PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Amy Rezec

Publications and source records attributed to Amy Rezec.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments.

Several previous psychophysical and neurophysiological studies have investigated the separate effects of attention and adaptation on visual processing. Here, we investigated the combined effects of attention and adaptation on motion processing by measuring the effects of spatial attention on the duration of the motion after-effect (MAE) over a wide range of stimulus contrasts. MAE duration was compared between two conditions: full-attention, subjects were required to pay attention to the adapting motion stimulus, and poor-attention, subjects performed a difficult vowel detection task at the center of gaze and ignored the adapting motion stimulus. Attention was found to increase the MAE duration by a factor of 1.4, which was approximately constant over a wide range of stimulus contrasts (3.22-80.6%). Notably, this included contrasts for which the MAE duration had reached its asymptotic value. We show that a quantitative model based on known properties of directionally selective MT neurons can explain these results by assuming that attention enhances the effects of adaptation, a phenomenon we refer to as "adaptation gain". Specifically, attending to an adapting motion stimulus shifts the semi-saturation point (C50) of the underlying contrast response function (CRF) of motion detectors roughly 1.4-fold more to the right than does ignoring that same stimulus. By enhancing the effects of adaptation in this fashion, attention is predicted to enhance the adaptability of the visual motion system.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Chromatic input to motion processing in the absence of attention.

While several previous psychophysical and neurophysiological studies have demonstrated chromatic (red/green) input to motion processing, the nature of this input is still a matter of debate. In particular, recent controversy has developed regarding whether chromatic motion processing relies on lower-level processes [J. Neurosci. 14 (1994) 4854; 19 (1999) 6571] versus higher-level, attention- or salience-based mechanisms [Science 257 (1992) 1563; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96 (1999a) 8289; 96 (1999b) 15374]. In this study, we investigated the degree to which chromatic motion is influenced by attentional mechanisms by employing a dual-task paradigm, which allowed us to compare the strength of chromatic motion under conditions of poor versus full attention. Here, we found that for equiluminant red/green gratings, chromatic motion processing is as robust in poor, as in full, attention conditions. This lack of an attentional effect suggests that chromatic motion processing must rely, at least in part, on lower-level (i.e., pre-attentive) motion mechanisms. For non-equiluminant (e.g., red brighter than green) gratings, however, attention significantly modulates chromatic motion strength. Possible explanations for this latter result are discussed in the context of inherent salience differences between the bright-red and dim-green stripes of the heterochromatic grating.

Attention↗