Biomedical subjects

Allison C Morton

Publications and source records attributed to Allison C Morton.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Simultaneous kissing stent technique to treat left main stem bifurcation disease.

BACKGROUND: While several endovascular techniques have been developed for treating arterial bifurcation lesions, there is, as yet, no single, widely accepted technique for treating left main stem (LMS) bifurcation lesions with stents. The simultaneous kissing stent (SCS) technique seems particularly suited for such lesions. The authors describe a consecutive cohort of patients with LMS bifurcation stenosis treated with this technique and present mechanistic insights from a porcine model. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with LMS bifurcation stenosis +/- multivessel disease were treated with SCS technique using paclitaxel-eluting stents. The technique involves simultaneous implantation of two stents (LMS-LAD and LMS-Cx) so that the proximal end of both stents lie at the same level in the body of LMS. Symptom status was recorded and follow-up angiography was performed. In addition, four pigs underwent SCS implantation of the LMS and were studied by direct examination, histology, and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 63, 26 were elective and 19 were male. Paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus, Boston Scientific) were used. There was one in-hospital death in a highly unstable patient. At 6-month follow-up angiography, two patients required target lesion revascularization. At 13 +/- 3 month follow-up, the remaining patients remain well, with no other major adverse cardiac events. The animals all survived with patent stents. SEM demonstrated full re-endothelialization and histology showed a thin but complete neointima covering the stent struts. CONCLUSION: The SCS technique for treating LMS bifurcation disease with paclitaxel-eluting stents is safe and feasible. Medium term clinical and angiographic results are good. An endothelium and a thin neointima cover the metal struts.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist alters the response to vessel wall injury in a porcine coronary artery model.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of IL-1 on the arterial response to experimental injury in porcine models of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: An intravenous (i.v.) bolus of 0.5 mg/kg followed by a subcutaneous (s.c.) infusion of 2 mg/kg/24 h of human IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) inhibited neutrophil recruitment in response to intradermal IL-1. Using this dose regimen, five groups of pigs were studied: Group 1, oversized balloon angioplasty of 2 coronary vessels (14-day infusion, 28th day sacrifice and analysis); Groups 2, 3, 4, and 5, oversized stenting of 2 coronary vessels (Group 2: 14-day infusion, 28th day analysis; Group 3: 14-day infusion, 14th day analysis; Group 4: 28-day infusion, 28th day analysis; Group 5: 28-day infusion, 90th day analysis). Neointimal area was quantified by standard means. RESULTS: In Group 1, IL-1ra resulted in a 23% decrease in neointimal area (p=0.04); in Group 2, a 34% increase (p=0.001); in Group 3, a 38% decrease (p<0.0001); in Group 4, a 34% decrease (p=0.0004); and in Group 5, a 41% decrease (p=0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: IL-1ra was associated with a sustained, significant reduction in neointima after vessel wall injury as long as it is given for the duration of the stimulation of the IL-1 system, in this case at least 28 days. This suggests that therapies based on the antagonism of IL-1 may modulate the coronary artery response to injury.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed2004

The influence of physical stent parameters upon restenosis.

In this paper we examine whether the structure, geometry and dimensions of coronary stents influence the occurrence of restenosis. Whilst many consider these parameters to be less important since the advent of drug-eluting stents, this view reveals a poor appreciation of the technological development of stents over the last 18 years. Early 'slotted tube' stents were completely inflexible and posed major problems for delivery; and early 'coil' stents had poor radial strength, allowing considerable tissue prolapse. Nowadays, we are used to greatly improved physical stent parameters, which provide better deliverability, visibility, procedural success and scaffolding performance. Many of these physical parameters also impact upon restenosis, even in the current era of drug-eluting stent. In this paper we examine the contribution of mode of expansion (self vs. balloon-expandable), design (coil vs. tube), length and width to restenosis. We also consider the more subtle influence of advanced slotted tube vs. modular design, percent metal coverage, strut thickness, strut shape, surface smoothness and alloy composition.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed2002

Stenting the stent.

BACKGROUND: Stents are constructed with predefined radial strength which, on occasion, may be insufficient to support a resistant lesion. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the need for, and safety of, implanting a second stent within the first, during the index procedure, in a consecutive series of 500 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by a single operator in the period 1998 2001. The indication was a lesion that appeared angiographically suboptimal after full balloon/stent expansion to high pressure with appropriate sizing. Visible thrombus was an exclusion. Stents were slotted tubes or ring designs whenever possible. Clinical follow-up was > 1 year and angiographic re-study was performed when indicated. RESULTS: We identified 18 patients/lesions (3.6%) that required implantation of a stent within a stent. The appearance was due to tissue/stent prolapse in 72%, edge dissection in 17%, narrow stent inflow/outflow in 5.5% and inadvertent stent detachment in 5.5%. There were no lesion-related acute or in-hospital complications. There was no late thrombosis or death. Follow-up was 21 10 months, and revealed 11% target lesion revascularization, of which half were at the site of stent overlap. CONCLUSION: Stenting the stent, where extra support is required, is safe and effective.

Adult↗