PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Andrew M Shedlock

Publications and source records attributed to Andrew M Shedlock.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Phylogenetics of modern birds in the era of genomics.

In the 14 years since the first higher-level bird phylogenies based on DNA sequence data, avian phylogenetics has witnessed the advent and maturation of the genomics era, the completion of the chicken genome and a suite of technologies that promise to add considerably to the agenda of avian phylogenetics. In this review, we summarize current approaches and data characteristics of recent higher-level bird studies and suggest a number of as yet untested molecular and analytical approaches for the unfolding tree of life for birds. A variety of comparative genomics strategies, including adoption of objective quality scores for sequence data, analysis of contiguous DNA sequences provided by large-insert genomic libraries, and the systematic use of retroposon insertions and other rare genomic changes all promise an integrated phylogenetics that is solidly grounded in genome evolution. The avian genome is an excellent testing ground for such approaches because of the more balanced representation of single-copy and repetitive DNA regions than in mammals. Although comparative genomics has a number of obvious uses in avian phylogenetics, its application to large numbers of taxa poses a number of methodological and infrastructural challenges, and can be greatly facilitated by a 'community genomics' approach in which the modest sequencing throughputs of single PI laboratories are pooled to produce larger, complementary datasets. Although the polymerase chain reaction era of avian phylogenetics is far from complete, the comparative genomics era-with its ability to vastly increase the number and type of molecular characters and to provide a genomic context for these characters-will usher in a host of new perspectives and opportunities for integrating genome evolution and avian phylogenetics.

Animals↗

Assigning African elephant DNA to geographic region of origin: applications to the ivory trade.

Resurgence of illicit trade in African elephant ivory is placing the elephant at renewed risk. Regulation of this trade could be vastly improved by the ability to verify the geographic origin of tusks. We address this need by developing a combined genetic and statistical method to determine the origin of poached ivory. Our statistical approach exploits a smoothing method to estimate geographic-specific allele frequencies over the entire African elephants' range for 16 microsatellite loci, using 315 tissue and 84 scat samples from forest (Loxodonta africana cyclotis) and savannah (Loxodonta africana africana) elephants at 28 locations. These geographic-specific allele frequency estimates are used to infer the geographic origin of DNA samples, such as could be obtained from tusks of unknown origin. We demonstrate that our method alleviates several problems associated with standard assignment methods in this context, and the absolute accuracy of our method is high. Continent-wide, 50% of samples were located within 500 km, and 80% within 932 km of their actual place of origin. Accuracy varied by region (median accuracies: West Africa, 135 km; Central Savannah, 286 km; Central Forest, 411 km; South, 535 km; and East, 697 km). In some cases, allele frequencies vary considerably over small geographic regions, making much finer discriminations possible and suggesting that resolution could be further improved by collection of samples from locations not represented in our study.

Africa↗

SINEs of speciation: tracking lineages with retroposons.

The value of short interspersed elements (SINEs) for diagnosing common ancestry is being expanded to examine the differential sorting of lineages through the course of speciation events. Because most SINEs are neutral markers of identical descent, are not precisely excised from the genome and have a known ancestral condition, they are advantageous for reconciling gene trees and species trees with minimal phylogenetic error. A population perspective on SINE evolution combined with coalescence theory provides a context for investigating the phenomenon of ancestral polymorphism and its role in producing incongruent SINE insertion patterns among multiple loci. Studies of human Alu repeats demonstrate the value of young polymorphic SINEs for assessing human genomic diversity and tracking ancient demographics of human populations, whereas incongruent insertion patterns revealed by older fixed SINE loci, such as those in African cichlid fishes, contain information that might help identify ancient radiations that are otherwise obscured by accumulated mutations in sequence data. Here, we review the utility of retroposons for inferring common ancestry, discuss limits to the method, and clarify confusion by providing examples from the literature that illustrate how discordant multi-locus insertion patterns of retroelements can indicate lineage-sorting events that should not be misinterpreted as phylogenetic noise.

Journal Article↗

Retroposon mapping in molecular systematics.

Advances in genome sciences are demonstrating the dynamic nature of noncoding DNA regions, which are comprised largely of repetitive elements with no apparent function. Retroposons are one class of mobile genetic elements that amplify and move about the genome via a copy-and-paste mechanism that employs an RNA intermediate. Short and long interspersed elements (SINEs and LINEs, respectively) are types of retroposons of particular interest because of their active role in shaping the architecture of genomes and their diagnostic value as evolutionary markers for studies of phylogeny and population biology. Although the use of SINEs and LINEs for molecular systematic studies is proliferating, a comprehensive laboratory protocol that explicitly outlines how to isolate and characterize retroposons for systematic studies in a detailed, step-by-step fashion has been lacking. The present chapter addresses this gap in the literature by focusing on the strategy for isolating new SINEs from a genomic library, the screening process, the sequencing and characterization of clones into subfamilies, quantification of copy number in host taxa, and the critical diagnosis of phylogenetically informative SINE and LINE insertion patterns. Practical limits to the method are discussed in relation to sampling design, systematic character theory, and the empirical distribution of elements observed in eukaryotic lineages. Major steps in the experimental process are illustrated with case examples from a diversity of taxonomic groups and by published results in the molecular biology and systematics literature.

Animals↗