Anne Kupczok | PubMed Health

PubMed2026

Integrating multi-omics technologies to decipher microbiome functions.

Multi-omics approaches have revolutionized our understanding of microbial communities by enabling simultaneous interrogation of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data. The systematic integration and analysis of these deep datasets help decipher the functional roles of microbiomes, providing critical insights into microbial activities, interactions, and dynamics across diverse environments. Biological complexity makes multi-omics analysis of a single, isolated organism demanding but highly informative, yet this complexity increases further when samples comprise hundreds to thousands of individual species. As microbiome research continues to expand into clinical, environmental, and engineered systems, standardized workflows, benchmarked datasets, and community-driven initiatives are essential to ensure reproducibility, standardization and interpretability. Establishing and disseminating best practices for experimental design, data processing, and integrative analyses will be critical for maximizing comparability and scientific rigor across studies. This perspective highlights recent advances in multi-omics microbiome research, outlines key obstacles in data integration and metadata harmonization, and proposes a collaborative roadmap for scalable, FAIR-compliant multi-omics investigations and potentially disruptive Artificial Intelligence (AI) advances comparable to those of AlphaFold in the field of microbiome science.

Multiomics↗

PubMed2026

Identification and Classification of Expressed Orphan Genes, Spurious Orphan Genes, and Conserved Genes in the Human Gut Microbiome.

Orphan genes (OGs)-genes lacking detectable homologs outside a species-are widespread in microbial genomes and are thought to contribute to their adaptation and molecular innovation. However, not all predicted OGs may represent novel functional coding sequences. False positive OGs, also called spurious OGs, can arise from gene prediction errors. We reason that OGs lacking detectable expression are more likely to be spurious. To test this, we combined large-scale metatranscriptomic profiling of the human gut microbiome with machine learning to distinguish expressed OGs from spurious ones and compare them with conserved genes (CGs) found in multiple species. Using nearly 5,000 metatranscriptome libraries, we identified ∼218,000 OGs supported by expression evidence, while ∼330,000 predicted OGs lacked detectable expression and were classified as spurious. We extracted 154 features for sequence, structural, and evolutionary properties for each gene and trained XGBoost classifiers while accounting for genomic representation. The models achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 in distinguishing expressed OGs from spurious OGs and an AUC of 0.93 in distinguishing expressed OGs from CGs. Interpretation based on SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) revealed clear biological signals. Particularly, expressed orphans were present in more genomes than spurious ones, and expressed OGs were shorter than CGs. This work improves OG discovery and suggests that expressed OGs differ systematically from CGs and spurious OGs in sequence composition, structural constraints, and evolutionary signals.

Humans↗