Biomedical subjects

Allison McDonnell

Publications and source records attributed to Allison McDonnell.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Chronic instrumentation with model microstimulators in an animal model of the lower urinary tract.

BACKGROUND: Microstimulators are a new type of neuroprosthetic device that should be considered for applications such as micturition control after spinal cord injury (SCI). These devices are small (less than 25 mm by 5 mm) and the electrodes are located on the ends of the stimulator. The aim of the current study was to develop methods for chronic implantation of model microstimulators (M-Micro) on the bladder wall and pelvic plexus of female cats. A postmortem evaluation of the effects of 3 months of implantation is reported. METHODS: Techniques to produce the M-Micro are described. Four of these devices were implanted in 4 female cats and maintained after the initial instrumentation surgery and a second survival surgery for SCI (at T10). Using a single suture tied around the M-Micro, these devices were secured to the bladder wall or the fat pads adjacent to the pelvic plexus. Additional instrumentation was implanted, including 2 catheters in the bladder, 1 abdominal balloon, and electromyography electrodes in the urethral and anal sphincters. Postmortem observations of the location of the M-Micro on the bladder wall were conducted after fixation. RESULTS: The animals' conditions were good. One animal was sacrificed early because of a skin infection. A single suture was sufficient to anchor the M-Micro. However, during the surgical implantation the pelvic plexus M-Micro ended up close to the bladder neck. Extensive fibrous connective tissue formed around the M-Micro and implanted catheters on the bladder wall. This appeared to result, in part, from multiple devices implanted on or near the bladder wall. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot studies showed that the M-Micro could be easily constructed and secured to the bladder wall or fat pads close to the pelvic plexus. There was a concern that the pelvic plexus location for the M-Micro ended near the bladder neck during the surgical implantation; however, these devices did not appear to migrate over this short, 3-month implantation period. The extensive connective tissue responses of the bladder wall to the tubes, wires, and M-Micro was a major concern. The M-Micro appears to be a good device to assess the potential of commercial microstimulators for use in micturition control.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

A spinal cord injured animal model of lower urinary tract function: observations using direct bladder and pelvic plexus stimulation with model microstimulators.

BACKGROUND: Microstimulators are new devices that should be considered for management of lower urinary tract problems following spinal cord injury (SCI) such as urinary retention. These devices are small (less than 25 mm by 5 mm) with the electrodes located on the ends of the stimulator. However, it is not known whether the small electrodes on these devices would be effective in stimulating the plexus of nerves that innervate the bladder. The aim of the present study was to provide preliminary observations with model microstimulators (M-Micro) for inducing bladder contractions in an SCI animal model. Bladder wall and pelvic plexus stimulation sites were compared. Additional investigations evaluated parameters such as stimulation polarity, frequency, and period as well as bladder filling volume. METHODS: In an initial survival surgery, bilateral M-Micros were implanted on the bladder wall and the pelvic plexus along the urethra in 3 female cats. A second survival surgery was conducted 3 to 5 weeks later to produce a T1 0 SCI. Studies are reported following the second survival surgery. These studies included the effects of stimulation and bladder filling. RESULTS: The postmortem location of the implanted pelvic plexus M-Micro was previously described as near the bladder neck. Therefore, the pelvic plexus location is described in this report as "pelvic plexus (bladder neck)" stimulation. The observations showed effective stimulation with pelvic plexus (bladder neck) stimulation and voiding in some cases. Stimulation was limited by side effects of increased abdominal pressure and leg movement. Other factors also affected the response to stimulation, including the initial bladder volume and stimulating parameters. Fluoroscopy showed that when stimulation did not induce voiding the striated urethral sphincter was closed. CONCLUSIONS: This case series of 3 SCI animals showed that the small electrodes on the M-Micro could be used to stimulate the bladder with contractions and voiding in some cases. The pelvic plexus (bladder neck) location for the M-Micro may be a better location than higher on the bladder wall. Limiting side effects of stimulation included leg movement and increased abdominal pressure. Additional important factors included the stimulation parameters, initial bladder volume, and the function of the skeletal urethral sphincter.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Bladder-wall and pelvic-plexus stimulation with model microstimulators: Preliminary observations.

Severe urinary retention is not a common condition, but may occur following some pelvic surgeries or other medical conditions. Electrical stimulation of the bladder has been examined as a means of managing this difficult problem. We conducted preliminary investigations in cats to prove the hypothesis that pelvic-plexus (bladder-neck) stimulation would produce greater micturition response with reduced side effects, such as animal movement or discomfort, than bladder-wall stimulation with electrodes implanted higher on the bladder wall. We used model microstimulators that mimic the look and function of commercial microstimulators, but that we constructed. We instrumented four female cats during a survival surgery. Animals recovered well and studies were conducted over a 1-month period in the conscious animal and under anesthesia. We performed a variety of studies with different stimulation parameters and electrode locations to evaluate our hypothesis. In the active animal, we supplied only low currents, but two animals responded to stimulation with bladder contractions and voiding. Following anesthesia, higher stimulating currents resulted in greater bladder contractions during stimulation in two of the three animals. In two cases, pelvic-plexus (bladder-neck) stimulation induced greater micturition responses than direct bladder-wall stimulation. In conclusion, we learned from these preliminary observations that stimulation at the pelvic plexus (bladder neck) may induce a better micturition response than stimulation higher on the bladder-wall. Newly available commercial microstimulators should be further studied for the treatment of urinary retention.

Animals↗