Biomedical subjects

Andries M Bergman

Publications and source records attributed to Andries M Bergman.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Expression microarray analysis and oligo array comparative genomic hybridization of acquired gemcitabine resistance in mouse colon reveals selection for chromosomal aberrations.

Gemcitabine is a commonly used therapy for many solid tumors. Acquired resistance to this nucleoside analogue, however, diminishes the long-term effectiveness in a majority of patients. To better define the molecular background of gemcitabine resistance, a mouse colon tumor was selected during successive rounds of transplantation with continued treatment of gemcitabine. Expression microarray analysis was applied to determine which genes are consistently and highly overexpressed or underexpressed in the resistant versus the nonresistant tumor. For the statistical interpretation of the microarray data, a parametric model was implemented, which returns model-based differential gene expression (log-) ratios and their uncertainties. This defined a set of 13 genes, putatively responsible for the gemcitabine resistance in solid tumors. One of these, RRM1, was previously identified as an important marker for gemcitabine resistance in human cell lines. Five of the 13 genes, including RRM1, are located within a 3 Mb region at chromosome 7E1 of which four are highly overexpressed, suggesting a chromosomal amplification. Therefore, chromosomal copy number changes were measured, using oligo array comparative genomic hybridization. A narrow and high amplification area was identified on 7E1 that encompassed all five genes. In addition, reduced RNA expression of two other genes at 8E1 encoding COX4I1 and RPL13 could be explained by a decrease in chromosomal copy number on chromosome 8. In conclusion, the array comparative genomic hybridization biologically validates our statistical approach and shows that gemcitabine is capable to select for chromosomally aberrant tumor cells, where changed gene expression levels lead to drug resistance.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

In vivo induction of resistance to gemcitabine results in increased expression of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 as the major determinant.

Gemcitabine is a deoxycytidine (dCyd) analogue with activity against several solid cancers. Gemcitabine is activated by dCyd kinase (dCK) and interferes, as its triphosphate dFdCTP, with tumor growth through incorporation into DNA. Alternatively, the metabolite gemcitabine diphosphate (dFdCDP) can interfere with DNA synthesis and thus tumor growth through inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Gemcitabine can be inactivated by the enzyme dCyd deaminase (dCDA). In most in vitro models, resistance to gemcitabine was associated with a decreased dCK activity. In all these models, resistance was established using continuous exposure to gemcitabine with increasing concentrations; however, these in vitro models have limited clinical relevance. To develop in vivo resistance to gemcitabine, we treated mice bearing a moderately sensitive tumor Colon 26-A (T/C = 0.25) with a clinically relevant schedule (120 mg/kg every 3 days). By repeated transplant of the most resistant tumor and continuation of gemcitabine treatment for >1 year, the completely resistant tumor Colon 26-G (T/C = 0.96) was created. Initial studies focused on resistance mechanisms known from in vitro studies. In Colon 26-G, dCK activity was 1.7-fold decreased; dCDA and DNA polymerase were not changed; and Colon 26-G accumulated 1.5-fold less dFdCTP, 6 hours after a gemcitabine injection, than the parental tumor. Based on in vitro studies, these relative minor changes were considered insufficient to explain the completely resistant phenotype. Therefore, an expression microarray was done with Colon 26-A versus Colon 26-G. Using independently grown nonresistant and resistant tumors, a striking increase in expression of the RRM1 subunit gene was found in Colon 26-G. The expression of RRM1 mRNA was 25-fold increased in the resistant tumor, as measured by real-time PCR, which was confirmed by Western blotting. In contrast, RRM2 mRNA was 2-fold decreased. However, ribonucleotide reductase enzyme activity was only moderately increased in Colon 26-G. In conclusion, this is the first model with in vivo induced resistance to gemcitabine. In contrast to most in vitro studies, dCK activity was not the most important determinant of gemcitabine resistance. Expression microarray identified RRM1 as the gene with the highest increase in expression in the Colon 26-G, which might clarify its complete gemcitabine-resistant phenotype. This study is the first in vivo evidence for a key role for RRM1 in acquired gemcitabine resistance.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Determinants of resistance to 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine).

The inherent or induced resistance of tumors to cytostatic agents is a major clinical problem. In this review, we summarize the pre-clinical mechanisms of acquired and inherent resistance to the fluorinated deoxycytidine analog gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC, Gemzar((R))), which has proven activity in non-small cell lung carcinoma, pancreatic and bladder cancer. Extensive research has been performed to elucidate the complex mechanism of action of this relatively new drug. Gemcitabine requires phosphorylation to mono-, di- and triphosphates to be active. Similar to the structurally and functionally related deoxycytidine analog ara-C, the first, crucial step in phosphorylation is catalyzed by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK). However, in contrast to ara-C, gemcitabine has multiple intracellular targets; up- or down-regulation of these targets may confer resistance to this drug. Resistance is associated with altered activities of enzymes involved in the metabolism of the drug, of target enzymes, and of enzymes involved in programmed cell death. However, the only strong correlations with gemcitabine sensitivity are dCK activity and dFdCTP pools, with a potential important role for ribonucleotide reductase.

Animals↗