Biomedical subjects

Andrea Bertolini

Publications and source records attributed to Andrea Bertolini.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Relation of extent of nocturnal blood pressure decrease to cardiovascular remodeling in never-treated patients with essential hypertension.

The clinical significance of the extent of a decrease in nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and the resulting classification of hypertensives as "dipper" (decrease in BP >10% day BP) or "nondipper" (decrease in BP <10% day BP) has been questioned recently. The aim of our study was to evaluate if the extent of a nocturnal BP decrease, established on the basis of a single 24-hour BP monitoring, is related to cardiovascular remodeling in essential hypertension. We enrolled 253 never-treated essential hypertensives (24-hour BP > or = 140 and/or 90 mm Hg); for each patient we recorded 24-hour BP, left ventricular (LV) echocardiogram, Doppler transmitral flow velocities, and carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocities. A dipper BP profile was found in 161 patients, whereas 92 patients were nondippers. The 2 groups did not differ with regard to age, gender, body mass index, 24-hour and daytime BP, and 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime heart rate. All LV morphologic characteristics LV systolic and diastolic functional parameters, mitral Doppler-derived diastolic indexes, as well as carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity, and aortic index distensibility were not significantly different between dippers and nondippers. The prevalence of LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction was also similar between the 2 groups. The extent of a decrease in nocturnal BP did not correlate with any cardiovascular parameter. In conclusion, in never-treated hypertensives, the extent of a nocturnal BP decrease is not related to LV morpho-functional characteristics and aortic distensibility; therefore, the nondipping status established on the basis of a single 24-hour BP monitoring does not identify hypertensive patients with greater cardiovascular damage.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Aldosterone antagonist improves diastolic function in essential hypertension.

Experimental studies demonstrated that mineralocorticoid antagonists prevent or reverse myocardial fibrosis. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the aldosterone antagonist canrenone can improve left ventricular diastolic function in essential hypertension. Using digitized M-mode echocardiography and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), we realized a prospective, randomized, controlled study on 34 never-treated essential hypertensives with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Echocardiogram and ABPM were repeated after 6 months of effective antihypertensive treatment with ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists (second evaluation) and then after a 6-month period with 17 patients randomly assigned to add canrenone 50 mg/d to the previous treatment (third evaluation). At the basal evaluation 32 patients had left ventricular concentric hypertrophy, and 2 patients had left ventricular concentric remodeling. All the patients had normal left ventricular systolic function. At the second evaluation blood pressure was reduced (P<0.0001), left ventricular mass index decreased (P<0.0001), and diastolic function improved (P<0.0001). After randomization, the canrenone and control groups had similar 24-hour blood pressure and left ventricular morpho-functional characteristics. At the third evaluation, despite unchanged blood pressure and similar decrease of left ventricular mass index, the canrenone group, compared with control group, showed a significantly greater increase in left ventricular diastolic indices. In essential hypertension, a low dose of aldosterone antagonist added to antihypertensive treatment significantly improved left ventricular diastolic function. This improvement, not accounted for by changes in blood pressure and left ventricular mass, can be therefore ascribed to a direct action of the drug on the myocardium.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

PubMed1999

Relationship between a genetic predisposition to hypertension, blood pressure levels and pain sensitivity.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether the degree of blood pressure elevation and/or a genetic predisposition to hypertension have a major role in determining a reduced pain perception in hypertensives. The reasons underlying the relationship between blood pressure elevation and pain perception mechanisms are not completely understood. METHODS: One hundred and four untreated hypertensive patients (65 subjects with and 39 without a positive parental history of hypertension) together with a control group of 42 subjects (20 normotensive offspring of normotensive parents, and 22 normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents) were submitted to standard blood pressure evaluation, 24-h blood pressure monitoring and dental pain perception evaluation. RESULTS: Both pain threshold and tolerance were found to be higher in hypertensive than normotensive subjects (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.015, respectively). Positive significant correlations were found between both 24-h systolic and diastolic pressure and the pain perception variables. When a 2 x 2 ANOVA test was performed, factoring for the effects of both blood pressure status and family history of hypertension on pain sensitivity, a significant effect was revealed only for blood pressure status. Moreover, after controlling for blood pressure by a covariate analysis, no significant difference was found between the subjects with or without hypertensive parents as regards pain perception variables. CONCLUSIONS: Pain sensitivity is correlated to blood pressure levels whereas the parental history of hypertension per se does not affect the pain perception pattern. Thus, the degree of blood pressure elevation, more than a genetic predisposition to hypertension may influence the mechanisms leading to hypalgesia in hypertension.

Adult↗