PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ameneh Rezayof

Publications and source records attributed to Ameneh Rezayof.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Morphine-induced place preference: involvement of the central amygdala NMDA receptors.

In the present study, the effects of bilateral injections of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonist and/or antagonist into the central amygdala (CeA) on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) were investigated in male Wistar rats. Animals that received 3 daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine (1-9 mg/kg) or saline (1.0 ml/kg) indicated a significant preference for compartment paired with morphine in a dose dependent manner. Intra-CeA administration of the NMDA (0.01, 0.1 or 1 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (1 mg/kg, s.c.) elicited a significant CPP. Administration of the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801 (0.1, 0.3 or 0.5 microg/rat), into the central amygdala dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (6 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced place preference. Furthermore, intra-CeA administration of MK-801 (0.25, 0.5 or 1 microg/rat) reduced the response induced by NMDA (1 microg/rat, intra-CeA) plus morphine (1 mg/kg, s.c.). Neither NMDA nor MK-801 alone produce a significant place preference or place aversion. Moreover, intra-CeA injection of NMDA but not MK-801 before testing significantly increased the expression of morphine (6 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced place preference. NMDA or MK-801 injections into the CeA had no effects on locomotor activity on the testing sessions. These results suggest that the NMDA receptor mechanisms in the central amygdala may be involved in the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference.

Amygdala↗

Dorsal hippocampal dopamine receptors are involved in mediating ethanol state-dependent memory.

In the present study, the effects of bilateral injections of dopaminergic agents into the hippocampal CA1 regions (intra-CA1) on ethanol (EtOH) state-dependent memory were examined in mice. A single-trial step-down passive avoidance task was used for the assessment of memory retention in adult male NMRI mice. Pre-training intra-peritoneal (i.p.) administration of EtOH (0.25, 0.5 and 1 g/kg) dose dependently induced impairment of memory retention. Pre-test administration of EtOH (0.5 g/kg)-induced state-dependent retrieval of the memory acquired under pre-training EtOH (0.5 g/kg) influence. Intra-CA1 administration of the dopamine D(1) receptor agonist, SKF 38393 (0.5, 1 and 2 g/mouse) or the dopamine D(2) receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.25, 0.5 and 1 microg/mouse) alone cannot affect memory retention. While, pre-test intra-CA1 injection of SKF 38393 (2 microg/mouse, intra-CA1) or quinpirole (0.25, 0.5 and 1 microg/mouse, intra-CA1) improved pre-training EtOH (0.5 g/kg)-induced retrieval impairment. Moreover, pre-test administration of SKF 38393 (0.5, 1 and 2 microg/mouse, intra-CA1) or quinpirole (0.5 and 1 microg/mouse, intra-CA1) with an ineffective dose of EtOH (0.25 g/kg) significantly restored the retrieval and induced EtOH state-dependent memory. Furthermore, pre-training injection of the dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (4 microg/mouse), but not the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist, sulpiride, into the CA1 regions suppressed the learning of a single-trial passive avoidance task. Pre-test intra-CA1 injection of SCH 23390 (2 and 4 microg/mouse, intra-CA1) or sulpiride (2.5 and 5 microg/mouse, intra-CA1) 5 min before the administration of EtOH (0.5 g/kg, i.p.) dose dependently inhibited EtOH state-dependent memory. These findings implicate the involvement of a dorsal hippocampal dopaminergic mechanism in EtOH state-dependent memory and also it can be concluded that there may be a cross-state dependency between EtOH and dopamine.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

Histaminergic receptors of medial septum and conditioned place preference: D1 dopamine receptor mechanism.

In the present study, the effects of intra-medial septum injections of histamine and/or the histamine H1 or H2 receptor antagonists on the acquisition of conditioned place preference (CPP) in male Wistar rats have been investigated. Our data showed that the conditioning treatments with intra-medial septum injection of different doses of histamine (0.5-15 microg/rat) induced a significant CPP for the drug-associated place. Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, it was found that the histamine H1 receptor antagonist, pyrilamine (10 and 15 microg/rat, intra-medial septum) also induced a significant place preference. In addition, pyrilamine inhibited the histamine (7.5 microg/rat)-induced place preference. Intra-medial septum administration of the histamine H2 receptor antagonist, ranitidine (5-15 microg/rat) alone or in combination with histamine did not produce a significant place preference or place aversion. On the other hand, intra-medial septum administration of the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 233390 (0.5, 0.75 and 1 microg/rat) inhibited the histamine (7.5 microg/rat) or pyrilamine (15 microg/rat)-induced place preference in a dose-dependent manner, but no effect was observed for the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride on the histamine or pyrilamine response. The administration of histamine (2.5-15 microg/rat) or pyrilamine (10 and 15 microg/rat) during acquisition increased locomotor activity of the animals on the testing days. The results suggest that histaminergic receptors of the medial septum may be involved in CPP and thus it is postulated that dopamine D1 receptors may play an important role in this effect.

Analysis of Variance↗

Influence of intracerebroventricular administration of dopaminergic drugs on morphine state-dependent memory in the step-down passive avoidance test.

The effects of dopaminergic drugs on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance task were examined in mice. Pre-training administration of morphine (5mg/kg) led to state-dependent learning with impaired memory retrieval on the test day which was reversed by pre-test administration of the same dose of the opiate. The pre-test intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist (SKF38393), dopamine D2 receptor agonist (quinpirole) and dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (sulpiride) not only reversed the effect of pre-training morphine treatment, but also increased this action of the drug. Furthermore, the pre-test i.c.v. administration of dopamine D1 receptor antagonist (SCH23390) prevented the restoration of memory by morphine. In conclusion, the morphine-induced recovery of memory, on the test day, seems to be induced, at least in part, through dopamine receptors.

Analysis of Variance↗

Influence of nitric oxide on morphine-induced amnesia and interactions with dopaminergic receptor agents.

The interactions of dopaminergic receptors and nitric oxide (NO) with morphine-induced memory of passive avoidance have been investigated in mice. Pre-training administration of morphine (1, 3 and 5 mg/kg, s.c.) dose-dependently decreased the learning of a one-trial passive avoidance task. Pre-training administration of L-arginine, a nitric oxide precursor (50, 100 and 200 mg/kg, i.p.), alone did not affect memory formation. The drug (100 and 200 mg/kg) decreased significantly amnesia induced by pre-training morphine (5 mg/kg). Pre-training administration of L-NAME (N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester), a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor (20 and 30 mg/kg, i.p.), dose-dependently impaired memory formation. In addition, co-pretreatment of different doses of L-NAME (10, 20 and 30 mg/kg) with lower dose of morphine (1 mg/kg), which did not induce amnesia by itself, caused inhibition of memory formation. Pre-training administration of apomorphine, a dopaminergic receptor agonist (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg, i.p.), alone also did not affect memory formation, but morphine-induced amnesia was significantly inhibited by pretreatment with apomorphine (0.5 and 1 mg/kg, 5 min, i.p.). On the other hand, the inhibition of morphine-induced amnesia by L-arginine (200 mg/kg, i.p.) was significantly decreased by pretreatment with different doses of dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.001, 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) or D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride (12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg, i.p.). However, the dopamine receptor antagonists could not affect memory formation by themselves. It may be concluded that the morphine-induced impairment of memory formation can be prevented by nitric oxide donor and, in this effect, dopaminergic mechanism is involved.

Amnesia↗

GABA(A) receptors of hippocampal CA1 regions are involved in the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference.

In the present study, the effects of bilateral intra-hippocampal CA1 (intra-CA1) injections of GABA(A) receptor agonist and/or antagonist on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference in male Wistar rats have been investigated. The conditioning treatments with subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of different doses of morphine (0.5-7.5 mg/kg) induced a conditioned place preference (CPP) for the drug-associated place in a dose-dependent manner. Intra-CA1 administration of the GABA(A) receptor agonist, muscimol (0.25, 0.5 and 1 microg/rat) significantly inhibited the morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced CPP. Intra-CA1 injections of different doses of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist, bicuculline (0.25, 0.5 and 1 microg/rat), in combination with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) elicited a significant CPP. However, muscimol or bicuculline by themselves did not elicit any effect on place conditioning. Furthermore, the muscimol-induced inhibition of morphine response was reversed by bicuculline (1 microg/rat, intra-CA1) administration. On the other hand, the bilateral intra-CA1 injections of muscimol (0.25, 0.5 and 1 microg/rat) or bicuculline (0.5, 1 and 2 microg/rat) significantly decreased the expression of morphine-induced CPP. Intra-CA1 administration of different doses of muscimol or bicuculline had no effect on locomotor activity in the testing phase. Our data indicated that the GABA(A) receptors of the hippocampal CA1 regions may play an important role in the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference.

Analysis of Variance↗

Repeated administration of dopaminergic agents in the nucleus accumbens and morphine-induced place preference.

In the present study, the effects of repeated intra nucleus accumbens (intra-NAc) injections of dopamine receptor agents on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats were investigated by using an unbiased 3-days schedule of place conditioning design. The animals receiving once daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine (0.5-7.5mg/kg) or saline (1.0 ml/kg, s.c.) showed a significant place preference in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum response was observed with 5mg/kg of the opioid. Three days intra-NAc injections of apomorphine (0.5 and 1 microg/rat) followed by 5 days free of the drug, increased or decreased, respectively CPP induced by the lower dose of morphine (0.5mg/kg, s.c.). Morphine-induced CPP was also significantly increased in the animals that had previously received the 3-days intra-NAc injections of SKF 38393 (4 and 8 microg/rat) or quinpirole (2 and 4 microg/rat, intra-NAc). The CPP induced by a higher dose of morphine (5mg/kg, s.c.) was significantly decreased in the animals that had previously received the 3-days SCH 23390 (0.005 and 0.01 microg/rat; intra-NAc). On the other hand, the CPP induced by morphine (5mg/kg, s.c.) was significantly increased in the animals that had previously received the 3-days sulpiride administration (5 microg/rat, intra-NAc). The 3-days administration of apomorphine, SKF 38393 or quinpirole, but not SCH 23390 and sulpiride reduced the locomotor activity in the test session. It is concluded that repeated injections of dopamine receptors agents followed by 5 days free of the drugs in the NAc can affect morphine reward.

Animals↗

Involvement of NMDA receptors in morphine state-dependent learning in mice.

In the present study, the effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of NMDA receptor agonist and antagonist on impairment of memory formation and the state-dependent learning by morphine have been investigated in mice. Pretraining administration of morphine (5 mg/kg; s.c.) decreased the learning of one-trial passive avoidance task. Pretest administration of morphine (5 mg/kg) induced state-dependent learning acquired under pretraining morphine influence. Pretest administration of NMDA receptor agonist, L-glutamate (0.00001 and 0.0001 and 0.001 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) following pretraining saline treatment did not affect retention. Amnesia induced by pretraining morphine was significantly reversed by pretest administration of L-glutamate (0.0001 and 0.001 microg/mouse, i.c.v.). Pretest administration of noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801 (0.5, 1, and 2 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) significantly impaired memory formation. Amnesia induced by pretraining morphine was increased by pretest administration of MK-801 (2 microg/mouse, i.c.v.). Pretest coadministration of L-glutamate (0.0001 and 0.001 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) or MK-801 (0.5, 1, and 2 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) with morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) increased and decreased morphine state-dependent learning, respectively. The results suggest that NMDA receptors are involved in morphine state-dependent learning in mice.

Animals↗

Effect of the GABAergic system on memory formation and state-dependent learning induced by morphine in rats.

In the present study, the effects of intraperitoneal injections of GABA(A) receptor agonist and antagonist on memory formation and morphine state-dependent learning were investigated in rats. Pre-training administration of morphine (1-15 mg/kg) in a step-down passive avoidance task induced state-dependent learning with impaired memory retrieval on the test day. The impairment of memory was restored after the pre-test administration of the same dose of morphine. The pre-test administration of the GABA(A) receptor agonist, muscimol (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), significantly decreased state-dependent retrieval induced by pre-test morphine (5 mg/kg). The state-dependency effect of morphine (1 mg/kg) was significantly potentiated by the pre-test administration of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist, bicuculline (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg). Furthermore, the pre-training injection of muscimol (0.01 mg/kg) impaired memory retrieval which was restored by pre-test morphine (1, 3 and 5 mg/kg) administration. However, the pre-training administration of bicuculline did not affect retention by itself. In addition, amnesia induced by pre-training morphine (5 mg/kg) was significantly reversed in rats which had received pre-test injections of muscimol (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg). Pre-test injections of bicuculline (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) significantly decreased morphine-induced amnesia. It is concluded that the GABA(A) receptor mechanisms may be involved in the memory formation and it is postulated that these receptors may play an important role in morphine state-dependent learning.

Animals↗

Involvement of GABA(B) receptors of the dorsal hippocampus on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference in rats.

In the present study, effects of intra-hippocampal CA1 (intra-CA1) injections of GABA(B) receptor agonist and antagonist on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference in male Wistar rats have been investigated. Subcutaneous administration of different doses of morphine sulphate (0.5-6 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent conditioned place preference (CPP). Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, it was found that the GABA(B) receptor agonist, baclofen (0.5-2 microg/rat; intra-CA1), or the GABA(B) receptor antagonist, phaclofen (1-3 microg/rat; intra-CA1), did not produce a significant place preference or place aversion. Intra-CA1 administration of baclofen (1 and 2 microg/rat; intra-CA1) decreased the acquisition of CPP induced by morphine (3 mg/kg; s.c.). On the other hand, intra-CA1 injection of phaclofen (1 and 2 microg/rat; intra-CA1) in combination with a lower dose of morphine (1 mg/kg) elicited a significant CPP. The response of baclofen (2 microg/rat; intra-CA1) was reversed by phaclofen (4 and 6 microg/rat; intra-CA1). Furthermore, intra-CA1 administration of baclofen but not phaclofen before testing significantly decreased the expression of morphine (3 mg/kg; s.c.)-induced place preference. Baclofen or phaclofen injections had no effects on locomotor activity on the testing sessions. It is concluded that the GABA(B) receptors in dorsal hippocampus may play an active role in morphine reward.

Animals↗

Dorsal hippocampal muscarinic and nicotinic receptors are involved in mediating morphine reward.

In the present study, the effects of bilateral injections of cholinergic agents into the hippocampal CA1 region on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) were investigated in male Wistar rats. Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of different doses of morphine sulphate (0.5-6 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent CPP. Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, it was found that intra-CA1 administration of the anticholinesterase, physostigmine (2, 4 and 8 microg/rat) significantly potentiated the morphine (0.5 mg/kg)-induced CPP. Moreover, intra-CA1 administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist, atropine (1, 4 and 7 microg/rat) inhibited the morphine (6 mg/kg)-induced CPP dose-dependently. On the other hand, atropine (7 microg/rat, intra-CA1) reversed the physostigmine-induced potentiation of the morphine response. Furthermore, intra-CA1 administration of nicotine (0.5, 0.75 and 1 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) elicited a significant CPP. Bilateral injections of different doses of the nicotinic receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (2, 4 and 8 microg/rat) into the CA1 regions significantly inhibited the morphine (6 mg/kg)-induced CPP. Moreover mecamylamine (8 microg/rat, intra-CA1) decreased the effect of nicotine-induced potentiation of the morphine response. Intra-CA1 injections of physostigmine, atropine, nicotine or mecamylamine alone did not induce a significant place preference or place aversion. It may be concluded that the muscarinic and nicotinic receptors of the hippocampal CA1 regions play an important role in morphine reward.

Analysis of Variance↗

The influence of central administration of dopaminergic and cholinergic agents on morphine-induced amnesia in morphine-sensitized mice.

In the present study, effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections of dopaminergic and cholinergic agents on morphine-induced amnesia in morphine-sensitized mice were investigated by using a one-trial passive avoidance task. Amnesia induced by pre-training morphine was significantly reversed in morphine-sensitized mice, which had previously received once daily injections of morphine (20 and 30 mg/kg, s.c.) for 3 days. Three daily injections of SKF 38393 (1, 2 and 4 g/mouse, i.c.v.) or SCH 23390 (0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 g/mouse, i.c.v.) before morphine, and during morphine-sensitization, decreased and increased the amnesia induced by pre-training morphine respectively. Three daily injections of quinpirole (0.3, 1 and 3 g/mouse, i.c.v.) or sulpiride (0.03, 0.1, 0.3 and 1 g/mouse, i.c.v.) before morphine, also decreased and increased the amnesia induced by pre-training morphine respectively. Morphine-sensitized mice received similar injections of cholinergic agents. Three daily injections of physostigmine (1, 3 and 5 g/mouse, i.c.v.) or atropine (1, 4 and 7 g/mouse, i.c.v.) before morphine, and during morphine-sensitization, decreased and increased the amnesia induced by pre-training morphine respectively. Three daily injections of nicotine (0.75, 1 and 2 g/mouse, i.c.v.) or mecamylamine (1, 3 and 6 g/mouse, i.c.v.) before morphine, also decreased and increased the amnesia induced by pre-training morphine respectively. The results suggest that morphine sensitization affects the impairment of memory formation and thus it is postulated that central dopaminergic and cholinergic systems may play an important role in this effect.

Amnesia↗

Involvement of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in morphine-induced memory retention in morphine-sensitized rats.

In the present study, the effects of intra-ventral tegmental area (VTA) injections of morphine on memory retention of a one-trial passive avoidance task have been investigated in morphine-sensitized rats. Retrieval was examined 24h after training and used as memory retention. Sensitization was obtained by subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine, once daily for 3 and 5 days free of the opioid before training. Post-training administration of the both systemic (2.5, 5 and 7.5mg/kg, s.c.) and intra-VTA (5 and 7.5microg/rat) of morphine, dose-dependently decreased memory retention. The response induced by post-training administration of intra-VTA morphine (7.5microg/rat) was significantly reversed in morphine-sensitized rats. The inhibition of morphine-induced amnesia in morphine-sensitized rats was decreased by once daily injections of naloxone (0.5, 1 and 2mg/kg, s.c.), SCH 23390 (0.025, 0.05 and 0.1mg/kg, s.c.) or sulpiride (25, 50 and 100mg/kg, s.c.), during the sensitization. The results suggest that VTA has an important role in morphine-induced amnesia and morphine sensitization affects this process through opioid and dopamine receptors.

Amnesia↗

The influence of NMDA receptor agonist and antagonist on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance in mice.

The measurement of step-down latency in passive avoidance has been used to study memory in laboratory animals. The pre-training injection of 5 mg/kg morphine impaired memory, which was restored when 24 h later the same dose of the drug was administered. To explore the possible involvement of NMDA modulators on morphine-induced memory impairment, we have investigated the effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of NMDA and the competitive NMDA antagonist, DL-AP5, on morphine-induced memory impairment or recall, on the test day. Morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) was administered 30 min before training to induce impairment of memory and 24 h later, 30 min before test to improve it. Pre-test administration of NMDA (0.00001, 0.0001 and 0.001 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) did not alter the retention latency compared to the saline-treated animals. But restored the memory impairment induced by pre-training morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.). Pre-test administration of DL-AP5 (1, 3.2 and 10 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) by itself decreased the retention latencies. The same doses of DL-AP5 increased pre-training morphine-induced memory impairment. Co-administration of NMDA (0.0001 and 0.001 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) and morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) on the test day increased morphine memory improvement. Conversely, DL-AP5 (1, 3.2 and 10 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) inhibited morphine-induced memory recall. It is concluded that NMDA receptors may be involved, at least in part, in morphine state-dependent learning in mice.

2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate↗

Role of the cholinergic system in the rat basolateral amygdala on morphine-induced conditioned place preference.

The effects of intra-basolateral amygdala (intra-BLA) injections of physostigmine, atropine, nicotine and/or mecamylamine on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats was investigated by using an unbiased 3-day schedule of place conditioning design. Animals that received 3 daily injections of morphine (0.5-10 mg/kg) subcutaneously (s.c.) or saline (1.0 ml/kg, s.c.) showed a significant preference for compartment paired with morphine. The maximum response was observed with 7.5 mg/kg of the opioid. Administration of the anticholinesterase drug, physostigmine (1, 3 and 5 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) elicited a significant CPP. Injections of antimuscarinic receptor agent, atropine (1, 4 and 7 microg/rat) dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (7.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. The injections of nicotine (0.75, 1 and 2 microg/rat) potentiated the morphine (0.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference, while the nicotinic receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (1, 3 and 6 microg/rat) dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (7.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. Furthermore, administration of atropine (7 microg/rat) but not mecamylamine (6 microg/rat) reduced the response induced by different doses of physostigmine plus morphine. Moreover, mecamylamine (6 microg/rat) but not atropine (7 microg/rat) reduced the response induced by different doses of nicotine plus morphine. It is concluded that the muscarinic and nicotinic receptor mechanisms in the BLA may be involved in the acquisition of morphine-induced place preference.

Amygdala↗

Morphine state-dependent learning: sensitization and interactions with dopamine receptors.

In the present study, the effects of morphine sensitization on impairment of memory formation and the state-dependent learning by morphine have been investigated in mice. Pretraining administration of morphine (0.5, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg) dose dependently decreased the learning of a one-trial passive avoidance task. Pretest administration of morphine (0.5, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg) induced state-dependent retrieval of the memory acquired under pretraining morphine influence. Pretraining or pretest administration of naloxone (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg) reversed both responses to morphine (5 mg/kg). Amnesia induced by pretraining morphine was significantly reversed in morphine-sensitized mice which had previously received once daily injections of morphine [20 and 30 mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)] for 3 days. Morphine sensitization tended to reverse but did not significantly affect morphine state-dependent memory. The inhibition of morphine-induced amnesia in morphine-sensitized mice was decreased by once daily administration of naloxone (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) 30 min prior to injection of morphine (20 mg/kg/day x 3 days). Three-days administration of 1-phenyl-7,8-dihydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine HCL (SKF 38393; 8, 16 and 32 mg/kg) or SCH 23390; R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine HCL (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) before morphine (for 3 days) and during morphine-sensitization, decreased and increased, the amnesia induced by pretraining morphine, respectively. Similar administration of quinpirole (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) or sulpiride (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg) before morphine also decreased and increased the amnesia induced by pretraining morphine, respectively. The results suggest that morphine sensitization affects the impairment of memory formation, but not the facilitation of retrieval induced by morphine and thus it is postulated that dopamine receptors may play an important role in this effect.

Animals↗

GABA(A) receptors in the basolateral amygdala are involved in mediating morphine reward.

In the present study, the effects of intra-basolateral amygdala (BLA) injection of GABA(A) receptor agonist and antagonist on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in male Wistar rats have been investigated. Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of different doses of morphine sulfate (1-9 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent CPP. Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, it was found that the GABA(A) receptor agonist, muscimol (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat) or the GABA(A) receptor antagonist, bicuculline (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat), did not produce a significant place preference or place aversion. Intra-BLA administration of muscimol (0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat) decreased the acquisition of CPP induced by morphine (6 mg/kg). On the other hand, intra-BLA injection of bicuculline (0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat) in combination with an ineffective dose of morphine (1 mg/kg) elicited a significant CPP. The response of different doses of muscimol was attenuated by bicuculline (0.125 and 0.25 microg/rat). Furthermore, intra-BLA administration of bicuculline but not muscimol before testing significantly decreased the expression of morphine (6 mg/kg)-induced place preference. The administration of the higher doses of bicuculline (0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat) during acquisition and the higher dose of muscimol (2 microg/rat) on the test day decreased the locomotor activity of the animals on the testing phase. It can be concluded that GABA(A) receptors in the amygdala are involved in morphine reward.

Amygdala↗

Involvement of dopamine D1 receptors of the central amygdala on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference in rat.

In the present study, the effects of intra-central amygdala (CeA) injection of dopamine D1 receptor agonist and antagonist on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) were investigated in male Wistar rats. Our data showed that subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of morphine sulphate (0.5-10 mg/kg) significantly increased the time spent in the drug-paired compartment in a dose-dependent manner. Intra-CeA administration of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist, SKF 38393 (2 and 4 micro g/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg), elicited a significant conditioned place preference. On the other hand, a single dose of SKF 38393 (2 micro g/rat, intra-CeA) in combination with the lower doses (0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg), but not with the higher doses of morphine potentiated morphine-induced CPP. Furthermore, intra-CeA administration of the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.5-1 micro g/rat) decreased the acquisition of conditioned place preference induced by morphine (7.5 mg/kg). The response of SKF 38393 was decreased by SCH 23390 (0.75 micro g/rat). SKF 38393 or SCH 23390 by themselves did not elicit any effect on place conditioning. On the other hand, intra-CeA administration of SKF 38393 or SCH 23390 significantly decreased the expression of morphine (7.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. SKF 38393 or SCH 23390 injections into the CeA had no effects on the locomotor activity on the test sessions. The results indicate that the dopamine D1 receptors in the CeA may be involved in the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference.

Amygdala↗