Biomedical subjects

Aniki Rothova

Publications and source records attributed to Aniki Rothova.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Ocular manifestations of toxoplasmosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The concepts of toxoplasmosis and its ocular manifestations in humans have thoroughly changed in the past 3 years. This review addresses new epidemiologic data, specifically the occurrence of ocular disease in postnatal infections, and puts the changed views on the frequency and pathogenesis of toxoplasmic ocular manifestations into historical perspective. RECENT FINDINGS: Newly described clinical presentations are discussed together with their recent diagnostic possibilities. The new data on congenital or postnatal acquisition of infection and their importance for ocular involvement are presented as well as the high prevalence of 79% of recurrent disease in ocular toxoplasmosis, which cannot be prevented by short-term treatments. Recently published analyses of literature showed, unexpectedly, the lack of efficacy of short-term treatments for ocular disease as well as of the long-term prenatal treatments on fetal transmission rate and the severity of congenital disease. SUMMARY: The recent guidelines for treatment are included together with the up-to-date recommendations for the treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis in the immunosuppressed host.

Africa, Western↗

PubMed2002

A prospective, randomized trial of pyrimethamine and azithromycin vs pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine for the treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two treatment regimens, one of which included azithromycin, for the treatment of sight-threatening (near optic disk or fovea) ocular toxoplasmosis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized open-labeled multicenter study, masked in part with regard to evaluation. METHODS: PARTICIPANTS TOTAL ENROLLMENT: 46 patients with sight-threatening ocular toxoplasmosis; pyrimethamine and azithromycin group: 24 patients; pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine group: 22 patients. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized into two treatment regimens. Group 1 was treated with pyrimethamine and azithromycin complemented with folinic acid and the addition of prednisone from day 3. Group 2 was treated with pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine complemented with folinic acid and the addition of prednisone from day 3. Patients used study medications daily for 4 weeks. Ocular and laboratory examinations were performed at least weekly during the observation period. The study was masked in part with regard to evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An assessment was made of the time to resolution of the intraocular inflammatory activity, the size of the retinochoroidal lesion, and visual acuity before and after the treatment as well as all adverse effects of treatments. RESULTS: Adverse effects were more frequent in the pyrimethamine/sulfadiazine group (P <.04), and three patients in this group had to discontinue treatment. The time to resolution of inflammatory activity, decrease in size of retinochoroidal lesions, and optimal visual acuity did not differ between the two treatment groups. The number of patients who developed recurrences during the first year after treatment was similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the multidrug regimen with pyrimethamine and azithromycin was similar to the standard treatment with pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine. However, the frequency and severity of adverse effects was significantly lower with a regimen containing pyrimethamine and azithromycin. Multidrug therapy with the combination of pyrimethamine and azithromycin appears to be an acceptable alternative for treatment of sight-threatening ocular toxoplasmosis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Reactivations of ocular toxoplasmosis after cataract extraction.

PURPOSE: To determine the risk of reactivation of ocular toxoplasmosis following cataract extraction. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Out of 154 patients with ocular toxoplasmosis, 14 patients (15 eyes) who had undergone a cataract extraction and 45 age- and sex- matched controls without cataract were selected. INTERVENTION: A review of the medical records of 14 patients with ocular toxoplasmosis and cataract and 45 control patients with ocular toxoplasmosis but without cataract. The clinical records of the controls and patients were assessed for an identical 4-month period following the date of the cataract extraction in the index patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of a new active retinal lesion within 4 months after cataract surgery in patients and age -and sex matched-controls. The presence of risk factors such as sex, congenital or postnatal acquisition of ocular toxoplasmosis, age at first clinical manifestation of ocular toxoplasmosis, total number of attacks per affected eye, type of cataract, age at the time of cataract surgery and the intervals between surgery and first clinical manifestation of ocular toxoplasmosis and between surgery and the last recurrence of ocular toxoplasmosis, as well as the use of antiparasitic medication during surgery, type and complications of surgery and optimal visual acuity before and after cataract surgery. RESULTS: Reactivations of ocular toxoplasmosis following cataract extraction occurred in 5/14 patients (5/15 eyes), which was higher than the incidence of recurrences in age -and sex-matched controls (p < 0.001). No additional risk factors for the development of recurrences of ocular toxoplasmosis after cataract surgery were found. Incidence of recurrences preceding surgery did not differ between patients and controls. CONCLUSION: We identified an increased risk of reactivation of ocular toxoplasmosis following cataract extraction which implies that prophylactic treatment with antiparasitic drugs during and after the cataract surgery might be worthwhile for patients at risk of visual loss.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Ocular toxoplasmosis: clinical features and prognosis of 154 patients.

PURPOSE: To ascertain the clinical features, visual outcome, and recurrence rates of ocular toxoplasmosis (OT) in a large series of patients. To determine the efficacy of various treatment strategies and identify the patients at risk of visual loss. DESIGN: Retrospective noncomparative observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-four consecutive patients with active lesions of OT (first attack and/or recurrence) were identified in a cohort of 1300 consecutive patients with uveitis. Mean follow-up was 5.8 years. INTERVENTION: A review of the medical records of 154 patients with active OT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were subdivided according to clinical and laboratory criteria. Numerous variables were compared per patient and group, including age and gender distribution, onset and course of infection, clinical ocular features, laboratory data, therapeutic strategies and their outcomes, number of recurrences, complications, final visual acuity, and features associated with poor visual outcome. RESULTS: Primary retinal lesions were observed in 28% and a combination of active lesions and old retinochoroidal scars in 72% of the patients at first presentation to the ophthalmologist. Mean age at first presentation with an active OT lesion was 29.5 years. Patients with primary OT were older than those with a combination of active lesions and old scars (P < 0.001). Serologic characteristics of the acute phase of systemic infection were found in 11% of the patients. Ocular involvement in these patients was associated with advanced age at onset (P < 0.001) and was characterized by severe intraocular inflammation. Most (82%) of the patients with serologic characteristics of the acute phase of systemic infection had primary lesions (compared with 23% of OT in the chronic phase of systemic infection; P < 0.001). Extensive retinal lesions were more frequently observed during the acute phase of systemic infection (P = 0.02) and in patients with primary OT (P < 0.04). Recurrences, which developed in 79% of all patients followed for more than 5 years, were located predominantly in previously affected eyes (with old scars) in contrast to the sporadic cases of recurrence in the healthy contralateral eye (P < 0.0001). Standard short-term therapeutic modalities had no effect on visual outcome or future recurrence rates. Legal blindness in one or both eyes was confirmed for 24% of the patients. Blindness of both eyes was more frequent in patients with congenital OT (P < 0.001). Risk factors for visual loss included congenital infection, OT manifesting during the acute phase of systemic infection, central location and/or extensive retinal lesions, and the administration of corticosteroids without a shield of antiparasitic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Legal blindness in at least one eye developed in 24% of the patients with OT. Recurrences, which developed in 79% of the patients with long-term follow-up, were located predominantly in eyes with toxoplasmic scars. Various short-term therapeutic modalities had no effect on visual outcomes or future recurrence rates, with the exception of a poor visual outcome for patients who received corticosteroids without a shield of antiparasitic drugs.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Corticosteroids in uveitis.

No strong evidence exists with which to answer questions about the effectiveness of CS in treating visual loss from intraocular inflammation. Steroids are valuable and quickly working anti-inflammatory medications, which may prevent visual loss in many patients with noninfectious uveitis. The value of prolonged treatment in uveitis is not yet established. The literature on efficacy of CS in diverse uveitic entities contains no results from randomized clinical trials; all of the information originated from case series. In addition, a quality of life assessment was not studied. These are serious limitations; the information about the effect of medication should be obtained by comparing a treated group with an untreated control group similar in all the important respects. Necessary documentation would include details about the patient selection criteria. Use of standardized follow-up intervals and outcomes assessment would further improve the quality of information, as would comparisons with the natural history of the untreated patient population. Because case series have no control group and do not use randomization, there is no way to estimate how CS might have changed a final outcome. Because of the severe adverse effects associated with chronic use of CS and unknown efficacy on final visual prognosis, it is recommended for those of need of long-term anti-inflammatory medication to start CS in the acute stage of the disease and taper off subsequently with use of CS-sparing medications. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the short- and long-term effectiveness of CS in uveitis.

Glucocorticoids↗

PubMed2002

Medical treatment of cystoid macular edema.

Although cystoid macular edema (CME) represents a major cause of visual loss in uveitis, the consensus on its treatment has not yet been reached. We performed a literature review on the efficacy of diverse medical treatment modalities for uveitic CME and suggest novel treatment recommendations. A literature search retrieved 173 citations (MEDLINE, conducted in March 2002, terms: macular edema, uveitis, treatment) and relevant publications were studied. The literature contained information based mainly on case series; the specific treatment targets were not clear. Causal treatment of the underlying ocular condition was considered essential and various approaches of symptomatic treatment were attempted (immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory agents, acetazolamide, octreotide), all with different inclusion criteria and evaluation protocols. The decision to initiate the symptomatic treatment of CME was usually made in cases with already compromised visual acuity. Despite aggressive treatment, the progression of CME with accompanying visual loss was common. On the basis of published results, we recommend starting treatment of CME at an early stage, even in eyes with full visual acuity. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the efficacy of diverse treatment modalities and to evaluate the effects of early intervention on inflammatory CME.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗