PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Amy B Reed

Publications and source records attributed to Amy B Reed.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Endovascular repair of an acute blunt popliteal artery injury.

Blunt popliteal arterial injury is uncommon and is usually associated with surrounding soft tissue and orthopedic injuries, which may complicate traditional open operative repair. We present the successful management of a blunt popliteal artery injury through an endovascular approach, where we imaged the lesion, extracted the thrombus, protected against distal embolization, and performed a balloon angioplasty to the intimal lesion. Our approach is the first documented in the literature in which endovascular repair of a blunt popliteal artery injury was performed successfully in an acutely ischemic extremity. Using a filter wire is a novel way to prevent distal embolization during manipulation.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed2006

Novel endovascular treatment of blunt thoracic aortic trauma with a self-expanding stent lined with aortic extender cuffs.

We report the successful treatment of blunt thoracic aortic trauma with a self-expanding stent lined with commercially available aortic extender cuffs. A 24 x 70 mm Wallstent was positioned distal to the left subclavian artery via a left femoral approach. The stent was then lined with three overlapping Gore Excluder aortic extender cuffs. Intravascular ultrasound was performed pre- and post-deployment. The aortic pseudoaneurysm was successfully excluded. The self-expanding stent facilitated placement of the extender cuffs and improved the contact between the multiple cuffs. This technique could still have utility in emergency settings when approved thoracic endografts are available for this indication.

Aneurysm, False↗
PubMed2006

Timing of endovascular repair of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic transections.

BACKGROUND: Patients with blunt traumatic thoracic aortic transection (BTTAT) just distal to the takeoff of the left subclavian artery typically have concomitant injuries that make open emergent surgical repair highly risky. Over the past decade, endovascular repair of the injured thoracic aorta with commercially available and custom-made covered stents has developed as a viable option, with reported decreases in short-term morbidity and mortality. If active extravasation of contrast from the injured thoracic aorta is not appreciated on chest computed tomography scan, other concurrent injuries of the head, abdomen, and extremities can often be repaired with careful control of blood pressure. The timing of endovascular repair of the traumatic thoracic aortic transection, however, often comes into question, particularly with the presence of fever, pneumonia, or bacteremia. We sought to identify a time frame during which endovascular repair of BTTAT could safely be performed. METHODS: Age, concomitant injuries, time from trauma to repair, type of device, and major outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period (January 2000 to March 2005), 51 patients presented with BTTAT. Twenty-seven (52.9%) patients with BTTAT died shortly after arrival. Of the remaining 24, 9 underwent emergent open repair, with 1 intraoperative death. Two delayed open repairs were performed. Thirteen patients with BTTAT underwent delayed endovascular repair. Successful endovascular repair of BTTAT was performed in all 13 patients, with no intraoperative deaths. Seven patients were treated with commercial devices and six with custom-made covered stents. None of the repairs was performed emergently. The timing of repair ranged from 1 day to 7 months (median, 6 days), and all patients were treated aggressively with beta-blockade before surgery. One patient was discharged from the hospital and underwent elective repair at a later date. Three patients died in the postoperative period (30 days): two from multisystem organ failure and one from iliac artery complications encountered at the time of device deployment. The remaining 10 patients were successfully discharged to a rehabilitation facility. CONCLUSIONS: The opportunity to successfully perform endovascular repair of BTTAT may be possible many days after the initial injury in the hemodynamically stable trauma patient.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Advanced training in vascular surgery: how does it need to change?

Fellowship training in vascular surgery over the last several decades has typically involved 1 to 2 years of clinical training incorporating open surgical techniques, some noninvasive vascular diagnostic laboratory, outpatient and inpatient experiences, occasionally basic science research, and more recently training in endovascular procedures. In order to meet the projected increased need for vascular care in the future, vascular surgery training needs to undergo both structural and content modifications if the field is to stay at the forefront in caring for the patient with vascular disease. This article addresses these issues and potential solutions.

Angioplasty↗
PubMed2004

Covered stent exclusion of blunt traumatic carotid artery pseudoaneurysm: case report and review of the literature.

Injury to the carotid artery from blunt trauma, when not lethal, will often go unrecognized. A 37-year-old male was the belted driver in a motor vehicle accident 15 years prior to presenting with intermittent left upper extremity parasthesias and weakness. A large, calcified distal right internal carotid artery (ICA) pseudoaneurysm was diagnosed and successfully excluded with a 7 x 30 mm covered stent.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed2004

Carotid endarterectomy: who is the high-risk patient?

The role of carotid endarterectomy in the prevention of stroke was validated by two randomized clinical trials, the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy (NASCET) and the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS). However, these trials excluded patients at high risk for perioperative stroke and other morbidity, raising concerns for the applicability of the trial results to the general population. Some have also suggested these "high-risk" patients are better suited for carotid artery stenting with the belief that stenting has lower morbidity and mortality. In this article, we review many of the commonly accepted high-risk factors for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and examine their outcomes. High-risk patients are more common than generally believed and their outcomes may be the same with carotid endarterectomy as it is with carotid stenting. Truly "high-risk" patients with shortened life expectancy are best served with no intervention.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

The impact of patient age and aortic size on the results of aortobifemoral bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: On the basis of the widespread belief that aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) represents the optimal mode of revascularization for patients with diffuse aortoiliac disease, vascular surgeons are often aggressive about its application in young adults. We undertook this retrospective evaluation of ABFs performed from 1980 to 1999 to determine whether the results justify this approach. Patients of less than 50 years of age (n = 45) were compared with those aged 50 to 59 years (n = 93) and those aged more than 60 years (n = 146). RESULTS: Younger patients were more likely to undergo operation for claudication than were older patients (72% versus 59% and 55%; P <.04). Younger patients were significantly more likely to be smokers (87%) but less likely to have diabetes, hypertension, or cerebrovascular disease. Bypasses were constructed in an end-to-end fashion in 71.1% of patients of less than 50 years versus 68.8% and 71.2% of older patients (P = not significant). The mean diameter of aortic grafts was significantly smaller in younger patients (14.6 mm) than in older patients (15.6 mm and 15.5 mm; P <.01). The need for a subsequent infrainguinal reconstruction was highest in the youngest patients (24% versus 17% and 7%; P <.01). Surgical mortality rates were low in all groups (0%, 1%, and 2.0% for increasing age groups; P = not significant). Five-year primary and secondary patency rates increased significantly with each increase in age interval: 5-year primary patency rate: less than 50 years, 66% +/- 8%; 50 to 59 years, 87% +/- 5%; more than 60 years, 96% +/-2% (P <.05 for all comparisons). Five-year secondary patency rates were: less than 50 years, 79% +/- 7%; 50 to 59 years, 91% +/- 4%; more than 60 years, 98% +/- 2% (P <.05 for all comparisons). Five-year survival rate was comparable in all three groups: less than 50 years, 93% +/- 5%; 50 to 59 years, 92% +/- 4%; more than 60 years, 87% +/- 4% (P = not significant). CONCLUSION: Increased virulence of aortic disease, smaller aortic size, and more progressive infrainguinal disease may all negatively impact the results of ABF in younger patients. Although 5-year results are acceptable, increased caution is warranted in the routine application of ABF in young patients without limb-threatening ischemia.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Preoperative risk factors for carotid endarterectomy: defining the patient at high risk.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for prevention of stroke has been demonstrated in randomized trials; however, the optimal approach in patients excluded from these trials or who have other significant comorbid conditions remains controversial, particularly with the advent of percutaneous interventions. We examined the influence of putative risk factors on outcome of CEA in a single-center experience. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1370 consecutive CEA performed from 1990 to 1999 was undertaken. Preoperative risk factors examined included age older than 80 years, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure (serum creatinine concentration > 2.0 mg/dL), contralateral carotid artery occlusion, recurrent ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis, ipsilateral hemispheric symptoms within 6 weeks, and recent coronary bypass grafting (CABG). The Fisher exact test was used to identify baseline variables associated with perioperative (30 days) risk for stroke or death. Multivariate analysis with Poisson regression was used to study the effect of all univariate criteria in combination. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, there were 32 adverse events (2.3%), including 11 deaths (0.8%), 6 disabling strokes (0.4%), and 10 nondisabling strokes (0.7%). There was no significant difference in incidence of perioperative stroke or death between patients with one or more risk factors (n = 689) and those with no risk factors (low risk, n = 681). Thirty-day mortality was significantly greater in patients with two or more risk factors compared with patients with no risk factors (2.8% vs 0.3%; P =.04), but no significant difference was noted in perioperative stroke rate (2.3% vs 1.0%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that contralateral carotid occlusion (n = 75) was the only significant predictor of adverse outcome (5 events, 6.7%) among the variables tested; this was confirmed with multivariate analysis (relative risk, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-12.3; P =.01). Five-year survival for patients with two or more risk factors was notably diminished compared with that for patients with no risk factors (38.7% +/- 5.9% vs 75.0% +/- 2.6%; P <.001). Contralateral occlusion was also associated with reduced 5-year survival (38 +/- 11% vs 67 +/- 2%; P <.004). CONCLUSION: CEA can be safely performed in patients deemed at high risk, including those aged 80 years or older and others with significant comorbid conditions, with combined stroke and mortality rates comparable to those found in randomized trials, ie, the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Contralateral occlusion may be a predictor for moderately increased perioperative risk and for reduced long-term survival. Caution may be warranted in asymptomatic patients with multiple risk factors, in whom presumed long-term benefit of CEA may be compromised by markedly reduced 5-year survival.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Usefulness of autogenous bypass grafts originating distal to the groin.

PURPOSE: Infrainguinal bypass grafting with a proximal anastomosis distal to the groin has been used increasingly to conserve available conduit and reduce wound morbidity and recovery time. The usefulness of the liberalized use of distal origin grafts (DOGs) is unknown. METHODS: Consecutive autogenous DOG procedures that were performed between 1978 and 2000 were reviewed retrospectively with a computerized registry. Procedures performed as revisions to earlier infrainguinal bypass grafting procedures and for popliteal aneurysm were excluded. RESULTS: In the 22-year study period, 249 autogenous DOG procedures were performed in 217 patients. Comparison of the 159 DOGs in patients with diabetes mellitus (+DM) with the 90 grafts in patients without diabetes mellitus (-DM) revealed more associated renal disease (33% vs 9%), preoperative foot necrosis (80% vs 52%), distal popliteal artery graft origins (49% vs 37%), and non-greater saphenous conduits used (30% vs 19%) among the +DM subgroup than the -DM subgroup (P <.05). The operative mortality rate was 2.0%, the major morbidity rate was 8.8%, the early graft failure rate was 6.4%, and the early amputation rate was 2.4%, with no differences related to diabetes mellitus. Follow-up was complete in 92% of patients in a mean interval of 27 months. At 5 years, cumulative primary graft patency rates were 62% overall, 73% for the +DM subgroup, and 45% for the -DM subgroup (P <.001). The overall limb salvage rate after DOG procedures for critical ischemia was 79%, and it was 84% for the +DM subgroup and 69% for the -DM subgroup (P <.04). The overall patient survival rate was 45%, with no difference related to diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: Outcome after autogenous DOG revascularization is satisfactory overall. Graft patency and limb salvage after DOG for critical ischemia are significantly better among patients with diabetes mellitus than patients without diabetes mellitus, despite significantly more bypass grafting procedures performed for foot necrosis. DOG revascularization appears to be an appropriate preference for patients with diabetes mellitus with good inflow below the groin; it should be used less liberally among patients without diabetes mellitus.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Initial experience with minimally invasive in situ bypass procedure with blind valvulotomy.

OBJECTIVE: The in situ vein (ISV) bypass is uniquely suited to technical modifications designed to reduce the wound morbidity of infrainguinal revascularization. A technique of "blind" valvulotomy and selective vein branch ligation was used, and a preliminary study was performed to assess safety and efficacy. METHODS: From November 1998 to July 2001, all patients for infrainguinal bypass procedures underwent evaluation for inclusion in the study. Thirty-five patients underwent ISV bypass procedures with an expandable, self-centering valvulotome (ESV). Intraoperative selection of veins suitable for the study was assisted with venography and duplex scanning. The ISV bypass procedures were performed with initial groin and distal incisions, with smaller incisions to ligate significant arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). Duplex graft scanning was performed at routine intervals after surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-seven ISV grafts were performed from the common femoral artery to the popliteal (n = 14), tibial (n = 20), and dorsalis pedis (n = 3) arteries. In 35 cases (95%), a full-length incision was avoided. With ESV, all valves in 34 cases (92%) were effectively lysed. Proximal extension of the distal incision was performed in four cases (10.8%). The mean number of incisions per case was 3.1 +/- 1.7. One graft failed within 30 days (2.7%), with successful revision. During the early follow-up period (9.9 +/- 7.3 months; range, 1 to 33 months), 44% of residual AVF closed spontaneously (15 of 34 AVF; 16 patients) and two anastomotic stenoses and two symptomatic AVF were corrected surgically. Four late graft occlusions occurred, with a 1-year cumulative primary patency rate of 77% and a secondary patency rate of 92%. CONCLUSION: Blind valvulotomy with ESV facilitates safe and effective minimally invasive ISV bypass. Resultant graft patency rates appear comparable with results with open techniques. This preliminary experience warrants further study to refine patient selection criteria and operative technique and to better clarify the natural history of residual AVF.

Aged↗