Biomedical subjects

Anand Ananthasubramaniam

Publications and source records attributed to Anand Ananthasubramaniam.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Extraction of the midsagittal plane from morphological neuroimages using the Kullback-Leibler's measure.

A theoretically simple and computationally efficient method to extract the midsagittal plane (MSP) from volumetric neuroimages is presented. The method works in two stages (coarse and fine) and is based on calculation of the Kullback and Leibler's (KL) measure, which characterizes the difference between two distributions. Slices along the sagittal direction are analyzed with respect to a reference slice to determine the coarse MSP. To calculate the final MSP, a local search algorithm is applied. The proposed method does not need any preprocessing, like reformatting, skull stripping, etc. The algorithm was validated quantitatively on 75 MRI datasets of different pulse sequences (T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR and SPGR) and MRA. The angular and distance errors between the calculated MSP and the ground truth lines marked by the expert were calculated. The average distance and angular deviation were 1.25 pixels and 0.63 degrees , respectively. In addition, the algorithm was tested qualitatively on PD, FLAIR, MRA, and CT datasets. To analyze the robustness of the method against rotation, inhomogeneity and noise, the phantom data were used.

Arachnoid Cysts↗

PubMed2006

A medical imaging and visualization toolkit in Java.

Medical imaging research and clinical applications usually require combination and integration of various techniques ranging from image processing and analysis to realistic visualization to user-friendly interaction. Researchers with different backgrounds coming from diverse areas have been using numerous types of hardware, software, and environments to obtain their results. We also observe that students often build their tools from scratch resulting in redundant work. A generic and flexible medical imaging and visualization toolkit would be helpful in medical research and educational institutes to reduce redundant development work and hence increase research efficiency. This paper presents our experience in developing a Medical Imaging and Visualization Toolkit (BIL-kit) that is a set of comprehensive libraries as well as a number of interactive tools. The BIL-kit covers a wide range of fundamental functions from image conversion and transformation, image segmentation, and analysis to geometric model generation and manipulation, all the way up to 3D visualization and interactive simulation. The toolkit design and implementation emphasize the reusability and flexibility. BIL-kit is implemented in the Java language so that it works in hybrid and dynamic research and educational environments. This also allows the toolkit to extend its usage for the development of Web-based applications. Several BIL-kit-based tools and applications are presented including image converter, image processor, general anatomy model simulator, vascular modeling environment, and volume viewer. BIL-kit is a suitable platform for researchers and students to develop visualization and simulation prototypes, and it can also be used for the development of clinical applications.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Quantitative analysis of brain asymmetry by using the divergence measure: normal-pathological brain discrimination.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The human brain demonstrates approximate bilateral symmetry of anatomy, function, neurochemical activity, and electrophysiology. This symmetry reflected in radiological images may be affected by pathology. Hence quantitative analysis of brain symmetry may enable the normal and pathological brain discrimination. We propose a method based on the Jeffreys divergence measure (J-divergence), which attempts to quantify "approximate symmetry" and also aids to classify the brain as bilaterally symmetrical/asymmetrical (normal/abnormal). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dataset included studies of 101 patients (59 without detectable pathologies and 42 with different abnormalities). First, the midsagittal plane is computed for the volume data that divides the head into two hemispheres. The J-divergence is calculated from the density functions of intensities of both the hemispheres. Statistical analysis was conducted to find the best distribution for normal/abnormal datasets. RESULTS: Statistical tests showed that the lognormal distribution best characterizes the values of the J-divergence for both normal and abnormal cases, and the threshold value for the Jeffreys divergence measure to classify the brains with and without detectable pathologies is T = 0.007. The threshold value had a sensitivity of 88.1% and specificity of 90.9%. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is fast and simple to compute. The high sensitivity and specificity indicate the results are encouraging. This method can be used for the initial analysis of data, detection of pathology, classification of dataset as presumably normal/abnormal, and localization of abnormality.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Rapid and automatic calculation of the midsagittal plane in magnetic resonance diffusion and perfusion images.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A near real-time and fully automatic method for calculation of the midsagittal plane (MSP) for magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion and perfusion images is introduced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The method is based on the Kullback-Leibler's (KL) measure quantifying the difference between two intensity distributions. The MSP is a sagittal plane with the highest KL measure. The method was validated quantitatively for 61 diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), peak height (PKHT), and time to peak (TPP) data sets of 11 stroke patients based on the ground truth provided by two raters. RESULTS: Average angular errors are less than 1 degrees for DWI and less than 2 degrees for CBF and CBV. Average distance errors measured in the worst case (on the brain's bounding box) are less than 2.5 mm for DWI and less than 5 mm for CBF and CBV. This algorithmic accuracy is at the level of interrater variability. Results obtained for the other perfusions maps (MTT, PKHT, TTP) were inferior; therefore, processing of CBF or CBV is preferred for accurate and robust calculation of the MSP from perfusion maps. Calculation of the MSP takes about half a second on a standard computer. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method is near real-time and fully automatic, and neither user interaction nor parameter setting is needed. It does not require preprocessing of data. The method potentially is useful in rapid and automated processing of MR stroke diffusion and perfusion images.

Algorithms↗