Biomedical subjects

Angie Rizzino

Publications and source records attributed to Angie Rizzino.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Different domains of the transcription factor ELF3 are required in a promoter-specific manner and multiple domains control its binding to DNA.

Elf3 is an epithelially restricted member of the ETS transcription factor family, which is involved in a wide range of normal cellular processes. Elf3 is also aberrantly expressed in several cancers, including breast cancer. To better understand the molecular mechanisms by which Elf3 regulates these processes, we created a large series of Elf3 mutant proteins with specific domains deleted or targeted by point mutations. The modified forms of Elf3 were used to analyze the contribution of each domain to DNA binding and the activation of gene expression. Our work demonstrates that three regions of Elf3, in addition to its DNA binding domain (ETS domain), influence Elf3 binding to DNA, including the transactivation domain that behaves as an autoinhibitory domain. Interestingly, disruption of the transactivation domain relieves the autoinhibition of Elf3 and enhances Elf3 binding to DNA. On the basis of these studies, we suggest a model for autoinhibition of Elf3 involving intramolecular interactions. Importantly, this model is consistent with our finding that the N-terminal region of Elf3, which contains the transactivation domain, interacts with its C terminus, which contains the ETS domain. In parallel studies, we demonstrate that residues flanking the N- and C-terminal sides of the ETS domain of Elf3 are crucial for its binding to DNA. Our studies also show that an AT-hook domain, as well as the serine- and aspartic acid-rich domain but not the pointed domain, is necessary for Elf3 activation of promoter activity. Unexpectedly, we determined that one of the AT-hook domains is required in a promoter-specific manner.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Differential activity of the FGF-4 enhancer in F9 and P19 embryonal carcinoma cells.

Transcription factors Oct-3/4 and Sox2 behave as global regulators during mammalian embryogenesis. They work together by binding co-operatively to closely spaced HMG and POU motifs (HMG/POU cassettes). Recently, it was suggested that a critical Sox2:Oct-3/4 target gene, FGF-4, is expressed at lower levels in P19 than in F9 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, due to lower levels of Sox2 in P19 than in F9 cells. We tested this possibility to better understand how FGF-4 expression is modulated during development. Although we found that P19 EC cells express approximately 10-fold less FGF-4 mRNA than F9 EC cells, we determined that Sox2 levels do not differ markedly in F9 and P19 EC cells. We also determined that Sox2 and Oct-3/4 work together equally well in both EC cell lines. Moreover, in contrast to an earlier prediction based on in vitro binding studies, we demonstrate that the function of the HMG/POU cassettes of the FGF-4 and UTF1 genes does not differ significantly in these EC cell lines when tested in the context of a natural enhancer. Importantly, we determined that the FGF-4 promoter is highly responsive to a heterologous enhancer in both EC cell lines; whereas, the FGF-4 enhancer is 7- to 10-fold less active in P19 than in F9 EC cells. Because F9 and P19 EC cells are likely to represent cells at different stages of mammalian development, we suggest that this difference in FGF-4 enhancer activity may reflect a mechanism used to decrease, but not abolish, FGF-4 expression as the early embryo develops.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Identification of an epithelial-specific enhancer regulating ESX expression.

The Ets transcription factor, ESX, exhibits a unique pattern of epithelial-restricted expression and transactivates genes involved in epithelial differentiation and cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the underlying genetic basis for epithelial-specific expression of ESX. We have identified a 30bp ESX enhancer sequence (EES) approximately 3 kb upstream of the proximal promoter. This region displays enhancer activity in an epithelial-specific manner and deletion of this region abrogates ESX gene transcription. An EES binding protein complex (EBC) was identified through electrophoretic mobility shift assays whose degree of EES binding correlated well with endogenous ESX levels in epithelial cells and was regulated by epithelial differentiation. Understanding the regulation of this element will lend insight into mechanisms of epithelial differentiation and the etiology of breast cancer and may provide novel targets for cancer therapeutic intervention.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Distal enhancer of the mouse FGF-4 gene and its human counterpart exhibit differential activity: critical role of a GT box.

Previous studies have shown that there is a strict requirement for fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF-4) during mammalian embryogenesis, and that FGF-4 expression in embryonic stem (ES) cells and embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells are controlled by a powerful downstream distal enhancer. More recently, mouse ES cells were shown to express significantly more FGF-4 mRNA than human ES cells. In the work reported here, we demonstrate that mouse EC cells also express far more FGF-4 mRNA than human EC cells. Using a panel of FGF-4 promoter/reporter gene constructs, we demonstrate that the enhancer of the mouse FGF-4 gene is approximately tenfold more active than its human counterpart. Moreover, we demonstrate that the critical difference between the mouse and the human FGF-4 enhancer is a 4 bp difference in the sequence of an essential GT box. Importantly, we demonstrate that changing 4 bp in the human enhancer to match the sequence of the mouse GT box elevates the activity of the human FGF-4 enhancer to the same level as that of the mouse enhancer. We extended these studies by examining the roles of Sp1 and Sp3 in FGF-4 expression. Although we demonstrate that Sp3, but not Sp1, can activate the FGF-4 promoter when artificially tethered to the FGF-4 enhancer, we show that Sp3 is not essential for expression of FGF-4 mRNA in mouse ES cells. Finally, our studies with human EC cells suggest that the factor responsible for mediating the effect of the mouse GT box is unlikely to be Sp1 or Sp3, and this factor is either not expressed in human EC cells or it is not sufficiently active in these cells.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

NF-Y behaves as a bifunctional transcription factor that can stimulate or repress the FGF-4 promoter in an enhancer-dependent manner.

NF-Y is a bifunctional transcription factor capable of activating or repressing transcription. NF-Y specifically recognizes CCAAT box motifs present in many eukaryotic promoters. The mechanisms involved in regulating its activity are poorly understood. Previous studies have shown that the FGF-4 promoter is regulated positively by its CCAAT box and NF-Y in embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells where the distal enhancer of the FGF-4 gene is active. Here, we demonstrate that the CCAAT box functions as a negative cis-regulatory element when cis-regulatory elements of the FGF-4 enhancer are disrupted, or after EC cells differentiate and the FGF-4 enhancer is inactivated. We also demonstrate that NF-Y mediates the repression of the CCAAT box and that NF-Y associates with the endogenous FGF-4 gene in both EC cells and EC-differentiated cells. Importantly, we also determined that the orientation and the position of the CCAAT box are critical for its role in regulating the FGF-4 promoter. Together, these studies demonstrate that the distal enhancer of the FGF-4 gene determines whether the CCAAT box of the FGF-4 promoter functions as a positive or a negative cis-regulatory element. In addition, these studies are consistent with NF-Y playing an architectural role in its regulation of the FGF-4 promoter.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Transcriptional regulation of the murine Elf3 gene in embryonal carcinoma cells and their differentiated counterparts: requirement for a novel upstream regulatory region.

The transcription factor Elf3, which is one of over 25 Ets family members, is expressed in a wide variety of carcinomas and has been shown to promote the transcription of many genes implicated in cancer. To understand how the Elf3 gene is regulated at the transcriptional level, we probed its 5'-flanking region, and we report here the identification of both proximal and distal regions that regulate murine Elf3 promoter activity. In addition to mapping the transcription start site of the Elf3 gene, the work described in this study identifies four cis-regulatory elements in the proximal promoter region of the gene. These include a cis-regulatory element previously designated ESE, a kappaB site, a POU motif, and a CCAAT box. In addition, we demonstrate that a novel 94 bp region 2 kb upstream of the transcription start site significantly elevates Elf3 promoter activity in F9-differentiated cells, but not in the parental F9 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells. This region appears to be largely responsible for the increase in Elf3 promoter activity that accompanies the differentiation of embryonal carcinoma cells.

5' Flanking Region↗

PubMed2004

Unique and selective effects of five Ets family members, Elf3, Ets1, Ets2, PEA3, and PU.1, on the promoter of the type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor gene.

Previous studies have shown that the promoter of the type II TGF-beta receptor gene (TbetaR-II) is strongly stimulated by Elf3, a member of the Ets transcription factor family. The TbetaR-II gene behaves as a tumor suppressor and it is expressed in nearly all cell types, whereas Elf3 is expressed primarily in epithelial cells. Hence, the TbetaR-II gene is likely to be regulated by other Ets proteins in nonepithelial cells. In this study, we examined the effects of four other Ets family members (Ets1, Ets2, PEA3, and PU.1) on TbetaR-II promoter/reporter constructs that contain the two essential ets sites of this gene. These studies employed F9 embryonal carcinoma cells and their differentiated cells, because transcription of the TbetaR-II gene increases after F9 cells differentiate. Here we demonstrate that Ets2, which is expressed in F9-differentiated cells along with Elf3, does not stimulate or bind to the TbetaR-II promoter in these cells. In contrast, PEA3 stimulates the TbetaR-II promoter in F9-differentiated cells, but it inhibits this promoter in F9 cells. Thus, the effects of PEA3 on the TbetaR-II promoter are cell context-dependent. We also show that the effects of Elf3 are cell context-dependent. Elf3 strongly stimulates the TbetaR-II promoter in F9-differentiated cells, but not in F9 cells. In contrast to Elf3 and PEA3, Ets1 strongly stimulates this promoter in both F9 cells and F9-differentiated cells. Finally, we show that PU.1 exerts little or no effect on the activity of the TbetaR-II promoter. Together, our findings indicate that Elf3 is not the only Ets protein capable of stimulating the TbetaR-II promoter. Importantly, our findings also indicate that each of the five Ets proteins influences the TbetaR-II promoter in a unique manner because of important differences in their biochemical properties or their patterns of cellular expression.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Transcription factor Sox-2 inhibits co-activator stimulated transcription.

Previous studies have shown that transcription of the fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF-4) gene by early embryonic cells is dependent upon a powerful distal enhancer located 3 kb downstream of the transcription start site within the untranslated region of the last exon. The transcription factors Sox-2 and Oct-3 cooperatively bind to critical cis-regulatory elements within the enhancer to synergistically activate transcription. Moreover, the co-activator p300 can mediate the synergistic activity of Sox-2 and Oct-3, and p300 associates with the FGF-4 enhancer in vivo. Embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells have been used extensively as a model system to study the regulation of the FGF-4 gene during early development. Recently, it has been suggested that suboptimal levels of Sox-2 expression in F9 EC cells limit the transcription of the FGF-4 gene. The studies presented in this report argue that Sox-2 levels are not limiting in F9 EC cells. Moreover, overexpression of Sox-2 in F9 EC cells decreases FGF-4 promoter activity. In addition, overexpression of Sox-2 in these cells inhibits activation by the co-activators p300, CBP, and OCA-B in a manner that requires the transactivation domain of Sox-2. These findings suggest that Sox-2 levels in F9 EC cells are regulated carefully to avoid interference with the transcription of critical genes.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Regulation of the FGF-4 gene by a complex distal enhancer that functions in part as an enhanceosome.

The exact mechanisms by which enhancers regulate transcription are currently under investigation. For some genes, activation is accomplished by an intricate array of enhancer cis-regulatory elements that direct the assembly of a gene-specific activation complex known as an "enhanceosome". Transcription of the fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF-4) gene during early development is controlled by a powerful distal enhancer located 3 kb downstream of the transcription start site within the 3' untranslated region of the gene. Previous studies have shown that FGF-4 enhancer function is mediated by at least three critical positive cis-regulatory elements: an HMG, a POU, and a GT-box motif, which bind the transcription factors Sox-2, Oct-3, and Sp1/Sp3, respectively. In this study, we identify a second essential HMG motif within the FGF-4 enhancer that binds the transcription factor Sox-2. Moreover, we demonstrate that spatial alignment of the new HMG motif, relative the other enhancer cis-regulatory elements, is important. Based on findings presented in this report, and work published earlier, we propose that the previously identified core HMG and POU cis-regulatory elements of the FGF-4 enhancer are dependent on one another and function in an enhanceosome-like manner. In contrast, the HMG motif identified in this study is only partially dependent on the other enhancer cis-regulatory elements for its function.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

NF-kappa B regulates BCL3 transcription in T lymphocytes through an intronic enhancer.

Exposure to soluble protein Ags in vivo leads to abortive proliferation of responding T cells. In the absence of a danger signal, artificially provided by adjuvants, most responding cells die, and the remainder typically become anergic. The adjuvant-derived signals provided to T cells are poorly understood, but recent work has identified BCL3 as the gene, of those tested, with the greatest differential transcriptional response to adjuvant administration in vivo. As an initial step in analyzing transcriptional responses of BCL3 in T cells, we have identified candidate regulatory regions within the locus through their evolutionary conservation and by analysis of DNase hypersensitivity. An evolutionarily conserved DNase hypersensitive site (HS3) within intron 2 was found to act as a transcriptional enhancer in response to stimuli that mimic TCR activation, namely, PHA and PMA. In luciferase reporter gene constructs transiently transfected into the Jurkat T cell line, the HS3 enhancer can cooperate not only with the BCL3 promoter, but also with an exogenous promoter from herpes simplex thymidine kinase. Deletional analysis revealed that a minimal sequence of approximately 81 bp is required for full enhancer activity. At the 5' end of this minimal sequence is a kappaB site, as confirmed by EMSAs. Mutation of this site in the context of the full-length HS3 abolished enhancer activity. Cotransfection with NF-kappaB p65 expression constructs dramatically increased luciferase activity, even without stimulation. Conversely, cotransfection with the NF-kappaB inhibitor IkappaBalpha reduced activation. Together, these results demonstrate a critical role for NF-kappaB in BCL3 transcriptional up-regulation by TCR-mimetic signals.

B-Cell Lymphoma 3 Protein↗

PubMed2003

Identification of novel domains within Sox-2 and Sox-11 involved in autoinhibition of DNA binding and partnership specificity.

Sox transcription factors play key regulatory roles throughout development, binding DNA through a consensus (A/T)(A/T)CAA(A/T)G sequence. Although many different Sox proteins bind to this sequence, it has been observed that gene regulatory elements are commonly responsive to only a small subset of the entire family, implying that regulatory mechanisms exist to permit selective DNA binding and/or transactivation by Sox family members. To identify and explore the mechanisms modulating gene activation by Sox proteins further, we compared the function of Sox-2 and Sox-11. This led to the discovery that Sox proteins are regulated differentially at multiple levels, including transactivation, protein partnerships with Pit-Oct-Unc (POU) transcription factors, and DNA binding autoregulation. Specifically, we determined that Sox-11 activates transcription more strongly than Sox-2 and that the transactivation domain of Sox-11 is primarily responsible for this capability. Additionally, we demonstrate that the Sox-11 DNA binding domain is responsible for selective cooperation with the POU factor Brn-2. This requirement cannot be replaced by the DNA binding domain of Sox-2, indicating that the DNA binding domain of Sox proteins is critical for Sox-POU partnerships. Interestingly, we have also determined that a conserved domain of Sox-11 has the novel capability of autoinhibiting its ability to bind DNA in vitro and to activate gene expression in vivo. Our findings suggest that the autoinhibitory domain can repress promiscuous binding of Sox-11 to DNA and plays an important role in regulating the recruitment of Sox-11 to specific genes.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed2003

Roles of the conserved CCAAT and GC boxes of the human and mouse type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor genes.

Embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells are used widely to study the molecular mechanisms that regulate the transcription of genes during mammalian embryogenesis. The type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor (TbetaR-II) gene is expressed at very low levels by mouse EC cells prior to differentiation. Differentiation of EC cells results in increases of both the steady-state levels of TbetaR-II mRNA and the activity of the TbetaR-II promoter. Several cis-regulatory elements have been shown previously to regulate the TbetaR-II gene. This study focuses on the role of a CCAAT box and three GC boxes in the regulation of the human and mouse TbetaR-II promoters in EC-differentiated cells. We demonstrate that the CCAAT box and two flanking GC boxes, Sp A and Sp B, function as positive regulatory elements in the human TbetaR-II promoter, and that the transcription factor complex NF-Y positively regulates the human TbetaR-II promoter through the CCAAT box motif. We also show that the CCAAT box and the downstream GC box Sp B, which are conserved between the human and mouse promoters, behave as positive regulatory elements in the mouse TbetaR-II promoter. In addition, we demonstrate that the transcription factor Sp1 can bind to the Sp B GC box in vitro. Finally, we show that a GC box located 25 bp upstream of the major transcription start site of the TbetaR-II gene plays a minimal role in the function of the TbetaR-II promoter in EC-differentiated cells. Together, our studies highlight important differences and similarities in the cis-regulatory elements that regulate the human and mouse TbetaR-II promoters.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

The co-activator p300 associates physically with and can mediate the action of the distal enhancer of the FGF-4 gene.

Distal enhancers commonly regulate gene expression. However, the mechanisms of transcriptional mediation by distal enhancers remain largely unknown. To better understand distal enhancer-mediated transcription, we examined the regulation of the FGF-4 gene. The FGF-4 gene is regulated during early development by a powerful distal enhancer located downstream of the promoter in exon 3. Sox-2 and Oct-3 bind to the enhancer and are required for the activation of the FGF-4 gene. Previously, we implicated the co-activator p300 as a mediator of Sox-2/Oct-3 synergistic activation of a heterologous promoter, suggesting that p300 may play a role in mediating enhancer activation of the FGF-4 gene. In this study, we provide both functional and physical evidence that p300 plays an important role in the action of the FGF-4 enhancer. Specifically, we show that E1a, but not a mutant form of E1a that is unable to bind p300, inhibits enhancer activation of the FGF-4 promoter. We also demonstrate that Gal4/p300 fusion proteins can stimulate the FGF-4 promoter when bound to the FGF-4 enhancer. Additionally, we present evidence that p300 mediation of the FGF-4 enhancer requires acetyltransferase activity. Importantly, we also show that Sox-2 and p300 are physically associated with the endogenous FGF-4 enhancer but weakly associated with the endogenous FGF-4 promoter. These results are consistent with a model of transitory interaction between the distal enhancer and the FGF-4 promoter. Our results also suggest that intragenic distal enhancers may use mechanisms that differ from extragenic distal enhancers.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Activation of the murine type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor gene: up-regulation and function of the transcription factor Elf-3/Ert/Esx/Ese-1.

Previous studies demonstrated that differentiation of mouse embryonal carcinoma cells leads to transcriptional up-regulation of the mouse type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor (mTbetaR-II) gene. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms regulating transcription of this gene, we isolated the 5'-flanking region of the mTbetaR-II gene and characterized its expression in F9-differentiated cells. Analysis of mTbetaR-II promoter/reporter gene constructs demonstrates that two conserved Ets-binding sites play an important role in the activity of the mTbetaR-II promoter. Importantly, we present evidence that mElf-3, a member of the Ets family, plays a key role in the activation of the mTbetaR-II promoter. Northern blot analysis reveals that the steady-state levels of mTbetaR-II mRNA increase in parallel with those of mElf-3 mRNA during the differentiation of F9 embryonal carcinoma cells. We also demonstrate that mElf-3 contains one or more domains that influence its binding to DNA. Finally, we report that a single amino acid substitution in the transactivation domain of mElf-3 reduces its ability to transactivate and elevates its steady-state levels of expression. In conclusion, our data argue that mElf-3 plays a key role in the regulation of the mTbetaR-II gene, and Elf-3 itself is regulated at multiple levels.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Stimulation of the murine type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor promoter by the transcription factor Egr-1.

Previous studies have demonstrated that differentiation of murine embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells leads to the appearance of high affinity receptors for transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta). Subsequently, it was demonstrated that differentiation of F9 EC cells leads to increases in the transcription of the type II TGF-beta-receptor gene (TbetaR-II) and leads to significant increases in the steady-state levels of TbetaR-II mRNA. Analysis of the human TbetaR-II promoter in F9-differentiated cells identified several cis-regulatory elements that influence the activity of the promoter, including a CRE/ATF site and a CCAAT box motif. In the work described in this report, we focused on the effect of the transcription factor Egr-1 on the murine TbetaR-II promoter. We have identified an Egr-1 response-element approximately 150 bp upstream of the major transcription start site of the murine TbetaR-II gene. We demonstrate by electrophoretic mobility shift analysis (EMSA) that this cis-regulatory element binds Egr-1, and we demonstrate that disruption of this site eliminates the response to Egr-1. As part of this analysis, we also examined the effect of Egr-1 on human TbetaR-II promoter. In contrast to a previous report, which reported that Egr-1 inhibits expression of human TbetaR-II promoter/reporter gene constructs, we did not observe an inhibitory effect of Egr-1 that was specific for the human TbetaR-II promoter. Taken together, the findings described in this report identify important differences between the human and the murine TbetaR-II promoter, and our findings identify an Egr-1 cis-regulatory element that is capable of stimulating the activity of the murine TbetaR-II promoter.

5' Flanking Region↗

PubMed2002

Transfection of embryonal carcinoma cells at high efficiency using liposome-mediated transfection.

Embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells are recognized as an excellent model system for studying the early stages of mammalian development. Many studies performed with EC cells involve transient transfection with promoter/reporter gene constructs and/or mammalian expression vectors. One of the limitations of working with EC cells is their inability to be transfected at high efficiency. In most cases, EC cells are transfected using the calcium phosphate method. The objective of this study was to identify protocols and culture conditions that significantly increase the transfection efficiency of EC cells. F9 EC cells were used for this purpose, because they are the EC cell line studied most commonly. We show that the transfection efficiency of F9 EC cells using the calcium phosphate method is less than 5%; whereas, their transfection efficiency can be improved approximately 15-fold using optimized culture conditions and liposome-based transfection reagents. Specifically, we demonstrate that more than 50% of F9 EC cells can be transfected using LipofectAMINE 2000. In addition to higher levels of transfection, there is much less plate-to-plate variation with liposome-based reagents as compared to transfection with calcium phosphate. Interestingly, transfection efficiency using these reagents was found to be inversely related to cell density. This contrasts sharply with the recommendation that transfection with LipofectAMINE 2000 or LipofectAMINE in conjunction with the PLUS reagent be performed at high cell densities. Given the improvements in transfection efficiency reported here, it will now be possible to perform studies with F9 EC cells that require transfection at significantly higher levels than that achieved using the calcium phosphate method. Overall, the highest transfection efficiencies were consistently obtained using LipofectAMINE 2000.

Drug Carriers↗

PubMed2002

Embryonic stem cells provide a powerful and versatile model system.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells are pluripotent stem cells that differentiate both in vitro and in vivo into cell types derived from each of the three embryonic germ layers. ES cells and their close relatives, embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells and embryonic germ (EG) cells, have been used extensively as model systems for studying early mammalian development. This work has led to important insights into the mechanisms that control embryogenesis at the molecular and cellular levels. This chapter focuses on the use of ES cells as an in vitro model system for studying cellular differentiation and reviews several areas where important progress has been made. Impressive progress has been made in the isolation and characterization of ES cells from many species, including humans. Significant progress has also been made in the development of culture conditions that help direct the differentiation of ES cells to specific cell types that form during myogenesis, angiogenesis, hematopoiesis, neurogenesis, and cardiogenesis. The ability to inactivate virtually any gene in ES cells by gene targeting has vastly improved our understanding of the roles played by specific genes at the cellular and organismic levels. Moreover, ES cells and EC cells have been used widely to investigate how specific genes are turned on and turned off in the course of differentiation. In this connection, DNA array technology has been used to identify genes regulated when ES cells differentiate. The final section of this chapter discusses how work with ES cells is shaping our understanding of stem cells, mammalian development, and cell replacement therapy.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Expression profile of differentially-regulated genes during progression of androgen-independent growth in human prostate cancer cells.

Because of the heterogeneous nature of prostate cancer, identifying the molecular mechanisms involved during the transition from an androgen-sensitive to an androgen-independent phenotype is very complex. An LNCaP cell model that recapitulates prostate cancer progression, comprising early passage androgen-sensitive (LNCaP-C33) and late passage androgen-independent (LNCaP-C81) phenotypes, would help to provide a better understanding of such molecular events. In this study, we examined the genes expressed by LNCaP-C33 and LNCaP-C81 cells using cDNA microarrays containing 1176 known genes. This analysis demonstrated that 34 genes are up-regulated and eight genes are down-regulated in androgen-independent cells. Northern blot analysis confirmed the differences identified by microarrays on several candidate genes, including c-MYC, c-MYC purine-binding transcription factor (PuF), macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1), lactate dehydrogenase-A (LDH-A), guanine nucleotide-binding protein Gi, alpha-1 subunit (NBP), cyclin dependent kinase-2 (CDK-2), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSM), cyclin H (CCNH), 60S ribosomal protein L10 (RPL10), 60S ribosomal protein L32 (RPL32), and 40S ribosomal protein S16 (RPS16). These differentially-regulated genes are correlated with progression of human prostate cancer and may be of therapeutic relevance as well as an aid in understanding the molecular genetic events involved in the development of this disease's hormone-refractory behavior.

Androgens↗