PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Andrea Mechelli

Publications and source records attributed to Andrea Mechelli.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Neuroimaging studies of word and pseudoword reading: consistencies, inconsistencies, and limitations.

Several functional neuroimaging studies have compared words and pseudowords to test different cognitive models of reading. There are difficulties with this approach, however, because cognitive models do not make clear-cut predictions at the neural level. Therefore, results can only be interpreted on the basis of prior knowledge of cognitive anatomy. Furthermore, studies comparing words and pseudowords have produced inconsistent results. The inconsistencies could reflect false-positive results due to the low statistical thresholds applied or confounds from nonlexical aspects of the stimuli. Alternatively, they may reflect true effects that are inconsistent across subjects; dependent on experimental parameters such as stimulus rate or duration; or not replicated across studies because of insufficient statistical power. In this fMRI study, we investigate consistent and inconsistent differences between word and pseudoword reading in 20 subjects, and distinguish between effects associated with increases and decreases in activity relative to fixation. In addition, the interaction of word type with stimulus duration is explored. We find that words and pseudowords activate the same set of regions relative to fixation, and within this system, there is greater activation for pseudowords than words in the left frontal operculum, left posterior inferior temporal gyrus, and the right cerebellum. The only effects of words relative to pseudowords consistent over subjects are due to decreases in activity for pseudowords relative to fixation; and there are no significant interactions between word type and stimulus duration. Finally, we observe inconsistent but highly significant effects of word type at the individual subject level. These results (i) illustrate that pseudowords place increased demands on areas that have previously been linked to lexical retrieval, and (ii) highlight the importance of including one or more baselines to qualify word type effects. Furthermore, (iii) they suggest that inconsistencies observed in the previous literature may result from effects arising from a small number of subjects only.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Comparing event-related and epoch analysis in blocked design fMRI.

In this study we demonstrate that, even in blocked design fMRI, an event-related analysis may provide a more accurate model of the hemodynamic responses than an epoch-related analysis. This is because the temporal shape of the predicted response differs between the event-related and the epoch model, with the former reaching its peak sooner and returning to baseline later than the latter. We present data from a blocked design fMRI study of single word reading alternated with rest. Conventionally, such a design would be analyzed using an epoch analysis with boxcar regressors. However, here we used a combined model in which trials were modeled as both single events and epochs. This allowed us to estimate the variance in the BOLD signal that was explained by either the event-related or the epoch regressors having discounted the effect of the other. We found that, in a number of language regions, the event-related model explained changes in activity that were not accounted for by the epoch model. In addition, we show that the advantage of the event-related over epoch model was engendered by its early onset rather than its late offset, relative to the epoch model.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Estimating efficiency a priori: a comparison of blocked and randomized designs.

This technical note deals with a priori estimation of efficiency of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) designs. The efficiency of an estimator is a measure of how reliable it is and depends on error variance (the variance not modeled by explanatory variables in the design matrix) and the design variance (a function of the explanatory variables and the contrast tested). Changes in the experimental design can induce changes in the variance of estimated responses. This translates into changes in the standard error of the response estimate or equivalently into changes in efficiency. One consequence is that statistics, testing for the same activation in different contexts (i.e., experimental designs), can change substantially even if the activation and error variance are exactly the same. We demonstrate this effect using an event-related fMRI study of single word reading during blocked and randomized trial presentations. Furthermore, we show that the error variance can change with the experimental design. This highlights a problem with a priori comparison of efficiency for two or more experimental designs, which usually assumes identical error variance.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

A report of the functional connectivity workshop, Dusseldorf 2002.

This report provides a commentary on the issues presented and discussed at the recent "Functional Brain Connectivity" workshop, held in Dusseldorf, Germany. The workshop brought together researchers using different approaches to study connectivity in the brain, providing them with an opportunity to share conceptual, mathematical, and experimental ideas and to develop strategies and collaborations for future work on functional integration. The main themes that emerged included: (1) the importance of anatomical knowledge in understanding functional interactions the brain; (2) the need to establish common definitions for terms used across disciplines; (3) the need to develop a satisfactory framework for inferring causality from functional imaging and EEG/MEG data; (4) the importance of analytic tools that capture the dynamics of neural interactions; and (5) the role of experimental paradigms that exploit the functional imaging of perturbations to cortical interactions.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

The Functional Brain Connectivity Workshop: report and commentary.

This report summarizes the presentations and discussions at a recent workshop entitled 'Functional Brain Connectivity', held in Düsseldorf, Germany. The aims of the workshop were to bring together researchers using different approaches to study connectivity in the brain, to enable them to share conceptual, mathematical and experimental ideas and to develop strategies for future work on functional integration. The main themes that emerged included: (1) the importance of anatomical knowledge in understanding functional interactions the brain; (2) the need to establish common definitions for terms used across disciplines; (3) the need to develop a satisfactory framework for inferring causality from functional imaging and electroencephalographic/magneto-encephalographic data; (4) the importance of analytic tools that capture the dynamics of neural interactions; and (5) the role of experimental paradigms that exploit the functional imaging of perturbations to cortical interactions.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes?

Enumeration of small groups of four or fewer objects is very fast and accurate (often called "subitizing"), but gets slower and more error prone for more than four items ("counting"). Many theories have been proposed to account for this dichotomy, most suggesting that "subitizing" and "counting" are two qualitatively different and separable processes. Others, in contrast, have proposed that the two operations reflect two different levels along a continuum of complexity. In this paper we present a PET study that attempts to characterize subitizing and counting at a neural level in order to investigate whether they are implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes. Subjects performed an enumeration task on visual arrays of dots that varied in numerosity (1-4 and 6-9 dots) and spatial arrangement (canonical and random). The results demonstrated a common network for subitizing and counting that comprises extrastriate middle occipital and intraparietal areas. The intensity and spatial extent of this network were modulated by the number of dots and their spatial arrangement: activation increased as the number of items in the visual array increased, reaching maximum peak and extent for counting 6-9 randomly arranged items. Direct comparison between subitizing and counting showed that counting, relative to subitizing, was correlated with increased activity in this occipitoparietal network, while subitizing did not show areas of increased activation with respect to counting. Results speak against the idea of the two processes being implemented in separable neural systems.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Effective connectivity and intersubject variability: using a multisubject network to test differences and commonalities.

This article is about intersubject variability in the functional integration of activity in different brain regions. Previous studies of functional and effective connectivity have dealt with intersubject variability by analyzing data from different subjects separately or pretending the data came from the same subject. These approaches do not allow one to test for differences among subjects. The aim of this work was to illustrate how differences in connectivity among subjects can be addressed explicitly using structural equation modeling. This is enabled by constructing a multisubject network that comprises m regions of interest for each of the n subjects studied, resulting in a total of m x n nodes. Constructing a network of regions from different subjects may seem counterintuitive but embodies two key advantages. First, it allows one to test directly for differences among subjects by comparing models that do and do not allow a particular connectivity parameter to vary over subjects. Second, a multisubject network provides additional degrees of freedom to estimate the model's free parameters. Any neurobiological hypothesis normally addressed by single-subject or group analyses can still be tested, but with greater sensitivity. The common influence of experimental variables is modeled by connecting a virtual node, whose time course reflects stimulus onsets, to the sensory or "input" region in all subjects. Further experimental changes in task or cognitive set enter through modulation of the connections. This approach allows one to model both endogenous (or intrinsic) variance and exogenous effects induced by experimental design. We present a functional magnetic resonance imaging study that uses a multisubject network to investigate intersubject variability in functional integration in the context of single word and pseudoword reading. We tested whether the effect of word type on the reading-related coupling differed significantly among subjects. Our results showed that a number of forward and backward connections were stronger for reading pseudowords than words, and, in one case, connectivity showed significant intersubject variability. The discussion focuses on the implications of our findings and on further applications of the multisubject network analysis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The importance of distributed sampling in blocked functional magnetic resonance imaging designs.

In this study we demonstrate the importance of distributed sampling of peristimulus time in blocked design fMRI studies. Distributed sampling ensures all the components of an event-related hemodynamic response are sampled and avoids the bias incurred when stimulus presentation is time-locked to data acquisition. We found that differences in the temporal offset between stimulus presentation and data acquisition had a significant effect on some language-related activations. These effects, induced by simply shifting stimulus presentation by a fraction of the interscan interval, suggest that fixed sampling does indeed bias estimated responses, even in blocked designs.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Heat shock proteins and their role in heart injury.

Heat shock protein (HSP) synthesis arises transiently as a tool to protect cellular homeostasis after exposure to heat and a wide spectrum of stressful and potentially deleterious stimuli. HSPs are "molecular chaperones" that recognize and form a complex with incorrectly folded or denatured proteins, which ultimately leads to correct folding, compartmentalization, or degradation. Accumulating evidence has implicated HSPs as mediators of myocardial protection, particularly in experimental models of ischemia and reperfusion injury. Impaired myocardial performance, which results from many factors, including hypoxia, is one of the main mechanisms responsible for heart failure in the critically ill patient. In this setting, different protective functions have been attributed to HSPs, which include repairing ion channels, restoring redox balance, interacting with nitric oxide-induced protection, inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines, and preventing apoptosis pathway activation. On this basis, novel therapeutic strategies by means of promising pharmacologic interventions and/or gene transfection techniques are being investigated for their potential to enhance HSP expression by myocardial cells, with the goal of improving the outcome of the critically ill patient.

Apoptosis↗