PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ananya Das

Publications and source records attributed to Ananya Das.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Endoscopic ultrasonography and prognosis of esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) staging is used for management of esophageal cancer, but its effect on the outcome of patients is unknown. Our aim was to study the association of receipt of EUS and overall survival in a cohort of patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: All persons 65 years or older who were diagnosed with esophageal cancer between January 1994 and December 1999 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database were identified. Relevant demographic, cancer-specific information and EUS procedural information were extracted. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred thirty patients with esophageal cancer (48% squamous cell cancer) were eligible for analysis. Only 303 (10.7%) patients underwent a EUS examination. Patients who had EUS evaluation were more likely to undergo esophageal resection (21.1% vs 14.7%, P = .01) and more likely to have received adjuvant therapy (11.2% vs 6.7%, P = .008). When adjusted for age at diagnosis, race, gender, comorbidity, histology, and tumor stage, receipt of EUS was associated with a reduced risk of death (relative hazard, 0.594; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.68; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing EUS in patients with esophageal cancer is independently associated with improved survival, possibly because of improved stage-appropriate management such as use of adjuvant therapy and surgical resection.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Primary care physician attitudes toward endoscopic screening for GERD symptoms and unsedated esophagoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend consideration of screening patients with chronic GERD for Barrett's esophagus (BE). Unsedated esophagoscopy (UE) is a less costly alternative to standard EGD for identifying BE. The aim of this study was to determine the indications for EGD referral, the barriers to screening, and the interest in performing UE. METHODS: A one-page survey was mailed to a random sample of 500 family practitioners and 500 internists. This sample was obtained from the American Academy of Family Physicians and American Society of Internal Medicine (500 from each organization). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 54%. The majority (78%) refer more than 50% of their GERD patients for EGD; however, 34% also refer more than 10% of their patients for barium studies. Primary care physicians cited alarm symptoms, refractory symptoms, and chronicity and severity of symptoms as the major indications for referral for EGD. Gender, age, obesity, and tobacco use were cited less frequently. Cost of endoscopy, poor patient acceptance, and lack of evidence were the most common reasons cited for not referring for EGD. A majority of respondents (62%) indicated that the availability of UE would increase referral for the procedure, and 52% would be willing to perform UE in their office. CONCLUSIONS: Severe, refractory, and chronic symptoms are the primary reasons for endoscopic referral from primary care physicians who manage patients with GERD. Other risk factors for BE, such as gender and age, do not appear to be important determinants for endoscopic referral. Further evaluation of UE as a mechanism to increase screening for BE in primary care patients is merited.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2006

Temporal trend in relative risk of second primary colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are at a higher risk for developing a second primary. Factors (such as survival rate, rate of receipt of surveillance procedures, and the overall incidence of CRC) with potential impact on the risk for second primary CRC have changed over the last three decades. Thus, it is likely that the risk for second primary CRC also has changed over the years. OBJECTIVES: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results public-use database to assess whether the relative risk of second primary CRC has changed in patients with initial primary CRC. METHODS: The temporal trend in the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for a second primary CRC was estimated. Also, the clinical features of the second primary CRC were compared in two subgroups based on the year of diagnosis of the first primary CRC: Group A (1973-1977) and Group B (1988-1992). RESULTS: During the period of 1973 to 2002, 216,751 patients developed a primary CRC and over a follow-up period of 1,250,687 person-years, 5,595 of these patients developed a second primary CRC, with an SIR of 1.36 (95% CI 1.32-1.39). In a Cox regression model, the period of diagnosis of the first primary CRC was an independent risk factor for a subsequent primary CRC, with a relative hazard of second colon cancer in Group B compared with Group A being 1.18 (95% CI 1.06-1.31), after controlling for age at diagnosis, site, stage of first primary, gender, and race. CONCLUSION: The relative risk of the second primary CRC has increased since early 1990s. These subsequent cancers are being diagnosed at an earlier stage. Increased surveillance may be one of the factors contributing to this temporal difference.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Increased risk of squamous cell esophageal cancer after adjuvant radiation therapy for primary breast cancer.

Prior studies have demonstrated that adjuvant radiation therapy following mastectomy for breast cancer increases the risk of second primary esophageal cancer after 10 years, but the risk following breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy) has yet to be determined. The authors used 1973-2000 data from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and estimated relative risks of 2.83 (95% confidence interval: 1.35, 5.92) and 2.17 (95% confidence interval: 1.67, 4.02) for squamous cell esophageal cancer at 5-9 and > or =10 years, respectively, following postmastectomy radiation therapy. This increase was mainly due to tumors located in the upper and middle thirds of the esophagus. No significant increase in risk was found for adenocarcinoma following mastectomy or for any type of esophageal cancer following lumpectomy. In summary, postmastectomy radiation therapy moderately increases the risk of squamous cell esophageal cancer starting 5 years after exposure, which persists after 10 years, with no increase in the risk of adenocarcinoma. This finding appears to be a function of the portals used for postmastectomy radiation therapy, which do not expose the lowest third of the esophagus, where adenocarcinomas commonly arise.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Accuracy of endoscopic optical coherence tomography in the detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective, double-blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic optical coherence tomography (EOCT) is a high-resolution, cross-sectional tissue-imaging technique that provides microscopic morphologic information. EOCT should detect dysplasia in Barrett's epithelium, but this has not been established in a prospective blinded study. This study evaluated the accuracy of EOCT for the diagnosis and the exclusion of dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: A 2.4-mm diameter EOCT probe was modified for use with a cap-fitted, two-channel endoscope. Pairs of EOCT image streams and jumbo biopsy specimens were obtained. Endoscopy/EOCT procedures were performed by 4 endoscopists who separately reviewed the EOCT digital images for the absence or the presence of dysplasia (low grade, high grade, or cancer) for each biopsy specimen obtained. The endoscopists were blinded to the interpretation of the pathology. An experienced pathologist blinded to the endoscopic/EOCT findings evaluated each biopsy for the absence or the presence of dysplasia. The setting of the study was a major academic medical center. Adult patients with documented Barrett's esophagus greater than 2 cm were included in the study. The main outcome measurement was the accuracy of EOCT in the detection of dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. RESULTS: A total of 314 usable EOCT image stream/biopsy pairs were obtained in 33 patients. By using histology as the standard, the performance of EOCT was sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 82%; positive predictive value, 53%; negative predictive value, 89%; and diagnostic accuracy, 78%. Diagnostic accuracy for the 4 endoscopists ranged from 56% to 98%. Limitations of the study were the variability in endoscopists' accuracy rates, difficulty in real-time interpretation, and the need for refined criteria of dysplasia by EOCT imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The current EOCT system has an accuracy of 78% for the detection of dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. EOCT could be used to target biopsies to areas of Barrett's epithelium with a higher probability for the presence of dysplasia. However, further modifications, including increased resolution and identification of further potential OCT characteristics of dysplasia, are needed before EOCT can be used clinically.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: a national Web survey.

BACKGROUND: Lower reimbursements for endoscopic procedures and increasing demand for screening endoscopy over the past decade have spurred efforts to increase efficiency in the performance of endoscopic procedures. Two dichotomous approaches have emerged: (1) unsedated endoscopy and (2) propofol sedation. The aim was to determine national practice patterns of unsedated endoscopy and propofol sedation, and to assess endoscopists' attitudes toward unsedated screening with an electronic survey. METHODS: A short survey was developed and then was converted to a Web-based format. All national members of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) were invited via electronic mail (e-mail) to participate. Survey data were collected electronically. RESULTS: Two e-mails elicited responses to the Web survey from 18% (724) of national ASGE members contacted, within 2 weeks. Of the respondents, 45% do not routinely offer unsedated EGD and colonoscopy, and only 15% of those respondents plan to incorporate unsedated endoscopy into their practice in the next year. Of the 55% who currently perform unsedated endoscopy, 85% do no more than 25 unsedated procedures per year. Lack of patient acceptance was the most common reason cited for not offering unsedated endoscopy. Most endoscopists felt that the availability of unsedated esophagoscopy or colonoscopy would not significantly increase screening for Barrett's esophagus or colonic polyps/colorectal cancer, respectively. Routine use of propofol sedation for EGD, colonoscopy, and ERCP/EUS was reported by 19%, 22%, and 19%, respectively. Community practitioners were more likely to use propofol than those at academic centers (p < 0.0002 for all). Of those not currently using propofol, 43% plan to incorporate it into their practice within the next year. Over 70% of respondents would themselves choose to be sedated for routine endoscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic surveys allow for rapid distribution and data collection but suffer from a limited response rate. The survey suggests that unsedated endoscopy has limited acceptance in the United States, and, without a major intervention that affects endoscopists' attitudes, its use is not likely to increase significantly. Unsedated endoscopy will not have a great impact on endoscopic screening. In contrast, propofol sedation has already gained acceptance in the community, and the routine use of propofol in endoscopy units will likely increase in the future.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed2004

Association of ampullary and colorectal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Because of the similarities in terms of carcinogenesis and natural history between cancer of the ampulla of Vater and colorectal cancer, the authors examined whether ampullary and colorectal malignancies occur in the same individuals at increased rates. METHODS: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute for the period from January 1973 through December 1999. Person-years of follow-up for patients with ampullary (or colorectal) cancer were used to calculate the expected number of cases of colorectal (or ampullary) cancer as a second primary malignancy. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Byar limits and assuming a Poisson distribution. RESULTS: The authors identified 2043 white patients with ampullary cancer who were included in the SEER registry between 1973 and 1999. Over an aggregate 5674 person-years of follow-up, 30 patients, compared with an expected 14, developed colorectal cancer, yielding an overall SIR of 2.14 (95% CI, 1.45-3.06). Similarly, 57 of 262,066 white patients with colorectal cancer developed ampullary cancer over an aggregate 1,270,255 person-years of follow-up, yielding an SIR of 2.18 (95% CI, 1.69-2.85). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ampullary cancer are at increased risk for a second primary colorectal malignancy, and patients with colorectal cancer are at increased risk for a second primary ampullary malignancy. These findings suggest that ampullary and colorectal malignancies share common environmental and/or genetic risk factors.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2004

Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Impaired drainage of the pancreatic duct is one of the possible triggers for post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether temporary stent placement across the main pancreatic-duct orifice lowers the frequency of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in patients at high risk for this complication. METHODS: Two reviewers systematically identified prospective studies that (1) compared the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in patients with pancreatic stent placement vs. no stent placement and (2) included patients at high risk of developing this complication. Studies were assessed for methodologic quality and variations in execution and design. Frequency and severity of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis were the primary outcomes evaluated. RESULTS: Five trials involving 481 patients were selected. Of the 481, 55 (11.4%) patients developed pancreatitis after ERCP. Patients in the no stent group had 3-fold higher odds of developing pancreatitis compared with the stent group (15.5% vs. 5.8%; OR 3.2: 95% CI[1.6, 6.4]). Number needed to treat analysis showed that one in every 10 patients (95% CI[6,18]) could be expected to benefit from pancreatic-duct stent placement. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic temporary stent placement across the main pancreatic-duct orifice reduces the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in patients at risk for developing this complication.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

An international survey of the clinical practice of EUS.

BACKGROUND: No comparative information exists regarding clinical variations in EUS practice patterns among American and international endosonographers. METHODS: Eligible attendees of the XIIIth International Symposium on EUS, October 4-6 2002, New York, New York, were asked to complete a 2-page survey questionnaire on clinical practice of EUS. RESULTS: A total of 191 of 391 eligible attendees (48.9%) participated in the survey (110 from the United States, 81 from 30 different countries). The mean age of participants was 40.5 (10.6) years, and 171 (89.5%) were men. A total of 102 endosonographers (53.4%) were in academic practice. The majority (150, 78.5%) also performed ERCP. Seventy-eight (40.8%) had performed EUS for more than 5 years and 21 (11%) for less than 1 year. Only 36 (18.8%) had more than 6 months of dedicated hands-on EUS training, and more than a third of the respondents learned to perform EUS by observing others or they were self-taught. Compared with respondents from the United States, relatively fewer international respondents were performing open-access EUS, pancreatobiliary EUS procedures, and interventions such as EUS-guided FNA and celiac plexus neuralysis. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides insight into the status of EUS as practiced in the United States and internationally. Although it appears that over the last decade EUS has become disseminated fairly uniformly on a global basis, a lack of consistent training standards and also inadequate opportunities for EUS training remain important areas of concern.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Prediction of outcome in acute lower-gastrointestinal haemorrhage based on an artificial neural network: internal and external validation of a predictive model.

BACKGROUND: Models based on artificial neural networks (ANN) are useful in predicting outcome of various disorders. There is currently no useful predictive model for risk assessment in acute lower-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. We investigated whether ANN models using information available during triage could predict clinical outcome in patients with this disorder. METHODS: ANN and multiple-logistic-regression (MLR) models were constructed from non-endoscopic data of patients admitted with acute lower-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The performance of ANN in classifying patients into high-risk and low-risk groups was compared with that of another validated scoring system (BLEED), with the outcome variables recurrent bleeding, death, and therapeutic interventions for control of haemorrhage. The ANN models were trained with data from patients admitted to the primary institution during the first 12 months (n=120) and then internally validated with data from patients admitted to the same institution during the next 6 months (n=70). The ANN models were then externally validated and direct comparison made with MLR in patients admitted to an independent institution in another US state (n=142). FINDINGS: Clinical features were similar for training and validation groups. The predictive accuracy of ANN was significantly better than that of BLEED (predictive accuracy in internal validation group for death 87% vs 21%; for recurrent bleeding 89% vs 41%; and for intervention 96% vs 46%) and similar to MLR. During external validation, ANN performed well in predicting death (97%), recurrent bleeding (93%), and need for intervention (94%), and it was superior to MLR (70%, 73%, and 70%, respectively). INTERPRETATION: ANN can accurately predict the outcome for patients presenting with acute lower-gastrointestinal haemorrhage and may be generally useful for the risk stratification of these patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis of liver with application of neural network technology.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of mortality from cirrhosis is important in planning optimal timing of liver transplantation and other interventions. We evaluated the role of the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), which uses non-linear statistics for pattern recognition in predicting one-year liver disease-related mortality using information available during initial clinical evaluation. METHODS: The ANN was constructed using software with data from a training set (n = 46) selected at random from a cohort of adult cirrhotics (n = 92). After training, validation was performed in the remaining patients (n = 46) whose outcome in terms of one-year mortality was unknown to the network. The performance of ANN was compared to those of a logistic regression model (LRM) and Child-Pugh's score (CPS). Death (related to cirrhosis/its complications) within one year of inclusion was the outcome variable. The ANN was also tested in an external validation sample (EVS, n = 62) from another hospital. RESULTS: Patients in the EVS were younger (mean age, 41 vs 45 years), infrequently of alcoholic etiology (5% vs 49%), had less severe disease (mean CPS 6.6 vs 10.8), and had lower one-year mortality (13 vs 46%). In the internal validation sample, ANN's accuracy was 91%, sensitivity 90% and specificity 92% in prediction of one-year mortality; area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94. The performance of the LRM (accuracy 74%) and the CPS (accuracy 55%) was significantly worse than ANN (P < 0.05, McNemar's test). Despite differences in the characteristics of the two groups, the ANN performed fairly well in the EVS (accuracy of 90%, area under curve 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: ANN can accurately predict one-year mortality in cirrhosis and is superior to CPS and LRM.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of esophageal cancer: a review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the important studies, published since April 2002, on the role of endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of esophageal cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: The loco-regional staging accuracy for esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography is superior to other currently available imaging modalities such as helical computed tomography. Endoscopic ultrasonographic staging accuracy is further enhanced by the ability to obtain guided fine needle aspiration specimens for cytology from any suspicious celiac lymph nodes. In addition to the initial staging of esophageal cancer, endoscopic ultrasonography-based measurement of reduction of tumor cross-sectional area appears to be a reliable predictor of pathologic response to initial neoadjuvant therapy. Recently published studies on the outcomes of endoscopic ultrasonography support its utility in the staging of esophageal cancer, particularly in guiding different treatment options for different stages of loco-regional involvement. SUMMARY: Overall, endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of patients with esophageal cancer seems to be a cost-effective intervention.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2003

Cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation: economic implications.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a pathogen, commonly encountered in the recipients of solid organ transplantation and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. CMV infection and disease have been shown to increase the cost of care in transplant recipients and several different strategies of prevention have been shown to be effective in clinical trials. A systematic review of published information on the economic impact of CMV in solid organ transplantation was performed; both clinical- and decision-analysis-based studies were reviewed. Clinical studies have shown that CMV infection and disease is associated with increased length of hospital stay and overall costs. Decision-analysis-based studies suggest that in general, antiviral chemoprophylaxis against CMV in transplant recipients is a cost-effective intervention compared with other established healthcare interventions such as strategies for colorectal cancer screening. Prophylaxis with oral or parenteral ganciclovir is probably the most cost-effective strategy; however, restricting prophylaxis to high-risk groups (such as donor seropositive/recipient seronegative status and the use of an antilymphocyte antibody) or chemoprophylaxis for an extended period does not improve cost effectiveness. Pre-emptive therapy is an evolving strategy for prevention of CMV disease in transplant recipients and is rapidly gaining in popularity. Well-designed trials incorporating prospective cost data and comparing pre-emptive therapy versus conventional antiviral prophylaxis are needed to establish the superiority of one strategy over the other.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed2002

A lesson in poverty.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Foreign Medical Graduates↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Association of esophageal adenocarcinoma with other subsequent primary cancers.

PURPOSE: Esophageal adenocarcinoma shares risk factors such as obesity and smoking with other common cancers. The association of esophageal adenocarcinoma with other primary cancers has not been systematically evaluated. The authors used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results database of the National Cancer Institute to explore the association of esophageal adenocarcinoma with other primary cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All adult patients with esophageal cancers, both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed between 1973 and 2001, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database, and standardized incidence rates were calculated for all subsequent primary cancers in these patients. The analysis was reversed to estimate the standardized incidence rate for subsequent primary esophageal cancer after a first primary cancer. RESULTS: In comparison with a standard population, patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were at higher risk for the development of another subsequent cancer, specifically, cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx, lung and bronchus, and kidney and renal pelvis, and adenocarcinoma of the colon/rectum and pancreas. With squamous cell esophageal cancer, there was an association with tobacco-related cancers such as those of the oral cavity and pharynx, the lung and bronchus, and the breast. There was either no association or even a negative association of esophageal adenocarcinoma with other obesity-related cancers such as breast, uterine, and prostate cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are at increased risk for the development of specific second primary cancers that share smoking as a common risk factor. Esophageal adenocarcinoma does not have a strong association with obesity-related cancers with respect to the relative risk for the development of subsequent primary cancers.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A novel use of endoscopic clips in the treatment planning for radiation therapy (XRT) of esophageal cancer.

GOAL: To determine if the placement of metal endoclips improves radiotherapy (XRT) planning for esophageal cancer. BACKGROUND: XRT is an important modality in the treatment and palliation of esophageal cancer. Accurate simulation of the radiation field ensures optimal therapy while limiting toxicity. STUDY: Patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent EGD and endoscopic mucosal clip placement at the proximal and distal margins of the tumor. At XRT simulation the radiation oncologist simulated the field based on barium study, CT scan, and endoscopy report. A second radiation oncologist then assessed the ease of identification of the clips/margins of the tumor, shift in the field isocenter, and change in the radiation field width and length because of the metal clips. RESULTS: Seven patients with cancer of the esophagus had endoscopic clips placed followed by XRT simulation. The clips could be identified in all 7 patients. Simulation with the use of clips caused a shift in the field isocenter with a mean longitudinal shift (y-axis) of 3.5 cm (range, 1-6 cm) and a mean lateral shift (x-axis) of 0.33 cm (range, 0-1 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopically placed mucosal metal clips can aid field simulation when planning radiation therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Aged↗