Biomedical subjects

Andrea Nobbe

Publications and source records attributed to Andrea Nobbe.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.

The cochlear frequency-place function in normal hearing ears has been found to be an exponential relationship in a wide variety of species [D.D. Greenwood, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87 (1990) 2592-2605]. Although it seems reasonable to assume a similar function for electrical stimulation by means of an intra-cochlear electrode array, the exact frequency-place function for this special type of stimulation needs to be investigated. Six users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant device with moderate to profound hearing loss between 125 and 1000 Hz in the non-implanted ear took part in a binaural pitch adjustment experiment. The COMBI 40+ electrode array provides a deep insertion into the scala tympani and a wide spatial separation between the stimulating electrodes. Insertion depth was controlled by Stenver's view plain radiographs and the insertion angle was estimated. The task of the subjects was to adjust the frequency of a sinusoid presented in the non-implanted ear by means of an adjusting knob until they perceived the same pitch as was elicited by a reference stimulus in the implanted ear. The results show adjustments corresponding to electrode positions along the cochlea, with the exception of the two most apical electrodes for most of the subjects. Pitch increased in an orderly fashion with an average of 98 Hz per electrode separation (40 Hz/mm). In contrast to the exponential predictions according to [D.D. Greenwood, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87 (1990) 2592-2605] for normal hearing, the average electrode-pitch function shows a linear relationship.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays.

Pulse rate difference limen (PRDL) and amplitude modulation difference limen (AMDL) were assessed as a function of base rate and cochlear electrode location in seven (three for AMDL) subjects implanted with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ implant. The MED-EL COMBI 40+ electrode array allows deep insertion of the electrode up to the apex of the cochlea to minimize the rate/place mismatch for pulse rates below 500 pps. A three interval, two alternative forced-choice procedure with feedback was used to measure the difference limen. The base rate was in the range between 200 and 800 pps. The carrier rate for the AMDL measurement was 5081 pps. The PRDL increased with increasing base pulse rate. At 200 pps the average PRDL measured at the apical electrode amounted to 48.7 pps, at 400 pps the average PRDL reached 206.6 pps. No significant difference between PRDL obtained from apical or basal electrodes could be observed. AMDL was higher than PRDL at all tested base rates. The ability to discriminate rate changes is limited to base rates up to about 283 pps. The results indicate that rate changes smaller than a major third do not elicit distinguishable auditory perceptions in electrical hearing. The absence of a difference between apical and basal electrode locations indicates that a reduction of the rate/place mismatch does not improve discrimination performance.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays.

OBJECTIVE: Electrode pitch ranking was assessed as a function of cochlear region, electrode spacing, and stimulation rate in eight subjects implanted with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ implant. The MED-EL COMBI 40+ electrode array allows deep insertion of the electrode up to the apex of the cochlea and provides a wide electrode spacing of 2.4 mm. DESIGN: The pitch of a reference electrode was compared with the pitch of two apical and two basal probe electrodes using a two-alternative forced-choice procedure. The reference electrodes were placed in the apical region, in the middle region, and in the basal region of the cochlea. Each condition was tested at pulse rates of 1515 pps, 500 pps, and 250 pps. RESULTS: Electrode pitch ranking did not depend on electrode spacing, the position of the reference electrode in the cochlea, or stimulation rate. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a spacing of 2.4 mm seems sufficient to allow good electrode pitch ranking performance for the average user and that electrode pitch ranking is similar in the apical, middle, and basal region of the cochlea, irrespective of the stimulation rate. Most importantly, the results of this study indicate that residual neural structures in the apical region of the cochlea are sensitive to pitch changes provided by different places of electrical stimulation.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Microsecond temporal resolution in monaural hearing without spectral cues?

The auditory system encodes the timing of peaks in basilar-membrane motion with exquisite precision, and perceptual models of binaural processing indicate that the limit of temporal resolution in humans is as little as 10-20 microseconds. In these binaural studies, pairs of continuous sounds with microsecond differences are presented simultaneously, one sound to each ear. In this paper, a monaural masking experiment is described in which pairs of continuous sounds with microsecond time differences were combined and presented to both ears. The stimuli were matched in terms of the excitation patterns they produced, and a perceptual model of monaural processing indicates that the limit of temporal resolution in this case is similar to that in the binaural system.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Buildup and breakdown of echo suppression for stimuli presented over headphones-the effects of interaural time and level differences.

The current study investigates buildup and breakdown of echo suppression for stimuli presented over headphones. The stimuli consisted of pairs of 120-micros clicks. The leading click (lead) and the lagging click (lag) in each pair were lateralized on opposite sides of the midline by means of interaural level differences (ILDs) of +/-10 dB or interaural time differences (ITDs) of +/-300 micros. Echo threshold was measured with an adaptive one-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure with a subjective decision criterion, in which listeners had to report whether they heard a single, fused auditory event on one side of the midline, or two separate events on both sides. In the control conditions, referred to as the "single" conditions, echo threshold was measured for a single click pair, the test pair, presented in isolation. In addition to the control conditions, two kinds of test conditions were investigated, in which the test pair was preceded by 12 identical conditioning pairs: in the "same" conditions, the interaural configuration (ILDs or ITDs) of the conditioning pairs was identical to that of the test pair; in the "switch" conditions, the interaural configuration of lead and lag was reversed between the conditioning pairs and the test pair, in order to produce a switch in the lateralizations of the stimuli between the conditioning train and the test pair. No matter whether the lateralization of the clicks was produced by ILDs or by ITDs, most listeners experienced a buildup of echo suppression in the "same" conditions, manifested by a prolongation of echo threshold relative to the respective "single" conditions. However, the breakdown of echo suppression was much stronger in the ILD-switch than in the ITD-switch conditions. In five out of six listeners, the ITD switch had hardly any effect on echo threshold, although the ITDs (+/-300 micros) produced roughly the same degree of lateral displacement as the ILDs (+/-10 dB). These results suggest that the dynamic processes in echo suppression operate differentially in pathways responsible for the processing of interaural time and level differences.

Adult↗