PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Amy H Sobel

Publications and source records attributed to Amy H Sobel.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Process involved in reading imaging studies: workflow analysis and implications for workstation development.

Software development for imaging workstations has lagged behind hardware availability. To guide development and to analyze work flow involved in interpretation of cross-sectional imaging studies, we assessed the cognitive and physical processes. We observed the performance and interpretation of body computed tomography (CT scans and recorded the events that occurred during this process. We studied work flow using a bottleneck analysis. Twenty-four ofa total of 54 cases (44%) involved comparing the images with those of prior scans. Forty-seven of 54 scans (87%) were viewed using windows other than soft tissue, or compared with precontrast scans. In 46 cases (85%), the interpretation stopped to return to a previous level for review. Measurement of lesions was performed in 24 of 54 (44%) cases, and in 15 (63%)of these cases, measurements were taken of lesions on old studies for comparison. Interpretation was interrupted in 14 of 54 cases (26%) by referring clinicians desiring consultation. The work flow analysis showed film folder retrieval by the film room to be the bottleneck for interpretation by film. For picture archiving and communication system (PACS) reading,the CT examination itself proved to be the bottleneck. We conclude that workstations for CT interpretation should facilitate movement within scans, comparison with prior examinations, and measuring lesions on these scans. Workstation design should consider means of optimizing time currently not used between interpretation sessions, minimizing interruptions and providing more automated functions currently requiring physician interaction.

Efficiency, Organizational↗

Breast cyst recurrence after postaspiration injection of air.

Breast cysts are a common cause of breast pain, lumps, and patient anxiety. Older studies incidentally reported a decrease in cyst recurrence when air was injected for diagnostic purposes after aspiration. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of cyst recurrence after ultrasound-guided aspiration and injection of air for therapeutic purposes. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 113 cysts aspirated in 90 women; 88 had air injected for therapeutic purposes after aspiration, and 25 did not. Subsequent mammograms and sonograms were reviewed (mean follow-up 21 months, range of 8-36 months) to assess for recurrence. Demographic and imaging features were not different between the two study groups. Of the 88 cysts that had air injected after aspiration, 14 recurred (16%) compared with 20 of 25 cysts (80%) that did not have air injected following aspiration. Cyst recurrence correlated with air injection, but did not correlate with cyst size, menopausal status, or use of hormone replacement therapy. Only one patient complained of pain, and no complications occurred. The injection of air into cysts following aspiration may be useful for therapeutic purposes.

Adult↗