PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Anand M Murthi

Publications and source records attributed to Anand M Murthi.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Distal biceps tendon rupture: biomechanical analysis of repair strength of the Bio-Tenodesis screw versus suture anchors.

The purpose of this study was to compare the strength and stiffness of distal biceps tendon ruptures repaired with either a Bio-Tenodesis screw or suture anchor technique in a cadaveric model. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric arms underwent simulated distal biceps tendon ruptures and were repaired with either a Bio-Tenodesis screw or suture anchor technique. We analyzed pullout strength, stiffness, and mode of failure for each construct. The mean pullout strength of the repair with a Bio-Tenodesis screw was significantly higher (192 N [SD, 42.5 N] vs 147 N [SD, 29.5 N], P < .013). Use of the Bio-Tenodesis screw is an effective means of repairing distal biceps tendon ruptures. It provides significantly more initial pullout strength compared with suture anchors. This could potentially allow more aggressive rehabilitation and faster return to function.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Anterior glenohumeral force/translation behavior with and without rotator cuff contraction during clinical stability testing.

OBJECTIVE: Measure stiffness of the glenohumeral joint during clinical laxity testing with and without muscular contraction of the Internal rotators. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of normal shoulders. BACKGROUND: Clinical examination for shoulder instability is based on subjective impression, and is only performed passively. Our study presents a method for quantitative clinical examination of the shoulder under both passive and active muscle contraction conditions. We hypothesized that in a normal shoulder, contraction of the internal rotators will increase the stiffness of the glenohumeral joint, effectively constraining the head of the humerus against anterior directed forces. METHODS: Ten subjects were instrumented with electromagnetic sensors to record glenohumeral linear displacements. A mini-force transducer recorded forces applied to subjects during anterior drawer testing (forced anterior glenohumeral displacement), which was performed passively, and during isometric contraction of internal rotators. RESULTS: Only mild contraction of the internal rotators is needed to significantly increase the stiffness to anterior directed forces. Greater muscular activation does not result in further increased stiffness. CONCLUSION: Objective measurement of glenohumeral stiffness during passive and active muscular contraction may be useful for evaluating the capacity of rotator cuff muscles to stabilize the shoulder. The concept of more strength is better, for rotator cuff strengthen programs is questioned.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Two-part and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with suture fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures (two-part and three-part) treated with nonabsorbable rotator cuff-incorporating sutures. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: There were 27 patients (28 shoulders) with displaced proximal humerus fractures. There were 13 greater tuberosity (GT) and 9 surgical neck (SN) two-part fractures and 6 GT/SN three-part fractures. The average age was 64 years (range 38 to 84 years). The average follow-up was 4.4 years (range 1.0 to 11.5 years). INTERVENTION: All patients were surgically treated solely with heavy polyester nonabsorbable sutures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional assessment was obtained using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Neer's criteria, which grade outcomes as excellent, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory. RESULTS: Overall, there were 22 (78%) excellent, 3 (11%) satisfactory, and 3 (11%) unsatisfactory results, and the average ASES score was 87.1 (range 35.0 to 100.0). All shoulders healed radiographically without evidence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head. Twenty-four shoulders (86%) had anatomic alignment on postoperative radiographs. Of four shoulders with nonanatomic alignment, three had ASES scores of >/=90, with excellent Neer scores. When comparing patients with isolated two-part GT fractures (n = 13) with patients having two-part SN or three-part SN/GT fractures (n = 15), there were no statistically significant differences with respect to range of motion (P > 0.05) and outcome measures (P > 0.05). All patients who had unsatisfactory outcomes were noncompliant with physical therapy, with ASES scores averaging 39.4 (range 35.0 to 43.3). CONCLUSION: Two-part and three-part GT and SN fractures can be treated satisfactorily with heavy nonabsorbable rotator cuff-incorporating sutures, particularly in elderly patients. Hardware-associated complications are obviated. Patients with SN fractures treated with sutures can have outcomes similar to patients with two-part GT fractures. Although the goal is to reconstruct a "one-part" fracture pattern, some residual deformity does not preclude an excellent outcome. A compliant patient is crucial for a successful result.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Fixation for the millennium: the shoulder.

Charles Neer designed his original prosthesis in 1951. It was made of cast cobalt chrome alloy and was only press-fit. There was not any significant loosening in his original series, but patients complained of easy fatigability. This finding was attributed to glenoid issues and a cemented glenoid replacement was introduced in 1973. High rates of lucencies were reported and raised issues regarding fixation. Cementless glenoid components have been found to have fewer lucencies but require metal backing. Higher failure rates have been reported for the cementless design versus the cemented glenoids. With humeral fixation, symptomatic loosening is not a problem with cement or coated press-fit fixation. Long-term outcome studies with cemented and uncemented stems have shown the incidence of humeral loosening to be low. Fixation of humeral components should be based on bone quality, patient age, prosthetic design, and surgeon preference.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗