Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Ambrosio Núñez.
A 70-year-old lady with diabetes and monoclonal gammopathy underwent pacemaker implant for 2:1 atrioventricular block. Within 7 days, a painful, infiltrating, necrotic lesion involved the implant area. Biopsy was compatible with pyoderma gangrenosum and corticosteroid treatment led to healing in 3 weeks.
Invasive electrophysiologic studies have changed the clinical outlook for patients with atrial flutter. Recognition of the reentrant circuit responsible for typical atrial flutter has led to the development of catheter ablation techniques that can prevent recurrence in >90% of cases. In addition, general understanding of atrial tachycardias has changed radically, such that ECG-based classifications are now obsolete. Atypical reentrant circuits associated with surgical scars or fibrotic areas in either atrium, which are indistinguishable from focal tachycardias on ECG, have been identified. These circuits also seem amenable to treatment by ablation. Recently, a new type of reentrant tachycardia that could be problematic in the future has emerged in patients who have undergone extensive left atrial ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. These atypical circuits can be characterized using the mapping and entrainment techniques initially developed for typical flutter. In these cases, electroanatomical mapping, involving the construction of a virtual anatomical model of the atria, is extremely helpful. Despite the success of ablation, long-term prognosis is frequently overshadowed by the appearance of atrial fibrillation, which suggests that flutter and fibrillation share a common arrhythmogenic origin that is not modified by cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. In contrast with our clear electrophysiologic understanding of atrial flutter, little is known about the natural history of the condition because the literature has traditionally grouped patients with flutter and fibrillation together. Consequently, the complex relationship between the two arrhythmias has still to be clearly delineated. Primary prevention and preventing the development of atrial fibrillation after ablation remain outstanding clinical challenges.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: The high posterolateral right atrium (RA) is considered the "sinus node area," but we lack information on endocardial atrial activation in sinus rhythm. We studied RA and left atrial (LA) endocardial activation in the electrophysiology laboratory. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (21 men) aged 47 +/- 16.4 years (mean +/- SD) underwent RA mapping (22.2 +/- 3.8 points). In 21 patients, LA activation was mapped (11.1 +/- 3.9 points) through the coronary sinus (CS), right pulmonary artery, and/or a patent oval foramen. Fourteen patients had atrial arrhythmias, and 3 an ECG pattern of Bachmann's bundle block. Endocardial RA activation preceded P wave in 5 (-14 +/- 4.2 ms), coincided in 11, and followed P onset in 18 (16.7 +/- 6.6 ms). Location of the zero point varied from the superior vena cava to the low RA and from lateral to paraseptal RA. In 19 patients, activation started simultaneously in 2 to 5 points located >or=1 cm apart. RA activation was descending in most, but in 3 with low onset there was collision in the anterior and septal walls. In 15 of 21 patients, descending LA activation dominated, ending in the mid CS in 12, proximal CS in 1, and simultaneously throughout the CS in 2. In 3 with Bachmann's bundle block, CS activation was ascending and in 2 double potentials were recorded from the LA roof. CONCLUSION: During stable sinus rhythm, RA activation can start in different areas or simultaneously over large areas resulting in different activation patterns, both in the RA and the LA. LA activation is predominantly descending, but in Bachmann's bundle block it becomes ascending, and double potentials suggest a location of block in the LA roof.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We are reporting the characteristics of 9 patients with left atrial macroreentrant tachycardia, an arrhythmia not well studied in man. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Mean age was 60 years and 7 were men. Tachycardia was spontaneous in 6 and induced in 3. Two had no heart disease, 2 sick sinus syndrome, 3 aortic prosthesis, 2 hypertension, 1 cardiomyopathy and 1 chronic bronchitis. Simultaneous recordings from right atrial, coronary sinus and right pulmonary artery were obtained at baseline and with atrial pacing. Macroreentrant tachycardia was diagnosed when entrainment with fusion was documented. RESULTS: Cycle length was 230-440 ms (287 67). The ECG showed atypical flutter in 3 patients and P waves with flat baseline in 6. Coronary sinus activation was distal to proximal in 7. Right atrial activation was circular in 3 with previous typical flutter ablation. Entrainment from the right atrium produced long return cycles in the right atrial recordings, but equal to basal tachycardic cycle in coronary sinus recordings. Entrainment from the coronary sinus produced local return cycles equal to basal cycle in 8 and prolonged in 1. After stimulation, 4 recovered sinus rhythm, 4 went to atrial fibrillation and 1 had no change. After a follow-up of 9-19 months 5 remain in sinus rhythm treated with antiarrhythmic drugs and/or atrial pacing. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial macroreentrant tachycardia is associated with organic heart disease. The ECG most frequent pattern tends to show P waves with flat baseline at a relatively slow rate. Most circuits turn clockwise in anterior view. Atrial stimulation is not very effective for cardioversion to sinus rhythm. The prognosis of long term rhythm is uncertain.
A case of severe mitral regurgitation with refractory heart failure, after atrioventricular junction ablation and pacemaker implant, was solved with left ventricular pacing. Mitral regurgitation was related to a change in segmental left ventricular motion during right ventricular pacing.