhuman primates. We therefore performed a trial to determine if lymphocyte depletion with alemtuzumab combined with DSG would induce tolerance in humans. METHODS: Five recipients of live donor kidneys were treated perioperatively with alemtuzumab and DSG and followed postoperatively without maintenance immunosuppression. Patients were evaluated clinically, by flow cytometry, and by protocol biopsies analyzed immunohistochemically and with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results were compared to previously studied patients receiving alemtuzumab alone or standard immunosuppression. RESULTS: Despite profound T-cell depletion and therapeutic DSG dosing, all alemtuzumab/DSG patients developed reversible rejection that was similar in timing, histology, and transcriptional profile to that seen in patients treated with alemtuzumab alone. Chemokine expression was marked prior to and during rejections. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that treatment with alemtuzumab and DSG does not induce tolerance in humans. Chemokine production may not be adequately suppressed using this approach.

Adult↗

Induction of transplantation tolerance in non-human primate preclinical models.

Short-term outcomes following organ transplantation have improved considerably since the availability of cyclosporine ushered in the modern era of immunosuppression. In spite of this, many of the current limitations to progress in the field are directly related to the existing practice of relatively non-specific immunosuppression. These include increased risks of opportunistic infection and cancer, and toxicity associated with long-term immunosuppressive drug exposure. In addition, long-term graft loss continues to result in part from a failure to adequately control the anti-donor immune response. The development of a safe and reliable means of inducing tolerance would ameliorate these issues and improve the lives of transplant recipients, yet given the improving clinical standard of care, the translation of new therapies has become appropriately more cautious and dependent on increasingly predictive preclinical models. While convenient and easy to use, rodent tolerance models have not to date been reliably capable of predicting a therapy's potential efficacy in humans. Non-human primates possess an immune system that more closely approximates that found in humans, and have served as a more rigorous preclinical testing ground for novel therapies. Prior to clinical adaptation therefore, tolerance regimens should be vetted in non-human primates to ensure that there is sufficient potential for efficacy to justify the risk of its application.

Animals↗

Challenges in therapeutic strategies for transplantation: where now from here?

The current standard of care in transplantation reliably achieves acceptable graft and patient survival but still depends on life long immunosuppression in most patients. Current strategies employ medications that, in general, inhibit distal events mediating rejection, namely T cell activation and cytotoxicity. They do not typically interfere with initial allorecognition or the factors that influence the direction of an immune response (towards cytotoxicity as opposed to anergy or regulation). Given the exponential amplification of immune responses, these proximal targets may be more efficient in preventing rejection. Recent laboratory investigations have identified several approaches, e.g., costimulation blockade, depletion, and hematopoietic chimerism, that influence the initial stages of the alloimmune response, or establish self-perpetuating means of eliminating rejection without chronic immunosuppression. This manuscript reviews methods of immune manipulation that the authors view as promising for future exploitation and transfer to the clinic. These therapies are similar in that they are viewed as attempts to influence the ability of the body to mount an immune response and its subsequent direction, as opposed to supplying late effector phase inhibition. While it is recognized as unlikely that any one therapy will universally lead to tolerance, the authors propose that these concepts will make immunosuppressive drug minimization more readily successful.

Animals↗

Surgical transplant physical examination: correlation of renal resistance index and biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains the leading cause of late renal allograft loss that is minimally responsive to therapy once graft dysfunction is clinically evident. A screening test capable of identifying individuals at high risk for CAN would be a valuable adjunct to patient care, but to be cost effective, should be administered during routine evaluations by transplantation clinicians. STUDY DESIGN: We have compared the resistive index (RI) as measured by Doppler ultrasonography with subsequent biopsy findings on 91 renal allograft recipients who had a subsequent protocol-directed biopsy at least 3 months after renal transplant. All ultrasonography was performed by the transplantation surgical staff without involving the radiology department or a separate appointment time. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients had RI >/= 80 (average 621 days posttransplantation). Among these individuals, the subsequent incidence of CAN was 38%. Length of time between initial assessment of increased RI and biopsy-proved CAN averaged 233 days. The remaining 70 patients with RI < 80 had an incidence of CAN of 11.4% (p = 0.018). There were minimal complications from these biopsies. Sensitivity and specificity of an elevated RI in predicting CAN were 50% and 83%, respectively. The negative predicted value of an elevated RI in determination of CAN was 89%. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that elevated RI is an early predictor of histologically relevant CAN, possibly a result of burgeoning vasculopathy. The technical expertise required to make this appraisal is well within the capabilities of transplantation surgeons and trainees. Early evidence of CAN may allow for a targeted change in therapy before clinically significant injury. Ultrasonography should become a routine part of a transplantation clinic evaluation.

Adolescent↗

Is tolerance induction the answer to adolescent non-adherence?

By definition, tolerance will eliminate the problem of adolescent medication non-adherence. Although adolescents' propensity toward non-adherence makes them at first glance to be particularly attractive candidates for tolerance trials, there are also immunologic, psychosocial and ethical barriers that temper enthusiasm for their inclusion at present. Limits in emotional and cognitive maturity are combined during the teenage years with adult-like immunologic maturity to lessen the potential for successful implementation of tolerance and near tolerance strategies. Alternatively, an interval step to tolerance in adolescents is to eliminate the medications most likely contributing to non-adherence through harsh side effects such as steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. This manuscript will review the general topic of transplantation tolerance with specific attention given to the application of pro-tolerant therapies in adolescent recipients.

Adolescent↗

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension following kidney transplantation: a case report and review of the literature.

A pediatric kidney transplant recipient receiving tacrolimus for immunosuppression experienced symptoms consistent with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. The diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension and possible secondary causes of intracranial hypertension are reviewed in association with the patient's clinical course. Treatment options for the reversal of intracranial hypertension are summarized. Because of the complexity of associated conditions in kidney transplant recipients, symptoms of persistent headaches, visual changes and nausea and vomiting should be promptly investigated by fundoscopic examination in the setting of immunosuppression therapy to prevent vision loss.

Child↗

Strategies for minimizing immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

Immunosuppression remains the cause of most morbidity following organ transplantation. However, its use is also responsible for the outstanding graft and patient survival rates commonplace in modern transplantation. Thus, the predominant challenge for transplant clinicians is to provide a level of immunosuppression that prevents graft rejection while preserving immunocompetence against environmental pathogens. This review will outline several strategies for minimizing or tailoring the use of immunosuppressive drugs. The arguments for various strategies will be based on clinical trial data rather than animal studies. A distinction will be made between conventional immunosuppressive drug reduction based on over-immunosuppression, and newer induction methods specifically designed to lessen the need for chronic immunosuppression. Based on the available data we suggest that most patients can be transplanted with less immunosuppression than is currently standard.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗

Functionally significant renal allograft rejection is defined by transcriptional criteria.

Renal allograft acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a T-cell mediated disease that is diagnosed histologically. However, many normally functioning allografts have T-cell infiltrates and histological ACR, and many nonimmune processes cause allograft dysfunction. Thus, neither histological nor functional criteria are sufficient to establish a significant rejection, and the fundamental features of clinical rejection remain undefined. To differentiate allograft lymphocyte infiltration from clinically significant ACR, we compared renal biopsies from patients with ACR to patients with: sub-clinical rejection (SCR, stable function with histological rejection); no rejection; and nontransplanted kidneys. Biopsies were compared histologically and transcriptionally by RT-PCR for 72 relevant immune function genes. Neither the degree nor the composition of the infiltrate defined ACR. However, transcripts up-regulated during effector T(H)1 T-cell activation, most significantly the transcription factor T-bet, the effector receptor Fas ligand and the costimulation molecule CD152 clearly (p = 0.001) distinguished the patient categories. Transcripts from other genes were equivalently elevated in SCR and ACR, indicating their association with infiltration, not dysfunction. Clinically significant ACR is not defined solely by the magnitude nor composition of the infiltrate, but rather by the transcriptional activity of the infiltrating cells. Quantitative analysis of selected gene transcripts may enhance the clinical assessment of allografts.

Adult↗

Immunocompetent T-cells with a memory-like phenotype are the dominant cell type following antibody-mediated T-cell depletion.

T-cell depletion facilitates reduced immunosuppression following organ transplantation and has been suggested to be pro-tolerant. However, the characteristics of post-depletional T cells have not been evaluated as they relate to tolerance induction. We therefore studied patients undergoing profound T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin following renal transplantation, evaluating the phenotype and functional characteristics of their residual cells. Naive T cells and T cells with potential regulatory function (CD4+CD25+) were not prevalent following aggressive depletion. Rather, post-depletion T cells were of a single phenotype (CD3+CD4+CD45RA-CD62L-CCR7-) consistent with depletion-resistant effector memory T cells that expanded in the first month and were uniquely prevalent at the time of rejection. These cells were resistant to steroids, deoxyspergualin or sirolimus in vitro, but were calcineurin-inhibitor sensitive. These data demonstrate that therapeutic depletion begets a limited population of functional memory-like T cells that are easily suppressed with certain immunosuppressants, but cannot be considered uniquely pro-tolerant.

Alemtuzumab↗

IDEC-131 (anti-CD154), sirolimus and donor-specific transfusion facilitate operational tolerance in non-human primates.

CD154-specific antibody therapy prevents allograft rejection in many experimental transplant models. However, initial clinical transplant trials with anti-CD154 have been disappointing suggesting the need for as of yet undetermined adjuvant therapy. In rodents, donor antigen (e.g., a donor blood transfusion), or mTOR inhibition (e.g., sirolimus), enhances anti-CD154's efficacy. We performed renal transplants in major histocompatibility complex-(MHC) mismatched rhesus monkeys and treated recipients with combinations of the CD154-specific antibody IDEC-131, and/or sirolimus, and/or a pre-transplant donor-specific transfusion (DST). Therapy was withdrawn after 3 months. Triple therapy prevented rejection during therapy in all animals and led to operational tolerance in three of five animals including donor-specific skin graft acceptance in the two animals tested. IDEC-131, sirolimus and DST are highly effective in preventing renal allograft rejection in primates. This apparently clinically applicable regimen is promising for human renal transplant trials.

Animals↗