PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Andrej A Romanovsky

Publications and source records attributed to Andrej A Romanovsky.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural substrate of cold-seeking behavior in endotoxin shock.

Systemic inflammation is a leading cause of hospital death. Mild systemic inflammation is accompanied by warmth-seeking behavior (and fever), whereas severe inflammation is associated with cold-seeking behavior (and hypothermia). Both behaviors are adaptive. Which brain structures mediate which behavior is unknown. The involvement of hypothalamic structures, namely, the preoptic area (POA), paraventricular nucleus (PVH), or dorsomedial nucleus (DMH), in thermoregulatory behaviors associated with endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide [LPS])-induced systemic inflammation was studied in rats. The rats were allowed to select their thermal environment by freely moving in a thermogradient apparatus. A low intravenous dose of Escherichia coli LPS (10 microg/kg) caused warmth-seeking behavior, whereas a high, shock-inducing dose (5,000 microg/kg) caused cold-seeking behavior. Bilateral electrocoagulation of the PVH or DMH, but not of the POA, prevented this cold-seeking response. Lesioning the DMH with ibotenic acid, an excitotoxin that destroys neuronal bodies but spares fibers of passage, also prevented LPS-induced cold-seeking behavior; lesioning the PVH with ibotenate did not affect it. Lesion of no structure affected cold-seeking behavior induced by heat exposure or by pharmacological stimulation of the transient receptor potential (TRP) vanilloid-1 channel ("warmth receptor"). Nor did any lesion affect warmth-seeking behavior induced by a low dose of LPS, cold exposure, or pharmacological stimulation of the TRP melastatin-8 ("cold receptor"). We conclude that LPS-induced cold-seeking response is mediated by neuronal bodies located in the DMH and neural fibers passing through the PVH. These are the first two landmarks on the map of the circuitry of cold-seeking behavior associated with endotoxin shock.

Animals↗

Cells that trigger fever.

Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is recognized by several receptors, including the toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, on various cells. Among many biological responses to LPS is fever, an often polyphasic rise in body temperature that is thought to be mediated by prostaglandin (PG) E(2). Which receptors on which cells are linked to fever production is unknown. It is also unknown which cells produce PGE(2) that triggers the earliest (first) phase of fever. Two recent studies from our group answer these questions. In the first one, we studied LPS-induced fever in mouse chimeras selectively lacking the TLR4 in hematopoietic or nonhematopoietic cells. We found that the first phase of fever is triggered via the TLR4 on hematopoietic cells. In the second study, we investigated LPS fever in rats. We found that the number of cells expressing cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, a PGE(2)-synthesizing enzyme, surged at the onset of fever in the lung and liver (but not in the brain), and that most of these cells were macrophages. Because LPS-induced PGE(2) production in macrophages is TLR4-dependent, it is tempting to speculate that the TLR4-bearing, bone marrow-derived cells implicated in fever pathogenesis by the first study are the same as the COX-2-positive macrophages identified in the second study. Hence, pulmonary and hepatic macrophages that recognize LPS via the TLR4 and rapidly produce PGE(2) are likely triggers of the fever response.

Animals↗

Thermoregulation: some concepts have changed. Functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system.

While summarizing the current understanding of how body temperature (T(b)) is regulated, this review discusses the recent progress in the following areas: central and peripheral thermosensitivity and temperature-activated transient receptor potential (TRP) channels; afferent neuronal pathways from peripheral thermosensors; and efferent thermoeffector pathways. It is proposed that activation of temperature-sensitive TRP channels is a mechanism of peripheral thermosensitivity. Special attention is paid to the functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system. The notion that deep T(b) is regulated by a unified system with a single controller is rejected. It is proposed that T(b) is regulated by independent thermoeffector loops, each having its own afferent and efferent branches. The activity of each thermoeffector is triggered by a unique combination of shell and core T(b)s. Temperature-dependent phase transitions in thermosensory neurons cause sequential activation of all neurons of the corresponding thermoeffector loop and eventually a thermoeffector response. No computation of an integrated T(b) or its comparison with an obvious or hidden set point of a unified system is necessary. Coordination between thermoeffectors is achieved through their common controlled variable, T(b). The described model incorporates Kobayashi's views, but Kobayashi's proposal to eliminate the term sensor is rejected. A case against the term set point is also made. Because this term is historically associated with a unified control system, it is more misleading than informative. The term balance point is proposed to designate the regulated level of T(b) and to attract attention to the multiple feedback, feedforward, and open-loop components that contribute to thermal balance.

Afferent Pathways↗

Bacterial lipopolysaccharide fever is initiated via Toll-like receptor 4 on hematopoietic cells.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a well-known bacterial pyrogen, is recognized by several receptors, including the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), on various cells. Which of these receptors and cells are linked to fever production is unknown. By constructing 4 mouse chimeras and studying their thermoregulatory responses, we found that all 3 phases of the typical LPS fever depend on TLR4 signaling. The first phase is triggered via the TLR4 on hematopoietic cells. The second and third phases involve TLR4 signaling in both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells.

Animals↗

Putative dual role of ephrin-Eph receptor interactions in inflammation.

Inflammation is associated with a decreased adhesion between endothelial cells in blood vessels and an increased adhesion of circulating leukocytes to vascular endothelium and to epithelia of internal organs. These changes lead to leukocyte extravasation and tissue transmigration. We propose that ephrins and Eph receptors play important, but underappreciated, signaling roles in these processes. At early stages of inflammation, EphA2 receptor and ephrin-B2 are overexpressed in endothelial and epithelial cells, thus leading to those events (expression of adhesion molecules on the cell surface and reorganization of the intracellular cytoskeleton) that cause cell repulsion and disruption of endothelial and epithelial barriers. At later stages of inflammation, expression of EphA1, EphA3, EphB3, and EphB4 on leukocytes and endothelial cells decreases, thus promoting adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells. Taking into consideration the abundance of ephrins and Eph receptors in tissues and the robustness of their signaling effects, the proposed involvement is likely to be substantial and may constitute a novel therapeutic target.

Animals↗

Cold-seeking behavior as a thermoregulatory strategy in systemic inflammation.

Systemic inflammation (SI) is a leading cause of hospital death. Although fever and hypothermia are listed as symptoms in every definition of SI, how SI affects thermoregulatory behavior is unclear. SI is often modeled by systemic administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to rats. When rats are not allowed to regulate their body temperature (Tb) behaviorally, LPS causes either fever or hypothermia, and the direction of the response is determined by LPS dose and ambient temperature (Ta). However, in many studies in which rats were allowed to regulate Tb behaviorally (by selecting their preferred Ta in a thermogradient apparatus), they consistently expressed warmth-seeking behavior and developed fever. We hypothesized that SI can cause not only warmth-seeking behavior but also cold-seeking behavior; we then tested this hypothesis by studying LPS-induced thermoregulatory behavior in adult Wistar rats. A multichannel thermogradient apparatus, implantable data loggers and infrared thermography were used; multiple control experiments were conducted; and the ability of the apparatus to reliably register the changes in rats' preferred Ta induced by thermal (external cooling or heating) or chemical (TRPV1 or TRPM8 agonist) stimuli was confirmed. The rats responded to a low dose of LPS (10 microg/kg i.v.) with warmth-seeking behavior and a polyphasic fever, but to a high dose (5 mg/kg i.v.) with marked cold-seeking behavior and hypothermia followed by warmth-seeking behavior and fever. This is the first well-controlled study to report SI-associated cold-seeking behavior in rats. Cold-seeking behavior is likely to be an important defense response in severe SI.

Animals↗

Microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1, ephrins, and ephrin kinases as suspected therapeutic targets in arthritis: exposed by "criminal profiling".

Feeding information obtained in one criminal case into the profile of another crime often helps to solve the latter. The literature on two different "crimes," namely, acute systemic inflammation and arthritis (including osteoarthritis [OA] and rheumatoid arthritis [RA] deals largely with the same "gang" of inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandin (PG) E2. Early investigations suggested that microsomal PGE synthase-1 (mPGES-1; a terminal PGE2-synthesizing enzyme) plays a pivotal role in bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic inflammation, but overlooked the possibility that the same enzyme could be involved in OA or RA. Later studies showed that mPGES-1 is indeed a key perpetrator in arthritic diseases, a fact that could have been predicted earlier by pooling the new knowledge about mPGES-1 into the profile of arthritic diseases. In this review, we analyze our recent study on the expression of erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular (Eph) receptor kinases and their ligands, ephrins, in LPS-induced systemic inflammation. By pooling these results together with literature data into the profile of RA, we conclude that Eph kinases and ephrins are prime suspects for being involved in the pathogenesis of RA. We further conjecture that the involvement of Eph kinases and ephrins may be realized via the induction of angiogenesis in the inflamed joint, promotion of leukocyte infiltration, and activation of the infiltrated cells. Studies to test this new hypothesis seem warranted, and our prediction is that the "smoking gun" will be found.

Animals↗

Cellular and molecular bases of the initiation of fever.

All phases of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced fever are mediated by prostaglandin (PG) E2. It is known that the second febrile phase (which starts at approximately 1.5 h post-LPS) and subsequent phases are mediated by PGE2 that originated in endotheliocytes and perivascular cells of the brain. However, the location and phenotypes of the cells that produce PGE2 triggering the first febrile phase (which starts at approximately 0.5 h) remain unknown. By studying PGE2 synthesis at the enzymatic level, we found that it was activated in the lung and liver, but not in the brain, at the onset of the first phase of LPS fever in rats. This activation involved phosphorylation of cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) and transcriptional up-regulation of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2. The number of cells displaying COX-2 immunoreactivity surged in the lung and liver (but not in the brain) at the onset of fever, and the majority of these cells were identified as macrophages. When PGE2 synthesis in the periphery was activated, the concentration of PGE2 increased both in the venous blood (which collects PGE2 from tissues) and arterial blood (which delivers PGE2 to the brain). Most importantly, neutralization of circulating PGE2 with an anti-PGE2 antibody both delayed and attenuated LPS fever. It is concluded that fever is initiated by circulating PGE2 synthesized by macrophages of the LPS-processing organs (lung and liver) via phosphorylation of cPLA2 and transcriptional up-regulation of COX-2. Whether PGE2 produced at the level of the blood-brain barrier also contributes to the development of the first phase remains to be clarified.

Animals↗

Fever and hypothermia in systemic inflammation: recent discoveries and revisions.

Systemic inflammation is accompanied by changes in body temperature, either fever or hypothermia. Over the past decade, the rat and mouse have become the predominant animal models, and new species-specific tools (recombinant antibodies and other proteins) and genetic manipulations have been applied to study fever and hypothermia. Remarkable progress has been achieved. It has been established that the same inflammatory agent can induce either fever or hypothermia, depending on several factors. It has also been established that experimental fevers are generally polyphasic, and that different mechanisms underlie different febrile phases. Signaling mechanisms of the most common pyrogen used, bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), have been found to involve the Toll-like receptor 4. The roles of cytokines (such as interleukins-1beta and 6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) have been further detailed, and new early mediators (e.g., complement factor 5a and platelet-activating factor) have been proposed. Our understanding of how peripheral inflammatory messengers cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has changed. The view that the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis is the major port of entry for pyrogenic cytokines has lost its dominant position. The vagal theory has emerged and then fallen. Consensus has been reached that the BBB is not a divider preventing signal transduction, but rather the transducer itself. In the endothelial and perivascular cells of the BBB, upstream signaling molecules (e.g., pro-inflammatory cytokines) are switched to a downstream mediator, prostaglandin (PG) E2. An indispensable role of PGE2 in the febrile response to LPS has been demonstrated in studies with targeted disruption of genes encoding either PGE2-synthesizing enzymes or PGE2 receptors. The PGE2-synthesizing enzymes include numerous phospholipases (PL) A2, cyclooxygenases (COX)-1 and 2, and several newly discovered terminal PGE synthases (PGES). It has been realized that the "physiological," low-scale production of PGE2 and the accelerated synthesis of PGE2 in inflammation are catalyzed by different sets of these enzymes. The "inflammatory" set includes several isoforms of PLA2 and inducible isoforms of COX (COX-2) and microsomal (m) PGES (mPGES-1). The PGE2 receptors are multiple; one of them, EP3 is likely to be a primary "fever receptor." The effector pathways of fever start from EP3-bearing preoptic neurons. These neurons have been found to project to the raphe pallidus, where premotor sympathetic neurons driving thermogenesis in the brown fat and skin vaso-constriction are located. The rapid progress in our understanding of how thermoeffectors are controlled has revealed the inadequacy of set point-based definitions of thermoregulatory responses. New definitions (offered in this review) are based on the idea of balance of active and passive processes and use the term balance point. Inflammatory signaling and thermoeffector pathways involved in fever and hypothermia are modulated by neuropeptides and peptide hormones. Roles for several "new" peptides (e.g., leptin and orexins) have been proposed. Roles for several "old" peptides (e.g., arginine vasopressin, angiotensin II, and cholecystokinin) have been detailed or revised. New pharmacological tools to treat fevers (i.e., selective inhibitors of COX-2) have been rapidly introduced into clinical practice, but have not become magic bullets and appeared to have severe side effects. Several new targets for antipyretic therapy, including mPGES-1, have been identified.

Animals↗

Thermoregulatory responses to lipopolysaccharide in the mouse: dependence on the dose and ambient temperature.

Most published studies of thermoregulatory responses of mice to LPS involved a stressful injection of LPS, were run at a poorly controlled and often subneutral ambient temperature (T(a)), and paid little attention to the dependence of the response on the LPS dose. These pitfalls have been overcome in the present study. Male C57BL/6 mice implanted with jugular vein catheters were kept in an environmental chamber at a tightly controlled T(a). The relationship between the T(a)s used and the thermoneutral zone of the mice was verified by measuring tail skin temperature, either by infrared thermography or thermocouple thermometry. Escherichia coli LPS in a wide dose range (10(0)-10(4) microg/kg) was administered through an extension of the jugular catheter from outside the chamber. The responses observed were dose dependent. At a neutral T(a), low (just suprathreshold) doses of LPS (10(0)-10(1) microg/kg) caused a monophasic fever. To a slightly higher dose (10(1.5) microg/kg), the mice responded with a biphasic fever. To even higher doses (10(1.75)-10(4) microg/kg), they responded with a polyphasic fever, of which three distinct phases were identified. The dose dependence and dynamics of LPS fever in the mouse appeared to be remarkably similar to those seen in the rat. However, the thermoregulatory response of mice to LPS in a subthermoneutral environment is remarkably different from that of rats. Although very high doses of LPS (10(4) microg/kg) did cause a late (latency, approximately 3 h) hypothermic response in mice, the typical early (latency, 10-30 min) hypothermic response seen in rats did not occur. The present investigation identifies experimental conditions to study LPS-induced mono-, bi-, and polyphasic fevers and late hypothermia in mice and provides detailed characteristics of these responses.

Animals↗

Expanding the febrigenic role of cyclooxygenase-2 to the previously overlooked responses.

Previous studies on the role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and -2 in fever induced by intravenous LPS have failed to investigate the role of these isoenzymes in the earliest responses: monophasic fever (response to a low, near-threshold dose of LPS) and the first phase of polyphasic fever (response to higher doses). We studied these responses in 96 mice that were COX-1 or COX-2 deficient (-/-) or sufficient (+/+). Each mouse was implanted with a temperature telemetry probe into the peritoneal cavity and a jugular catheter. The study was conducted at a tightly controlled, neutral ambient temperature (31 degrees C). To avoid stress hyperthermia (which masks the onset of fever), all injections were performed through a catheter extension. The +/+ mice responded to intravenous saline with no change in deep body temperature. To a low dose of LPS (1 microg/kg iv), they responded with a monophasic fever. To a higher dose (56 microg/kg), they responded with a polyphasic fever. Neither monophasic fever nor the first phase of polyphasic fever was attenuated in the COX-1 -/- mice, but both responses were absent in the COX-2 -/- mice. The second and third phases of polyphasic fever were also missing in the COX-2 -/- mice. The present study identifies a new, critical role for COX-2 in the mediation of the earliest responses to intravenous LPS: monophasic fever and the first phase of polyphasic fever. It also suggests that no product of the COX-1 gene, including the splice variant COX-1b (COX-3), is essential for these responses.

Animals↗

Thermoregulatory responses of rats to conventional preparations of lipopolysaccharide are caused by lipopolysaccharide per se-- not by lipoprotein contaminants.

LPS preparations cause a variety of body temperature (T(b)) responses: monophasic fever, different phases of polyphasic fever, and hypothermia. Conventional (c) LPS preparations contain highly active lipoprotein contaminants (endotoxin proteins). Whereas LPS signals predominantly via the Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, endotoxin proteins signal via TLR2. Several TLR2-dependent responses of immunocytes to cLPS in vitro are triggered by endotoxin proteins and not by LPS itself. We tested whether any T(b) response to cLPS from Escherichia coli 055:B5 is triggered by non-TLR4-signaling contaminants. A decontaminated (d) LPS preparation (free of endotoxin proteins) was produced by subjecting cLPS to phenol-water reextraction. The presence of non-TLR4-signaling contaminants in cLPS (and their absence in dLPS) was confirmed by showing that cLPS (but not dLPS) induced IL-1beta expression in the spleen and increased serum levels of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta of C3H/HeJ mice; these mice bear a nonfunctional TLR4. Yet, both cLPS and dLPS caused cytokine responses in C3H/HeOuJ mice; these mice bear a fully functional TLR4. We then studied the T(b) responses to cLPS and dLPS in Wistar rats preimplanted with jugular catheters. At a neutral ambient temperature (30 degrees C), a low (0.1 microg/kg iv) dose of cLPS caused a monophasic fever, whereas a moderate (10 microg/kg iv) dose produced a polyphasic fever. In the cold (20 degrees C), a high (500 microg/kg iv) dose of cLPS caused hypothermia. All T(b) responses to dLPS were identical to those of cLPS. We conclude that all known T(b) responses to LPS preparations are triggered by LPS per se and not by non-TLR4-signaling contaminants of such preparations.

Animals↗

Expression of Eph receptors and their ligands, ephrins, during lipopolysaccharide fever in rats.

Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular (Eph) receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands, ephrins, are involved in embryogenesis and oncogenesis by mediating cell adhesion and migration. Although ephrins can be induced by bacterial LPS in vitro, whether they are involved in inflammation in vivo is unknown. Using differential mRNA display, we found that a febrigenic dose of LPS (50 microg/kg iv) induces a strong transcriptional upregulation of ephrin-A1 in rat liver. We confirmed this finding by real-time RT-PCR. We then quantified the mRNA expression of different ephrins and Eph receptors at phases 1-3 of LPS fever in different organs. Febrile phases 2 (90 min post-LPS) and 3 (300 min) were characterized by robust upregulation (up to 16-fold) and downregulation (up to 21-fold) of several ephrins and Eph receptors. With the exception of EphA2, which showed upregulation in the brain at phase 2, expressional changes of Eph receptors and ephrins were limited to the LPS-processing organs: liver and lung. Characteristic, counter-directed changes in expressional regulation of Eph receptors and their corresponding ligands were found: upregulation of EphA2, downregulation of ephrin-A1 in the liver and lung at phase 2; downregulation of EphB3, upregulation of ephrin-B2 in the liver at phase 2; downregulation of EphA1 and EphA3, upregulation of ephrins-A1 and -A3 in liver at phase 3. In the liver, transcriptional changes of EphA2 and EphB3 at phase 2 were confirmed at protein level. These coordinated, phase-specific responses suggest that different sets of ephrins and Eph receptors may be involved in cellular events (such as disruption of tissue barriers and leukocyte transmigration) underlying different stages of systemic inflammatory response to LPS.

Animals↗

Albumin is not an irreplaceable carrier for amphipathic mediators of thermoregulatory responses to LPS: compensatory role of alpha1-acid glycoprotein.

In view of the potential involvement of peripherally synthesized, circulating amphipathic mediators [such as platelet-activating factor (PAF) and prostaglandin E(2)] in the systemic inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), we hypothesized that transport of amphipaths by albumin is essential for conveying peripheral inflammatory signals to the brain. Our first specific aim was to test this hypothesis by studying LPS-induced fever and hypothermia in Nagase analbuminemic rats (NAR). NAR from two different colonies and normalbuminemic Sprague-Dawley rats were preimplanted with jugular catheters, and their febrile responses to a mild dose of LPS (10 microg/kg i.v.) at thermoneutrality and hypothermic responses to a high dose of LPS (500 microg/kg i.v.) in the cold were studied. NAR of both colonies developed normal febrile and hypothermic responses, thus suggesting that transport of amphipathic mediators by albumin is not indispensable for LPS signaling. Although alternative carrier proteins [such as alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein (AGP)] are known to assume transport functions of albumin in NAR, it is unknown whether inflammatory mediators are capable of inducing their actions when bound to alternative carriers. To test whether PAF, the most potent amphipathic pyrogen, causes fever when administered in an AGP-bound form was our second aim. Sprague-Dawley rats were preimplanted with jugular catheters, and their thermal responses to infusion of a 1:1 [PAF-AGP] complex (40 nmol/kg i.v.), AGP (40 nmol/kg i.v.), or various doses of free (aggregated) PAF were studied. The complex, but neither free PAF nor AGP, caused a high ( approximately 1.5 degrees C) fever with a short (< 10 min) latency. This is the first demonstration of a pyrogenic activity of AGP-bound PAF. We conclude that, in the absence of albumin, AGP and possibly other carriers participate in immune-to-brain signaling by binding and transporting amphipathic inflammatory mediators.

Animals↗

Lipopolysaccharide fever is initiated via a capsaicin-sensitive mechanism independent of the subtype-1 vanilloid receptor.

As pretreatment with intraperitoneal capsaicin (8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide, CAP), an agonist of the vanilloid receptor known as VR1 or transient receptor potential channel-vanilloid receptor subtype 1 (TRPV-1), has been shown to block the first phase of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) fever in rats, this phase is thought to depend on the TRPV-1-bearing sensory nerve fibers originating in the abdominal cavity. However, our recent studies suggest that CAP blocks the first phase via a non-neural mechanism. In the present work, we studied whether this mechanism involves the TRPV-1. Adult Long-Evans rats implanted with chronic jugular catheters were used. Pretreatment with CAP (5 mg kg(-1), i.p.) 10 days before administration of LPS (10 microg kg(-1), i.v.) resulted in the loss of the entire first phase and a part of the second phase of LPS fever. Pretreatment with the ultrapotent TRPV-1 agonist resiniferatoxin (RTX; 2, 20, or 200 microg kg(-1), i.p.) 10 days before administration of LPS had no effect on the first and second phases of LPS fever, but it exaggerated the third phase at the highest dose. The latter effect was presumably due to the known ability of high doses of TRPV-1 agonists to cause a loss of warm sensitivity, thus leading to uncontrolled, hyperpyretic responses. Pretreatment with the selective competitive TRPV-1 antagonist capsazepine (N-[2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl]-1,3,4,5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-2H-2-benzazepine-2-carbothioamidem, CPZ; 40 mg kg(-1), i.p.) 90 min before administration of LPS (10 microg kg(-1), i.v.) or CAP (1 mg kg(-1), i.p.) did not affect LPS fever, but blocked the immediate hypothermic response to acute administration of CAP. It is concluded that LPS fever is initiated via a non-neural mechanism, which is CAP-sensitive but RTX- and CPZ-insensitive. The action of CAP on this mechanism is likely TRPV-1-independent. It is speculated that this mechanism may be the production of prostaglandin E(2) by macrophages in LPS-processing organs.

Animals↗

A new function of the leptin receptor: mediation of the recovery from lipopolysaccharide-induced hypothermia.

Obese (f/f) Koletsky rats lack the leptin receptor (LR), whereas their lean (F/?) counterparts bear a fully functional LR. By using f/f and F/? rats, we studied whether the LR is involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced fever and hypothermia. The body temperature responses to LPS (10 or 100 microg/kg iv) were measured in Koletsky rats exposed to a thermoneutral (28 degrees C) or cool (22 degrees C) environment. Rats of both genotypes responded to LPS with fever at 28 degrees C and with dose-dependent hypothermia at 22 degrees C. The fever responses of the f/f and F/? rats were identical. The hypothermic response of the f/f rats was markedly prolonged compared with that of the F/? rats. The prolonged hypothermic response to LPS in the f/f rats was accompanied by enhanced NF-kappaB signaling in the hypothalamus and an exaggerated rise in the plasma concentration of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. The f/f rats did not respond to LPS with an increase in the plasma concentration of corticosterone or adrenocorticotropic hormone, whereas their F/? counterparts did. The hypothermic response to TNF-alpha (80 microg/kg iv) was markedly prolonged in the f/f rats. These data show that the LR is essential for the recovery from LPS hypothermia. LR-dependent mechanisms of the recovery from LPS hypothermia include activation of the anti-inflammatory hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, inhibition of both the production and hypothermic action of TNF-alpha, and suppression of inflammatory (via NF-kappaB) signaling in the hypothalamus.

Animals↗

Do fever and anapyrexia exist? Analysis of set point-based definitions.

Fever and anapyrexia are the most studied thermoregulatory responses. They are defined as a body temperature (T(b)) increase and decrease, respectively, occurring because of a shift in the set point (SP) and characterized by active defense of the new T(b). Although models of T(b) control with a single SP (whether obvious or hidden) have been criticized, the SP-based definitions have remained unchallenged. In this article, the SP-based definitions of fever and anapyrexia were subjected to two tests. In test 1, they were compared with experimental data on changes in thresholds for activation of different thermoeffectors. Changes in thresholds were found compatible with an SP increase in some (but not all) cases of fever. In all cases of what is called anapyrexia, its mechanism (dissociation of thresholds of different effectors) was found incompatible with a decrease in a single SP. In test 2, experimental data on the dependence of T(b) on ambient temperature (T(a)) were analyzed. It was found that the febrile level of T(b) is defended in some (but not all) cases. However, strong dependence on T(a) was found in all cases of anapyrexia, which agrees with threshold dissociation but not with a decrease of the SP. It is concluded that fever (as defined) has only limited experimental support, whereas anapyrexia (as defined) does not exist. Two solutions are offered. A palliative is to accept that SP-based terms (anapyrexia, cryexia, regulated hypothermia, and such) are inadequate and should be abandoned. A radical solution is to transform all definitions based on comparing T(b) with the SP into definitions based on balancing active and passive processes of T(b) control.

Animals↗