Randomized trials are also essential for device therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Andreas Rück.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this substudy of the EUROINJECT-ONE double-blind randomized trial was to analyze changes in myocardial perfusion in NOGA-defined regions with intramyocardial injections of plasmid encoding plasmid human (ph)VEGF-A(165) using an elaborated transformation algorithm. METHODS AND RESULTS: After randomization, 80 no-option patients received either active, phVEGF-A165 (n=40), or placebo plasmid (n=40) percutaneously via NOGA-Myostar injections. The injected area (region of interest, ROI) was delineated as a best polygon by connecting of the injection points marked on NOGA polar maps. The ROI was projected onto the baseline and follow-up rest and stress polar maps of the 99m-Tc-sestamibi/tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography scintigraphy calculating the extent and severity (expressed as the mean normalized tracer uptake) of the ROI automatically. The extents of the ROI were similar in the VEGF and placebo groups (19.4+/-4.2% versus 21.5+/-5.4% of entire myocardium). No differences were found between VEGF and placebo groups at baseline with regard to the perfusion defect severity (rest: 69+/-11.7% versus 68.7+/-13.3%; stress: 63+/-13.3% versus 62.6+/-13.6%; and reversibility: 6.0+/-7.7% versus 6.7+/-9.0%). At follow-up, a trend toward improvement in perfusion defect severity at stress was observed in VEGF group as compared with placebo (68.5+/-11.9% versus 62.5+/-13.5%, P=0.072) without reaching normal values. The reversibility of the ROI decreased significantly at follow-up in VEGF group as compared with the placebo group (1.2+/-9.0% versus 7.1+/-9.0%, P=0.016). Twenty-one patients in VEGF and 8 patients in placebo group (P<0.01) exhibited an improvement in tracer uptake during stress, defined as a >or =5% increase in the normalized tracer uptake of the ROI. CONCLUSIONS: Projection of the NOGA-guided injection area onto the single-photon emission computed tomography polar maps permits quantitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion in regions treated with angiogenic substances. Injections of phVEGF A165 plasmid improve, but do not normalize, the stress-induced perfusion abnormalities.
OBJECTIVES: In the Euroinject One phase II randomized double-blind trial, therapeutic angiogenesis of percutaneous intramyocardial plasmid gene transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor (phVEGF-A(165)) on myocardial perfusion, left ventricular function, and clinical symptoms was assessed. BACKGROUND: Evidence for safety and treatment efficacy have been presented in phase I therapeutic angiogenesis trials. METHODS: Eighty "no-option" patients with severe stable ischemic heart disease, Canadian Cardiovascular Society functional class 3 to 4, were assigned randomly to receive, via the NOGA-MyoStar system (Cordis Corp., Miami Lakes, Florida), either 0.5 mg of phVEGF-A(165) (n = 40) or placebo plasmid (n = 40) in the myocardial region showing stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects on (99m)Tc sestamibi/tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography. RESULTS: No differences among the groups were recorded at baseline with respect to clinical, perfusion, and wall motion characteristics. After three months, myocardial stress perfusion defects did not differ significantly between the VEGF gene transfer and placebo groups (38 +/- 3% and 44 +/- 2%, respectively). Similarly, semiquantitative analysis of the change in perfusion in the treated region of interest did not differ significantly between the two groups. Compared with placebo, VEGF gene transfer improved the local wall motion disturbances, assessed both by NOGA (p = 0.04) and contrast ventriculography (p = 0.03). Canadian Cardiovascular Society functional class classification of angina pectoris improved significantly in both groups but without difference between the groups. No phVEGF-A(165)-related adverse events were observed; however, NOGA procedure-related adverse events occurred in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: The VEGF gene transfer did not significantly improve stress-induced myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared with placebo; however, improved regional wall motion, as assessed both by NOGA and by ventriculography, may indicate a favorable anti-ischemic effect. This result should encourage more studies within the field. Transient VEGF overexpression seems to be safe.
Angiogenic gene therapy in angina pectoris has been disappointing so far. Reasons might be that the administered genes already are overexpressed in ischemic myocardium, or that atrial and brain natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP) are overexpressed, as they have anti-angiogenic effects. Five stable angina pectoris patients without heart failure were studied. Left ventricular biopsies were taken during coronary by-pass surgery from a region with stress-inducible ischemia and from a normal region. Both ANP and BNP but not vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF-receptor 1 and 2 were overexpressed in ischemic regions compared to non-ischemic regions as measured by real-time PCR. The expression of 15 other angiogenic genes measured by oligonucleotide arrays was not consistently increased in ischemic regions. The overexpression of ANP and BNP suggests an anti-angiogenic effect in ischemic heart disease. The lack of overexpression of angiogenic genes supports the concept of therapeutic overexpression of these genes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.