PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Anthony F Lehman

Publications and source records attributed to Anthony F Lehman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Schizophrenia, co-occurring substance use disorders and quality of care: the differential effect of a managed behavioral health care carve-out.

This study explores the differential effect of a managed behavioral health Carve-Out (CO) on outpatient treatment quality for persons with schizophrenia (SCHZ) alone and co-occurring substance use disorders (SUD) (SCHZ+SUD). We used claims data from a state Medicaid program and employed a retrospective, quasi-experimental design with logit and difference in difference formula regression models. The results show the CO was associated with greater changes in treatment quality for the SCHZ population, compared to the SCHZ+SUD population. Most pronounced across both populations were decrements in receiving the psychosocial treatments for enrollees in the CO arrangement.

Adult↗

Evidence-based psychotherapy for schizophrenia.

Many patients with schizophrenia have psychological distress and receive some form of psychotherapy. Several different psychotherapeutic approaches for schizophrenia have been developed and studied. Of these approaches, cognitive behavior therapy has the strongest evidence base and has shown benefit for symptom reduction in outpatients with residual symptoms. In addition to cognitive behavior therapy, other approaches include compliance therapy, personal therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and supportive therapy. Although usually studied as distinct approaches, the therapies overlap with each other in their therapeutic elements. As psychotherapy for schizophrenia further evolves, it will likely be informed by other psychosocial interventions used with this clinical population. In particular, techniques of remediating cognitive deficits, teaching behavioral skills, and educating about schizophrenia may be incorporated with psychotherapy. Future research may also consider three different goals of psychotherapy with this population: to provide emotional support, to enhance skills for functional recovery, and to alter the underlying illness process.

Ambulatory Care↗

Clozapine utilization and outcomes by race in a public mental health system: 1994-2000.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess racial differences in clozapine prescribing, dosing, symptom presentation and response, and hospitalization status. This study extends previous studies of clozapine by examining patient- and treatment-related factors that may help explain or eliminate reasons for differential prescribing. METHOD: Clozapine records for 373 white and African American patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder treated between March 1, 1994, and December 31, 2000, in inpatient mental health facilities in the state of Maryland were examined. Records for this study were derived from 3 state of Maryland databases: the Clozapine Authorization and Monitoring Program, the State of Maryland Antipsychotic Database, and the Health Maintenance Information System Database. RESULTS: A total of 10.3% of African Americans (150/1458) with schizophrenia received clozapine treatment compared with 15.3% of whites (223/1453) (chi2 = 16.74, df = 1, p < .001) during inpatient treatment in the public mental health system in Maryland. Clozapine doses were lower in African Americans relative to whites (385.3 +/- 200.6 vs. 447.3 +/- 230.3 mg/day) (t = -2.66, df = 366, p = .008). At the time of clozapine initiation, whites had more activating symptoms as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (t = -3.98, df = 301, p < .0001); however, African Americans had significantly greater improvements in BPRS total symptoms (F = 4.80, df = 301, p = .03) and in anxiety/ depressive symptoms during 1 year of treatment with clozapine (F = 10.04, df = 303, p = .002). The estimated rate of hospital discharge was not significantly different for African Americans compared to whites prescribed clozapine (log-rank chi2 = 0.523, df = 1, p = .470); however, African Americans were more likely than whites to discontinue clozapine during hospitalization (log-rank chi2 = 4.19, df = 1, p = .041). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest underutilization of clozapine in African American populations. This racial disparity in clozapine treatment is of special concern because of the favorable outcomes associated with clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and in the specific benefits observed in African American patients. More research is needed to determine why disparities with clozapine treatment occur and why African Americans may be discontinued from clozapine at a higher rate, despite potential indicators of equal or greater effectiveness among African Americans compared with whites.

Black or African American↗

An empirical conceptualization of the recovery orientation.

OBJECTIVE: The recovery movement is having a growing impact on policy for people with severe mental illness. The empirical literature on the recovery orientation, however, is scant, and no empirical conceptualization of recovery has been published. METHOD: We identified items reflecting recovery themes and measuring aspects of subjective experience, and used principle components and confirmatory factor analyses to develop an empirical conceptualization of the recovery orientation, using data from a large, systematic study of schizophrenia. RESULTS: We identified four domains of the recovery orientation: empowerment, hope and optimism, knowledge and life satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: We propose here an initial approach to measuring and conceptualizing recovery attitudes. We also suggest that the evidence-based practice (EBP) movement may help to identify interventions that promote the recovery orientation and help to advance recovery attitudes. We suggest that there is a bidirectional relationship between recovery attitudes and the positive clinical outcomes that are the goals of EBPs. Through the use of empirically derived conceptualizations of recovery, EBPs can provide a mechanism for identifying treatments that promote the recovery orientation. The conceptualization proposed here can, thus, serve as a tool to assess changes in recovery attitudes during participation in specific EBPs.

Adult↗

Correlates of family contact with the mental health system: allocation of a scarce resource.

This study explored correlates of informal and formal contact between clinicians and families of individuals with schizophrenia. We reanalyzed data from 902 individuals with schizophrenia from the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) client survey and a Veterans Affairs extension. Only 31% of families had any informal contact with a clinician and 7.8% attended a formal support program. Logistic regression showed that younger age, greater education, drug problems, receiving psychiatric inpatient and day treatment services, and participants' satisfaction with their family were all positively and significantly associated with informal contact. Receipt of formal family services was associated with intensity of social contact between participants and families. These results suggest that formal services for families of individuals with schizophrenia are not commonly available, and that informal pathways are the most common, although still limited, mechanism through which families of those patients who are receiving intensive services communicate with clinicians.

Adult↗

Clinical factors associated with employment among people with severe mental illness: findings from the employment intervention demonstration program.

Research has shown that supported employment programs are effective in helping psychiatric outpatients achieve vocational outcomes, yet not all program participants are able to realize their employment goals. This study used 24 months of longitudinal data from a multisite study of supported employment interventions to examine the relationship of patient clinical factors to employment outcomes. Multivariate random regression analysis indicated that, even when controlling for an extensive series of demographic, study condition (experimental versus control), and work history covariates, clinical factors were associated with individuals' ability to achieve competitive jobs and to work 40 or more hours per month. Poor self-rated functioning, negative psychiatric symptoms, and recent hospitalizations were most consistently associated with failure to achieve these employment outcomes. These findings suggest ways that providers can tailor supported employment programs to achieve success with a diverse array of clinical subpopulations.

Adolescent↗

Integration of psychiatric and vocational services: a multisite randomized, controlled trial of supported employment.

OBJECTIVE: Although large-scale surveys indicate that patients with severe mental illness want to work, their unemployment rate is three to five times that of the general adult population. This multisite, randomized implementation effectiveness trial examined the impact of highly integrated psychiatric and vocational rehabilitation services on the likelihood of successful work outcomes. METHOD: At seven sites nationwide, 1,273 outpatients with severe mental illness were randomly assigned either to an experimental supported employment program or to a comparison/services-as-usual condition and followed for 24 months. Data collection involved monthly services tracking, semiannual in-person interviews, recording of all paid employment, and program ratings made by using a services-integration measure. The likelihood of competitive employment and working 40 or more hours per month was examined by using mixed-effects random regression analysis. RESULTS: Subjects served by models that integrated psychiatric and vocational service delivery were more than twice as likely to be competitively employed and almost 1(1/2) times as likely to work at least 40 hours per month when the authors controlled for time, demographic, clinical, and work history confounds. In addition, higher cumulative amounts of vocational services were associated with better employment outcomes, whereas higher cumulative amounts of psychiatric services were associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Supported employment models with high levels of integration of psychiatric and vocational services were more effective than models with low levels of service integration.

Adult↗

The heterogeneity of schizophrenia in disease states.

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Some of the contents of this paper have been previously presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Technology Assessment in Health Care June 20, 2000 in the Hague, Netherlands and at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making as a poster on October 3, 1999 in Reno, NV. BACKGROUND: Studies of schizophrenia treatment often oversimplify the array of health outcomes among patients. Our objective was to derive a set of disease states for schizophrenia using the Positive and Negative Symptom Assessment Scale (PANSS) that captured the heterogeneity of symptom responses. METHODS: Using data from a 1-year clinical trial that collected PANSS scores and costs on schizophrenic patients (N=663), we conducted a k-means cluster analyses on PANSS scores for items in five factor domains. Results of the cluster analysis were compared with a conceptual framework of disease states developed by an expert panel. Final disease states were defined by combining our conceptual framework with the empirical results. We tested its utility by examining the influence of disease state on treatment costs and prognosis. RESULTS: Analyses led to an eight-state framework with varying levels of positive, negative, and cognitive impairment. The extent of hostile/aggressive symptoms and mood disorders correlated with severity of disease states. Direct treatment costs for schizophrenia vary significantly across disease states (F=27.47, df=7, p<0.0001), and disease state at baseline was among the most important predictors of treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: The disease states we describe offer a useful paradigm for understanding the links between symptom profiles and outcomes.

Adolescent↗

The effect of a managed behavioral health carve-out on quality of care for medicaid patients diagnosed as having schizophrenia.

CONTEXT: Managed behavioral health carve-outs (MBHCOs) are a regular feature of public and private mental health care systems and have been successful in reducing costs. The evidence on quality impacts is limited and suggests comparable quality overall, except that people with severe psychiatric disorders may be those most disadvantaged by MBHCOs. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of implementing an MBHCO on the quality of outpatient care received by enrollees diagnosed as having schizophrenia. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational retrospective cohort study using a quasi-experimental design of state Medicaid enrollees diagnosed as having schizophrenia, aged 18 to 64 years between 1994 and 2000 in the carve-out and comparison regions (8082 person-years). SETTING: Ambulatory care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality indicators derived from the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team recommendations. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the carve-out and integrated arrangements in the likelihood of receiving any antipsychotic medication (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.29), second-generation antipsychotics (including clozapine: OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.86-1.28; not including clozapine: OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.29), or antiextrapyramidal medication (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.84-2.19). The carve-out was negatively associated with receiving any individual therapy (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.22-0.33), group therapy (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.14-0.25), and psychosocial rehabilitation (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.26-0.38). Family therapy occurred for less than 1% of this population in both carve-out and integrated regions. CONCLUSIONS: The MBHCO was not associated with changes in medication quality (for which it was not at financial risk). It was significantly associated with sharp decreases in the likelihood of receiving psychosocial treatments (for which it was financially at risk)-independent of whether a clinical evidence base supported them.

Adolescent↗

The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): updated treatment recommendations 2003.

Since publication of the original Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) treatment recommendations in 1998, considerable scientific advances have occurred in our knowledge about how to help persons with schizophrenia. Today an even stronger body of research supports the scientific basis of treatment. This evidence, taken in its entirety, points to the value of treatment approaches combining medications with psychosocial treatments, including psychological interventions, family interventions, supported employment, assertive community treatment, and skills training. The most significant advances lie in the increased options for pharmacotherapy, with the introduction of second generation antipsychotic medications, and greater confidence and specificity in the application of psychosocial interventions. Currently available treatment technologies, when appropriately applied and accessible, should provide most patients with significant relief from psychotic symptoms and improved opportunities to lead more fulfilling lives in the community. Nonetheless, major challenges remain, including the need for (1) better knowledge about the underlying etiologies of the neurocognitive impairments and deficit symptoms that account for much of the disability still associated with schizophrenia; (2) treatments that more directly address functional impairments and that promote recovery; and (3) approaches that facilitate access to scientifically based treatments for patients, the vast majority of whom currently do not have such access.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

An exploratory analysis of correlates of recovery.

OBJECTIVE: The concept of recovery has received increasing emphasis in the delivery of services to persons with schizophrenia. This study was an initial effort to develop an empirically based model of factors associated with a recovery orientation. METHODS: The authors reanalyzed data from 825 persons with schizophrenia who were assessed in the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) client survey. Multiple regression models were used to identify client and service use variables associated with each of four domains identified as important to a recovery orientation: life satisfaction, hope and optimism, knowledge about mental illness and services, and empowerment. RESULTS: In each regression model, the strongest relationship was observed between recovery orientation and lower severity of depressive symptoms. Both receipt of family psychoeducation and fewer side effects of medications were significantly and positively related to three of the four recovery domains. Psychotic symptoms were associated with less life satisfaction. Receipt of various services, including day treatment and legal services, was positively associated with knowledge about illness and services. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of psychiatric symptoms, a core feature of the biomedical perspective of mental illness, was negatively associated with a recovery orientation, and use of a variety of standard services were positively associated with a recovery orientation. Thus a polarized view of biomedical and recovery perspectives on mental illness may be unfounded, given that these perspectives appear to be mutually reinforcing.

Adult↗

Evidence-based treatment for schizophrenia.

Taken together, the research on what treatments help people with schizophrenia point to the value of treatment programs that combine medications with a range of psychosocial services. Provision of such packages of services likely reduces the need for crisis-oriented care hospitalizations and emergency room visits and enables greater recovery. For most people with schizophrenia, the combination of psychopharmacological and psychosocial interventions improves outcomes. Several psychosocial treatments have demonstrated efficacy. These include family intervention, supported employment, assertive community treatment, skills training, and CBT. In the same way that psychopharmacologic management must be tailored individually to the needs and preferences of the patient, so too should the selection of psychosocial treatments. At the very least, all people with schizophrenia should be provided with education about their illness. Beyond illness education, all of the recommended psychosocial interventions would be used rarely during any one phase of illness for an individual. Some psychosocial treatments share treatment components, and patients have different clinical and social needs at different points in their illness course. Knowledge regarding how best to combine treatments to optimize outcomes is scarce.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

Racial disparity in the pharmacological management of schizophrenia.

This study investigated racial differences in the prescription of psychopharmacologic treatments to individuals with schizophrenia. Data were derived from a patient survey and medical record review for 344 persons with schizophrenia recruited from outpatient psychiatric facilities in two States in the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team study. African-Americans were three times more likely to receive depot antipsychotic medications (odds ratio [OR]: 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-5.01) and 76 percent less likely to receive new-generation antipsychotic medications (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.46), compared to their Caucasian counterparts. Chlorpromazine-equivalent antipsychotic dosages did not differ significantly between African-American and Caucasian patients. Compared to Caucasians, a larger proportion of African-Americans received antiparkinsonian medications (63% vs. 48%, chi2 = 7.01; df = 1; p = 0.008), but African-Americans were less than half as likely to receive adjunctive psychopharmacologic treatments (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.27-0.71). Pronounced racial variations in the psychopharmacologic management of schizophrenia in typical clinical practice settings were observed and persisted when analyses were adjusted for selected patient demographic and clinical characteristics. A prospective, longitudinal evaluation is warranted to determine whether the observed patterns of prescribing are associated with poorer therapeutic outcomes in minority patients.

Adult↗

The Schizophrenia Care and Assessment Program Health Questionnaire (SCAP-HQ): an instrument to assess outcomes of schizophrenia care.

Advances in treatment technologies and development of evidence-based standards of care demand better methods for routine assessment of outcomes for schizophrenia in systems of care. This article describes the development and psychometrics of a new instrument to assess outcomes of routine care for persons with schizophrenia in service systems. Candidate items for the Schizophrenia Care and Assessment Program Health Questionnaire (SCAP-HQ) were drawn from existing measures. Domains covered include disease outcomes (symptoms, subjective medication effects, substance abuse), functional status, health status, quality of life, and public safety. A sample of 1,584 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were recruited into a large prospective, naturalistic study on the course of treatment for schizophrenia completed the SCAP-HQ at baseline and 1 year later (n = 434), providing data for factor analysis, assessment of internal consistency, convergent validity, and responsiveness to change. A subsample of 121 patients completed a test-retest protocol. Fifteen scales were derived by factor analysis from 55 outcome items on the SCAP-HQ. These factors covered psychiatric symptoms, life satisfaction, instrumental activities of daily living, health-related disability, subjective medication side effects, vitality, legal problems, social relations, mental health-related disability, suicidality, drug and alcohol use, daily activities, victimization, violence, and employment. For most scales, standard psychometric parameters, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and responsiveness to change, were acceptable for application to large sample evaluations of care systems. This new measure represents an advance in the development of outcome measures for schizophrenia for use in large-scale studies of routine care.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: a literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Although most individuals with schizophrenia are unemployed, plentiful evidence suggests that work rehabilitation is effective for this population. Yet, there have been only 11 published randomized controlled trials of work rehabilitation interventions for people with severe mental illness. We review these 11 studies, 9 of which were trials examining Individual Placement and Support (IPS) or supported employment (SE) interventions. Outcomes strongly favored the experimental groups in terms of the percentage of participants who worked at any point during the studies (weighted mean effect size = 0.66). In the 5 investigations comparing IPS/SE to conventional vocational rehabilitation services, 51% of the participants receiving IPS/SE worked competitively, versus 18% of those in the comparison groups (weighted mean effect size = 0.79). This effect size may be a useful benchmark for future trials. Further investigations should examine individual differences as predictors of response, to identify modifiable versus nonmodifiable factors that yield better outcomes.

Adult↗

Evidence-based psychosocial treatment practices in schizophrenia: lessons from the patient outcomes research team (PORT) project.

The care of persons with schizophrenia, the prototypical severe mental illness, has been a barometer of mental health care policy for decades. The prevalence, severity, and costs of schizophrenia combine to make this illness a major health problem throughout the world. In 1992, the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the National Institute of Mental Health funded the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. The PORT undertook several activities, including a comprehensive review of the empirical literature on the treatment of persons with schizophrenia; development of evidence-based treatment recommendations; description of current treatment practices; and comparison of these current practices to the evidence-based treatment recommendations, using administrative claims data and a survey of persons under treatment for schizophrenia; and dissemination of the treatment recommendations to evaluate impacts on practices. The PORT found that despite considerable evidence for effective treatments for persons with schizophrenia, most patients do not receive an appropriately comprehensive treatment "package." In particular, efficacious psychosocial treatments are highly underutilized.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗