Biomedical subjects

Andrea Simpson

Publications and source records attributed to Andrea Simpson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.

Previous investigation of an experimental, wearable frequency-compression hearing aid revealed improvements in speech perception for a group of listeners with moderately sloping audiograms (Simpson et al, 2005). In the frequency-compression hearing aid, high frequencies (above 1600 Hz) were amplified in addition to being lowered in frequency. Lower frequencies were amplified without frequency shifting. In the present study, an identical frequency-compression scheme was evaluated in a group of seven subjects, all of whom had steeply sloping hearing losses. No significant differences in group mean scores were found between the frequency-compression device and a conventional hearing instrument for understanding speech in quiet. Testing in noise showed improvements for the frequency-compression scheme for only one of the five subjects tested. Subjectively, all but one of the subjects preferred the sound quality of the conventional hearing instruments. In conclusion, the experimental frequency-compression scheme provided only limited benefit to these listeners with steeply sloping hearing losses.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.

A consonant identification test was carried out with 10 hearing-impaired listeners under various low-pass filter conditions. Subjects were also tested for cochlear dead regions with the TEN test. All subjects had moderate-to-severe high-frequency hearing losses. Consonant recognition was tested under conditions in which the speech signals were highly audible to subjects for frequencies up to the low-pass filter cut-off. Extensive dead regions were found for one subject with the TEN test. The remaining subjects may have had dead regions above 3 kHz, because of the severity of their hearing losses, but these could not be demonstrated with the TEN test. Average consonant scores for the subject group improved significantly (p<0.05) with increasing audibility of high-frequency components of the speech signal. There were no cases of speech perception being reduced with increasing bandwidth. Nine of the subjects showed improvements in scores with increasing audibility, whereas the remaining subject showed little change in scores. For this subject, speech perception results were consistent with the TEN test findings. In general, the results suggest that listeners with severe high-frequency losses are often able to make some use of high-frequency speech cues if these cues can be made audible.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device.

The performance of an experimental frequency compression hearing device was evaluated using tests of speech understanding in quiet. The device compressed frequencies above a programmable cut-off, resulting in those parts of the input signal being shifted to lower frequencies. Below the cut-off, signals were amplified without frequency shifting. Subjects were experienced hearing aid users with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss and sloping audiograms. Their recognition of monosyllabic words was tested using the experimental device in comparison with conventional hearing aids. Of the 17 subjects, eight showed a significant score improvement (p < 0.05), whereas one subject showed a significant score decrease. Some of the improvements may have resulted from the better audibility provided in the high frequencies by the experimental device in comparison with the conventional aids. However, a subsequent study found that increasing the high-frequency gain in the conventional aids did not produce equivalent perceptual benefits.

Acoustic Stimulation↗