PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Allan S Brett

Publications and source records attributed to Allan S Brett.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Primary HIV infection presenting with acute rhabdomyolysis.

In several reported cases, rhabdomyolysis has been a manifestation of primary infection with HIV. However, other potential causes of rhabdomyolysis were either present or not excluded in most of those cases. We describe a patient in whom acute rhabdomyolysis was a presenting manifestation of primary HIV infection, and in whom other plausible causes of rhabdomyolysis were reasonably excluded.

HIV Infections↗

Hidradenitis suppurativa complicated by squamous cell carcinoma and paraneoplastic neuropathy.

Squamous cell carcinoma is a rare complication of chronic, severe, hidradenitis suppurativa. We describe a patient with a 20-year history of extensive perineal hidradenitis suppurativa who presented with subacute muscle weakness and sensory symptoms. He was subsequently diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma arising in the area of hidradenitis. The neurologic symptoms and signs resolved after complete excision of the tumor. This presentation is consistent with a paraneoplastic neuropathy, which has not been reported previously in patients with squamous cell carcinoma arising in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

Coccidioidomycosis diagnosed in South Carolina.

Primary care physicians in the Eastern United States rarely consider coccidioidomycosis in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary infections or febrile illnesses. However, the mobility of the population mandates consideration of this diagnosis, particularly in patients with fever and cough that do not resolve rapidly and in patients with adenopathy on chest radiography. In this report, we describe two unrelated cases encountered during a single week in a South Carolina internal medicine practice. These cases highlight the importance of obtaining travel histories from patients with atypical pulmonary infections. Early consideration of coccidioidomycosis confers several benefits, including allaying patient anxiety by more timely diagnosis, minimizing the empiric use of antibiotics, and reducing the need for extensive and possibly invasive diagnostic testing.

Adult↗

Brief report: attitudes toward hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: a comparison of internists and gynecologists.

In the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), postmenopausal women receiving combination hormone therapy (HT) experienced more adverse outcomes than placebo recipients. To determine whether gynecologists and internists interpreted the WHI differently, we conducted a survey in which physicians responded to a hypothetical asymptomatic woman who asks whether to continue HT. In response to this scenario, gynecologists were more likely than internists to hold permissive views about prescribing HT (66% vs 35%; P<.001). These results suggest that gynecologists may be less concerned than internists about the adverse events associated with HT, or that gynecologists have stronger beliefs about benefits of HT.

Adult↗

Fibrosing colonopathy in an adult cystic fibrosis patient after discontinuing pancreatic enzyme therapy.

Fibrosing colonopathy, a complication of cystic fibrosis, has generally been reported in young children with exposure to high doses of pancreatic enzymes. The authors report the case of a 25-year-old male with cystic fibrosis who presented with gradually progressive symptoms of bowel obstruction. Pathologic examination of the right colon revealed findings consistent with fibrosing colonopathy. This case is distinctive because of the adult presentation, and because the patient's symptoms developed long after he had discontinued taking a high-strength enzyme preparation. This case suggests that multiple etiologic factors, and not simply exposure to pancreatic enzymes, may result in fibrosing colonopathy in adults with cystic fibrosis.

Adult↗

Are gifts from pharmaceutical companies ethically problematic? A survey of physicians.

BACKGROUND: Personalized pharmaceutical marketing to physicians, including the provision of gifts and sponsorship of educational and recreational activities, raises ethical issues. We sought to determine the degree to which physicians regarded common pharmaceutical marketing activities as ethically problematic, and to compare the views of experienced physicians and physicians-in-training. METHODS: A questionnaire that included 18 scenarios portraying interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry was distributed to residents and faculty members at a US medical school. RESULTS: Most marketing activities were not thought to pose major ethical problems. Respondents tended to make distinctions about the ethical appropriateness of gifts on the basis of the monetary value and type of gift. Some respondents' views would be in violation of recent professional guidelines that address interactions between physicians and pharmaceutical companies. However, some respondents were troubled by activities that are permitted by professional guidelines. The responses of residents and faculty physicians were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recent publicity about ethical problems in relationships between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry, inexperienced and experienced physicians at a single institution continue to have a rather permissive view about a variety of marketing activities.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

"Inappropriate" treatment near the end of life: conflict between religious convictions and clinical judgment.

Not infrequently, Christian patients and families provide religious justifications for an insistence on aggressive medical care near the end of life. Four commonly invoked reasons are (1). hope for a miracle, (2). refusal to give up on the God of faith, (3). a conviction that every moment of life is a gift from God and is worth preserving at any cost, and (4). a belief that suffering can have redemptive value. For each of these 4 reasons, however, there are alternative Christian interpretations that point in the direction of limiting medical intervention under certain circumstances. When clinicians believe that an intervention is medically inappropriate or inhumane, they are not necessarily obligated to provide it simply because it is demanded on religious grounds. Instead, clinicians-preferably assisted by chaplains or clergy-should discuss alternative religious interpretations with the patient or family, and should attempt to reach a consensus on the appropriate limits to life-sustaining treatment.

Aged↗