Biomedical subjects

Anna N A Tosteson

Publications and source records attributed to Anna N A Tosteson.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial.

CONTEXT: Lumbar diskectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed for back and leg symptoms in US patients, but the efficacy of the procedure relative to nonoperative care remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disk herniation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial, a randomized clinical trial enrolling patients between March 2000 and November 2004 from 13 multidisciplinary spine clinics in 11 US states. Patients were 501 surgical candidates (mean age, 42 years; 42% women) with imaging-confirmed lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and persistent signs and symptoms of radiculopathy for at least 6 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: Standard open diskectomy vs nonoperative treatment individualized to the patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were changes from baseline for the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey bodily pain and physical function scales and the modified Oswestry Disability Index (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons MODEMS version) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years from enrollment. Secondary outcomes included sciatica severity as measured by the Sciatica Bothersomeness Index, satisfaction with symptoms, self-reported improvement, and employment status. RESULTS: Adherence to assigned treatment was limited: 50% of patients assigned to surgery received surgery within 3 months of enrollment, while 30% of those assigned to nonoperative treatment received surgery in the same period. Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated substantial improvements for all primary and secondary outcomes in both treatment groups. Between-group differences in improvements were consistently in favor of surgery for all periods but were small and not statistically significant for the primary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in both the surgery and the nonoperative treatment groups improved substantially over a 2-year period. Because of the large numbers of patients who crossed over in both directions, conclusions about the superiority or equivalence of the treatments are not warranted based on the intent-to-treat analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000410.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort.

CONTEXT: For patients with lumbar disk herniation, the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized trial intent-to-treat analysis showed small but not statistically significant differences in favor of diskectomy compared with usual care. However, the large numbers of patients who crossed over between assigned groups precluded any conclusions about the comparative effectiveness of operative therapy vs usual care. OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment effects of diskectomy and usual care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective observational cohort of surgical candidates with imaging-confirmed lumbar intervertebral disk herniation who were treated at 13 spine clinics in 11 US states and who met the SPORT eligibility criteria but declined randomization between March 2000 and March 2003. INTERVENTIONS: Standard open diskectomy vs usual nonoperative care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes from baseline in the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) bodily pain and physical function scales and the modified Oswestry Disability Index (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/MODEMS version). RESULTS: Of the 743 patients enrolled in the observational cohort, 528 patients received surgery and 191 received usual nonoperative care. At 3 months, patients who chose surgery had greater improvement in the primary outcome measures of bodily pain (mean change: surgery, 40.9 vs nonoperative care, 26.0; treatment effect, 14.8; 95% confidence interval, 10.8-18.9), physical function (mean change: surgery, 40.7 vs nonoperative care, 25.3; treatment effect, 15.4; 95% CI, 11.6-19.2), and Oswestry Disability Index (mean change: surgery, -36.1 vs nonoperative care, -20.9; treatment effect, -15.2; 95% CI, -18.5. to -11.8). These differences narrowed somewhat at 2 years: bodily pain (mean change: surgery, 42.6 vs nonoperative care, 32.4; treatment effect, 10.2; 95% CI, 5.9-14.5), physical function (mean change: surgery, 43.9 vs nonoperavtive care 31.9; treatment effect, 12.0; 95% CI; 7.9-16.1), and Oswestry Disability Index (mean change: surgery -37.6 vs nonoperative care -24.2; treatment effect, -13.4; 95% CI, -17.0 to -9.7). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with persistent sciatica from lumbar disk herniation improved in both operated and usual care groups. Those who chose operative intervention reported greater improvements than patients who elected nonoperative care. However, nonrandomized comparisons of self-reported outcomes are subject to potential confounding and must be interpreted cautiously. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000410.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Hormone therapies in women aged 40 and older: prevalence and correlates of use.

CONTEXT: The objective of this paper is to report the prevalence and correlates of both prescription and non-prescription hormone use. DESIGN/SETTING/SAMPLE: Cross-sectional baseline study from a prospective cohort of 30,448 women receiving mammography in New Hampshire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds of prescription hormone and non-prescription hormone use. RESULTS: 29,851 women were included; 62% reported some use of prescription hormone therapy, with current long-term prescription hormone therapy users representing the largest group (25%). Among ever-users, estrogen only was the most commonly used preparation (71% versus 30% for estrogen and progestin combined). Both single agent estrogen and estrogen and progestin combined regimens were taken primarily for treatment of menopausal symptoms or disease prevention. Correlates for prescription hormone use included a family history of breast cancer (associated with decreased use-OR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.93), and family history of heart disease (associated with increased use-OR 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.17). Ten percent of women reported ever use of phytoestrogens (over-the-counter hormones). Family history of breast cancer was a correlate of over-the-counter hormone use (OR 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.19). CONCLUSION: Management of menopausal symptoms and disease prevention were the main reasons for using prescription hormones, and health histories were important correlates of both prescription and over-the-counter hormone exposures. As evidence changes regarding risks and benefits of hormone exposure, primary care physicians should help women reassess their use of hormonal agents.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density (United States).

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate known breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density. METHODS: We examined factors in relation to breast density in 144,018 New Hampshire (NH) women with at least one mammogram recorded in a statewide mammography registry. Mammographic breast density was measured by radiologists using the BI-RADS classification; risk factors of interest were obtained from patient intake forms and questionnaires. RESULTS: Initial analyses showed a strong inverse influence of age and body mass index (BMI) on breast density. In addition, women with late age at menarche, late age at first birth, premenopausal women, and those currently using hormone therapy (HT) tended to have higher breast density, while those with greater parity tended to have less dense breasts. Analyses stratified on age and BMI suggested interactions, which were formally assessed in a multivariable model. The impact of current HT use, relative to nonuse, differed across age groups, with an inverse association in younger women, and a positive association in older women (p < 0.0001 for the interaction). The positive effects of age at menarche and age at first birth, and the inverse influence of parity were less apparent in women with low BMI than in those with high BMI (p = 0.04, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01, respectively, for the interactions). We also noted stronger positive effects for age at first birth in postmenopausal women (p = 0.004 for the interaction). The multivariable model indicated a slight positive influence of family history of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of age at menarche and reproductive factors on breast density is less evident in women with high BMI. Density is reduced in young women using HT, but increased in HT users of age 50 or more.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical practice guideline panels: suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians task force.

Most panels that develop clinical practice guidelines are poorly equipped to address resource allocation or cost issues associated with management options. This risks neglect, arbitrariness, lack of transparency, and methodological flaws in consideration of resource allocation. We provide recommendations for guideline panels to promote greater transparency and rigor. We suggest focusing on resource allocation issues for only a limited number of recommendations and provide criteria for selecting those in which economic considerations are likely to influence the direction or strength of the recommendation. Panels should involve a health economist to assist with the systematic review and critical interpretation of relevant economic analyses. They should carefully define the intended audience and may consider issuing alternative recommendations when available resources vary widely across target clinical settings. Targeting a limited number of recommendations for the consideration of resource allocation issues, and ensuring methodologically high-quality review, will best serve guideline panels, and the health-care providers and patients they hope to assist.

Advisory Committees↗

PubMed2005

American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) and each participating site and by the IRB and the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at the National Cancer Institute. The study was monitored by an independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board, which received interim analyses of data to ensure that the study would be terminated early if indicated by trends in the outcomes. The ACRIN, which is funded by the National Cancer Institute, conducted the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) primarily to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital and screen-film mammography in asymptomatic women presenting for screening for breast cancer. Over the 25.5 months of enrollment, a total of 49 528 women were included at the 33 participating sites, which used five different types of digital mammography equipment. All participants underwent both screen-film and digital mammography. The digital and screen-film mammograms of each subject were independently interpreted by two radiologists. If findings of either examination were interpreted as abnormal, subsequent work-up occurred according to the recommendations of the interpreting radiologist. Breast cancer status was determined at biopsy or follow-up mammography 11-15 months after study entry. In addition to the measurement of diagnostic accuracy by using the interpretations of mammograms at the study sites, DMIST included evaluations of the relative cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life effects of digital versus screen-film mammography. Six separate reader studies using the de-identified archived DMIST mammograms will also assess the diagnostic accuracy of each of the individual digital mammography machines versus screen-film mammography machines, the effect of breast density on diagnostic accuracy of digital and screen-film mammography, and the effect of different rates of breast cancer on the diagnostic accuracy in a reader study.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2005

The need for microsimulation to evaluate osteoporosis interventions.

Simulations play an increasingly important role in the evaluation of osteoporosis interventions. Existing evaluations have been based on "reduced-form" cohort simulations that do not reflect the complexity and heterogeneity of osteoporosis and its outcomes. Such simplified models offer parsimony and ease of use, but they also are limited in their ability to explain and extrapolate outcomes in a way that is most useful for both clinical and health policy decision makers. Alternatively, evaluations could be based on "structural" microsimulations, which explicitly model the underlying biology of osteoporosis at the individual level. The structural approach presents technical challenges, including the need to obtain more-detailed data and the requirement that underlying biological models be validated. However, evaluations based on structural microsimulation may ultimately provide substantially more useful information, resulting in improved decision making.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) participants.

PURPOSE: To compare societal values across health-state classification systems and to describe the performance of these systems at baseline in a large population of persons with confirmed diagnosis of intervertebral disc herniation (IDH), spinal stenosis (SpS), or degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). METHODS: We compared values for EQ-5D (York weights), HUI (Mark 2 and 3), SF-6D, and the SF-36-derived estimate of the Quality of Well Being (eQWB) score using signed rank tests. We tested each instrument's ability to discriminate between health categories and level of symptom satisfaction. Correlations were assessed with Spearman rank correlations. We evaluated ceiling and floor effects by comparing the proportion at the highest and the lowest possible score for each tool. In addition, we compared proportions at the highest and lowest levels by dimension. The number of unique health states assigned was compared across instruments. We calculated the difference between those who were very dissatisfied and all others. RESULTS: Mean values ranged from 0.39 to 0.63 among 2097 participants ages 18-93 (mean age 53, 47% female) with significant differences in pair-wise comparisons noted for all systems. Correlations ranged from 0.30 to 0.78. Although all systems showed statistically significant differences in health state values when baseline comparisons were made between those who were very dissatisfied with their symptoms and those who were not, the magnitude of this difference ranged widely across systems. Mean differences (95% CI) between those very dissatisfied and all others were 0.30 (0.269, 0.329) for EQ-5D, 0.22 (0.190, 0.241) for HUI(3), 0.18 (0.161, 0.201) for HUI(2), 0.11 (0.095, 0.117) for SF-6D, 0.04 (0.039, 0.049) for eQWB, and 0.07 (0.056, 0.077) for VAS (with transformation applied to group means). CONCLUSION: Differences in preference-weighted health state classification systems are evident at baseline in a population with confirmed IDH, SpS, and DS. Caution should be used when comparing health state values derived from various systems.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Screening mammography: costs and use of screening-related services.

PURPOSE: To determine the costs and screening-related services in women undergoing screening mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study procedures were approved by the institutional committee for the protection of human subjects, and participants gave prior written consent. Data from a statewide mammography registry were used to identify imaging examinations, clinical consultations, interventional procedures, and pathology reports associated with screening mammography. The analysis included 99 064 women in the New Hampshire Mammography Network who underwent screening mammography between November 1, 1996, and March 31, 2000. Use of screening-related services in each case was tracked over an 18-month period, and procedure-specific national Medicare reimbursement rates from 2002 were applied for estimation of costs. Descriptive statistics (means, medians, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals, frequencies, and percentages of resources and of costs) were calculated. RESULTS: The majority of subjects (85 809, or 87%) underwent screening mammography only. Of the 13 255 (13%) who underwent diagnostic imaging, additional mammographic views were obtained in most at the time of screening, within days or weeks of screening, or at short-interval follow-up. The total cost was $12 287 739. Approximately 80% ($9 777 670) of the total cost was related to imaging, and 68% ($8 410 313), specifically to screening mammography. Twenty percent ($2 510 069) of the total cost was associated with consultation and interventional procedures in only 2942 (3%) of the women, primarily those who underwent biopsy. Procedures resulted in benign findings in 2247 (76%) of the 2942. Mean total direct medical costs per capita were low ($99) in women who underwent screening mammography only, moderate ($286) in women who also underwent diagnostic imaging, and substantially greater in women who underwent biopsy ($993). CONCLUSION: While the largest component cost of screening mammography is that incurred in obtaining screening views alone, the highest costs per capita are associated with interventional procedures.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Likelihood of additional work-up among women undergoing routine screening mammography: the impact of age, breast density, and hormone therapy use.

BACKGROUND: Mammography screening can involve subsequent work-up to determine a final screening outcome. Understanding the likelihood of different events that follow initial screening is important if women and their health care providers are to be accurately informed about the screening process. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of additional work-up following screening mammography to characterize use of supplemental imaging and recommendations for biopsy and/or surgical consultation and the factors associated with their use. We included all events following screening mammography performed between 1/1/1998 and 12/31/1999 on a population-based sample of 37,632 New Hampshire women. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for supplemental imaging and recommended biopsy and/or surgical consultation as function of age, menopausal status and HRT use, breast density, and family history of breast cancer. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of women (n = 34,445) did not require supplemental imaging. Among those who did (n = 3187), 84% had additional views, 9% ultrasound, and 7% received both. Supplemental imaging was affected by age (OR 0.84; 95% CI = 0.76-0.94 for 50-59; OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.58-0.75 for > or = 60 versus < 50), menopausal status, and HRT use (OR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.21-1.47 for peri- or post-menopausal HRT users; OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.01-1.29 for premenopausal versus peri- or post-menopausal non-HRT users), breast density (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.33-1.55 for dense versus fatty breasts) and family history (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.06-1.25 for any versus none). In women with supplemental imaging, age (OR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.11-2.90 for > or = 60, relative to <50) and imaging type (OR = 3.23; 95% CI = 2.38-4.38 for ultrasound with or without additional views versus additional views only) were significantly associated with biopsy and/or surgical consultation recommendation. In those with no supplemental imaging, breast density was associated with recommended biopsy and/or surgical consultation (OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.13-2.07 for dense versus fatty breasts). CONCLUSIONS: Breast density and HRT use are both independent predictors of use of supplemental imaging in women. With advancing age (age 60 and older), women were less likely to require follow-up imaging but more likely to receive a recommendation for biopsy and/or surgical consultation. This information should be used to inform women about the likelihood of services received as part of the screening work-up.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2003

Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with early treatment discontinuation of three agents commonly prescribed for women with low bone density. METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted in 2000 to 2001 in a random sample of women aged 45 years or older who had bone density T-scores -1.0 or lower and who had initiated treatment with hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene, oral endronate. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios for early treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: Among 956 women who were interviewed an average of 7 months after treatment initiation, 334 were taking hormone therapy, and 88 (26%) had discontinued; 256 were taking raloxifene, and 48 (19%) had discontinued (P = 0.03 vs. hormone therapy); and 366 were taking alendronate, and 70(19%) had discontinued (P = 0.02 vs. hormone therapy). Women with bothersome side effects (somewhat bothered: odds ratio [OR] = 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5 to 6.5; very or extremely bothered: OR = 25; 95% CI: 16 to 39) or who thought that their bone density test results did not show osteoporosis (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.5) were more likely to discontinue therapy, as compared with women reporting regular exercise (OR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.4 to 1.0) or a willingness to take prescribed medications (OR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.9). After adjustment for side effects and patient characteristics, the odds of early treatment discontinuation did not differ significantly among treatments. CONCLUSION: Improved adherence to osteoporosis treatment requires that treatment side effects be minimized and women be educated regarding their bone density test results.

Alendronate↗

PubMed2003

Effect of the Women's Health Initiative on women's decisions to discontinue postmenopausal hormone therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether women who were using postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) before publication of Women's Health Initiative findings about risks associated with HT had been informed about the findings once published; and to estimate how knowledge of these findings was associated with their decision to discontinue HT. METHODS: We performed a telephone survey of 670 female members of a large health maintenance organization, aged 50-69 yr, who had regularly used HT from July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2002. RESULTS: Most women (93%) reported hearing about the new findings; however, only 57% considered the quality of this information to be good, regardless of its source: mass media (21%), the health plan (32%), or a health care practitioner (34%). Women's knowledge of Women's Health Initiative findings was generally poor; 64% did not know what the findings were, 7% were unsure of their knowledge, 6% had incorrect knowledge, and 23% had correct knowledge of Women's Health Initiative findings. On a simple, five-question, true-or-false quiz about HT risks, 30% of respondents answered four to five questions correctly. Although not well informed, 56% reported attempting to discontinue HT in the 6 to 8 months after July 2002. Our multivariable model included five statistically significant predictors of attempting to stop HT: having been sent a letter about Women's Health Initiative findings (odds ratio [OR] 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8, 3.9), reporting good-quality information from media (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.3, 3.3), having started HT for health promotion (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2, 3.3), using a lower-than-standard dosage of estrogen (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1, 3.1), and correctly answering four or more items on the HT quiz (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2, 2.8). CONCLUSION: During the 6-8 months after publication of Women's Health Initiative trial findings, most regular postmenopausal HT users tried to stop using HT, despite not being well informed about the Women's Health Initiative findings.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Predictors of difficulty when discontinuing postmenopausal hormone therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experiences of postmenopausal women who try to stop hormone therapy and to identify characteristics associated with inability to stop. METHODS: We conducted telephone interviews with 377 randomly selected female members of the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, aged 50-69 years, who regularly used hormone therapy for at least 1 year before July 1, 2002 and had attempted to stop between July 2002 and March 2003. RESULTS: Of the 377 women, 280 (74%) successfully stopped and 97 (26%) resumed taking hormone therapy. The major predictor of resuming hormone therapy use was the development of troublesome withdrawal symptoms (odds ratio 8.8; 95% confidence interval 4.9, 16.0). Report of hysterectomy, hormone therapy prescribed by a nongynecologist, and perception of high risk of hip or spine fracture were independently associated with a higher likelihood of unsuccessful stopping. Women with a hysterectomy who had used hormone therapy for 10 or more years and who started hormone therapy mainly for reasons other than health promotion were more likely (P <.001) to be unsuccessful in quitting (44%) compared with those with one or two (25%) or none (9%) of these three characteristics. Most successful stoppers (71%) stopped hormone therapy abruptly, but 29% tapered off hormone therapy; there was no difference in the incidence of troublesome withdrawal symptoms or successful quitting between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Approximately one quarter of women who try to stop report that they are unable to discontinue postmenopausal hormone therapy, primarily because they develop troublesome withdrawal symptoms. Effective approaches to reducing hormone therapy withdrawal symptoms should be a priority for future research.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Design of the Spine Patient outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) was designed to assess the relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical approaches to the treatment of common conditions associated with low back and leg pain. OBJECTIVES: To describe the rationale and design of the SPORT project and to discuss its strengths and limitations. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive. METHODS: First, the authors explain the rationale for embarking on SPORT, i.e., deficiencies in the existing scientific knowledge base for treatment of these conditions. Second, the authors describe the design of SPORT, including topics such as specific aims, participating sites, study population, recruitment and enrollment, study interventions, follow-up, outcomes, statistical analysis, and study governance and organization. Finally, issues that complicate the performance of randomized trials in surgery as they relate to the design and conduct of SPORT are discussed. RESULTS: The SPORT project is being conducted at 11 clinical centers around the United States. It involves the simultaneous conduct of three multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trials. The study includes patients with the three most common diagnoses for which spine surgery is performed: intervertebral disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis, and it compares the most commonly used standard surgical and nonsurgical treatments for patients with these diagnoses. By the end of enrollment the authors anticipate a total of 500 patients with intervertebral disc herniation, 370 patients with spinal stenosis, and 300 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis in the randomized trials. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria but decline to be randomized are invited to participate in an observational cohort study. Patients are being followed for a minimum of 24 months with visits scheduled at 6 weeks and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will provide high-quality scientific evidence to aid clinical decision-making and improve treatment outcomes for these common, costly, and, in some instances, debilitating conditions.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed2002

Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare persons with and without hip fracture for subsequent mortality and change in disability and nursing home (NH) use. DESIGN: Population-based historical cohort study. SETTING: Olmsted County, Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: All residents who experienced a first hip fracture between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1993, and, for each case, a resident of the same sex and similar age who had not experienced a hip fracture and was seen by a local care provider. MEASUREMENTS: Data on disability (Rankin score), comorbidity (Charlson Index), and NH residency before baseline (fracture date for cases and registration date for controls) were obtained by review of complete community-based medical records. The records were then reviewed from baseline through December 31, 1994, for Rankin disability at 1 month and 1 year, all NH admissions and discharges, and date of death for those who died. RESULTS: There were 312 cases and 312 controls (81% female, mean age +/- standard deviation = 81 +/- 12 years). Before baseline, cases had higher comorbidity (45% vs 30% had Charlson Index >/= 1, P <.001) and disability (mean Rankin score = 2.5 +/- 1.1 vs 2.2 +/- 1.1, P <.001) and were more likely to be in a NH (28% vs 18%, P <.001) than controls. One year after baseline, estimated mortality was 20% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 16-24) for cases vs 11% (95% CI = 8-15) for controls, 51% of cases versus 16% of controls had a level of disability one or more units worse than before baseline (P <.001), and the cumulative incidence of first NH admission was 64% (95% CI = 58-71) for cases versus 7% (95% CI = 4-11) for controls. The risk of NH admission for cases relative to controls diminished over time, but remained elevated 5 years after the event (risk ratio = 20.0 at 3 months and 2.1 at 5 years), but, in persons admitted to a nursing home, cases were two times more likely than controls to be discharged alive within a year (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture is an important contributor to disability and NH use, but the potential savings from hip fracture prophylaxis may be overestimated by studies that fail to consider differential risk, mortality, and long-term follow-up.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Quality-of-life assessment in osteoporosis: health-status and preference-based measures.

Health-status and preference-based approaches to assessing health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in osteoporosis are reviewed. Osteoporosis-targeted health-status instruments [i.e. Osteoporosis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire (OPAQ), Quality-of-Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO), Osteoporosis-Targeted Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (OPTQoL), Osteoporosis Functional Disability Questionnaire (OFDQ), Quality-of-Life Questionnaire in Osteoporosis (QUALIOST)], which have been utilised to document the adverse impact of osteoporosis on HR-QOL in diverse clinical and epidemiological studies, are described first. Preference-based approaches to osteoporosis health-outcome measurement are then considered in both clinical and health policy settings. In the clinical setting, direct preference assessments [i.e. visual analogue scale (VAS), time tradeoff (TTO), standard gamble (SG)] using either experienced or described health outcomes have consistently shown significantly lower values for osteoporosis-related health states relative to usual or ideal health. In the health-policy context, preference-classification systems [i.e. EuroQoL (EQ-5D), Health Utilities Index (HUI)] for valuing health in economic studies are reviewed. At present, there is little evidence to guide the choice of one system over another for assessing the cost effectiveness of osteoporosis interventions; however, use of a consistent set of health-state values is essential. Further research is needed to characterise associations between osteoporosis-targeted health-status instruments and preference-based health-outcome measures. In addition, the longitudinal impact of osteoporosis and related fractures on HR-QOL must be documented.

Fractures, Bone↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Automated current health time-trade-off assessments in women's health.

OBJECTIVE: To motivate the role for preference assessment in women's health and to report pilot data addressing the performance of automated time-trade-off (TTO) valuations of current health, which were developed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in the women's health setting. METHODS: Values for current health relative to perfect health and death were assessed using an annual time trade-off (1-year horizon and sleep as the trading metaphor), a lifetime time trade-off, and a visual analog scale (VAS). All instruments were administered twice within a 12- to 14-day window among a convenience sample of 27 women. RESULTS: Valuation of health was similar for both time trade-offs (mean of 0.95 for both), but was significantly lower for the VAS (mean of 0.84, Wilcoxon signed-rank p-value < 0.001). Reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.67 +/- 0.09 and 0.75 +/- 0.07 for the annual and lifetime time trade-offs, respectively, and 0.89 +/- 0.03 for the VAS. Construct validity was supported by consistent trends in time-trade-off utilities across tertiles of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) general health subscale (trend test p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Automated time trade-offs for current health provide a promising approach for use in women's health studies where impact on QALYs must be measured. Natural areas of application include the economic evaluation of preventive interventions in postmenopausal women.

Adult↗