PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Amy Poremba

Publications and source records attributed to Amy Poremba.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Differential effects of cerebellar inactivation on eyeblink conditioned excitation and inhibition.

The neural mechanisms underlying excitatory and inhibitory eyeblink conditioning were compared using muscimol inactivation of the cerebellum. In experiment 1, rats were given saline or muscimol infusions into the anterior interpositus nucleus ipsilateral to the conditioned eye before each of four daily excitatory conditioning sessions. Postinfusion testing continued for four more excitatory conditioning sessions. All rats were given a final test session after muscimol infusions. The muscimol infusions inactivated the cerebellar nuclei, lateral anterior lobe, crus I, rostral crus II, and lobule HVI ipsilateral to the conditioned eye. Acquisition of excitatory conditioning was completely prevented by muscimol inactivation. In experiment 2, there were four experimental phases. Phase 1 consisted of excitatory conditioning. In phase 2, rats were given saline or muscimol infusions before conditioned inhibition training. Phase 3 consisted of continued conditioned inhibition training with no drug infusions. In phase 4, all rats received a retardation test in which the inhibitory stimulus was paired with the unconditioned stimulus. Muscimol infusions blocked the expression of conditioned responses during phase 2. However, robust conditioned inhibition was evident in phases 3 and 4. The findings indicate that conditioned excitation and inhibition depend on different mechanisms.

Animals↗

Dissociable functional cortical topographies for working memory maintenance of voice identity and location.

In order to ascertain whether the neural system for auditory working memory exhibits a functional dissociation for spatial and nonspatial information, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a single set of auditory stimuli to study working memory for the location and identity of human voices. The subjects performed a delayed recognition task for human voices and voice locations and an auditory sensorimotor control task. Several temporal, parietal, and frontal areas were activated by both memory tasks in comparison with the control task. However, during the delay periods, activation was greater for the location than for the voice identity task in dorsal prefrontal (SFS/PreCG) and parietal regions and, conversely, greater for voices than locations in ventral prefrontal cortex and the anterior portion of the insula. This preferential response to the voice identity task in ventral prefrontal cortex continued during the recognition test period, but the double dissociation was observed only during maintenance, not during encoding or recognition. Together, the present findings suggest that, during auditory working memory, maintenance of spatial and nonspatial information modulates activity preferentially in a dorsal and a ventral auditory pathway, respectively. Furthermore, the magnitude of this dissociation seems to be dependent on the cognitive operations required at different times during task performance.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Species-specific calls evoke asymmetric activity in the monkey's temporal poles.

It has often been proposed that the vocal calls of monkeys are precursors of human speech, in part because they provide critical information to other members of the species who rely on them for survival and social interactions. Both behavioural and lesion studies suggest that monkeys, like humans, use the auditory system of the left hemisphere preferentially to process vocalizations. To investigate the pattern of neural activity that might underlie this particular form of functional asymmetry in monkeys, we measured local cerebral metabolic activity while the animals listened passively to species-specific calls compared with a variety of other classes of sound. Within the superior temporal gyrus, significantly greater metabolic activity occurred on the left side than on the right, only in the region of the temporal pole and only in response to monkey calls. This functional asymmetry was absent when these regions were separated by forebrain commissurotomy, suggesting that the perception of vocalizations elicits concurrent interhemispheric interactions that focus the auditory processing within a specialized area of one hemisphere.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Functional mapping of the primate auditory system.

Cerebral auditory areas were delineated in the awake, passively listening, rhesus monkey by comparing the rates of glucose utilization in an intact hemisphere and in an acoustically isolated contralateral hemisphere of the same animal. The auditory system defined in this way occupied large portions of cerebral tissue, an extent probably second only to that of the visual system. Cortically, the activated areas included the entire superior temporal gyrus and large portions of the parietal, prefrontal, and limbic lobes. Several auditory areas overlapped with previously identified visual areas, suggesting that the auditory system, like the visual system, contains separate pathways for processing stimulus quality, location, and motion.

Acoustic Stimulation↗