PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Anarta Ghosh

Publications and source records attributed to Anarta Ghosh.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Performance analysis of LVQ algorithms: a statistical physics approach.

Learning vector quantization (LVQ) constitutes a powerful and intuitive method for adaptive nearest prototype classification. However, original LVQ has been introduced based on heuristics and numerous modifications exist to achieve better convergence and stability. Recently, a mathematical foundation by means of a cost function has been proposed which, as a limiting case, yields a learning rule similar to classical LVQ2.1. It also motivates a modification which shows better stability. However, the exact dynamics as well as the generalization ability of many LVQ algorithms have not been thoroughly investigated so far. Using concepts from statistical physics and the theory of on-line learning, we present a mathematical framework to analyse the performance of different LVQ algorithms in a typical scenario in terms of their dynamics, sensitivity to initial conditions, and generalization ability. Significant differences in the algorithmic stability and generalization ability can be found already for slightly different variants of LVQ. We study five LVQ algorithms in detail: Kohonen's original LVQ1, unsupervised vector quantization (VQ), a mixture of VQ and LVQ, LVQ2.1, and a variant of LVQ which is based on a cost function. Surprisingly, basic LVQ1 shows very good performance in terms of stability, asymptotic generalization ability, and robustness to initializations and model parameters which, in many cases, is superior to recent alternative proposals.

Algorithms↗

Robustness of shape descriptors to incomplete contour representations.

With inspiration from psychophysical researches of the human visual system, we propose a novel aspect and a method for performance evaluation of contour-based shape recognition algorithms regarding their robustness to incompleteness of contours. We use complete contour representations of objects as a reference (training) set. Incomplete contour representations of the same objects are used as a test set. The performance of an algorithm is reported using the recognition rate as a function of the percentage of contour retained. We call this evaluation procedure the ICR test. We consider three types of contour incompleteness, viz. segment-wise contour deletion, occlusion, and random pixel depletion. As an illustration, the robustness of two shape recognition algorithms to contour incompleteness is evaluated. These algorithms use a shape context and a distance multiset as local shape descriptors. Qualitatively, both algorithms mimic human visual perception in the sense that recognition performance monotonously increases with the degree of completeness and that they perform best in the case of random depletion and worst in the case of occluded contours. The distance multiset method performs better than the shape context method in this test framework.

Algorithms↗