How much will Herceptin really cost?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Biomedical subjects
Ann Barrett
Publications and source records attributed to Ann Barrett.
"Two are better than one": a pilot study of how radiologist and oncologists can collaborate in target volume definition.
The purpose of this study was to explore how radiologist and oncologists may work together efficiently and effectively to define target volume for radiotherapy treatment. Ten patients were chosen at random from those needing radiotherapy between December 2004 and June 2005. Sites of primary cancer included head and neck, pelvis, lung and brain. Diagnostic scans were available on the hospital PACS system and radiotherapy planning image data sets were available on the Eclipse radiotherapy planning system. A radiologist and two oncologists (one consultant, one senior registrar) outlined separately and without initial consultation the gross tumour volume (GTV). Analysis of target volume concordance rates was undertaken to assess and explore the reasons for any differences noted. Three of ten volumes defined (all head and neck tumours) were judged to be similar based on quantitative and qualitative data. There were varying degrees of difference in volume definition for the remaining seven patients. In three of these there were differences in GTV but when the treatment volume was drawn the differences were not clinically significant, as any areas of disagreement were included anyway in the fields in both plans. The remaining four cases had showed significant differences between the volume delineated by the oncologist and the radiologist. In all cases where the GTV was easily identifiable on the diagnostic and planning scans, there was concordance. In cases where the final treatment field used was much bigger than the GTV (e.g. a four-field box for pelvic fields) then small differences were negligible, although with conformal therapy these differences could become important. There were specific radiological anatomy learning points for the oncologists and the radiologist needed to be familiar with the process of treatment planning. A larger prospective study will continue to explore the potential gains from and the practicalities of collaborative working.
Brain Neoplasms↗
Optimization of follow-up timing from study of patterns of first failure after primary treatment. An example from patients with NSCLC: a study of the REACT working group of ESTRO.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology was funded by the EU for a project on Recording providing Education, and Ameliorating the Consequences of Treatment (REACT). An important aim of follow-up (FU) after treatment for cancer is to detect various events associated with disease recurrence or metastatic spread or severe treatment-related complications as early as possible. Each tumour type may show a specific pattern and timing of these events related to different prognostic factors. The aim of this study was to propose a way of defining an optimal timing schedule for follow-up after treatment based on the analysis of failure patterns determined from follow-up data from prospective clinical trials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors associated with each failure type (loco-regional recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM) or side effects (SE)). Competing risks methods were applied to estimate the cumulative incidence functions (CIF), adjusted on the significant prognostic factors. Equally spaced quantiles of the CIF were then used to estimate the corresponding optimised follow-up times depending on a pre-specified total number of visits. Follow-up data from the CHART bronchus clinical trial were used to analyse the pattern of time to first failure. RESULTS: A significantly higher risk of failure was observed for males (SE), stage III (DM) and conventional treatment (LR). Overall, patients treated with CHART needed 1 fewer visit in each category of patients compared to the Conventional group. For example, stage III male patients treated with CHART would need 8 visits during the first two years at 7, 11, 16, 24, 37, 52, 64 and 104 weeks rather than the 9 follow-up visits planned in the protocol. Similar patients treated with Conventional radiotherapy would need 8 visits at 3, 5, 7, 11, 15, 24, 52 and 104 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Use of these methods would allow timing of follow-up visits to be adapted according to tumour site and prognostic factors determined previously from audit or clinical trials. Application of this approach could optimize the timing of follow-up visits by placing them closer to the times when failures are expected to occur. It does not address the wider issues of follow-up such as who should do it or what should be done for which further studies are required.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
Group cohesion and nurse satisfaction: examination of a team-building approach.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a team-building intervention on group cohesion, nurse satisfaction, and turnover rates. BACKGROUND: Creating an environment that supports and retains nurses represents a formidable challenge for nursing leaders. Research related to strategies that positively impact the culture in which nurses practice, thus potentially improving nurse satisfaction and reducing turnover, is critically needed. METHODS: Registered nurses (RNs) employed on inpatient units in a 247-bed, private acute care Magnet teaching hospital participated in this quasi experimental preintervention and postintervention design. The RN-RN interaction subscale from the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators Adapted Index of Work Satisfaction, the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators Adapted Index of Job Enjoyment, the Group Cohesion Scale, and a facilitator-developed measure were completed preimplementation and postimplementation of unit-tailored intervention strategies, which took place over a 12-month period. Turnover rates were collected 6 month preintervention and postintervention. RESULTS: Improvement in group cohesion, RN-RN interaction, job enjoyment, and turnover was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Targeted, unit-based strategies can be an effective means of reducing turnover rates and improving group cohesion and nurse satisfaction.
Adult↗
Audit of effectiveness of routine follow-up clinics after radiotherapy for cancer: a report of the REACT working group of ESTRO.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology was funded by the EU for a project on recording providing education, and ameliorating the consequences of treatment (REACT). An European audit was carried out as part of which to assess the usefulness of current follow-up practices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 4-month period in 15 cancer centres in 10 countries, patients attending for routine follow-up completed a questionnaire covering their expectations of and satisfaction with the visit. This was matched with a questionnaire completed by the physician about the content and usefulness of the consultation. The feasibility of a short toxicity scale developed by Dische and Saunders was also investigated. RESULTS: In total, 2303 matched questionnaires were analysed. Forty percent of the patients had symptoms or medical problems related to their disease. In 18% there was a positive finding on clinical examination. In 28% investigations were undertaken part of departmental routine practice. Ten percent of the investigations showed an abnormal result. Ninety nine percent of physicians and 85% of the patients expressed satisfaction. Using the short toxicity scale rates of recording toxicity could be increased from 28 to 93%. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in follow-up practices among European centres. There was a low incidence of positive findings clinically or with routine investigations. A simple scale for recording morbidity has proved easy to use by departments, which have not routinely used one of the standard measures. Further work will attempt to produce an European guideline for effective routine follow-up after radiotherapy.
Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
Interferon-gamma responses to mycobacterial antigens in Heaf-positive children.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adolescent↗
Dorothy Reed and Hodgkin's disease: a reflection after a century.
It has now been 100 years since Dorothy Reed, at the age of 28, wrote her paper on Hodgkin's disease. Her biography reveals the difficult lives of women entering the hitherto male-dominated field of medicine, let alone medical research. Her historic paper on Hodgkin's disease is remarkable for its brilliant observations and concise scientific reasoning. Nevertheless, she was told that as a woman she could not hope for a career as an academic pathologist. After marriage to Charles Elwood Mendenhall, Professor of Physics at the University of Wisconsin and after giving birth to four children, the second part of her career began. Motivated by the loss of her firstborn, she began a study of infant mortality, an interest that lasted throughout her career. In 1926, Mendenhall undertook a survey comparing infant and maternal mortality rates in Denmark and the United States. This influential study concluded that American mortality rates were higher because of unnecessary interference in the natural process of childbirth and recommended the education of midwives follow the Danish model. In 1937, her efforts were rewarded when Madison, WI received recognition for having the lowest infant mortality of any city in the United States. Reading Reed's paper on Hodgkin's disease, we see that her observations go far beyond a description of a specific cell. Her presentation of macroscopic and microscopic features is remarkable for the distinction between "young" and "old" growths: Reed saw Hodgkin's disease as a process, rather than the spreading of a cancer. She was the first to note that those most commonly affected are boys or young adults, especially those whose general health before the disease had been excellent. She was also the first to note anergy to tuberculin. Dorothy Reed defined Hodgkin's disease in relation to tuberculosis, described its pathologic features, and offered comments on its pathogenesis, epidemiology, and immunology that still deserve to be discussed.
Child Welfare↗
Does writing a list help cancer patients ask relevant questions?
We examined the use of written lists to give patients an opportunity to have their questions answered. Patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for cancer were given a sheet of paper with the simple prompt to write questions and give to the hospital doctor at their appointment 3 weeks later. At 3 months, patients were asked about their use and opinions of the written list. About half of the 478 patients attended with a written list. Fewer patients living in deprived areas used the list compared to more affluent areas. Doctors thought that 34% of patients would not otherwise have asked those questions and 91% of prompted discussions were a worthwhile use of time.
Adaptation, Psychological↗