PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Annick Faurion

Publications and source records attributed to Annick Faurion.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Sensory interactions through neural pathways.

The word "taste" includes olfaction and somatosensory information besides the proper sense of taste. Taste and somatosensory sensitivity are very close and overlapping in most central nervous system projection areas. The objective of the present paper is to review a series of experiments disclosing functional neurophysiological interactions between taste and somatosensory information at different levels.

Animals↗

Taste deficits related to dental deafferentation: an electrogustometric study in humans.

Dental treatments, the prevalence of which increases with age, can cause orofacial somatosensory deficits. In order to examine whether they may also affect taste sensitivity, electrogustometric thresholds were measured at 9 loci on the tongue surface in 391 healthy non-smoking, non-medicated subjects. Results showed that the greater the number of deafferented teeth, the higher the thresholds. Irrespective of age, subjects with more than 7 deafferented teeth exhibited significantly higher thresholds than subjects with fewer than 7 deafferented teeth. Conversely, across age groups, no statistical difference was observed among subjects with no, or few, deafferented teeth. Hence, a taste deficit, which was not correlated to aging, was observed. An association was noticed between the location of taste deficits and the location of deafferented teeth. Higher thresholds at anterior sites, with no possible traumatic injury relationship, suggested that neurophysiological convergence between dental somatosensory and taste pathways - possibly in the nucleus tractus solitarius - could be responsible for these relative decreases of taste sensitivity when dental afferences were lacking. Among trigeminal contributions, lingual nerve and inferior alveolar nerve may synergize taste.

Adult↗

Modulation of taste peripheral signal through interpapillar inhibition in hamsters.

Single taste buds from fungiform papillae were iontophoretically stimulated with chemicals filling glass microelectrodes while a single unit was recorded in the taste pore of a neighbor papilla. High signal-to-noise ratio responses were observed in the recorded papilla as antidromic action potentials. These responses were possibly modulated by the simultaneous stimulation of another adjacent papilla. A decrease in the frequency of firing and/or both decrementing spikes were observed during such dual papillae stimulations. These inhibitory effects were not modified by the section of the chordo-lingual nerve, suggesting the tongue is able to process the gustatory information thanks to interpapillar negative feedback, prior to transmitting the signal to the central nervous system. Branched chorda tympani fibers can account for responses observed for single papillae stimulations; inhibitions and decrementing spikes may suggest the contribution of another mechanism of interaction between two different single fibers.

Action Potentials↗

Trigeminal modulation of gustatory neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Electrophysiological methods were used to investigate the effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation or transection on responses of single gustatory neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) to tastants (NaCl, sucrose, citric acid, monosodium glutamate) in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. Unilateral transection of the lingual nerve, or the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve, resulted in significant reductions (by 21 and 29%, respectively; P<0.01) in tastant-evoked responses, with no further effect following bilateral transection. Electrical stimulation of the central cut end of the mandibular nerve directly excited nine of 14 gustatory NTS units. For these units, central mandibular stimulation facilitated the tastant-evoked responses in six, depressed responses in three, and had no effect in five. Facilitation of tastant-evoked responses peaked 4 min after mandibular stimulation and recovered within 8 min. Electrical stimulation of the peripheral cut end of the mandibular nerve significantly reduced tastant-evoked responses in nine other NTS units, with a maximal reduction at 4 min post-stimulation followed by recovery. Stimulation of the superior cervical sympathetic ganglion did not affect NTS tastant-evoked responses. These results suggest the presence of complex central modulation of NTS neurons by trigeminal afferents, as well as a peripheral depressant effect on gustatory processing possibly mediated via neuropeptide release from trigeminal nerve endings in the tongue.

Action Potentials↗