PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Andreas Zapf

Publications and source records attributed to Andreas Zapf.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Very high compliance in an expanded MS-MS-based newborn screening program despite written parental consent.

OBJECTIVES: In Bavaria, Germany, an expanded MS-MS-based newborn screening program was implemented in 1999. The coverage of new additional conditions and novelty of technology required introduction of written parental consent. Here we evaluated the influence of the consent procedure on compliance by systematic demographic tracking. METHODS: Comprehensive information was provided for parents, professionals, and the public. Screening notifications were matched with all birth notifications on name and date of birth. Parents of children without screening notification were contacted and counseled. RESULTS: Between August 1, 1999, and July 31, 2000, 123,284 children eligible for screening were born. Of these, 116,652 were matched successfully. Among 6,632 parents contacted, 2,516 (2%) did not respond. Three thousand thirty-four children were screened but the parents initially refused to participate in tracking. Five hundred ninety-four were screened outside the program. Four hundred eighty-eight untested newborns were identified. Three hundred twenty-five screening failures due to logistic problems were tested subsequently. Screening was definitely refused by the parents of 163 children (0.1% of target population). CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate information provided and surveillance by tracking, high compliance with newborn screening can be achieved despite a written consent requirement.

Adult↗

Expanded newborn screening in Bavaria: tracking to achieve requested repeat testing.

OBJECTIVES: Expansion of newborn screening programs may increase the risk of missing cases through procedural failures. A coordinated process quality assurance procedure to track recalls was, therefore, introduced in parallel to expansion (including MS-MS and 17alpha-OHP) in Bavaria. METHODS: Using comprehensive computerized registration and automated monitoring a state-funded center coordinated all individual measures to achieve complete testing of all repeat requests-case-specific contacts to physicians, midwives, and parents. Mailing and phoning from the center were supplemented by local public health activities including home visits if needed. RESULTS: Among 243,422 children tested in 1999 and 2000 overall recall was 3.62% (8,809 children): 0.30% (726) were due to sample inadequacy, 1.35% (3,282) to early sampling (<48 h), and 1.97% (4,801) to abnormal results. Of all recalls, 80.9% were received following the initial request, 1,679 (19.1%) required special efforts. Of these, 873 were achieved following a single and 601 following repeated central activities, and 102 were achieved following local support. Sixty-three cases of parental refusal and 47 untraceable children remained. Altogether, 98.8% recalls were achieved, corresponding to 99.96% of all tested children for which definite screening results could be obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Expansion of newborn screening programs does not necessarily mean unsolvable problems in tracking of recalls if adequate logistics is established in parallel.

Germany↗