PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Angelo Di Leo

Publications and source records attributed to Angelo Di Leo.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Correction for chromosome-17 is critical for the determination of true Her-2/neu gene amplification status in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Trastuzumab is the cornerstone for treatment of women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer, both in the adjuvant and in the metastatic settings. The accurate assessment of HER2 is, therefore, critical to identifying patients who may benefit from trastuzumab-based therapy. This project aimed to determine the optimal scoring method for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. METHODS: FISH assay was done on 893 samples of breast cancer. Three scoring methods were evaluated: Her2/CEP17> or =2, Her2>4, or Her2>6. Protein and gene expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (n = 584) and mRNA/assay/nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA; n = 90). RESULTS: Samples were divided into five groups based on FISH results: disomic amplified and nonamplified, polysomic amplified, nonamplified, and discordant (10.8% of cases, mostly positive with Her2>4 scoring, but negative with the others). Her2/CEP17> or =2 and Her2>6 scoring methods showed the best association (a) with regard to FISH scoring (kappa = 0.906, P < 10(-6)) and (b) between FISH and immunohistochemistry (3+ as positive; kappa > 0.650, P < 10(-6)) or NASBA (kappa > 0.536, P < 10(-6)). Polysomy had an effect on Her2 copy number (P < 10(-6)), but had no effect on protein and mRNA content. Therefore, within the discordant subgroup, for which additive Her-2 gene copies are due to high polysomy, protein and mRNA levels were similar to those of the nonamplified samples. For this subgroup, the best concordance between FISH/immunohistochemistry/NASBA was observed with the Her2/CEP17 ratio and Her-2>6 scoring (68% and 58% perfect matches, respectively). No perfect matches were observed using the Her2>4 scoring method. CONCLUSION: Correction for chromosome-17 is the method of choice for clinical practice; Her-2>6, but not Her-2>4, could be used as an alternative.

Aneuploidy↗
PubMed2005

Polysomy 17 in HER-2/neu status elaboration in breast cancer: effect on daily practice.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of chromosome 17 copy number on HER-2/neu status determination in breast cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: HER-2/neu gene copy and chromosome 17 centromere numbers were evaluated on 893 breast carcinomas using double color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The net and chromosome 17 corrected (ratio) HER-2/neu copy numbers were compared and related to immunohistochemistry done according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved scoring system (0, 1+, 2+, and 3+) as a first screening step in 584 cases. RESULTS: When a ratio > or = 2 was considered as criterion for FISH positivity, 49.3% (440 of 893) of cases showed amplification versus 56.2% (502 of 893) by using a net HER-2/neu gene copy number >4 as a alternative criterion; 14.8% (67 of 453) of cases having a ratio <2 had a net HER-2/neu gene copy number >4 and 1.1% (5 of 440) with a ratio > or = 2 had a net HER-2/neu gene copy number <4. Among discordant cases, 88.8% (64 of 72) were polysomic (>2.25 chromosomes 17/cell) and among polysomic cases, 12.8% (40 of 312) of the low polysomic (2.26-3.75 chromosomes 17/cell) and 36.9% (24 of 65) of the highly polysomic (>3.75 chromosomes 17/cell) cases showed discordance. In cases with a ratio <2, polysomy 17 incidences were 85.7% (6 of 7) in IHC 3+, 42.4% (79 of 186) in IHC 2+, 33.3% (15 of 45) in IHC 1+, and 29.1% (16 of 55) in IHC 0. CONCLUSION: A net increase in HER-2/neu gene copy number consecutive to polysomy 17 in the absence of specific gene amplification might lead to a strong protein overexpression in a small subset of breast carcinomas. HER-2/neu status determination by FISH is dependent on the criterion considered for positivity in clinical practice.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review is intended to summarize the most up-to-date information in the field of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: During the past year, the literature on chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer has focused on three main areas of interest: the development of new cytotoxic agents with most studies addressing the taxane-pretreated population; the evaluation of new combination regimens, mainly incorporating a taxane; and the development of new trastuzumab-cytotoxic-agent combinations in the HER-2-positive population. In addition, interesting data regarding combination versus sequential single-agent chemotherapy and the optimal duration of chemotherapy have been published. SUMMARY: Interesting new drugs have faced phase II development. Randomized trials will define their role in the daily management of metastatic breast cancer. New combination regimens, generally incorporating a taxane, improve short-term efficacy in comparison with standard anthracycline-based combinations or single-agent chemotherapy, but at the cost of increased toxicity. Trastuzumab can be safely combined with several cytotoxic agents.

Anthracyclines↗
PubMed2004

Potential predictive value of Bcl-2 for response to tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting of node-positive breast cancer.

Approximately 50% of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) and 70%-80% of patients with ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive BC respond to hormonal therapy. Additional predictive markers are needed. A group of 287 patients with ER- and/or PgR-positive tumors was selected from 804 patients previously enrolled in a multicenter phase III trial. Bcl-2 expression was evaluated and correlated with response to adjuvant tamoxifen and survival. Estrogen receptor and PgR were determined by biochemical means and Bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry. With a median follow-up of 76 months (95 relapses and 60 deaths), of the 287 patients with, 187 (65%) had Bcl-2-positive tumors and 78 of these patients received tamoxifen. Of the 100 patients with Bcl-2-negative disease, 51 received tamoxifen and 49 regular follow-up. Using patients treated with tamoxifen as a reference, a univariate analysis of disease-free interval for patients who did not receive tamoxifen showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.42 (95% CI, 0.82-2.44; P = 0.21) for patients with Bcl-2-positive disease and a HR of 1.05 (95% CI, 0.55-1.99; P = 0.89) for patients with Bcl-2-negative disease (P = 0.48). After adjusting for number of positive lymph nodes, degree of receptor and PgR positivity, and type of surgery, the HRs were 1.54 (95% CI, 0.87-2.73; P = 0.14) for Bcl-2-positive disease and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.52-2.11; P = 0.88) for Bcl-2-negative disease. Despite its being a retrospective nonrandomized study with a relatively low number of patients, our results suggest that Bcl-2 deserves further evaluation as a predictive factor of sensitivity to tamoxifen.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2004

Topoisomerase-II alpha expression as a predictive marker in a population of advanced breast cancer patients randomly treated either with single-agent doxorubicin or single-agent docetaxel.

PURPOSE: The predictive value of topoisomerase-II alpha (topo-II) has been evaluated in advanced breast cancer patients randomly treated with single-agent doxorubicin or docetaxel. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Primary tumor samples from patients enrolled in a randomized, phase III clinical trial comparing single-agent doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2) q3wks) with docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) q3wks) were collected and topo-II status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (clone KiS1). RESULTS: Topo-II status was evaluated in 108 samples, 55 (51%) in the doxorubicin arm and 53 (49%) in the docetaxel arm. An increment of 10% in cells expressing topo-II is associated with a statistically significant odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval) of 1.09 (1.03-1.15; P = 0.002) for overall response to doxorubicin versus 1.002 (0.94-1.07; P = 0.95) in the docetaxel arm. With increasing topo-II, the favorable OR for overall response to docetaxel compared with doxorubicin decreases to become not significant in patients with topo-II tumor content >10%. In a multivariate analysis, (a) HER-2 status seems positively correlated with overall response to chemotherapy (OR, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-6.27; P = 0.09). (b) Overall response to doxorubicin is significantly lower than overall response to docetaxel (OR, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.64; P = 0.009) but with a significant interaction term for doxorubicin-treated patients with topo-II tumor content >10% (OR, 8.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-37.03; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: (a) Topo-II overexpression confers a higher probability of response in the doxorubicin arm only. (b) Despite being a small retrospective study, this study is in line with previously reported studies and the hypotheses raised are now being tested in a prospective neoadjuvant trial.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Topoisomerase II alpha as a marker predicting the efficacy of anthracyclines in breast cancer: are we at the end of the beginning?

This article attempts to provide the reader with a complete overview of topoisomerase (topo) II alpha as a marker for predicting the efficacy of anthracyclines in patients with breast cancer. In the first section of this article, in vitro data supporting the predictive value of topo II alpha are reviewed. Interestingly, these data suggest that the interaction between HER2 and anthracycline efficacy, which has been hypothesized in several clinical studies performed in the past decade, might depend on the concomitant topo II alpha status. Molecular pathology studies further reinforce the concept that HER2 might not be directly involved in the prediction of response to anthracyclines. They report that topo II alpha gene amplification can be found in 25%-40% of HER2/neu-amplified tumors, while no topo II gene amplification is detected in the absence of HER2/neu gene amplification. In the second part of this article, a series of clinical studies are reviewed and interpreted. These studies have attempted to correlate topo II alpha status with anthracycline efficacy in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic settings. All of the studies evaluating the topo II alpha gene suggest that gene amplification might be associated with an increased efficacy of anthracyclines, and some of the studies evaluating topo II alpha protein find that protein overexpression might correlate with an increased sensitivity to these compounds. Despite these findings, however, the reported studies do not provide the proof of principle needed to authorize the use of topo II alpha as a predictive marker for standard practice. A new generation of research is currently testing the predictive value of topo II alpha. It is hoped that these projects, which are described in the last section of the article, will clarify the role of topo IIa in the prediction of response to anthracyclines.

Anthracyclines↗
PubMed2002

Predictive molecular markers in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer: state of the art in the year 2002.

In the present article, an extensive review of the current knowledge regarding predictive molecular markers in breast cancer is presented. The main emphasis has been given to the adjuvant therapy setting, because of the lack of well-designed studies evaluating predictive markers in the metastatic setting. In the first part of the article some general concepts have been summarized, mainly to emphasize the difference between prognostic and predictive markers. In the second part of the article, studies evaluating molecular markers with predictive value for the most commonly used drugs or regimens (i.e., cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil [CMF], anthracyclines, taxanes, and herceptin) have been reviewed and discussed. An attempt has been made to provide for each single predictive marker the currently available level of evidence, to allow the reader to have immediate information regarding the impact of the evaluated marker in daily clinical practice. In the last part of the article, the most important findings have been summarized and future avenues of research have been outlined.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Controversies in the adjuvant systemic therapy of endocrine-non-responsive breast cancer.

Treatment of breast cancer requires a fully integrated multidisciplinary management as well as an ongoing dialogue with laboratory scientists. The growing amount of data generated by randomized clinical trials need to be interpreted by the clinicians and discussed with patients, so that treatment decisions might be better individualized. In early breast cancer, three consensus panels have been developed to help with this task: the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group or Oxford Overview, the NIH Consensus Conference on Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer and the St. Gallen International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Nevertheless, even these panels leave us with a good deal of uncertainty about the optimal adjuvant systemic treatment of the disease, especially when it is classified as "endocrine non-responsive". The two most problematic issues regarding the management of endocrine non-responsive breast cancer are: (1) which fit woman should not be treated, with two major "to treat or not to treat" dilemmas, (a) women above 70 years of age, where available evidence is scant and co-morbid conditions more often come into the equation of benefit/risk, and (b) women who have very small invasive tumours (<1 cm); and (2) what is the optimal chemotherapy regimen (type, doses, schedule, timing and duration). The aim of this review is to examine these controversial issues. Two difficult clinical cases, which are representative of those frequently encountered in daily practice, will also be presented and discussed, with the help of a panel of 48 breast cancer experts from different regions of the world.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Current status of HER2 testing.

HER2 gene amplification and receptor overexpression by tumors seems to be associated with poorer prognosis and may be predictive of response to certain anticancer therapies. Furthermore, and paramount to the clinician and patient, a positive HER2 status is a prerequisite eligibility requirement for Herceptin (trastuzumab) therapy in women with metastatic breast cancer. As a consequence, issues relating to accurate and reliable laboratory assessment of HER2 status are a matter of significant debate to pathologists and oncologists. Out of a wide range of techniques that have been used in research for the detection of HER2 status, two technologies are now predominant in the routine clinical pathology laboratory: determination of HER2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). This article discusses some of the recent experiences, guidelines, and opinions of pathologists and clinicians concerning aspects of HER2 testing with respect to when to test (at initial diagnosis or pretreatment), the relative advantages/disadvantages of IHC and FISH, and where to test (local or centralized laboratories).

Algorithms↗
PubMed2002

Resistance to trastuzumab: a necessary evil or a temporary challenge?

The aim of this review article is to examine the potential mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab. In the clinical setting, when trastuzumab is given as a single agent for first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer, it is associated with a 40% objective response rate. In the remaining cases, no tumor regression is observed, although HER2 protein is overexpressed and/or the corresponding gene is amplified. Hence, some other factors besides HER2 must play a role in determining the level of sensitivity to trastuzumab. The identification of the potential mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab can be very helpful for the development of new compounds, which might overcome that resistance and/or have additive/synergistic antitumor effect when given in association with trastuzumab. Moreover, thorough understanding of the HER2 pathway is essential to the identification of new predictive markers of response to trastuzumab that will help to better define the patients who are most likely to benefit from this drug.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2002

Microtubule-associated parameters as predictive markers of docetaxel activity in advanced breast cancer patients: results of a pilot study.

Docetaxel is currently one of the most active agents for breast cancer. Predictive markers of docetaxel efficacy are clearly needed in order to avoid unnecessary toxicity in nonresponding or resistant patients and to improve the cost-effectiveness ratio of docetaxel. This pilot study correlates the clinical efficacy of docetaxel in 54 metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer patients with the expression of microtubule-associated parameters evaluated by immunohistochemistry in archival tumor samples. Among the 41 eligible patients (evaluable response to docetaxel and available predocetaxel treatment paraffin-embedded tumor tissue), response to docetaxel was: partial response 54%, stable disease 29%, and progressive disease 17%. Alfa- and b-tubulin and Tau protein were expressed in the majority of tumor samples. Class II, III, and IV b-tubulin isotypes were expressed in 56%, 65%, and 82% of samples, respectively. No clear association was found between response to docetaxel and the level of expression of Tau protein, a- and b-tubulin, and class III and IV b-tubulin isotypes. In patients with class II b-tubulin-positive tumors, the response rate was 39%, while in class II b-tubulin-negative tumors the response rate was 79% (P = 0.04). Therefore, we conclude that the class II b-tubulin isotype seems to be a promising predictive marker of docetaxel activity. Nevertheless, further investigations are needed due to the limited number of patients evaluated in this pilot study.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The European experience with docetaxel in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

This article summarizes the European experience with docetaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer patients. Four categories of trials evaluating the role of docetaxel are discussed: (1) 2-arm trial in which an anthracycline-based regimen administered for 6-8 cycles is compared to 3-4 cycles of the same regimen followed by full doses of 3-4 cycles of docetaxel; (2) 2-arm trial in which anthracycline-based polychemotherapy is compared to an anthracycline/docetaxel-based regimen; (3) 4-arm trial in which 2 different concepts are under evaluation: the role of docetaxel and the comparison between different anthracycline/docetaxel-based regimens, in which the 2 drugs are administered either in combination or sequentially; (4) translational research prospective trials aiming to identify a specific subgroup of patients deriving the largest benefit from the use of docetaxel. While it is expected that these trials will show the superiority of the docetaxel-based treatment, it is also anticipated that the benefit related to the use of docetaxel will not be of the same magnitude in all patients. For this reason, it will be extremely important to identify subgroups of patients deriving the highest benefit from the use of docetaxel. In the past few years, substantial progress has been made in the area of molecular biology, and several molecular markers that could predict the efficacy of docetaxel have been identified. The p53 gene mutations seem to be the most promising predictive markers because preclinical data suggest that taxane-induced apoptosis is p53 independent. Other molecular markers of potential interest are the microtubule-associated parameters, which might confer different degrees of sensitivity to a docetaxel-based therapy, depending on the pattern of expression.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2002

HER-2 amplification and topoisomerase IIalpha gene aberrations as predictive markers in node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated either with an anthracycline-based therapy or with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate HER-2 and topoisomerase IIalpha (topo IIalpha) as candidates for predicting the activity of anthracyclines in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In this study, we evaluated HER-2 and topo IIalpha gene aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization in a series of 430 primary breast cancer samples. Samples came from node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated either with one of two anthracycline-based regimens [full-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (HEC) and moderate-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC)] or with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in the context of a Phase III adjuvant therapy trial. Event-free survival comparisons were performed between the three study arms in the subgroups of HER-2-amplified and nonamplified tumors. An explorative analysis was also performed to evaluate the predictive value of topo IIalpha in the cohort of HER-2-amplified patients. RESULTS: HER-2 amplification was observed in 73 of the 354 evaluable samples (21%), whereas topo IIalpha amplification was found in 23 of the 61 evaluable HER-2-amplified tumors (38%). The three event-free survival comparisons were CMF versus HEC, CMF versus EC, and EC versus HEC. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were as follows: (a) CMF versus HEC, HR = 1.42 for HER-2-amplified tumors (95% CI, 0.54-3.76; P = 0.48) and 0.84 for HER-2-nonamplified tumors (95% CI, 0.49-1.44; P = 0.53); (b) CMF versus EC, HR = 1.65 for HER-2-amplified tumors (95% CI, 0.66-4.13; P = 0.29) and 0.66 for HER-2-nonamplified tumors (95% CI, 0.39-1.10; P = 0.11); and (c) EC versus HEC, HR = 0.93 for HER-2-amplified tumors (95% CI, 0.31-2.77, P = 0.90) and 1.33 for HER-2-nonamplified tumors (95% CI, 0.82-2.14; P = 0.25). Observed HRs suggest that the anthracycline-based therapy could be more effective than CMF in the subgroup of HER-2-amplified patients, whereas treatments could be equally active in the HER-2-nonamplified cohort. topo IIalpha evaluation suggests that the superiority of anthracyclines over CMF in HER-2-amplified patients could be confined to the subgroup of topo IIalpha-amplified tumors. CONCLUSIONS: HER-2 could have a predictive value for the activity of anthracycline-based regimens in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients. The predictive value of HER-2 would most likely be related to the concomitant amplification of the topo IIalpha gene.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

3-year results of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel has proven efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. In this pilot study, we explored the efficacy/feasibility of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens as adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1996 till March 1998, four consecutive groups of patients with stages II and III breast cancer, aged < or = 70 years, received one of the following regimens: a) sequential Doxorubicin (A) --> Docetaxel (T) --> CMF (Cyclophosphamide+Methotrexate+5-Fluorouracil): A 75 mg/m q 3 wks x 3, followed by T100 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 3, followed by i.v. CMF Days 1+8 q 4 wks x 3; b) sequential accelerated A --> T --> CMF: A and T administered at the same doses q 2 wks with Lenograstin support; c) combination therapy: A 50 mg/m2 + T 75 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4, followed by CMF x 4; d) sequential T --> A --> CMF: T and A, administered as in group a), with the reverse sequence. When indicated, radiotherapy was administered during or after CMF, and Tamoxifen after CMF. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were treated. The median age was 48 years (29-66) and the median number of positive axillary nodes was 6 (1-25). Tumors were operable in 94% and locally advanced in 6% of cases. Pathological tumor size was >2 cm in 72% of cases. There were 21 relapses, (18 systemic, 3 locoregional) and 11 patients (12%) have died from disease progression. At median follow-up of 39 months (6-57), overall survival (OS) was 87% (95% CI, 79-94%) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 76% (95% CI, 67%-85%). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of these docetaxel-based regimens, in terms of OS and DFS, appears to be at least as good as standard anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), in similar high-risk patient populations.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

HER-2/neu evaluation by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast cancer: implications for daily laboratory practice.

BACKGROUND: HER-2/neu status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) methods in more than 300 paraffin-embedded primary breast cancer samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HER-2/neu status was determined by FISH using the PathVysion kit (Vysis) and by IHC using either a monoclonal antibody CB11 or a cocktail of antibodies: the monoclonal TAB250 and the polyclonal pAb1. RESULTS: Of the 324 cases evaluable by IHC, 65 out of 318 (20%) and 24 out of 324 (7%) were scored as positive when using the antibody cocktail and the CB11, respectively. HER-2/neu gene amplification occured in 64 out of 324 cases (20%). Concordance of FISH and IHC was found in 285 out of 318 cases (90%) and 278 out of 324 cases (86%) using the cocktail and the CB11, respectively. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that the use of a sensitive IHC method followed by confirmation of positive results by FISH considerably decreased the FISH costs and may become standard practice for HER-2/neu evaluation.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗