PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Andrea K Bruecks

Publications and source records attributed to Andrea K Bruecks.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Prospective step sections for small skin biopsies.

CONTEXT: In our laboratory, for small skin biopsies or curetted specimens, 3 slides are prepared before the case is reviewed by the dermatopathologist. OBJECTIVE: To examine the utility of these "prospective" step sections in improving diagnostic accuracy and turnaround time. DESIGN: Five hundred consecutive cases, in which step sections had been cut prior to slide review, were studied. For each specimen, 3 slides, each consisting of 1 ribbon of tissue containing 4 to 6 sections, were obtained at 50-microm intervals from the paraffin block. RESULTS: Fifty-eight biopsies (12%) were nondiagnostic using slide 1 alone. Step sections provided a diagnosis in 19 of 58 cases. In an additional 15 cases (3%) in which a diagnosis was possible using slide 1, deeper levels resulted in a change in diagnosis. Thus, in 34 (7%) of 500 biopsies, deeper levels resulted in improved diagnostic accuracy. In addition, the pathologist would have ordered step sections in a further 117 cases (23%) to clarify the diagnosis rendered on level 1 or to exclude other lesions. Thus, 30% of small skin biopsies would have required deeper levels if step sections had not been obtained prior to slide review. CONCLUSIONS: In our laboratory, the use of prospective step sections is essentially cost-neutral and case turnaround time is improved by 9% to 45%. Step sections result in a changed diagnosis in 7% of small skin biopsy specimens.

Adolescent↗

Atypical fibroxanthoma with prominent sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Malignant cutaneous spindle cell lesions with marked sclerosis are uncommon. Only a few cases of cutaneous leiomyosarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with sclerosis have been published. METHODS: We report a case of atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) with prominent sclerosis and hyalinization occurring on the scalp of an 81-year-old male. RESULTS: Histopathologic examination revealed an exophytic, well-delineated, focally ulcerated tumor arising in sun-damaged skin. The lesion was composed of atypical spindle cells arranged in a fascicled and vaguely storiform pattern. Occasional multinucleated giant cells were present. The tumor cells were strongly positive for CD99 (O13), vimentin, and smooth muscle actin, and focally positive for CD68. There was striking sclerosis with hyalinization throughout the lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Rarely, AFX may exhibit marked sclerosis with areas of complete replacement of tumor by hyalinized collagen. In a small biopsy, such hyalinization may be a diagnostic pitfall leading to an erroneous diagnosis.

Aged↗

Interpretation of skin biopsies by general pathologists: diagnostic discrepancy rate measured by blinded review.

CONTEXT: Slide review has been advocated as a means to reduce diagnostic error in surgical pathology and is considered an important component of a total quality assurance program. Blinded review is an unbiased method of error detection, and this approach may be used to determine the diagnostic discrepancy rates in surgical pathology. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic discrepancy rate for skin biopsies reported by general pathologists. DESIGN: Five hundred eighty-nine biopsies from 500 consecutive cases submitted by primary care physicians and reported by general pathologists were examined by rapid-screen, blinded review by 2 dermatopathologists, and the original diagnosis was compared with the review interpretation. RESULTS: Agreement was observed in 551 (93.5%) of 589 biopsies. Blinded review of these skin biopsies by experienced dermatopathologists had a sensitivity of 100% (all lesions originally reported were detected during review). False-negative errors were the most common discrepancy, but false positives, threshold discrepancies, and differences in type or grade were also observed. Only 1.4% of biopsies had discrepancies that were of potential clinical importance. CONCLUSIONS: Blinded review demonstrates that general pathologists reporting skin biopsies submitted by primary care physicians have a low diagnostic error rate. The method detects both false-negative and false-positive cases and identifies problematic areas that may be targeted in continuing education activities. Blinded review is a useful component of a dermatopathology quality improvement program.

Biopsy↗

Expression of desmin and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain in dermatofibromas.

BACKGROUND: The histopathologic features of dermatofibroma vary remarkably, and this diversity may occasionally cause problems in differentiating between benign and malignant mesenchymal lesions, including smooth muscle neoplasms. Immunohistochemical stains are sometimes necessary to clarify the histogenesis of a lesion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dermatofibromas for expression of desmin and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-MHC) antigens, which are commonly used as evidence of smooth muscle differentiation. METHODS: We studied 100 consecutive cases of dermatofibroma using hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections and immunoperoxidase staining with antibodies against desmin, SM-MHC, and smooth muscle actin. RESULTS: We found focal positivity for desmin in 9 cases, and in 2 of these cases, at least 10% of lesional cells showed strong expression. We found focal staining for SM-MHC in 10 cases, and in 2 of these cases, at least 10% of the lesional cells were positive. Regions positive for desmin and/or SM-MHC did not show definite histologic features of myogenous differentiation on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections. All dermatofibromas expressing desmin and SM-MHC were also strongly positive for smooth muscle actin. CONCLUSIONS: About 10% of dermatofibromas show focal expression of desmin and SM-MHC, and this expression may be present in up to 10% to 15% of lesional cells. Thus, in dermal spindle cell lesions, focal expression of these muscle antigens, like that of smooth muscle actin, is not diagnostic of a smooth muscle tumor.

Actins↗