PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Amar M Salam

Publications and source records attributed to Amar M Salam.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Drug-eluting coronary stents.

The introduction and widespread use of coronary stents have been the most important advancement in the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease since the introduction of balloon angioplasty. Coronary artery stents reduce the rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis compared to balloon angioplasty. This angiographic restenosis was further reduced with the introduction of drug-eluting stents and hence further reduction in the frequency of major adverse cardiac events. Herein we present a comprehensive and up-to-date review about the use of drug-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed2005

Acute myocardial infarction in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Acute myocardial infarction rarely occurs in women during pregnancy. However, when it does occur, it usually carries a high risk of maternal and perinatal mortality. There is a lack of awareness that this condition can occur in pregnancy since coronary artery disease is uncommon in women of childbearing age. In this report, a 43-year-old lady with acute anterior myocardial infarction in her eighth week of pregnancy is presented. The challenges involved in diagnosing this condition in pregnancy are briefly discussed.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2005

The therapeutic potential of vasopressin receptor antagonists in congestive heart failure.

Hospitalisation of patients presenting with deteriorating congestive heart failure is occurring with increasing frequency and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Diuretic use, the mainstay therapy for congestion, is associated with electrolyte abnormalities and deteriorating renal function. In a recent randomised study, tolvaptan, a novel vasopressin antagonist, in addition to standard therapy including diuretics, increased net fluid loss resulting in decreased body weight more effectively than standard therapy alone in patients hospitalised for heart failure. This desirable effect was achieved without adversely affecting blood pressure, heart rate, electrolyte levels, or renal function. Although tolvaptan did not reduce the rate of deteriorating heart failure after discharge, post hoc analysis suggested that mortality might be reduced in high-risk patients treated with tolvaptan. These results make an important contribution to heart failure research, and offer an insight into the future role of vasopressin antagonism in the treatment of congestive heart failure.

Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2005

Selected highlights from the 54th annual scientific session of the American College of Cardiology, Orlando, USA, 6-9 March 2005.

The recent scientific session of the American College of Cardiology, held in Orlando, Florida, US, was one of the largest gatherings in the field of cardiovascular medicine worldwide. This year's session provided a wealth of new information in many areas of cardiovascular medicine and the results of several clinically relevant new trials and current challenges facing cardiology were presented. Provided here are selected highlights that have important implications for clinical practice.

Cardiology↗
PubMed2004

Lipid-lowering therapy in patients with average cholesterol and high cardiovascular risk, insights from the Heart Protection Study.

Although the benefits of cholesterol-lowering with statins has been established for patients with high cholesterol levels as well as for patients with prior occlusive coronary heart disease, substantial uncertainty has existed about the long-term benefits of these agents in particular types of patient, including patients with moderate or low baseline cholesterol levels pre-treatment, women, the elderly, and those with prior occlusive non-coronary vascular disease. The Heart Protection Study was designed to resolve these uncertainties and to provide substantially more safety information of statins. In this report the study is presented with the significance and practical implications of the results briefly discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Impact of coronary artery stents on mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a strategy of routine stenting with that of balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: A strategy of routine stenting has been shown to reduce the need for target-vessel revascularization compared with a strategy of balloon angioplasty alone; however, the impact on mortality and frequency of nonfatal myocardial infarction is unclear. The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative comparison of the impact of coronary stenting on the rates of mortality and myocardial infarction with that of balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing routine coronary stenting to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), including only those trials that used combination antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and a thienopyridine) as an adjuvant to stenting. Such trials included: the Belegian Netherlands Stent Study (BENESTENT) II, Optimal Coronary Balloon Angioplasty With Provisional Stenting Versus Primary Stent (OCBAS), Balloon Optimization vs Stent Study (BOSS), Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT), Optimum Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Compared With Routine Stent Strategy (OPUS-1), French Optimal Stenting Trial (FROST), Angioplasty or Stent (AS), and Doppler Endpoint Stenting International Investigation (DESTINI) trials for de novo coronary artery lesions; the Stent vs Percutaneous Angioplasty in Chronic Total Occlusion (SPACTO), Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA), Stent or Angioplasty after Recanalization of Chronic Coronary Occlusions (SARECCO), and Mayo-Japan Investigation for Chronic Total Occlusion (MAJIC) trials for coronary occlusions; the Primary Angioplasty Versus Stent Implantation in Acute Myocardial Infarction (PASTA), Gianturco-Roubin in Acute Myocardial Infarction (GRAMI), Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO), Immediate Coronary Angioplasty with Elective Wiktor Stent Implantation Compared with Conventional Balloon Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction (STENTUIM-2), Stent Primary Angioplasty in MI (Stent-PAMI), Zwolle, and Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trials for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; and the Intracoronary Stenting or Angioplasty for Restenosis Reduction in Small Arteries (ISAR-SMART), Park, Stenting in Small Arteries (SISA), and Bestent in Small Arteries (BESMART) trials for small vessels. RESULTS: The 23 trials enrolled 10,347 patients, with 5130 patients randomized to receive stent and 5217 patients randomized to receive balloon angioplasty. A total of 902 (17 %) of patients crossed over from a strategy of balloon angioplasty to stent placement because of the inability to achieve a satisfactory result with a balloon. No significant difference was observed between the stent group and PTCA group in the rates of death or myocardial infarction, despite a significant reduction in the frequency of major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.50-0.70; P <.001), which was driven entirely by a reduction in target vessel revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: An initial strategy of stent placement versus balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting is associated with a similar mortality rate and frequency of nonfatal myocardial infarction after a mean follow-up period of 12.8 months. Patients who underwent stent placement had a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiac events only when target revascularization is included as an end point.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2004

Angiotensin receptor blockers in acute myocardial infarction.

It has been established from multiple randomised, placebo-controlled trials that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce the risk of death and major non-fatal cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction, especially when these agents are used for long-term treatment in high-risk patients. Angiotensin receptor blockers represent a theoretically appealing class of drugs for use in combination with or as alternatives to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in such patients. The Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction (VALIANT) trial compared the effects of valsartan, captopril and the combination of both in a population of high-risk patients with evidence of left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction. This article discusses this important study and its implications for the clinical management of these high-risk patients.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2004

Intensive lipid-lowering therapy in coronary artery disease: implications of the REVERSAL and PROVE-IT trials.

Current international guidelines recommend that the goal of treatment with lipid-lowering therapy in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) should be a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of < 100 mg/dl. The question that remains to be answered is whether more aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below this target offers additional benefit and whether it can be tolerated. Two recently published related studies addressed this question by comparing intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin (Lipitor, Pfizer) 80 mg/day with a moderate lipid-lowering regimen of pravastatin (Pravachol, Bristol-Myers Squibb) 40 mg/day. The first study, the Reversing Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) compared the effect of the two regimens on coronary artery atheroma burden and progression using intravascular ultrasound in patients with symptomatic CAD. The second study, the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE-IT) was a clinical outcome trial in patients recently hospitalised with acute coronary syndromes. This article reviews the implications of these two studies in the management of patients with CAD. In addition, other ongoing trials and future directions are explored.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2004

The therapeutic potential of ximelagatran to become the anticoagulant of choice in medicine: a review of recently completed clinical trials.

Ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca) is a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor that inhibits the final step in the coagulation process - namely, the conversion of fibrinogen to insoluble fibrin by thrombin. Recently completed large clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of ximelagatran compared to standard anticoagulation therapy with warfarin and heparins in several thrombotic disorders including the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism following major orthopaedic surgery; stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation; and after acute myocardial infarction. This article reviews these recent clinical trials and explores the therapeutic potential of ximelagatran to become the oral anticoagulant of first choice in medicine.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2003

Is there a role for oral blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors in coronary and cerebrovascular disease?

The success of intravenous platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockers as potent antithrombotic therapies has ignited interest in the research and development of oral agents with the intention of extending the initial clinical benefits proven with intravenous GP IIb/IIIa blockers to long-term care with the use of oral agents. Nonetheless, results of the recently published Blockade of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor to Avoid Vascular Occlusion (BRAVO) trial support the disappointing results of the earlier published studies, which revealed that the use of oral GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors was associated with an unacceptable increased mortality. Further research to elucidate the mechanism of this increased fatality risk is warranted before any further clinical studies with the oral GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors can be ethically justified.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Clinical trials evaluating angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.

There is strong evidence from controlled clinical trials that in the setting of acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure or isolated left ventricular dysfunction, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors started late during hospitalisation and continued in the long term, significantly reduced mortality and improved the prognosis. On the other hand, administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors during the first 24 h in unselected patients with acute myocardial infarction provided only a slight benefit in terms of mortality. Angiotensin-II receptor blockers have and are being examined in the setting of acute myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction and can provide an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In this article, an evidence-based review of these major trials and suggestions for clinical application are presented.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2003

Expanding indications of statins; implications of the Heart Protection Study.

The Heart Protection Study is the largest trial of statin therapy conducted to date. It provides important new information on the use of statins in women, the elderly, diabetics and people with low baseline cholesterol pretreatment and those with prior occlusive non-coronary vascular disease. In this report, the paper is discussed with the significance of the results outlined in view of existing evidence from previously published trials. In addition, ongoing trials and future directions are explored.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Evolving role of bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary interventions; impact of the REPLACE-2 study.

Percutaneous coronary interventions are being used with increasing frequency nowadays for the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease. Acute thrombotic complications remain one of the major limitations of these procedures for which unfractionated heparin has been the standard foundation anticoagulant. It has, however, many limitations and disadvantages that necessitated research and development of alternative anticoagulant therapies. The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has been approved as a substitute for heparin in patients undergoing angioplasty for unstable angina based on data in higher-risk patients where bivalirudin resulted in lower rates of ischaemic and bleeding complications compared to heparin. This evidence was collected prior to the widespread use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockers, thienopyridines and intracoronary stents, considered standard practice for such patients today. The REPLACE-2 study was carried out to establish whether, in the current era, bivalirudin used with provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade if necessary during the procedure could provide equivalent protection from ischaemic events compared with the gold standard of heparin plus routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade. With advantages with regards to bleeding, ease of use and reduced cost, bivalirudin use with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in low-to-moderate risk percutaneous coronary interventions allows GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists to be used in a selective fashion, rather than in all patients. In this article, background rationale for bivalirudin use in this setting is reviewed as well as past research in this area. Additionally, the implications of the REPLACE-2 study in establishing where bivalirudin fits into our current interventional cardiology practice and future directions are presented.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2003

Rate control versus rhythm control for the management of atrial fibrillation: the verdict of the AFFIRM trial.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice that affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and generates significant healthcare costs. There are two approaches for the management of atrial fibrillation: rate control and rhythm control. Rate-control strategy involves using rate-controlling agents such as beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers or digoxin, or a combination thereof to control symptoms while allowing atrial fibrillation to persist. Rhythm-control strategy involves cardioversion and treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs to maintain sinus rhythm. Although each strategy has its own advantages as well as limitations, it has long been debated which of the strategies offers better long-term outcomes and thus should be the preferred and recommended approach for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study was the first large-scale randomised study to address this important issue. In this article, the long awaited verdict of the AFFIRM study with its implications for the clinical management of patients with atrial fibrillation is discussed.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Selective aldosterone blockade with eplerenone in patients with congestive heart failure.

In the Eplerenone Postacute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) the effects of selective aldosterone blockade with eplerenone on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity were studied in patients with reduced left ventricular function postacute myocardial infarction. Data from this landmark study suggest that eplerenone can be an effective addition to the therapy of patients with congestive heart failure and is associated with fewer side effects than spironolactone. Further research is warranted concerning the possible benefits of this new agent in disease states other than congestive heart failure in which an activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system system has been implicated.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗